Jump to content

Other Games 23/24


skintsaint
 Share

Recommended Posts

Think we've got a good chance against these "young Liverpool pups who are defying the odds" right now by even being on the same pitch as chelsea, who themselves will be devastated if they miss this easy chance to win a cup.

Plucky plucky Liverpool... average age of 24 you know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, pingpong said:

Think we've got a good chance against these "young Liverpool pups who are defying the odds" right now by even being on the same pitch as chelsea, who themselves will be devastated if they miss this easy chance to win a cup.

Plucky plucky Liverpool... average age of 24 you know.

Isn't Chelseas team a lower average age? Their starting line up had two players over 25 and none over 30 - Liverpool's had 6 over 25 and 2 over 30.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, 64saint said:

Neil Warnock getting his first taste of VAR up in Scotland compared the technology  of the system to the Horizon post office scandal 🙄

Is mad that VVD goal ruled out and tackle that ended Gravenberch’s game is ok. I just fucking hate it all round. Minutiae that doesn’t matter being picked up on. No one asked for that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Saint_clark said:

Isn't Chelseas team a lower average age? Their starting line up had two players over 25 and none over 30 - Liverpool's had 6 over 25 and 2 over 30.

Only the great Jurgen trusts youth. We will miss his genius

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Saint_clark said:

Isn't Chelseas team a lower average age? Their starting line up had two players over 25 and none over 30 - Liverpool's had 6 over 25 and 2 over 30.

Chelsea current players on the pitch have an average age of 22.9, but that doesn't fit the narrative...

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Christ, Drury is having a meltdown with VvD scoring

he commentary winds me up when ever anyone has a shot he shouts "and it's *insert players name* and pauses, like it's the greatest bit of commentary you've ever heard.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Turkish said:

he commentary winds me up when ever anyone has a shot he shouts "and it's *insert players name* and pauses, like it's the greatest bit of commentary you've ever heard.

 

IMG_0175.jpeg

  • Haha 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get the two analysts for a Cup Final. BUT either have two 'neutrals' or if you must have one from each side. 

 

I'm no Chelsea lover but they've become the team that everyone likes to have an easy pop about and of course Sky's love-in with Liverpool is legendary. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The standard of Chelsea's team, after spending £1bn on it, is absolutely horrific.

They have overspent on every single one of their signings. Jackson was linked to us and Bournemouth, because we are his level - Chelsea need to be aiming better than players like him, but no they focused on him and spent £35m on him to top it off. Lavia had a good season with us but was still growing, he was not worth £60m - yet they felt they'd spunk that on him.

The pointless uneducated splurge they have made in the transfer market has probably killed their top of the table competitiveness for a generation. FFP will strangle them for a long time now, whilst the others just get further away.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neville is a twat, but he was right about Chelsea bottling it. They had Liverpool on the ropes at the end of normal time, but were very passive in extra time. Klopp defo seemed to do a better job in the break before the extra 30. personally, I don’t get the hype over Cole Palmer or Gallagher and they both reinforced that opinion today. Gallagher missed a sitter & a couple of decent chances, and Palmer disappeared as the game wore on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, S-Clarke said:

The standard of Chelsea's team, after spending £1bn on it, is absolutely horrific.

They have overspent on every single one of their signings. Jackson was linked to us and Bournemouth, because we are his level - Chelsea need to be aiming better than players like him, but no they focused on him and spent £35m on him to top it off. Lavia had a good season with us but was still growing, he was not worth £60m - yet they felt they'd spunk that on him.

The pointless uneducated splurge they have made in the transfer market has probably killed their top of the table competitiveness for a generation. FFP will strangle them for a long time now, whilst the others just get further away.

The more I see them play, the more I think both Jackson and Gakpo were two more poor finds from our scouting teams last season and we dodged a couple of bullets there. Would've been a few more million wasted. The two are struggling at Chelsea and Liverpool where chances are coming aplenty each game.

Ramos also isn't pulling up many trees in France, but that's more from his stats pages, rather than watching him play for PSG.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Holmes_and_Watson said:

But don't they have the same charges to face for the subsequent annual accounts? I was thinking that they didn't want to give them twenty, but will give them 12 in the end, across them both.

Will that be concluded in time for this season though? Its a farcical situation 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Doctoroncall said:

Yes, from the Telegraph and Guardian reports   

Good, but they can't be going into the last few games not knowing , makes the whole competition uncertain 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Turkish said:

he commentary winds me up when ever anyone has a shot he shouts "and it's *insert players name* and pauses, like it's the greatest bit of commentary you've ever heard.

He reads from a script and his constant use of poetic or latin phrases is both unnatural and annoying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I caught Kieran Maguire on the radio regarding Everton. He said there's a chance that any penalty imposed would be considerably reduced, based on the reduction via appeal of this one, and also the offence being related to one they've already been punished for. He was indicating it could be reduced by up to 2/3 so 2 or 3 points.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...