Jump to content

GB News

SotonianWill

By SotonianWill
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

aintforever

aintforever

Posted
Posted
  On 20/03/2024 at 19:26, hypochondriac said:

No is the answer it doesn't matter at all. It seems to me that the far left are much more interested in it than any other group. 

Expand  

The left are bound to be more concerned about right wing broadcasters breaking impartiality rules, that’s just obvious.

pingpong

pingpong

Posted
Posted
  On 20/03/2024 at 14:09, Weston Super Saint said:

Sorry, are you asking if free to air BBC, ITV, Channel 4 and Channel 5 exist?

There are a number of other over the air stations that also broadcast, they exist as well.

Expand  

I meant, does tv still get delivered through aerials, and do kids still end up waving coathangers in the air to get a good signal etc. I've not used one for about 30 years and that's what I associated with the original 4 or 5 channels. As I said, it was a genuine question, not making any kind of argument or disagreeing with anything!

Weston Super Saint

Weston Super Saint

Posted
Posted
  On 21/03/2024 at 08:20, pingpong said:

I meant, does tv still get delivered through aerials, and do kids still end up waving coathangers in the air to get a good signal etc. I've not used one for about 30 years and that's what I associated with the original 4 or 5 channels. As I said, it was a genuine question, not making any kind of argument or disagreeing with anything!

Expand  

Yes.

It's called digital TV.

east-stand-nic

east-stand-nic

Posted
Posted
  On 19/03/2024 at 13:53, sadoldgit said:

It is a propaganda channel for the far right masquerading as a news channel, pure and simple. Ofcom have finally got around to doing something about it thankfully. If it wants to broadcast as a proper news channel then it should abide by the rules. If it wants to continue as it is then it should rebrand itself as the Gammon Broadcasting Company so no one is in any doubt about what they are getting.

Ofcom have said that they hold news programmes on the BBC and Channel 4 to a higher standard because they are bigger. Absolutely ridiculous. All news outlets should be held to the same standards.

Oh, and for those making excuses for its existence, you don’t have to tune in to be flooded by its content. It’s propaganda appears all over news feeds too.

Expand  

Will you support the newspaper equivalent of offcom investigating the Guardian and its clear bias to the left? No need to answer; I think we all have your number.

Patrick Bateman

Patrick Bateman

Posted
Posted (edited)
  On 20/03/2024 at 15:29, sadoldgit said:

Many political commentators are of the opinion that this current Tory Party are “far right”.

GB News is very skewed in it support of the Tory Party.

Many of the people who are employed by GB News carry views which many would consider to be “far right” in political parlance.

The items that flood news feeds from the GB News platform are invariable well right of whatever normal people would consider Tory centre right politics.

Nigel Farage, one of the most obvious cheerleaders for far right policies is one of the major poster boys of GB News.

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, looks like a duck…

I would also imagine that the people it appeals to  take to social media to call any who dare to call it out for what it is a “helmet”.

By the way, I referred to it as “far right” to differentiate it from any kind of connection to more reasonable kind of Conservatism. I know it is hard to remember what centre right Tories were like as they seem to have disappeared and been replaced by the Lee Anderson, Rees-Mogg, Suella Braverman, Kemi Badenoch ultra nationalist, immigrant hating flag shaggers.

Didn’t they employ that notorious wokey hater 😂 Lawrence Fox too for a while? No “far right” vibes there either eh?

It will be interesting to see what kind of coverage (promotion) GB News gives to Reform in the forthcoming election. 

It bases itself on Fox News so that should be a giveaway. If you still aren’t convinced it was too much even for Andrew Neil!!
 

 

Expand  

Just go read what the definition of far right actually means, this is a decent starting point: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Far-right_politics#:~:text=Far-right politics%2C or right,often also including nativist tendencies.

The Conservative party are not "far right". GB News is not "far right".  Your view point is absolutely baffling and completely skewed, you are blind to reality. Go and live in a country with a far right or far left government and see how long you last if you aren't purged or put in prison etc. 

Let's look at this text here:

"Far-right politics have led to oppression, political violence, forced assimilation, ethnic cleansing, and genocide against groups of people based on their supposed inferiority or their perceived threat to the native ethnic group, nation, state, national religion, dominant culture, or conservative social institutions"

Is anyone oppressed in this country or by watching a news channel? No.

Has anyone faced political violence? Well yes, currently there is a lot of antisemitism.

Ethnic cleansing, genocide ... NO!

We live in a tolerant society, arguably the most tolerant in the world and you are welcome to try to disprove that statement.  

Even Reform are not a 'far right" party and the BBC have had to apologise (https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/mar/19/bbc-apologises-for-calling-reform-uk-far-right) or face action for labelling them as such at the weekend, they back-tracked pretty damn quickly with that one.  Lee Anderson in my opinion is a prat, but I am allowed that opinion - doesn't make me far left to say that. 

There is nothing wrong with having a centre right news channel, to say it's far right is just plain wrong and like me saying Channel 4 news is far left. It isn't.  There is no point getting so worked up about it all and to my original point, it's wrong (and libellous as per the BBC this week) to label it far right. 

Edited by Patrick Bateman
  • Like 9
Gloucester Saint

Gloucester Saint

Posted
Posted (edited)
  On 21/03/2024 at 06:22, Fan The Flames said:

No. Rachel Johnson's a presenter.

Expand  

And this bloke https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Ferrari

In fact that’s a balance as Johnson is Lib Dem/left wing Tory, Ferrari is right and O’Brien left.

It’s not the journalist presenters with a slight angle on GB News, it’s the fact you’ve got current ministers and MPs from a single party presenting news shows. If they cut that out, there’d still only be 100 people watching but they’d be ok with OFCOM because it’s no different to Andrew Pierce and Kevin Maguire debating on GMTV.

Edited by Gloucester Saint
Turkish

Turkish

Posted
Posted
  On 21/03/2024 at 13:00, Patrick Bateman said:

Just go read what the definition of far right actually means, this is a decent starting point: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Far-right_politics#:~:text=Far-right politics%2C or right,often also including nativist tendencies.

The Conservative party are not "far right". GB News is not "far right".  Your view point is absolutely baffling and completely skewed, you are blind to reality. Go and live in a country with a far right or far left government and see how long you last if you aren't purged or put in prison etc. 

Let's look at this text here:

"Far-right politics have led to oppression, political violence, forced assimilation, ethnic cleansing, and genocide against groups of people based on their supposed inferiority or their perceived threat to the native ethnic group, nation, state, national religion, dominant culture, or conservative social institutions"

Is anyone oppressed in this country or by watching a news channel? No.

Has anyone faced political violence? Well yes, currently there is a lot of antisemitism.

Ethnic cleansing, genocide ... NO!

We live in a tolerant society, arguably the most tolerant in the world and you are welcome to try to disprove that statement.  

Even Reform are not a 'far right" party and the BBC have had to apologise (https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/mar/19/bbc-apologises-for-calling-reform-uk-far-right) or face action for labelling them as such at the weekend, they back-tracked pretty damn quickly with that one.  Lee Anderson in my opinion is a prat, but I am allowed that opinion - doesn't make me far left to say that. 

There is nothing wrong with having a centre right news channel, to say it's far right is just plain wrong and like me saying Channel 4 news is far left. It isn't.  There is no point getting so worked up about it all and to my original point, it's wrong (and libellous as per the BBC this week) to label it far right. 

Expand  

if we really were under a far right government Sog wouldn't be able to come on here spouting all his shite so maybe one isn't such a bad idea.

AlexLaw76

AlexLaw76

Posted
Posted
  On 21/03/2024 at 17:46, Gloucester Saint said:

And this bloke https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Ferrari

In fact that’s a balance as Johnson is Lib Dem/left wing Tory, Ferrari is right and O’Brien left.

It’s not the journalist presenters with a slight angle on GB News, it’s the fact you’ve got current ministers and MPs from a single party presenting news shows. If they cut that out, there’d still only be 100 people watching but they’d be ok with OFCOM because it’s no different to Andrew Pierce and Kevin Maguire debating on GMTV.

Expand  

GB News even have ex labour MPs on their line up.

Current shadow ministers and MPs routine host shows on LBC?

 

moonraker

moonraker

Posted
Posted
  On 22/03/2024 at 06:48, AlexLaw76 said:

GB News even have ex labour MPs on their line up.

Current shadow ministers and MPs routine host shows on LBC?

 

Expand  

There has never been a bar on MPs presenting current affairs on TV.  What is in question is that MPs are not allowed to present news or specifically interview politicians about policy, it seems obvious that GB news have broken the code where other platforms have not.  It is really very simple, and no amount of whataboutary will justify GB news actions wrt to serving MPs.  PS. ex MPs don’t count😉

  • Like 4
badgerx16

badgerx16

Posted
Posted (edited)
  On 22/03/2024 at 06:48, AlexLaw76 said:

GB News even have ex labour MPs on their line up.

Current shadow ministers and MPs routine host shows on LBC?

 

Expand  

As Moonraker says above, the issue is that sitting MPs are not permitted to present or read news in the place of newsreaders. In the incidents OFCOM ruled on, studio discussions were interrupted by 'breaking' news items which the presenters proceeded to read out and comment on. Simple, clear, breach of the regulations.

Edited by badgerx16
  • Like 2
sadoldgit

sadoldgit

Posted
Posted (edited)
  On 21/03/2024 at 13:00, Patrick Bateman said:

Just go read what the definition of far right actually means, this is a decent starting point: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Far-right_politics#:~:text=Far-right politics%2C or right,often also including nativist tendencies.

The Conservative party are not "far right". GB News is not "far right".  Your view point is absolutely baffling and completely skewed, you are blind to reality. Go and live in a country with a far right or far left government and see how long you last if you aren't purged or put in prison etc. 

Let's look at this text here:

"Far-right politics have led to oppression, political violence, forced assimilation, ethnic cleansing, and genocide against groups of people based on their supposed inferiority or their perceived threat to the native ethnic group, nation, state, national religion, dominant culture, or conservative social institutions"

Is anyone oppressed in this country or by watching a news channel? No.

Has anyone faced political violence? Well yes, currently there is a lot of antisemitism.

Ethnic cleansing, genocide ... NO!

We live in a tolerant society, arguably the most tolerant in the world and you are welcome to try to disprove that statement.  

Even Reform are not a 'far right" party and the BBC have had to apologise (https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/mar/19/bbc-apologises-for-calling-reform-uk-far-right) or face action for labelling them as such at the weekend, they back-tracked pretty damn quickly with that one.  Lee Anderson in my opinion is a prat, but I am allowed that opinion - doesn't make me far left to say that. 

There is nothing wrong with having a centre right news channel, to say it's far right is just plain wrong and like me saying Channel 4 news is far left. It isn't.  There is no point getting so worked up about it all and to my original point, it's wrong (and libellous as per the BBC this week) to label it far right. 

Expand  

I don’t watch it so I am no expert on its content. I do see numerous items from it on my news feed daily and many of those fall into what I would describe as far right in their content. A number of the people it employs  or have employed are people who most people ((apart from Duckhunter) hold far right views. I don’t know why you are getting so worked up about it. It is just an opinion. The most important issue here is that it has already been found to be breaking broadcasting rules with a number of outstanding allegations of rule breaking still to be considered. The usual suspects who jump all over any criticism of anything remotely right of centre are already brandishing their pitchforks. Good for you if you feel that you need to join them. The simple fact is that the current Tory Party is considered by many people better versed to judge these things than you or I to have lurched a long way to the right and GB News is a station that promotes those values daily. The degrees to which the Tory Party and the content of GB News are beyond centre right ideology is open to interpretation but it is fair to say if Nigel Farage is a big player then that is an fair indicator of where they are. I think most reasonable people would consider UKIP as far right so this also is a good indicator of where we are now.

https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/48322-tories-now-seen-as-being-as-right-wing-as-2014-16-era-ukip

Edited by sadoldgit
  • Haha 3
sadoldgit

sadoldgit

Posted
Posted (edited)
  On 21/03/2024 at 06:22, Fan The Flames said:

No. Rachel Johnson's a presenter.

Expand  

As is Nick Ferrari, Iain Dale, Tom Swarbrick and several others with strong links to the Tories. But as has been pointed out, the rules that have been broken are very specific and concern a different issue than partisan presenters fronting up their own programmes. There is a reason why we don’t have Jacob Rees-Mogg or Nigel Farage as news anchors on the BBC and that has absolutely nothing to do with David Lammy presenting his own show on LBC. I appreciate that the difference might be lost on some here though.

There is also the issue of, in a democracy, why we have so many media outlets controlled by those who support right wing ideologies and so few supporting opposite ideologies but I know that upsets the usual crew here so I won’t say any more on the subject for now. 

I know that this article will mean nothing to the crew but they can’t deny that a lot of the rhetoric that has been normalised by Tory ministers nowadays would only have been expected from far right organisations like the BNP and UKIP a few years ago. The move towards far right politics across Europe is also very evident.

https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/the-changing-face-of-the-british-far-right/

https://www.politico.eu/article/brussels-braces-for-far-right-wave-as-eu-election-looms/

Edited by sadoldgit
Added text
  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
badgerx16

badgerx16

Posted
Posted
  On 22/03/2024 at 11:29, sadoldgit said:

 

There is also the issue of, in a democracy, why we have so many media outlets controlled by those who support right wing ideologies and so few supporting opposite ideologies but I know that upsets the usual crew here so I won’t say any more on the subject for now. 

 

Expand  

Could it be that most people with enough money to buy and run a large media outlet are capitalists and tend to favour Tory policies.

It's a free market.

  • Like 1
AlexLaw76

AlexLaw76

Posted
Posted
  On 22/03/2024 at 08:27, badgerx16 said:

As Moonraker says above, the issue is that sitting MPs are not permitted to present or read news in the place of newsreaders. In the incidents OFCOM ruled on, studio discussions were interrupted by 'breaking' news items which the presenters proceeded to read out and comment on. Simple, clear, breach of the regulations.

Expand  

is that it? is this the golden egg that means GB news (in the view on many, not you) is 'far right'....

 

Patrick Bateman

Patrick Bateman

Posted
Posted
  On 22/03/2024 at 11:13, sadoldgit said:

I don’t watch it so I am no expert on its content. I do see numerous items from it on my news feed daily and many of those fall into what I would describe as far right in their content. A number of the people it employs  or have employed are people who most people ((apart from Duckhunter) hold far right views. I don’t know why you are getting so worked up about it. It is just an opinion. The most important issue here is that it has already been found to be breaking broadcasting rules with a number of outstanding allegations of rule breaking still to be considered. The usual suspects who jump all over any criticism of anything remotely right of centre are already brandishing their pitchforks. Good for you if you feel that you need to join them. The simple fact is that the current Tory Party is considered by many people better versed to judge these things than you or I to have lurched a long way to the right and GB News is a station that promotes those values daily. The degrees to which the Tory Party and the content of GB News are beyond centre right ideology is open to interpretation but it is fair to say if Nigel Farage is a big player then that is an fair indicator of where they are. I think most reasonable people would consider UKIP as far right so this also is a good indicator of where we are now.

https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/48322-tories-now-seen-as-being-as-right-wing-as-2014-16-era-ukip

Expand  

I'm not the one who is worked up here, I want you to learn the definition of far right. I am not defending GB News, or anyone, just wanting you to admit you're incorrect with labelling them far right.  The over use of "far right" and "far left" in this country is laughable, by people who don't understand what it actually means. I refer you to my previous post.

And you don't know my politics, I haven't told you, however I won't be voting blue, red or for Tice/Anderson (no idea what colour they are?). 

  • Like 3
iansums

iansums

Posted
Posted
  On 22/03/2024 at 13:59, Patrick Bateman said:

I'm not the one who is worked up here, I want you to learn the definition of far right. I am not defending GB News, or anyone, just wanting you to admit you're incorrect with labelling them far right.  The over use of "far right" and "far left" in this country is laughable, by people who don't understand what it actually means. I refer you to my previous post.

And you don't know my politics, I haven't told you, however I won't be voting blue, red or for Tice/Anderson (no idea what colour they are?). 

Expand  

When I was growing up, far left was communism, far right was fascism.

badgerx16

badgerx16

Posted
Posted
  On 22/03/2024 at 13:24, AlexLaw76 said:

is that it? is this the golden egg that means GB news (in the view on many, not you) is 'far right'....

 

Expand  

Not sure how OFCOM's slap on the wrist turned GBeebies into Goebbels' propaganda ministry, I suspect the extrapolation is more in the imagination of the more susceptible of us.

  • Like 1
AlexLaw76

AlexLaw76

Posted
Posted
  On 22/03/2024 at 11:29, sadoldgit said:

As is Nick Ferrari, Iain Dale, Tom Swarbrick and several others with strong links to the Tories. But as has been pointed out, the rules that have been broken are very specific and concern a different issue than partisan presenters fronting up their own programmes. There is a reason why we don’t have Jacob Rees-Mogg or Nigel Farage as news anchors on the BBC and that has absolutely nothing to do with David Lammy presenting his own show on LBC. I appreciate that the difference might be lost on some here though.

There is also the issue of, in a democracy, why we have so many media outlets controlled by those who support right wing ideologies and so few supporting opposite ideologies but I know that upsets the usual crew here so I won’t say any more on the subject for now. 

I know that this article will mean nothing to the crew but they can’t deny that a lot of the rhetoric that has been normalised by Tory ministers nowadays would only have been expected from far right organisations like the BNP and UKIP a few years ago. The move towards far right politics across Europe is also very evident.

https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/the-changing-face-of-the-british-far-right/

https://www.politico.eu/article/brussels-braces-for-far-right-wave-as-eu-election-looms/

Expand  

 

IMG_0540.jpeg

  • Haha 2
badgerx16

badgerx16

Posted
Posted (edited)

"Anything that makes trade more difficult makes countries poorer"'.

Jacob Rees Mogg, ( arch Brexiteer ), GB News, March 21st 2024.

Edited by badgerx16
  • Like 3
hypochondriac

hypochondriac

Posted
Posted
  On 24/03/2024 at 09:21, badgerx16 said:

"Anything that makes trade more difficult makes countries poorer"'.

Jacob Rees Mogg, ( arch Brexiteer ), GB News, March 21st 2024.

Expand  

I coukd be wrong but from memory he always claimed that there woukd be a cost to brexit and that ease of trade was not the only consideration. I remember the interviews at the time so it doesn't sound like he's really changed his position. 

  • Haha 1
badgerx16

badgerx16

Posted
Posted
  On 24/03/2024 at 11:14, hypochondriac said:

I coukd be wrong but from memory he always claimed that there woukd be a cost to brexit and that ease of trade was not the only consideration. I remember the interviews at the time so it doesn't sound like he's really changed his position. 

Expand  

Crowns on pint glasses, removal of environmental controls, and reducing health and safety legislation were also up there, along with advising customers of his investment companies to move money to EU based institutions. That and the fifty years to see if there actually was an economic benefit.

  • Like 1
hypochondriac

hypochondriac

Posted
Posted
  On 24/03/2024 at 11:27, badgerx16 said:

Crowns on pint glasses, removal of environmental controls, and reducing health and safety legislation were also up there, along with advising customers of his investment companies to move money to EU based institutions. That and the fifty years to see if there actually was an economic benefit.

Expand  

Yeah I'm not chomping at the bit to start another brexit discussion, simply pointing out that he doesn't seem to have changed his opinion. 

LuckyNumber7

LuckyNumber7

Posted
Posted
  On 24/03/2024 at 11:14, hypochondriac said:

I coukd be wrong but from memory he always claimed that there woukd be a cost to brexit and that ease of trade was not the only consideration. I remember the interviews at the time so it doesn't sound like he's really changed his position. 

Expand  

Indeed, if the EU were only a trading bloc we'd still be in it.

  • Like 1
sadoldgit

sadoldgit

Posted
Posted
  On 24/03/2024 at 14:22, LuckyNumber7 said:

Indeed, if the EU were only a trading bloc we'd still be in it.

Expand  

We pretty much used it as “just a trading block”. If you are a member of a large trading block there are various rules and regulations. The trouble was that a certain section of people thought we ought to have the best of both worlds. It could be argued that we now have the worst of all worlds given the state of our fishing, farming and manufacturing industries post Brexit. Still, at least we got our country back. The only surprise in 2024 is that there are still some people who believe that Brexit was a good idea and would bring us so much more than we already had. This one’s for you Duckie 😂

  • Like 3
badgerx16

badgerx16

Posted
Posted
  On 31/03/2024 at 10:03, sadoldgit said:

We pretty much used it as “just a trading block”. If you are a member of a large trading block there are various rules and regulations. The trouble was that a certain section of people thought we ought to have the best of both worlds. It could be argued that we now have the worst of all worlds given the state of our fishing, farming and manufacturing industries post Brexit. Still, at least we got our country back. The only surprise in 2024 is that there are still some people who believe that Brexit was a good idea and would bring us so much more than we already had. This one’s for you Duckie 😂

Expand  

Fishing and farming, two industries that pushed for Brexit and sucked up every false promise that they were offered.

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 10 months later...
Lord Duckhunter

Lord Duckhunter

Posted
Posted
  On 19/03/2024 at 14:26, hypochondriac said:

I bet soggy is penning daily emails to Ofcom. 

Expand  

Didn’t do any good. 
 

GB News has comprehensively won its judicial review of TV regulator Ofcom’s decisions that two shows hosted by Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg breached the broadcasting Code.

In a landmark ruling the High Court found that Ofcom’s conclusions - that the broadcasts, on May 9 and June 13 2023, breached the Code’s due impartiality and content regulations - were unlawful.

 

As a result, the Court has quashed the decisions and awarded GB News its legal costs.

The historic judgment is the first time the broadcasting watchdog has lost a judicial review of one of its decisions in relation to the Broadcasting Code.

 

 

badgerx16

badgerx16

Posted
Posted (edited)

I'm not sure what OFCOM's issue was. It's not as if anybody was watching the programs, and even if they were they would just have been looking for confirmation bias.

Edited by badgerx16
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
LeGodSquad

LeGodSquad

Posted
Posted

I sometimes watch it when I need cheering up. Not sure what I enjoy most.. it's looney presenters and guests or its terrible production values.. fair play to them for keeping it going 😀

Gloucester Saint

Gloucester Saint

Posted
Posted (edited)
  On 05/03/2025 at 13:25, LeGodSquad said:

I sometimes watch it when I need cheering up. Not sure what I enjoy most.. it's looney presenters and guests or its terrible production values.. fair play to them for keeping it going 😀

Expand  

That’s down to Paul Marshall https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Marshall_(investor)

Hence the liking for the US evangelical TV channels like Fox and trying to establish them here in the UK (the cultural grievances simply don’t translate here in the same way, hence the hideous losses and single figure audiences). Not surprised likes of Andrew Neill didn’t stay long despite wheelbarrows of cash.

Reform UK via the Candy brothers may co-fund to keep it going I suspect if Marshall’s hedge fund continues its recent nose dive. The Candy’s have suspected links to Russian oligarchs and criminals   https://www.ft.com/content/d21a37fc-04d8-11e7-ace0-1ce02ef0def9 https://www.thetimes.com/article/candys-80m-remortgage-welcomes-russian-uber-tenants-0v2n3kd3m https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4278948/Christian-Candy-denies-Russian-gangster-threats.html https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/02/28/billionaire-christian-candy-bullied-brother-nick-dislikedsister/

Edited by Gloucester Saint
  • Haha 1
sadoldgit

sadoldgit

Posted
Posted
  On 05/03/2025 at 13:55, Gloucester Saint said:

That’s down to Paul Marshall https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Marshall_(investor)

Hence the liking for the US evangelical TV channels like Fox and trying to establish them here in the UK (the cultural grievances simply don’t translate here in the same way, hence the hideous losses and single figure audiences). Not surprised likes of Andrew Neill didn’t stay long despite wheelbarrows of cash.

Reform UK via the Candy brothers may co-fund to keep it going I suspect if Marshall’s hedge fund continues its recent nose dive. The Candy’s have suspected links to Russian oligarchs and criminals   https://www.ft.com/content/d21a37fc-04d8-11e7-ace0-1ce02ef0def9 https://www.thetimes.com/article/candys-80m-remortgage-welcomes-russian-uber-tenants-0v2n3kd3m https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4278948/Christian-Candy-denies-Russian-gangster-threats.html https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/02/28/billionaire-christian-candy-bullied-brother-nick-dislikedsister/

Expand  

Genuine question east-stand-nic. Why do you think that the above post warrants a laughing emoji?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


×
×
  • Create New...