Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Galway saint said:

What is it then ? 
he should have saved it.

 

Not a chance. 
 

Once an attacker gets within a few feet of a goalkeeper he is most probably going to score. You have a very unrealistic of what a goalkeeper can do. If you expect a save in such situations you’re going to be disappointed most of the time.

  • Like 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, Whitey Grandad said:

Not a chance. 
 

Once an attacker gets within a few feet of a goalkeeper he is most probably going to score. You have a very unrealistic of what a goalkeeper can do. If you expect a save in such situations you’re going to be disappointed most of the time.

Unless that attacker is che Adams of course

  • Like 1
  • Haha 9
Posted
9 minutes ago, Whitey Grandad said:

Not a chance. 
 

Once an attacker gets within a few feet of a goalkeeper he is most probably going to score. You have a very unrealistic of what a goalkeeper can do. If you expect a save in such situations you’re going to be disappointed most of the time.

Just watched it again and I quote,‘Hugely disappointing from his perspective’ said Adam Blackmore on commentary when talking about bazanu’s effort. He also said he let it go under his arm. How on earth you can say that was not a mistake is beyond me 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Galway saint said:

Just watched it again and I quote,‘Hugely disappointing from his perspective’ said Adam Blackmore on commentary when talking about bazanu’s effort. He also said he let it go under his arm. How on earth you can say that was not a mistake is beyond me 

 

Or…

He did very well to even get a hand on it.

  • Like 1
Posted

You can't play 'possession ball' and have McCarthy in goal. He struggles to pass to his man five feet away. That leaves Baz. I genuinely think his distribution is very very good and his control of the ball is solid. If someone can train him to stop shots (is this intuitive or can it be trained?), we'd have a top goalie. Until that time, we need someone else.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Whitey Grandad said:

Two?

I only saw The near post one.

Not to mention the world class save against Benfica.

Edited by manji
Posted
12 hours ago, manji said:

Not to mention the world class save against Benfica.

That save was luck more than anything else. He done well to get across, but when you're throwing your body at the ball, you're getting lucky if it hits you. You might get 1 or 2 of those a season.

I personally judge a keeper on the ones they should be saving, not the 'world class' ones they shouldn't. Baz doesn't save the simple one (to be honest, he hardly saves anything), which makes him a very, very poor keeper. 

  • Haha 2
Posted
43 minutes ago, Whitey Grandad said:

This may come as a surprise but…

…not all shots are the same.

What does that even mean ? 
Are you saying shots are harder to save in the premier league than the championship ?  You get good shots and bad shots whatever the division. The point is he’s shown himself poor at saving shots and had poor positional sense and a lack of physicality. The only redeeming feature at present is apparently good distribution but in that case let’s stick Stephen’s in goal

Posted
5 hours ago, saintant said:

Either you can save shots or you can't. Which division you're in is not so important.

I don't think you will ever get all Saints fans agreeing on Bazuna.

Personally i think he is a very intelligent young goalkeeper who was thrown into the Lions den last season with a woeful backline in front of him. Yes he made mistakes but he also made some incredible saves. Some fans are all too quick to only remember the mistakes because the mistakes led to a goal and points lost. A goalkeeper probably has  the hardest position on the pitch because the outfield players can often cock up several times a game and it not necessarily lead to a goal. A goalkeeper fucks up and it's a goal. I'm confident he will go on to be a top keeper.

  • Like 5
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Galway saint said:

What does that even mean ? 
Are you saying shots are harder to save in the premier league than the championship ?  You get good shots and bad shots whatever the division. The point is he’s shown himself poor at saving shots and had poor positional sense and a lack of physicality. The only redeeming feature at present is apparently good distribution but in that case let’s stick Stephen’s in goal

I believe he's referring to post shot expected goals. I.e. a statistical breakdown of how likely a keeper is to save a shot after its been hit - i.e. for given placements, powers, ranges etc. statistically how many are saved.

Edited by Saint86
  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Saint86 said:

I believe he's referring to post shot expected goals. I.e. a statistical breakdown of how likely a keeper is to save a shot after its been hit - i.e. for given placements, powers, ranges etc. statistically how many are saved.

I was going for...

Shots-Bar-Alcohol.jpg

skysports-danny-ings-southampton_5102676

590700468aa6c.image.jpg?resize=1200,936

 

But yeah, your reply with its analysis angle works too. 🙂

  • Haha 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, Saint86 said:

I believe he's referring to post shot expected goals. I.e. a statistical breakdown of how likely a keeper is to save a shot after its been hit - i.e. for given placements, powers, ranges etc. statistically how many are saved.

I never go anywhere near such sorts of statistics but yes, a well-placed  shot placed into the corner is different from a gentle back pass. In the top levels of football you tend to find that forwards will try to place their shots somewhere that the goalkeeper is not going to save them. That’s why they’re playing at a higher level.

Distance from goal is also an important factor. Not many defenders allow the opposition to waltz into their penalty areas before having a pop at goal.

Having Bednarek standing on your toes doesn’t help either.

In short, our defence was porous and ineffective no matter who was playing in goal.

Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, Galway saint said:

What does that even mean ? 
Are you saying shots are harder to save in the premier league than the championship ?  You get good shots and bad shots whatever the division. The point is he’s shown himself poor at saving shots and had poor positional sense and a lack of physicality. The only redeeming feature at present is apparently good distribution but in that case let’s stick Stephen’s in goal

Shots in the Premier League are not the same as shots in the Championship.

In short, they’re in a different league.

It’s one of the reasons that players like Che Adams and Adam Armstrong can do so well at one level yet struggle at another.

Edited by Whitey Grandad
  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Whitey Grandad said:

Shots in the Premier League are not the same as shots in the Championship.

In short, they’re in a different league.

It’s one of the reasons that players like Che Adams and Adam Armstrong can do so well at one level yet struggle at another.

No, they get more time and are up against defenders who won't be as good in the championship. A shot in the top corner in the championship is the same as shot hit into the top corner in the PL 😉

Posted
22 minutes ago, Whitey Grandad said:

I never go anywhere near such sorts of statistics but yes, a well-placed  shot placed into the corner is different from a gentle back pass. In the top levels of football you tend to find that forwards will try to place their shots somewhere that the goalkeeper is not going to save them. That’s why they’re playing at a higher level.

Distance from goal is also an important factor. Not many defenders allow the opposition to waltz into their penalty areas before having a pop at goal.

Having Bednarek standing on your toes doesn’t help either.

In short, our defence was porous and ineffective no matter who was playing in goal.

So your contention is that we woukd have conceded roughly the same amount whoever was in goal and that the quality of goalkeeper makes no difference? 

Posted
19 minutes ago, Whitey Grandad said:

Shots in the Premier League are not the same as shots in the Championship.

In short, they’re in a different league.

It’s one of the reasons that players like Che Adams and Adam Armstrong can do so well at one level yet struggle at another.

Yes they are - a shot is a shot regardless of the division. It’s just that the keepers who keep our more shots typically play in a higher division.

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Galway saint said:

Yes they are - a shot is a shot regardless of the division. It’s just that the keepers who keep our more shots typically play in a higher division.

 

 

Every shot is different.

Posted
6 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

So your contention is that we woukd have conceded roughly the same amount whoever was in goal and that the quality of goalkeeper makes no difference? 

To a large extent, yes. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Galway saint said:

Yes they are - a shot is a shot regardless of the division. It’s just that the keepers who keep our more shots typically play in a higher division.

This argument just doesn’t make any sense. If it were true, Plymouth’s Michael Cooper could replace De Gea at United. Strikers are quite obviously worse in this league and so are their shots.

  • Like 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, The Curse of St Mary's said:

No, they get more time and are up against defenders who won't be as good in the championship. A shot in the top corner in the championship is the same as shot hit into the top corner in the PL 😉

There are a lot more variables than just the placement. This is the problem with simplistic analysis. It is too simple.

Posted
Just now, Whitey Grandad said:

There are a lot more variables than just the placement. This is the problem with simplistic analysis. It is too simple.

Simplistic analysis will inevitably be simple.

Posted
Just now, hypochondriac said:

So is that the same the other way round too? Could someone rubbish replace Ederson and have conceded a similar amount? 

Yep. As far as stoppage ball going into the net is concerned. But there is a lot more to a good defence than having a goalkeeper for that rare occasion when the opposition get a chance to shoot at goal. Distribution, organising the defence, controlling the tempo of the game.

Posted
26 minutes ago, The Curse of St Mary's said:

No, they get more time and are up against defenders who won't be as good in the championship. A shot in the top corner in the championship is the same as shot hit into the top corner in the PL 😉

Going back to this, shots can come from all sorts of angles and distances and speeds. Other relevant factors are the time taken to line up the shot, whether it’s a snapshot or something more considered, whether there is a defender close to the attacker blocking the view of him, whether there are defenders standing back in front of the goalkeeper blocking his view, whether the shot comes at the end of a run or is from a ball cut back from the goal line, whether the pass to the shooter comes through a crowd of players from a few yards or from a long distance…

There are so many factors that trying to make a spreadsheet analysis is idiotic. That is the beauty of football.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Whitey Grandad said:

Yep. As far as stoppage ball going into the net is concerned. But there is a lot more to a good defence than having a goalkeeper for that rare occasion when the opposition get a chance to shoot at goal. Distribution, organising the defence, controlling the tempo of the game.

Hold on could you expand on what you're saying here? Are you saying that a goalkeeper who is equally adept at other skills such as distribution, organising defence etc but worse at shot stopping will concede the same amount as another keeper who is better at it? 

Posted
37 minutes ago, The Curse of St Mary's said:

No, they get more time and are up against defenders who won't be as good in the championship. A shot in the top corner in the championship is the same as shot hit into the top corner in the PL 😉

Yep. And with Baz the big issue is positioning...a keeper will concede more goals on any league if he starts in the wrong place. 

Posted
1 minute ago, notnowcato said:

I wonder if any other football forum has this quantity and quality of goalkeeper analysis. Halcyon times. 

If we had a prime Niemi in goal then no one could be arsed. The fact its debated in such detail speaks for itself. 

Posted

I think Whitey is on to something, he’s ahead of the game here. As it doesn’t matter who tries to save the shots, we could put Prowse in nets. But (here’s the genius bit), if we get a corner or free kick around the box, he could swap position & a full back could go in nets. We’d end up with 11 outfield players, and wouldn’t suffer for it. 

Posted
2 hours ago, hypochondriac said:

Hold on could you expand on what you're saying here? Are you saying that a goalkeeper who is equally adept at other skills such as distribution, organising defence etc but worse at shot stopping will concede the same amount as another keeper who is better at it? 

In such circumstances they are likely to be similar in that respect too.

Posted
2 minutes ago, SaintsBarry74 said:

One of the worst keepers I've ever seen relative to the level played. How have we not found a replacement? Guy's a sieve.

That's unfair!  He's showing massive improvement - at fetching the ball from the back of the net, Guy's a world beater.

  • Haha 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, SaintsBarry74 said:

One of the worst keepers I've ever seen relative to the level played. How have we not found a replacement? Guy's a sieve.

Whilst we all know Bazunu has been pretty poor for us so far, he had no chance for any of the goals today. 

It was all on the lack of midfield/poor play from the centre backs. 

  • Like 9
Posted
5 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said:

That's unfair!  He's showing massive improvement - at fetching the ball from the back of the net, Guy's a world beater.

I was wondering earlier what would stop more shots - a fit, off the back of a good week’s training Bazunu or a traffic cone.

Posted
13 minutes ago, SaintsBarry74 said:

I was wondering earlier what would stop more shots - a fit, off the back of a good week’s training Bazunu or a traffic cone.

How drunk is the traffic cone? 

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, SaintsBarry74 said:

One of the worst keepers I've ever seen relative to the level played. How have we not found a replacement? Guy's a sieve.

Until McCarthy leaves we ain't bringing in a replacement keeper. 

Posted
1 minute ago, SotonianWill said:

Do you mean Benfica? All I can remember about Goztepe was him conceding that cross

Sorry yes benfica, can’t the error I made it’s not hard to remember his saves 

Posted

Watched the game level with Bazunu today and the lack of presence, physicality and judgement is astonishing. The defence can be appalling (keystone cops today) but they are clearly aware that there is nothing behind them. 

  • Like 3
Posted
Just now, Miltonaggro said:

Watched the game level with Bazunu today and the lack of presence, physicality and judgement is astonishing. The defence can be appalling (keystone cops today) but they are clearly aware that there is nothing behind them. 

Worst keeper since Keith Granger absolutely shite

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...