Jump to content

Russell Martin


LegalEagle

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Fabrice29 said:

Nope. Actually can't wait for him to pull out of the running by the end of the week so all the people who don't want him can be even more angry that we didn't get it done.

You remind me of Always, just constantly attacking other views and mocking everyone.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Smirking_Saint said:

We’ve been fucking awful but we certainly haven’t attempted to be a possession based side, go and ask any coach what our tactical philosophy is and Id wager none will say possession based. Passing a ball around and looking for option’s doesn’t make us a possession side by the way.

Our MO is to try to catch the oppo in favourable positions in and around their penalty area, unfortunately we genuinely have very very little threat/build up other than that, but it has got even worse under the end of Ralph/Selles… teams know if they leave us on the ball we’re ponderous and toothless, hence the passing back.. because frankly our attacking bank of four make very few penetrating runs outside of Theo

Sure, under Ralph we certainly were a side that had limited aspirations other than setting traps and trying to force errors and turnovers that put us in great positions. But that feels like light years ago now.

It's hard to know what the plan was under Jones, as he talked about being aggressive and on the front foot, brought in a target man, but then seemed to look to play pretty short and through the lines. Forrest game apart, we didn't really go long and hopeful. In the City cup game, it was about pressing, and taking chances to break. I am not sure how to describe the philosophy in games like Brentford or Wolves. Flounder?

Selles initially seemed to also want to press, but that quickly morphed into more of a deep lying defence and slow, possession-based build up.  We passed the ball left to right, probing, trying to get the ball to a player with space to move into. We didn't hit it long, we didn't hit it down the channels, we didn't ping it to a target man. We passed it short, tried to keep it, tried to pass through teams. We have been terrible at it, but that doesn't mean we haven't tried to dominate possession.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know we were unlikely to ever attract a big name but surely we could have got someone that had managed at premier league level in the past either here or the equivalent abroad 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Chez said:

Sure, under Ralph we certainly were a side that had limited aspirations other than setting traps and trying to force errors and turnovers that put us in great positions. But that feels like light years ago now.

It's hard to know what the plan was under Jones, as he talked about being aggressive and on the front foot, brought in a target man, but then seemed to look to play pretty short and through the lines. Forrest game apart, we didn't really go long and hopeful. In the City cup game, it was about pressing, and taking chances to break. I am not sure how to describe the philosophy in games like Brentford or Wolves. Flounder?

Selles initially seemed to also want to press, but that quickly morphed into more of a deep lying defence and slow, possession-based build up.  We passed the ball left to right, probing, trying to get the ball to a player with space to move into. We didn't hit it long, we didn't hit it down the channels, we didn't ping it to a target man. We passed it short, tried to keep it, tried to pass through teams. We have been terrible at it, but that doesn't mean we haven't tried to dominate possession.

This is what I mentioned earlier, I think as a club we're totally confused and caught between two styles. That has also massively impacted our recruitment as we have such a miss match of a squad with no team suited to one way, it's just messy and incredibly unbalanced if you look at it on paper - that's why the attack is like a tombola, nothing sticks.

We've focused so much in recent years on players who are good off the ball, but are actually pretty shit when they have it. That started to change a bit last summer, but it needs to continue at a pace this year whilst also flogging the players who are just caught in between styles.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 22/05/2023 at 19:52, croydonsaint said:

Looking at this video I can’t say I’m being inspired. Will he be too keen to be liked? He doesn’t look a particularly strong character. Know he’s a decent guy and all that and am sure he’s intelligent but feels to me like we are making another big mistake if the rumours are correct. If we are wanting to bounce back up next season I doubt if this appointment can achieve that. 
If he comes I certainly wish him luck and will be very happy to be proved wrong but feels a risky appointment after 2 other risky appointments which failed badly. 

Omg,he reminds me of Ricky Gervais in 'The Office '

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Chez said:

Sure, under Ralph we certainly were a side that had limited aspirations other than setting traps and trying to force errors and turnovers that put us in great positions. But that feels like light years ago now.

It's hard to know what the plan was under Jones, as he talked about being aggressive and on the front foot, brought in a target man, but then seemed to look to play pretty short and through the lines. Forrest game apart, we didn't really go long and hopeful. In the City cup game, it was about pressing, and taking chances to break. I am not sure how to describe the philosophy in games like Brentford or Wolves. Flounder?

Selles initially seemed to also want to press, but that quickly morphed into more of a deep lying defence and slow, possession-based build up.  We passed the ball left to right, probing, trying to get the ball to a player with space to move into. We didn't hit it long, we didn't hit it down the channels, we didn't ping it to a target man. We passed it short, tried to keep it, tried to pass through teams. We have been terrible at it, but that doesn't mean we haven't tried to dominate possession.

Ralph was a very pure gagenpress, hyper aggressive, effectively he would intentionally GIFT the opposition possession at times in optimal areas (for us) via a long ball but also initiate a press so to try to catch them with a bad touch etc. It was pretty effective at first, he then changed it slightly as teams didn’t succumb to that, so we’d move up the pitch then press at certain trigger points, but ultimately that was our tactical philosophy… a press.. pressing tactics are actually arguably the hardest to coach, which is why you don’t see them outside of many top leagues and rarely internationally.. players need to be aware of triggers and act in groups, there needs to be a level of autonomy.

Jones… agreed, Im actually not sure if I could tell you what he was trying to do and Ill be 100% honest I was so demoralised I tended to turn games off 😅, it was a mess, he was just so out of his comfort zone it was actually quite sad seeing how badly he was failing, he just flailed around trying to find anything that would stick

Selles… I dunno, I actually do think there is a good tactical coach there, I do think he has good ideas but it just didn’t work did it… I think he wants to press, but its half baked (like the end of RH’s reign) and a half baked press is a disaster, kills team shape and the opponents just wander round it. I think we pass it slowly in order to try to pull a team out, so we can press but it doesn’t really work and we end up trying to pass our way through which we can’t because our front line is, as stated before, terrible from a movement POV

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Maggie May said:

Players will warm to Russell Martin a lot more than they did with NJ. It was quite clear from Jones’ first mic’d-up training session that it was going to end in tears.

He played premier league and was a full international for a start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Mr X said:

I know we were unlikely to ever attract a big name but surely we could have got someone that had managed at premier league level in the past either here or the equivalent abroad 

Who? 

Bearing mind we don't know which managers want a break, who would or wouldn't want to come here, I haven't seen many realistic better options. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Maggie May said:

Players will warm to Russell Martin a lot more than they did with NJ. It was quite clear from Jones’ first mic’d-up training session that it was going to end in tears.

Well the players loved Selles which got us absolutely nowhere also. As long he doesnt come across as a cunt, I couldnt care less what they think of Martin.

The players will be googling and looking at his wikipedia to find out what hes actually done as a manager, and then will come to the conclusion that hes achieved less than Jones unfortunately.

However, the proof is in the pudding and players will warm to the manager if its an enjoyable playing style, which most importantly gets the results on the pitch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of this is interesting and an insight into what he was dealing with in January. Reminded me a bit of the Maddison situation that Les Reed recently described where we almost had Maddison but had to waste time getting an approval from China.

Obviously he kind of toes the line of really slagging the owners off but it did much on either side to strengthen the relationships.

IMO he comes across as a collaborative person who clearly cares about his staff and players - and also who is quite open and chatty which fans usually prefer.

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, skintsaint said:

Has he signed yet?

Apparently we’re haggling over compensation. 800k for him and his staff.

What is 800k to Saints in this day in age? If you want the guy and he’s your no1, go get him. Don’t fart arse around like you have transfers over the past few seasons, then miss out and say ‘oh well, we tried hard’
This fuckking club, honestly.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Crab Lungs said:

Apparently we’re haggling over compensation. 800k for him and his staff.

What is 800k to Saints in this day in age? If you want the guy and he’s your no1, go get him. Don’t fart arse around like you have transfers over the past few seasons, then miss out and say ‘oh well, we tried hard’
This fuckking club, honestly.

If that is true, I'd probably look towards Swansea American ownership too who are known to change goalposts on deals at the 11th hour and delay and delay over everything.

It's certainly not going to be as clear cut as ''we don't pay x'', if that is the case.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Crab Lungs said:

Apparently we’re haggling over compensation. 800k for him and his staff.

What is 800k to Saints in this day in age? If you want the guy and he’s your no1, go get him. Don’t fart arse around like you have transfers over the past few seasons, then miss out and say ‘oh well, we tried hard’
This fuckking club, honestly.

It's not true

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Crab Lungs said:

Apparently we’re haggling over compensation. 800k for him and his staff.

What is 800k to Saints in this day in age? If you want the guy and he’s your no1, go get him. Don’t fart arse around like you have transfers over the past few seasons, then miss out and say ‘oh well, we tried hard’
This fuckking club, honestly.

Like with most things, just because that’s the asking price doesn’t mean you just pay it. It’s  a game of negotiation.

he’ll be announced next week after the season is finished. 

Also, what would happen if Russell resigned in order to push through a move?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Crab Lungs said:

Apparently we’re haggling over compensation. 800k for him and his staff.

What is 800k to Saints in this day in age? If you want the guy and he’s your no1, go get him. Don’t fart arse around like you have transfers over the past few seasons, then miss out and say ‘oh well, we tried hard’
This fuckking club, honestly.

Well spank my ass and call me Charlie!

"Oooooh Chaaarliee"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, EBS1980 said:

Like with most things, just because that’s the asking price doesn’t mean you just pay it. It’s  a game of negotiation.

he’ll be announced next week after the season is finished. 

Also, what would happen if Russell resigned in order to push through a move?

It's under contract laws, still requires compensation 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the video and just picturing him at our press conference explaining why the process failed to get us a striker. Or telling us what a good chance we have of hitting the playoffs, only for it to become out of reach. Brrrr. Let's hope that we've learned about recruitment, and he never has to explain why we're not going up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Crab Lungs said:

Apparently we’re haggling over compensation. 800k for him and his staff.

What is 800k to Saints in this day in age? If you want the guy and he’s your no1, go get him. Don’t fart arse around like you have transfers over the past few seasons, then miss out and say ‘oh well, we tried hard’
This fuckking club, honestly.

Which way is the payment going?

Edited by Dragon_man
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Crab Lungs said:

Apparently we’re haggling over compensation. 800k for him and his staff.

What is 800k to Saints in this day in age? If you want the guy and he’s your no1, go get him. Don’t fart arse around like you have transfers over the past few seasons, then miss out and say ‘oh well, we tried hard’
This fuckking club, honestly.

Or, it could all be in place and they could be waiting to announce it once the season ends on Sunday.

just a thought…..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Holmes_and_Watson said:

Looking at the video and just picturing him at our press conference explaining why the process failed to get us a striker. Or telling us what a good chance we have of hitting the playoffs, only for it to become out of reach. Brrrr. Let's hope that we've learned about recruitment, and he never has to explain why we're not going up.

Individually, the players are good. Look at the Leicester team, they're all Premier League players.

I think everything above player level has been the problem, it's the process of change that has led to this season. But this season has come about because of recent seasons.

I think, maybe, keeping former senior players would have kept us up, but still low down. 

You sometimes have to reboot, and we will be best placed to return next year. All the other teams are in more of a mess

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, James G said:

Individually, the players are good. Look at the Leicester team, they're all Premier League players.

I think everything above player level has been the problem, it's the process of change that has led to this season. But this season has come about because of recent seasons.

I think, maybe, keeping former senior players would have kept us up, but still low down. 

You sometimes have to reboot, and we will be best placed to return next year. All the other teams are in more of a mess

In what way are Leic and Leeds worse off?

Genuine Q 

Why are we 'best placed' to return?

We don't know anything really about how (who) the new manager is going to step up, or any idea about what the team will be (ditto Leeds and Leic).

I think we could well be top 8, middle 8 or bottom 8; come back to me after 15 games and I will have a bit more idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, EBS1980 said:

Also, what would happen if Russell resigned in order to push through a move?

Gardening leave or something. He can refuse to work for Swansea but wouldn't be able to start for us. Equally Swansea couldn't then replace him either.

Anyway, none of that is going to happen. He;s got a defined release clause, it's not even the end of the season. Martin is not going to be the manager on Sunday so it doesn't matter that much right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Crab Lungs said:

Apparently we’re haggling over compensation. 800k for him and his staff.

What is 800k to Saints in this day in age? If you want the guy and he’s your no1, go get him. Don’t fart arse around like you have transfers over the past few seasons, then miss out and say ‘oh well, we tried hard’
This fuckking club, honestly.

Bearing in mind the value for money we got in the January transfer window, we are probably haggling over the price because they're asking £800k and we keep offering £2m.

  • Haha 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Nolan said:

Swansea had Strikers managed by Russell Martin, in a style of Play Managed by Russell Martin.

There is a transfer window and two months before the championship season starts, so why and earth presume the squad we'll start with then?

 

Also, dont forget: One player links Southampton and Swansea. Michael Obafemi. in 21/22 Martin got 12 Goals out of him.

Fair enough. How many goals did RL get when we were promoted? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be very silly if we werent haggling.

Swansea know we're getting massive parachute payments so would sensibly try and push for as much as they can get.

Thats business 

Edited by Nolan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Ex Lion Tamer said:

Like Mourinho and Wenger 🤔

When Les Reed walked into the managers office at Charlton, some short sighted people said he would fail because he wasn't a former top player with big league experience.

Edited by CB Fry
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, The Cat said:

If that amount is correct and Crab Lungs was right about the haggling then it seems we have negotiated a lower amount and the board should be congratulated.

Half price manager! Go SR!

Time will tell if half price was still too much 🙂

Can only hope he turns out to be among our best ever, like I hope for all appointments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, sandwichsaint said:

If Martin does start work next week then the board are to be congratulated for getting on with it. 
 

no excuses now not to get the players in and out early and a decent pre-season.

Yeah totally agree.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s been Fabrizio’d. Looks like a three year deal, to be announced this afternoon. You’d think we made the Selles statement today so that we can go ahead and announce it now. Might not be everyone’s choice but I like how early we have got this done, so much to do in a short space of time before the season starts.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Dusic said:

Some of this is interesting and an insight into what he was dealing with in January. Reminded me a bit of the Maddison situation that Les Reed recently described where we almost had Maddison but had to waste time getting an approval from China.

Obviously he kind of toes the line of really slagging the owners off but it did much on either side to strengthen the relationships.

IMO he comes across as a collaborative person who clearly cares about his staff and players - and also who is quite open and chatty which fans usually prefer.

 

 

Watched the whole thing and I think Martin comes over very well. An earnest and solid person, which will get him some slack at Saints. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Miltonaggro said:

Watched the whole thing and I think Martin comes over very well. An earnest and solid person, which will get him some slack at Saints. 

He did come across well. That was a difficult time. It looked as though he was going to stray over the line a few times, but used the close relationships he had with others in the process, to show the all round frustration. It's exactly the scenario he shouldn't have here, with the money man on the board and a lot to do very quickly. There are links in that video to why he left, and I don't think he'd be best placed to have another window where all the business was done, or falls through, at the end.

But Selles and others come across well. In the end it's the results. Needing to do so much might mean it's a little tougher to build the same closeness. And we need to have that core in place as early as possible to give him every chance in pre season. A lot of that money we utterly wasted would be very handy now to get a few early deals over the line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, beatlesaint said:

He's had a hand in the appointment according to Jacob Tanswell of The Athletic. 

judging by the fact we handed the Man City assistant the job, that must’ve been Wilcox choice. I have the feeling Russell Martin is Dane Greasy’s man. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lighthouse changed the title to Russell Martin

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...