Gloucester Saint Posted February 21 Posted February 21 2 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said: 0-5 against the worst away team in the League...that's worse. They’re not the worst team away team since though!
TheAlehouseBrawlers Posted February 21 Posted February 21 FFS, we're this fookin shit because we never got rid sooner, we were already cooked long before Juric rolled up. 9
Farmer Saint Posted February 21 Posted February 21 6 minutes ago, CB Fry said: This is bullshit being that the team were putting out is basically the one that came up. The squad we have right now would be top 4 no bother. RM conceded 63 goals against last season. The man can't set up a defence even the Championship with one of the most expensive squads. We're well shot of him and other managers are available to take us back up. "Togetherness" and "identity" just comes from winning. TBF, we have conceded more per game with Juric as Manager...but luckily as you said a number of times, it can't get any worse!! And as I said, it can when SR are picking managers.
Gloucester Saint Posted February 21 Posted February 21 1 minute ago, Farmer Saint said: TBF, we have conceded more per game with Juric as Manager...but luckily as you said a number of times, it can't get any worse!! And as I said, it can when SR are picking managers. Rasmus and Spores probably watched Leicester tonight, and instead of clearing out the stables, they are instead preparing them for RVN.
trousers Posted February 21 Posted February 21 12 minutes ago, The Kraken said: Quite right. 0-5 at half time to Tottenham was perfectly good. Admirable, even. Definitely gotten worse since that display. No doubt. 4 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said: 0-5 against the worst away team in the League...that's worse. One result after the manager had been in post for 14 days and the other result after the manager had been in post for 905 days. Yep, definitely comparing like-with-like... 1
Farmer Saint Posted February 21 Posted February 21 1 minute ago, Gloucester Saint said: They’re not the worst team away team since though! No, results like that can help to pick up teams. It should have been 12, and we should have been in our Honeymoon period. The fact is we haven't conceded less than 60 in a season since the 2017/2018 season.
Farmer Saint Posted February 21 Posted February 21 1 minute ago, trousers said: One result after the manager had been in post for 14 days and the other result after the manager had been in post for 905 days. Yep, definitely comparing like-with-like... You'd imagine the second manager would do better though, wouldn't you? New Managers tend to do better initially, rather than ones getting towards the end of their tenure.
Gloucester Saint Posted February 21 Posted February 21 1 minute ago, Farmer Saint said: The fact is we haven't conceded less than 60 in a season since the 2017/2018 season. 🤦♂️ A dog with diarrhoea would be more solid.
Gloucester Saint Posted February 21 Posted February 21 Just now, Farmer Saint said: You'd imagine the second manager would do better though, wouldn't you? New Managers tend to do better initially, rather than ones getting towards the end of their tenure. Very unlikely he will be here in June, whatever Solak said on TalkSPORT frankly.
austsaint Posted February 21 Posted February 21 4 minutes ago, trousers said: One result after the manager had been in post for 14 days and the other result after the manager had been in post for 905 days. Yep, definitely comparing like-with-like... Fact checking seems to have gone out of fashion all over the place. Let the Farmer have his day in the sun - he’s another still grieving the loss of Russ. 1
trousers Posted February 21 Posted February 21 Just now, Farmer Saint said: You'd imagine the second manager would do better though, wouldn't you? New Managers tend to do better initially, rather than ones getting towards the end of their tenure. Depends what level of shite they inherit I guess...? (If it's a good enough excuse for Sir Kier Starmer... )
Farmer Saint Posted February 21 Posted February 21 Just now, Gloucester Saint said: 🤦♂️ A dog with diarrhoea would be more solid. And this is what I've been saying for the god knows how long. Our defence is dog shite, has been for years. This is due to player recruitment and coaching. It has spanned 8 managers. 2
Farmer Saint Posted February 21 Posted February 21 Just now, trousers said: Depends what level of shite they inherit I guess...? (If it's a good enough excuse for Sir Kier Starmer... ) But then you can't blame RM for it either then...
Farmer Saint Posted February 21 Posted February 21 1 minute ago, austsaint said: Fact checking seems to have gone out of fashion all over the place. Let the Farmer have his day in the sun - he’s another still grieving the loss of Russ. Check those facts then - prove me wrong. My guess is you won't, as you can't.
trousers Posted February 21 Posted February 21 1 minute ago, Farmer Saint said: But then you can't blame RM for it either then... Not entirely, I agree... 1
trousers Posted February 21 Posted February 21 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said: And this is what I've been saying for the god knows how long. Our defence is dog shite, has been for years. This is due to player recruitment and coaching. It has spanned 8 managers. Some might argue our defenders were some of the best in the Championship last season (on paper... I'm sure @Matthew Le God will correct me if I'm wrong ) but the system being played contributed significantly to our poor goals-against tally, less so the relative quality of the players (for a change). But I totally agree that we haven't had a premier league standard defence for many seasons now. Edited February 21 by trousers 1
Farmer Saint Posted February 21 Posted February 21 4 minutes ago, trousers said: Some might argue our defenders were some of the best in the Championship last season (on paper... I'm sure @Matthew Le God will correct me if I'm wrong ) but the system being played contributed significantly to our poor goals-against tally, less so the relative quality of the players (for a change). But I totally agree that we haven't had a premier league standard defence for many seasons now. I don't think many Saints fans would argue that Stephens and Bednarek are the best in any division - and I don't think KWP is any good defensively either. 1
trousers Posted February 21 Posted February 21 2 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said: I don't think many Saints fans would argue that Stephens and Bednarek are the best in any division - and I don't think KWP is any good defensively either. I think some Saints fans would argue certain points ad-infinitum... 2
Colinjb Posted February 21 Posted February 21 So, Foxes fans vent fury, we vent............... er.............. What exactly? 1
Lighthouse Posted February 21 Posted February 21 5 minutes ago, Colinjb said: So, Foxes fans vent fury, we vent............... er.............. What exactly? And that'll achieve what, exactly?
Farmer Saint Posted February 22 Posted February 22 1 hour ago, trousers said: I think some Saints fans would argue certain points ad-infinitum... Really? If they do they don't understand football. Entitled to their opinions of course, but so are a lot of clueless people. 2
SouSaint Posted February 22 Posted February 22 5 hours ago, Farmer Saint said: No, results like that can help to pick up teams. It should have been 12, and we should have been in our Honeymoon period. The fact is we haven't conceded less than 60 in a season since the 2017/2018 season. Janny fucking B. 3
CB Fry Posted February 22 Posted February 22 7 hours ago, Colinjb said: So, Foxes fans vent fury, we vent............... er.............. What exactly? Maybe you could organise one of your boycotts that involves piling money into the club's tills? 1
Gloucester Saint Posted February 22 Posted February 22 (edited) 3 hours ago, SouSaint said: Janny fucking B. TBF, what 150 PL appearances for £6m? Can’t moan at the value, issue is the club hasn’t spent the £25-30m required in that position. Probably only should’ve been a squad player but Wesley Hoedt at £17m/£35m in todays value yet appalling and wasn’t good enough for Watford last season, and Vestergaard who can’t run (amazingly we got our money back - cheers Brendan!). Then we went down the Lidl route with Lyanco, ABK and not replacing an ageing Yoshida or non-developing Stephens. Edited February 22 by Gloucester Saint 2
austsaint Posted February 22 Posted February 22 27 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: TBF, what 150 PL appearances for £6m? Can’t moan at the value, issue is the club hasn’t spent the £25-30m required in that position. Probably only should’ve been a squad player but Wesley Hoedt at £17m/£35m in todays value yet appalling and wasn’t good enough for Watford last season, and Vestergaard who can’t run (amazingly we got our money back - cheers Brendan!). Then we went down the Lidl route with Lyanco, ABK and not replacing an ageing Yoshida or non-developing Stephens. Yes, it’s been a decent spiral in CB quality if you take a line through the likes of Claus, Svensson, Fonte, Toby, VVD. 2
Dr Who? Posted February 22 Posted February 22 18 hours ago, The Kraken said: I think Dr Who is the one who made up some complete bunkum about new boy Johannes Spores. Tried to appear itk but got his facts completely muddled. So I’m gonna go out on a limb and suggest he might, just maybe, be full of it. Nope not me. I am not itk about anything Saints anymore and not for a good 15 years fella.
Lee On Solent Saint Posted February 22 Posted February 22 32 minutes ago, FarehamSaintJames said: Martin In. 😉 Lucy Pinder 1
aintforever Posted February 22 Posted February 22 Juric is making him look like a football genius at the moment. 2
Football Special Posted February 22 Posted February 22 10 minutes ago, aintforever said: Juric is making him look like a football genius at the moment. I'd say both shit managers with stupid commitment to systems ignoring basic football organisation, difference is Martin had a rapport with players who I think bought into his philosophy, Juric is out on his own , no way these players are playing for him 2
aintforever Posted February 22 Posted February 22 5 minutes ago, Football Special said: I'd say both shit managers with stupid commitment to systems ignoring basic football organisation, difference is Martin had a rapport with players who I think bought into his philosophy, Juric is out on his own , no way these players are playing for him A good manager gets the players to play for him, that’s his job. 1
trousers Posted February 22 Posted February 22 57 minutes ago, FarehamSaintJames said: Martin In. 😉 House!
LGTL Posted February 22 Posted February 22 5 minutes ago, Football Special said: I'd say both shit managers with stupid commitment to systems ignoring basic football organisation, difference is Martin had a rapport with players who I think bought into his philosophy, Juric is out on his own , no way these players are playing for him I’d say this is pretty much where we are. The cool boss who let you do whatever you wanted with minimal consequences has just been let go. He let you have days off whenever you wanted and brought his ex glamour model mrs on the Christmas party. He’s now replaced with a complete authoritarian who happily tells you you’re fucking useless and get you in doing laps 7 days a week. A true SR masterclass. 3
Holmes_and_Watson Posted February 22 Posted February 22 3 hours ago, FarehamSaintJames said: Martin In. 😉 2 hours ago, trousers said: House! Housemartins? No happy hours here 🙂 1
Pamplemousse Posted February 24 Posted February 24 Looks like he's in line for the Rangers job. How much will they offer for Manning, Wood, Fraser and Downes? 1 1
Holmes_and_Watson Posted February 24 Posted February 24 37 minutes ago, Pamplemousse said: Looks like he's in line for the Rangers job. How much will they offer for Manning, Wood, Fraser and Downes? Good luck to him there. 50 passes with no end product against sides they are expected (however realistically) to dominate and impose themselves against, is going to end badly. He's going to have to solve a lot of the issues he faced at his other clubs, on not a great budget. A fair number of others also in contention. Any of Manning, Wood, Fraser or Downes would be great signings for him. Can't see them paying those wage levels though.
Weston Super Saint Posted February 24 Posted February 24 9 hours ago, Pamplemousse said: Looks like he's in line for the Rangers job. How much will they offer for Manning, Wood, Fraser and Downes? Are you sure? I thought he was destined for a top European club. 1
Football Special Posted February 24 Posted February 24 9 hours ago, Pamplemousse said: Looks like he's in line for the Rangers job. How much will they offer for Manning, Wood, Fraser and Downes? That would be a great job for him to be fair, and means we can stop paying him 3
Gloucester Saint Posted February 24 Posted February 24 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Football Special said: That would be a great job for him to be fair, and means we can stop paying him It would be a good appointment for them and him if he’s had time to reflect self-critically on why things didn’t go as well this season. With the exception of 100mph Old Firm games, possession based will work for a big fish in that league and probably in Europe if he adapts it. Big club and profile even if the SPL is weak. In terms of SFC personnel, Aribo is a legend up there but wages would be an issue unless Joe swaps length of contract slightly taking into account the relegation reduction. Manning is likely, but I don’t think Rangers can afford the fee for Downes unless their new owners really put their hand in their pocket. I don’t know what their keeper is like but Bazanu on loan might suit him, Saints and Martin. Fraser likes the south coast of England and could still do a job in the Champ next year. Edited February 24 by Gloucester Saint
Football Special Posted February 24 Posted February 24 7 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: It would be a good appointment for them and him if he’s had time to reflect self-critically on why things didn’t go as well this season. With the exception of 100mph Old Firm games, possession based will work for a big fish in that league and probably in Europe if he adapts it. Big club and profile even if the SPL is weak. In terms of SFC personnel, Aribo is a legend up there but wages would be an issue unless Joe swaps length of contract slightly taking into account the relegation reduction. Manning is likely, but I don’t think Rangers can afford the fee for Downes unless their new owners really put their hand in their pocket. I don’t know what their keeper is like but Bazanu on loan might suit him, Saints and Martin. Fraser likes the south coast of England and could still do a job in the Champ next year. I'm not sure any of our Republic of Ireland players would be too popular at Ibrox 2
Gloucester Saint Posted February 24 Posted February 24 Just now, Football Special said: I'm not sure any of our Republic of Ireland players would be too popular at Ibrox Russell’s loan spell there towards the end of his playing career wasn't too stellar either.
HarvSFC Posted February 24 Posted February 24 Add Stephens and Smallbone to the list of players Rangers could hopefully afford. 5
Farmer Saint Posted February 24 Posted February 24 10 hours ago, Holmes_and_Watson said: Good luck to him there. 50 passes with no end product against sides they are expected (however realistically) to dominate and impose themselves against, is going to end badly. We scored 87 goals last season (5 less than Ipswich in top) with the largest number of created chances and second best XG, in a league we were expected to dominate. Stop talking rubbish - he'll probably do very well at Rangers. 1
TheAlehouseBrawlers Posted February 24 Posted February 24 Great job for him if it's confirmed. I think he'll do well as long as he does something that he's not really done so far in his managerial career, and that's not concede 60+ goals each season (even in a successful one). Wonder if he's still insistent on not deviating from his possession-obsession.
Gloucester Saint Posted February 24 Posted February 24 2 minutes ago, TheAlehouseBrawlers said: Great job for him if it's confirmed. I think he'll do well as long as he does something that he's not really done so far in his managerial career, and that's not concede 60+ goals each season (even in a successful one). Wonder if he's still insistent on not deviating from his possession-obsession. From what I can gather, he’s one of 3 names, Barry Ferguson interim manager.
CB Fry Posted February 24 Posted February 24 2 minutes ago, TheAlehouseBrawlers said: Great job for him if it's confirmed. I think he'll do well as long as he does something that he's not really done so far in his managerial career, and that's not concede 60+ goals each season (even in a successful one). Wonder if he's still insistent on not deviating from his possession-obsession. It's not confirmed- they've appointed Barry Ferguson (with coaching from Neil McCann) until the end of the season. Agree though - Rangers would be perfect for Russell Martin and he'd do pretty well there. I don't think he's getting a better job than that. 1
TheAlehouseBrawlers Posted February 24 Posted February 24 3 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: From what I can gather, he’s one of 3 names, Barry Ferguson interim manager. 2 minutes ago, CB Fry said: It's not confirmed- they've appointed Barry Ferguson (with coaching from Neil McCann) until the end of the season. Agree though - Rangers would be perfect for Russell Martin and he'd do pretty well there. I don't think he's getting a better job than that. Ah, when I heard he was linked I thought it was probably likely, just seems a good fit (and ex-Rangers). Yep, as good a job as he could expect to get if it eventually happens.
Whitey Grandad Posted February 24 Posted February 24 51 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said: We scored 87 goals last season (5 less than Ipswich in top) with the largest number of created chances and second best XG, in a league we were expected to dominate. Stop talking rubbish - he'll probably do very well at Rangers. 87 goals is the only figure that matters. Chances created and certainly xG are figments of somebody’s imagination. 1
Gloucester Saint Posted February 24 Posted February 24 (edited) 1 hour ago, HarvSFC said: Add Stephens and Smallbone to the list of players Rangers could hopefully afford. Smallbone is a good shout for either of the Old Firm. Good footballer, nice touch, passing range and can finish well. Just hasn’t got a physique suited to English football at all unless he’s willing to really work at it, and if he can’t, Old Firm and European football might work for Will as long as Saints weren’t too greedy on the fee eg £5-8m. Celtic probably better with the RoI connection. Edited February 24 by Gloucester Saint
Chez Posted February 24 Posted February 24 10 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: Smallbone is a good shout for either of the Old Firm. Good footballer, nice touch, passing range and can finish well. Just hasn’t got a physique suited to English football at all unless he’s willing to really work at it, and if he can’t, Old Firm and European football might work for Will as long as Saints weren’t too greedy on the fee eg £5-8m. Celtic probably better with the RoI connection. We rejected a £7m bid from Sheff United this summer, supposedly. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now