Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 minutes ago, madge said:

I seem to recall the majority wrote off Sadio Mane when he first arrived… lad needs time. He’s got some talent. 

Abuse of Sadio continued till he left. Our 'fans' are cruel.
No wonder we have worst home record

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, Dellman said:

Abuse of Sadio continued till he left. Our 'fans' are cruel.
No wonder we have worst home record

Jesus wept.

Posted

I think this thread is pretty brutal tbh, a young lad, new league, mid season joining a completely disjointed club who is bottom…it’s not a big surprise. He’s got talent, no doubt about that. Not sure he was the right signing this January though….

  • Like 14
Posted
4 hours ago, Dellman said:

Abuse of Sadio continued till he left. Our 'fans' are cruel.
No wonder we have worst home record

I still remember the chorus of boos when he scored that fastest hat trick in PL history. My ears are still ringing. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Whitey Grandad said:

No, not his fault, but is an inexperienced prospect what we really need in our situation?

Like Orsic?

Posted
9 hours ago, Dellman said:

Abuse of Sadio continued till he left. Our 'fans' are cruel.
No wonder we have worst home record

it’s a football game what do you expect, unless you believe that pompey myth we could be absolute shit every week and we’d still happy clap. maybe in one off games, but if you have been a shit for as long as we have what do you expect?

Mane got abuse for the first few appearances because he was pretty shit ie sheffield united away. the main one was pelle for continuously doing those flicks instead of heading the ball, due to not wanting to mess up his hair. as time passes we look down on this, but if someone did random flicks now instead of trying to get us forward for a much needed goal you’d still moan surely

Unless you’re at a club for a long time with good performances such as ward-prowse most fans moan at anyone. it isn’t specific to saints. 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Chez said:

Like Orsic?

Exactly - the youngsters aren’t the problem at this club it’s the experienced players who everyone tells me are good by default, that have not delivered 

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Saint Garrett said:

I think this thread is pretty brutal tbh, a young lad, new league, mid season joining a completely disjointed club who is bottom…it’s not a big surprise. He’s got talent, no doubt about that. 

Exactly this and thank goodness at least somebody on here has half a brain. These threads are sickening, one sh*t stirrer starts a slag and lo and behold and predictably half the forum cognoscenti chips in with the abuse, even some old stalwarts who should be above this sort of thing.

  • Like 3
Posted

I want our midfield or defenders to release him into space more often to run at them.

Happy with him so far giving the learning curve, needs to get goal and i think more will flow with his confidence up.

  • Like 2
Posted
10 hours ago, Saint Garrett said:

I think this thread is pretty brutal tbh, a young lad, new league, mid season joining a completely disjointed club who is bottom…it’s not a big surprise. He’s got talent, no doubt about that. Not sure he was the right signing this January though….

Spot on.

Posted

Use his pace, stop overlapping him. Give him the ball or through balls. Get Onuachu into the box, forget trying to get him pressing in the midfield. Get Alcaraz up with him. maybe play KWP in front of AMN. Forget as starters, Elyonoussie, Adams, Armstrong etc they won't get goals. If we are going to play Adams get him up alongside Onuachu and stay onside for once.

  • Like 2
Posted

This thread is up there with one of the most ill-informed on here. 

The comparison with Mane is clear, both in the style of play and the way posters who have no idea about ability or potential write a player off. 

He is younger than Mane, and probably joined at a harder time and started better. 

He wasn't great in midweek, but in a bad team performance it was clear he had ability on the ball and did OK. 

I used to love the way Mane would run at defenders, then stop and wait, knowing he could burst past them. 

Enjoyed seeing that done again today. 

Posters complained that Mane was a waste of money and not up to the level. He clearly was, even from the start, at least a decent player. So is Sulemana. 

Too early to say how good he will be but definately a decent signing. 

  • Like 13
Posted

Worth remembering that Kamaldeen only played more than 45 minutes once this season for Stade Renais.

he only played 314 minutes in 14 games in Ligue 1.

We don't want to have a situation where we lose him for long periods.

 

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Nolan said:

Worth remembering that Kamaldeen only played more than 45 minutes once this season for Stade Renais.

he only played 314 minutes in 14 games in Ligue 1.

We don't want to have a situation where we lose him for long periods.

 

 

And we paid how much for him ???

Posted
12 hours ago, Badger said:

And we paid how much for him ???

Bizarrely, when looking at other fees not much. 

 

£22 million.

 

Not in the top 100 fees for Premier league players. 

 

When you have other clubs paying 3 or 4 times that for players (Chelsea, Arsenal, Liverpool, Man C, Man U, Spurs, Newcastle) he is not anywhere near a premier league luxury level player. 

 

Even lower in the league many clubs pay more, or in some cases a lot more (Villa 33m, Bournemouth 25m, Palace 27m, Everton 45m,  Fulham 27m, Leeds 36m, Leicester 35m, Nottingham F 43m, West ham 45m, Wolves 42m).

 

Clearly has decent potential and for his age, and natural pace doesn't seem over priced in the current market. 

 

 

Posted

Once we've worked out how to get him into dangerous areas and then actually manage to give him the ball there he's going to be a massive threat.

Teams already aware of his pace so have been defending tight to him, denying space to turn. 

He's a young and relatively inexperienced player, although unfortunately we don't really have time to wait for him to really bed into the team and need him to perform now if we're going to stay up.

Another player who will be extremely important when we go down.

Posted

Just judging from the highlights, but he looked vastly improved on his recent performances.

As per West End's post, he is obviously going to be likened to Mane and he had plenty of critics when he was here, and not without reason. He could be unbelievable, but would often go missing. This lad hasn't gone missing in his bad perfromances, he has just been genuinely awful. His display at Old Trafford was desperate, which in a resoundingly solid team display, is some achievement.

Still very raw, obviously, and if we can nurture him in the right way he will be a right handful. His decision making needs vastly improving, though.

Posted
3 hours ago, saintscottofthenortham said:

Just judging from the highlights, but he looked vastly improved on his recent performances.

As per West End's post, he is obviously going to be likened to Mane and he had plenty of critics when he was here, and not without reason. He could be unbelievable, but would often go missing. This lad hasn't gone missing in his bad perfromances, he has just been genuinely awful. His display at Old Trafford was desperate, which in a resoundingly solid team display, is some achievement.

Still very raw, obviously, and if we can nurture him in the right way he will be a right handful. His decision making needs vastly improving, though.

There is a challenge in itself. How many players have improved in the last 5 years? While we’re obsessed with signing YHGTIers not many actually seem to improve much. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Lot of comparisons to Mane, but aren't they fairly different in style/position?  Mane is most effective playing narrowly, alongside a striker as he was/is very good at finding pockets of space between the lines.  Isn't Sulemana more of classic winger?

Could be wrong, but if he is a classic winger, it might explain why he's not starting in the 4-2-2-2 now it's back.

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

In a season of crazily bad signings, this guy may just be the worst in terms of value.

Players like him are ten a penny in this league and yet SR saw fit to spunk 22m on someone with three career goals.

It's just staggering how bad Rasmus has been at his job.

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, SambaMaverick said:

In a season of crazily bad signings, this guy may just be the worst in terms of value.

Players like him are ten a penny in this league and yet SR saw fit to spunk 22m on someone with three career goals.

It's just staggering how bad Rasmus has been at his job.

Onuachu has been worse. Bloke looks nowhere near a premier league level player.

At least with Sulemena there has been flashes. Still looking like a lot of money spunked on not a lot. 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Harry_SFC said:

Onuachu has been worse. Bloke looks nowhere near a premier league level player.

At least with Sulemena there has been flashes. Still looking like a lot of money spunked on not a lot. 

 

 

 

 

I think Onuachu will have some kind of resale value at least.

He has shown he can score lots of goals on the continent.

Meanwhile, Sulemana has shown he can... Run fast?

Posted
4 minutes ago, SambaMaverick said:

In a season of crazily bad signings, this guy may just be the worst in terms of value.

Players like him are ten a penny in this league and yet SR saw fit to spunk 22m on someone with three career goals.

It's just staggering how bad Rasmus has been at his job.

Indeed. He may develop into something but to splunk that money rather than simply recall our own player was despicable.

  • Like 5
Posted
8 minutes ago, SambaMaverick said:

In a season of crazily bad signings, this guy may just be the worst in terms of value.

Players like him are ten a penny in this league and yet SR saw fit to spunk 22m on someone with three career goals.

It's just staggering how bad Rasmus has been at his job.

Look on the bright side - we signed 2 useful croatians

  • Haha 3
Posted (edited)

I still think it's too early to judge him too harshly, he has come into the most dysfunctional group of losers the PL has ever seen. Hard for anyone to make a huge impact, especially when they're young. 

I imagine he'll be with us next year and with some confidence I reckon he'll be a threat. Too early to give up on him, ditto Ounachu - although he is starting to have Carillo vibes about him.

Edited by S-Clarke
  • Like 5
Posted

He looked amazing initially. Think he will come good, probably not helped ultimately having to be the main creative player in this team which isn't creative. Probably more to do with the tactics than him.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Pamplemousse said:

He looked amazing initially. Think he will come good, probably not helped ultimately having to be the main creative player in this team which isn't creative. Probably more to do with the tactics than him.

I like Sulemana - he's going to be a good player.  You have identified the problem though - in our current set up, he's the lone ranger running at the defence and showing a bit of creativity, with a bit of help from KWP.  

Posted

100% will be a good player, in the right team. Poor sod really does try his best with this utter shower of shite however unfortunately it almost brings him down to their levels and makes him ineffective. 
 

  • Like 2
Posted

He really is exciting to watch, but his powder puff shooting  and inability to stay on his feet frustrated me yesterday. 

Posted

I can at least see why we signed him. We needed a creative player with a bit of unpredictability in our incredibly dull attack.

Hasn't quite worked out yet but I don't think it's all down to him. I hope he sticks around next year and hasn't got some sort of relegation clause.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...