Jump to content

Summer Transfer Window 2023


FarehamSaintJames

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, The Kraken said:

Sounds like the first two are on, the third surely has zero chance of happening, Ings is on £125k a week and has two years left on his contract.

 

How things have changed!  I remember taking the piss out of Danny for the 'L' plates on his car, just before his move to Burnley where he would be on £10k per week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Saint Billy said:

I really didn't see many signs of A Armstrong refinding his level back in the championship. Lots of effort and energy but still no real threat.

Saints analysis did a breakdown of him pre SW, and, in the whole I do like that account BUT Armas game is based entirely about making late runs in behind… SW set up specifically as an extremely low block to stifle any space in behind them.. unfortunately I think it’ll be a common theme this year

We’ll be better playing off a striker in the mould of Che Adams who can occupy one of the oppositions CBs and contribute more in possession

Arma worked hard, but I don’t think he fits these tactics

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Saint Billy said:

I really didn't see many signs of A Armstrong refinding his level back in the championship. Lots of effort and energy but still no real threat.

I think if we do sign Matt Grimes that will help AA because he's brilliant at pinging very accurate passes into the channels which would give AA the chance to use his pace. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, saintant said:

I think if we do sign Matt Grimes that will help AA because he's brilliant at pinging very accurate passes into the channels which would give AA the chance to use his pace. 

Hitting the channels is something you'd hope most of our players could do. The issue for me will be whether AA could make the right runs, and whether Martin wants to play that way anyway. It seems that we'll need a forward better suited to getting the ball to feet and doing something with it and/or getting on the end of cute passes between the defence and being ruthless. Che would be perfect if he could actually finish! 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I know is being a fan of our club is better than being a fan of Ajax.

They look like they will lose this window - Tadic, Kudus, Alvarez, Timber and Bassey among others and only really bought Borges so far, they must be screwed financially now they aren't in the champions league this season.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sfcphilc said:

Apparently we're preparing to offer Tella a new contract.

That makes sense. Personally, I'd agree to to let him go next summer if we don't go up. Although I'd hope that that may make the difference, my instinct is that he'll go. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Smirking_Saint said:

Saints analysis did a breakdown of him pre SW, and, in the whole I do like that account BUT Armas game is based entirely about making late runs in behind… SW set up specifically as an extremely low block to stifle any space in behind them.. unfortunately I think it’ll be a common theme this year

We’ll be better playing off a striker in the mould of Che Adams who can occupy one of the oppositions CBs and contribute more in possession

Arma worked hard, but I don’t think he fits these tactics

Very decent point. 
We are set up to be devastating towards teams that want to attack us with a high press. In which case having three players up front ( AA,Edozie and NT who are all swift to latch onto calls out over the top is a good plan - BUT putting all our eggs into one stylistic basket. 
 

On the other hand Che Adams holds play up better than AA but lacks his pace imo. Having BOTH  available or players with those attributes is the better answer because the opposition teams will have to have to defend differently - in which case all good- but if we are not breaking teams down ( like last year) then holding CF players are going to be relatively more useful. Thats a big “if” as I suspect at Championship level we WILL be breaking teams down more often. 

I think Martin perhaps expected Shef weds to attack us more- being at home first match back up etc - and chose AA for Che accordingly - but the fact they did not should be a good pointer to what set up most teams will employ against us this season, and hence why it’s a good idea to have that plan b and c. 

Edited by gio1saints
SP and it did not make sense
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, egg said:

Hitting the channels is something you'd hope most of our players could do. The issue for me will be whether AA could make the right runs, and whether Martin wants to play that way anyway. It seems that we'll need a forward better suited to getting the ball to feet and doing something with it and/or getting on the end of cute passes between the defence and being ruthless. Che would be perfect if he could actually finish! 

He scored a lot of his goals for Blackburn by making runs into the channels. We've never used him that way which is why we've never seen the best of him. Poor bloke has been starved of the sort of service he thrives on.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Saint Billy said:

I really didn't see many signs of A Armstrong refinding his level back in the championship. Lots of effort and energy but still no real threat.

Lots of effort and energy to a point, I actually forgot he was playing in the second half. I keep willing him to do well but he remains ineffective. Still hoping he turns a corner.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Patches O Houlihan said:

Is there a scenario where Tall Paul can be fitted into our new style and is effective against the low block many teams will play against us? 
 

He ought to be good at both defensive and offensive set pieces too (and we’ve just employed an ex Brentford/Arsenal set piece specialist coach)

Ive not really seen anything from him that suggests he’s capable

His passing game for a start is awful unfortunately 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Patches O Houlihan said:

Is there a scenario where Tall Paul can be fitted into our new style and is effective against the low block many teams will play against us? 
 

He ought to be good at both defensive and offensive set pieces too (and we’ve just employed an ex Brentford/Arsenal set piece specialist coach)

Where is he ?? What’s going on there? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He’s been linked with Belgium and German clubs but nothing in the last week or two that I’ve seen. 
 

AA was so isolated from play in the 2nd half on Friday I was wondering if it would work to have 9 men playing total football, and 1 big stationary bloke stood in the six yard box between the posts who we chip the ball to. He either heads it in or knocks it down Pelle style to Charley or one of the wingers to finish off

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Patches O Houlihan said:

AA was surrounded by defenders cutting off space for a pass to him. An airborne pass wouldn’t work because of the size of the average Championship defender. 
 

But it might work if you had the Statue of Liberty playing striker…

We’re more dynamic than that, and to be fair Adams wins his fair share of aerial balls but also adds a lot more

For me its Adams or a new signing, with Arma being available if the game gets stretched

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Patches O Houlihan said:

AA was surrounded by defenders cutting off space for a pass to him. An airborne pass wouldn’t work because of the size of the average Championship defender. 
 

But it might work if you had the Statue of Liberty playing striker…

That’s obviously not on the Martin playbook but in certain situations it really makes sense.
If he leaves, as seems likely, so be it, but even a Man City can lob it long to Hoiland on occasion and it sticks due to his size ( strength pace and skill). Last CF we had that excited me at SMS had to go back to Chelsea unfortunately….

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That’s the issue really - Paul is hopeless at pressing, and movement of more than 10 yards. BUT he must have the knack of being in the right place at the right time in front of goal because of the number of goals he’s scored consistently in previous seasons. 
 

Don’t get me wrong I’d rather have a fit Danny Ings in that role but we’re a Championship side for now and don’t have that budget

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Patches O Houlihan said:

AA was surrounded by defenders cutting off space for a pass to him. An airborne pass wouldn’t work because of the size of the average Championship defender. 
 

But it might work if you had the Statue of Liberty playing striker…

Reminds me of the old Woody Allen line....."the last time I was inside a woman was during a visit to the Statue Of Liberty."

Can't see a future here for Paul O.   It all depends on the Adams situation - I'd be happy enough with Adams and AA,,,,,,back up from Mara.  Especially the case if Tella stays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Patches O Houlihan said:

Is there a scenario where Tall Paul can be fitted into our new style and is effective against the low block many teams will play against us? 
 

He ought to be good at both defensive and offensive set pieces too (and we’ve just employed an ex Brentford/Arsenal set piece specialist coach)

He would actually have suited that Wednesday game a lot. The number of crosses we put into the box where it was crying out for a big forward to get in the end of them!

Edited by Saint86
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, skintsaint said:

Wasn't even on the bench was he on Friday? That says where he is in the pecking order right now.

Was also not even mentioned by Martin when he was talking about strikers he had in the squad. Pretty sure all parties know he's off but because he'll need a wage cut I've got a hunch he's leaving it until the last minute to get one last big months pay :D 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, saintant said:

He could be the perfect replacement for KWP. Quick, good going forward and in recovery and can play on both sides.

Aarons is more of an up and down wing back and doesn't have the range of skills of KWP in my opinion, although he's probably faster than KWP and perhaps a better defender, but he would be less well suited to the close passing in tight areas that Russel Martin's style needs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, FarehamSaintJames said:

Agreed. He was linked with Arsenal for £40m a couple of years ago. 
Amazing how times change.

Still young, hopefully can kick on (if we do get him).

 

12 hours ago, Chez said:

Why aren't Prem sides going for him?

Surprised there isn’t Prem interest in him. Probably not at the Arsenal or North London Yobbo end of the market, but a Palace, Luton, Burnley or Everton. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Smirking_Saint said:

Ive not really seen anything from him that suggests he’s capable

His passing game for a start is awful unfortunately 

Tall Paul struck me as living proof of Brian Clough’s old comment of a player “who couldn’t trap a bag of cement”.

BUT on the occasions I’ve seen him he unsettled the Wolves defence a bit, and drew a good save from Fabianski in a match we’d created nothing in.
 

He might offer something as the often hyped ‘Plan B’ or ‘C’ , but that may seem a luxury if taking up a squad place better used by someone else. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, saint lard said:

Tenuous links that Tottenham might be interested.🤷🏻‍♂️ 

Once Hojbjerg has completed his move to Atletico, I fully expect Spurs to use the funds to bid for JWP.

It's the only club I could see him really "wanting" to go to (without European football). 

  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...