Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What or who is he? A conman, a professional bullshitter, someone who thinks he’s smarter than everyone else but over and over again proves otherwise or just a complete absolute fucking idiot? 

Surprised Solak has let him run/ruin the club for so long. If that was my investment I would be on the phone warning him that we have a meeting the next and that he shouldn’t be shocked to hear that the game was over. Seriously I cannot think of a way how to do a worse job than him. 

Every fucking thing he has done at the club was the wrong decision. Not buying a striker last summer, squandering money on poor/cheap players instead of investing in players that improve the starting 11, waiting with sacking Ralph (if you wanted rid of him, do it the day after the last match of the season), Nathan fucking Jones, the scouting department, the list goes on. 

The good days of Adkins, Pochetinno and Koeman seem so far away.

  • Like 3
Posted
11 minutes ago, Dr. Kucho said:

What or who is he? A conman, a professional bullshitter, someone who thinks he’s smarter than everyone else but over and over again proves otherwise or just a complete absolute fucking idiot? 

Surprised Solak has let him run/ruin the club for so long. If that was my investment I would be on the phone warning him that we have a meeting the next and that he shouldn’t be shocked to hear that the game was over. Seriously I cannot think of a way how to do a worse job than him. 

Every fucking thing he has done at the club was the wrong decision. Not buying a striker last summer, squandering money on poor/cheap players instead of investing in players that improve the starting 11, waiting with sacking Ralph (if you wanted rid of him, do it the day after the last match of the season), Nathan fucking Jones, the scouting department, the list goes on. 

The good days of Adkins, Pochetinno and Koeman seem so far away.

Send for Cortese, he'll sort it

  • Like 1
Posted
14 hours ago, Dr. Kucho said:

What or who is he? A conman, a professional bullshitter, someone who thinks he’s smarter than everyone else but over and over again proves otherwise or just a complete absolute fucking idiot? 

All of the above.

 

Posted

I think Ankersen has been exposed and seen.  Solak likely to wait until the end of the season but I think he's done at Saints, probably done in football.  Best description to add to the above appropriate suggestions is a busted flush. 

Posted
18 minutes ago, Miltonaggro said:

I think Ankersen has been exposed and seen.  Solak likely to wait until the end of the season but I think he's done at Saints, probably done in football.  Best description to add to the above appropriate suggestions is a busted flush. 

As one of only two Directors of SR, he owns the club so not like he can be fired like an employee. Solak and Kraft could of course force him out but that’s highly unlikely I would say. 

Our only hope is that day-to-day control of the club is handed back to Semmens (generally) and Wilcox (football matters) and he goes back to scouting new clubs to buy. 

Posted

I think the man needs a reality check and to realise that the decisions he has participated in ultimately will cost us our Premiership status with the current trajectory.

I think the man believes own hype like he is some form of scouting guru and is a level above everyone becuase of XG, Spreadsheets and big words...

Now don't get me wrong I'm not a negative Nancy I was willing to give Sports Republic a fair chance and was optimistic when they came in. 

But now I'm in a position where I am left scratching my head. Thinking how could a organisation possibly mess up tensureship of our club so badly...... 

Rasmus please do us all a favour take a back seat leave the footballing decisions and football philosophy to actual footballing men.

Oh wait that's the issue we currently do not have any..... 

Solution is obvious get some footballing men in at board level who will set the standards across the board. 

Also give the black box a kick clearly isn't working 🤣

 

 

  • Like 3
Posted

Never trust a man who writes the type of bullshit books that Ankersen puts his name to. In general these sort of authors fill the pages with a load of self-indulgent waffle and none of it has the remotest connection to real life. The brains at Brentford is still there and, when Ankersen left, they didn't even bother replacing him. He talks a good game but there is no substance to him.

  • Like 3
Posted
2 hours ago, SW11_Saint said:

As one of only two Directors of SR, he owns the club so not like he can be fired like an employee. Solak and Kraft could of course force him out but that’s highly unlikely I would say. 

Our only hope is that day-to-day control of the club is handed back to Semmens (generally) and Wilcox (football matters) and he goes back to scouting new clubs to buy. 

Can't be fired in the employment law sense but easily removed for his abject failure, as always in these situations money talks and bullshit walks and it's clear where those qualities lie in this set up.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Pilchards said:

Wilcox won’t work with him so IMHO he has to go.

Is this opinion or is there trouble in paradise already? 

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Pilchards said:

Wilcox won’t work with him so IMHO he has to go.

Eh? Wilcox won't work with the boss/owner who employed him...? Call me old fashioned but you'd have thought that ever so minor stumbling block would have come to light during the job interview....? ;)

Edited by trousers
Posted
4 minutes ago, revolution saint said:

He’s a cunt

Interesting point you make, I’ll run an algorithm on it and come back to you, but early indications are your theory may have substance 

Posted
2 hours ago, Toussaint said:

Interesting point you make, I’ll run an algorithm on it and come back to you, but early indications are your theory may have substance 

You'll need a spreadsheet with xG on it.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, revolution saint said:

 

We should have a poll.  My suggestions are:

A.  Football visionary

B.  Slightly misguided but has some good ideas that will ultimately benefit us

C. An alien

D.  Hipster bullshitter

E. CUNT

E unless C includes reptilian shapeshifters, in which case E and C

Edited by Toussaint
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Greedyfly said:

You'll need a spreadsheet with xG on it.

xC in this instance, however, I can confirm results are now in and the original hypothesis has been proven correct 

Edited by Toussaint
  • Haha 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...