Holmes_and_Watson Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 DCC was done far too easily for that one. Always a chance with the game getting stretched. But disapointing for it to be down to such another obvious error. But as I type. NJ's goal machine pulls it back!
Convict Colony Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 Hahaha what a terrible goal but I'll take it
saintscottofthenortham Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 GTTTTTFFFFIRFIIFIFIFFIFIFIFIFIFIF IN
Colinjb Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 No way is he intending to handling it. But we never get these kind of decisions. 1
Holmes_and_Watson Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 Well doen AA. Great to see all that effort pay off.
OttawaSaint Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 None of that would have happened if AA hadn't chased down the original ball to the touchline. Or if he'd stayed down.
RedArmy Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 How is he meant to get his arm out of the way when it bounces off a thigh 6 inches away
Holmes_and_Watson Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 Oh come on. How could he possibly have doen anything differently there.
Saint NL Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 The FA just received a call from the Saudis and the goal is ruled out 1 2
Suhari Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 Fucks sake. At their place, if it was them, that goal stands. 1
Tanlee Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 (edited) The worst thing about having Che upfront, it's a constant reminder of what you could have won Edited 24 January, 2023 by Tanlee 4
SNSUN Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 We really aren't getting much rub of the green this season. Still, tie isn't over yet.
jawillwill Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 Everyone ignoring the fact Armstrong is being pushed over as he "handball's" it? 1 1
Holmes_and_Watson Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 VAR denies us yet again. 2 games on the bounce. Utter nonsense. 2
adrian lord Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 Well, that’s clearly the VAR people making up for the “error” with the first disallowed Newcastle “goal”.
The Kraken Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 It doesn’t have to go in off his hand, it just has to hit his hand at some point in the movement. It’s rightly chalked off. 3
OttawaSaint Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 I thought they decided that it can't be handball if deflected at that close. That's what they said for Matty Cash against us. VAR just makes up the rules as it goes. FUCKING BULLSHIT! 6 1
Saint NL Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 You can see that it's sucked the life out the players. Game over, such a shame as we were on top before that
Sheaf Saint Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 Annoying, but if the Joelinton one in the first half is disallowed then that has to be too. Can't really complain. 2
sammysaint93 Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 On 24/01/2023 at 21:40, Suhari said: Fucks sake. At their place, if it was them, that goal stands. Expand Did you watch the first half?
DT Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 VAR really hates us. But we should be ahead anyway again. But we have Che Adams. And we never score massive clear cut opportunities because he is so dire. And we still play him. And it happens again.
OttawaSaint Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 Feels so much worse to score, celebrate like crazy and then have this VAR bullshit. Worse than if he'd just blasted it over the bar. I hate it!
Sheaf Saint Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 On 24/01/2023 at 21:41, OttawaSaint said: I thought they decided that it can't be handball if deflected at that close. That's what they said for Matty Cash against us. VAR just makes up the rules as it goes. FUCKING BULLSHIT! Expand The difference with that one was that it hit (well... grazed) his knee first. Not so just now.
Yorkshire Saint Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 Same as the league game at St Mary's v Newcastle ... Adams has to score when he had that chance and its a different game. How many ways can the club not see we need a new striker. 1
Ball boy Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 Pretty sure it has to go straight in to be ‘rightly chalked off’ so yet again car has let us down.
obelisk Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 If it's a defender that is not handball. Different laws for attackers and defenders is making football look ridiculous. 1
CB Fry Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 On 24/01/2023 at 21:42, sammysaint93 said: Did you watch the first half? Expand This is why people think that VAR is always against us. They can't even remember a VAR decision going in our favour in the same bloody game about an hour ago. 1
Holmes_and_Watson Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 I'm thinking NJ needs a warmer jacket. He looks really cold and sniffley in that one.
The Kraken Posted 24 January, 2023 Posted 24 January, 2023 On 24/01/2023 at 21:41, OttawaSaint said: I thought they decided that it can't be handball if deflected at that close. That's what they said for Matty Cash against us. VAR just makes up the rules as it goes. FUCKING BULLSHIT! Expand It’s not bullshit, it’s different rules for strikers and defenders. If it hits the strikers arm at all, no matter whatever else, it’s handball. It’s not a conspiracy Ffs. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now