Jump to content

Nathan Jones


AlexLaw76
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, OldNick said:

I wonder why the club failed to give him no more than a 15 word send off? I know his tenure was not good but to be so blunt is a surprise

The usual cliches "would like to thank X for his work while at the club' or "would like to wish X the best for the future" are trotted out even when things haven't ended well.

The fact that the club wouldn't even get these out through gritted teeth, speaks volumes about how divisive and unliked he made himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Holmes_and_Watson said:

Laughed out loud several times when reading that this morning, but none more so than the final speech bubble. Genius. 

D65AD356-A32B-440C-86E6-A6C1A65E55B8.jpeg

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Despite having two articles that pillory him today, the Guardian’s Football Pod made the point that his own ludicrous outbursts will sadly now follow him around - possibly for the rest of his career, and possibly to the detriment of his  mental health. Hopefully he’ll take some time out to recuperate before returning to football/Luton.  

https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/football-weekly/id188674007?i=1000599393530

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, SW11_Saint said:

Despite having two articles that pillory him today, the Guardian’s Football Pod made the point that his own ludicrous outbursts will sadly now follow him around - possibly for the rest of his career, and possibly to the detriment of his  mental health. Hopefully he’ll take some time out to recuperate before returning to football/Luton.  

https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/football-weekly/id188674007?i=1000599393530

As angry as we've all been recently, and as much as we jest, he his human, and he certainly wouldn't have wanted this to end the way it has. Granted we needed the change, but hopefully he'll find somewhere to restart his career. 

  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Southner said:

As angry as we've all been recently, and as much as we jest, he his human, and he certainly wouldn't have wanted this to end the way it has. Granted we needed the change, but hopefully he'll find somewhere to restart his career. 

It's clear from all the other forums and former players that, despite reflection, he couldn't implement any of the hard lessons learnt after his time at Stoke. He talked about being himself in glowing terms. That turned out to be the case with all the traits he would have wanted to move away from too.

As it stands, he can certainly do a job driving a L1 side. Any success they have should be together, rather than him jumping ship. That way, if he gets promoted with them, he won't struggle to impose his ideas on "better" players.

Due to the premier League platform, he will find it harder, as future players/ chairpersons will have easy access to his interviews, and less than complimentary articles. Although even a quick look at wiki and win % would not help either.

I'd be surprised if anyone wanted it to end the way it did. One of the key questions is more how it was allowed to start, rather than pointing at NJ for taking the offer.

While never wishing ill of anyone, I can't say he'll be taking up too many of my thoughts in future, outside of cautionary posts on here. A little thought is that he takes Havant and Waterlooville to glory. But that's not a level he knows about, and he may be looking to come back somewhere higher up. 🙂

1 hour ago, Pengi said:

Not forgetting the two coaches that have lost their jobs too. 

Yeah. They were early in my thoughts. After the sheer relief. While NJ gets a big pay off, those guys will get far less. Part of the risk going with a manager. I wonder where they were while their boss was clearly compromising his principles though.

I have more sympathy for his Saints supporting relatives. It's harder for them to move on than NJ and his staff.

Edited by Holmes_and_Watson
autocarrot
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Holmes_and_Watson said:

It's clear from all the other forums and former players that, despite reflection, he couldn't implement any of the hard lessons learnt after his time at Stoke. He talked about being himself in glowing terms. That turned out to be the case with all the traits he would have wanted to move away from too.

As it stands, he can certainly do a job driving a L1 side. Any success they have should be together, rather than him jumping ship. That way, if he gets promoted with them, he won't struggle to impose his ideas on "better" players.

Due to the premier League platform, he will find it harder, as future players/ chairpersons will have easy access to his interviews, and less than complimentary articles. Although even a quick look at wiki and win % would not help either.

I'd be surprised if anyone wanted it to end the way it did. One of the key questions is more how it was allowed to start, rather than pointing at NJ for taking the offer.

While never wishing ill of anyone, I can't say he'll be taking up too many of my thoughts in future, outside of cautionary posts on here. A little thought is that he takes Havant and Waterlooville to glory. But that's not a level he knows about, and he may be looking to come back somewhere higher up. 🙂

Yeah. They were early in my thoughts. After the sheer relief. While NJ gets a big pay off, those guys will get far less. Part of the risk going with a manager. I wonder where they were while their boss was clearly compromising his principles though.

I have more sympathy for his Saints supporting relatives. It's harder for them to move on than NJ and his staff.

There's clearly an ego there that doesn't want to learn lessons from Stoke. This, as you mention, will do him no favours when looking for his next challenge. His media performances alone will have seen to that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Holmes_and_Watson said:

 

I have more sympathy for his Saints supporting relatives. It's harder for them to move on than NJ and his staff.

I have thought about this many times, I suspect they now dislike Saints and the fanbase pretty much. There were a section of fans who were at him from the first moment.

Iam like it with JM but I will do my best to try and give him a little time. He grates me, but is he is our hope, I have to go with it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, OldNick said:

I have thought about this many times, I suspect they now dislike Saints and the fanbase pretty much. There were a section of fans who were at him from the first moment.

Iam like it with JM but I will do my best to try and give him a little time. He grates me, but is he is our hope, I have to go with it

If he grated you how in the hell did you tolerate Jones?

he was just about the most unlikeable person you could listen to and you seemed to love him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, OldNick said:

I have thought about this many times, I suspect they now dislike Saints and the fanbase pretty much. There were a section of fans who were at him from the first moment.

Iam like it with JM but I will do my best to try and give him a little time. He grates me, but is he is our hope, I have to go with it

I'm clinging to the hope that it's not a done deal (yet) and it's all an elaborate smokescreen for a vaguely successful replacement to be announced.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, tdmickey3 said:

If he grated you how in the hell did you tolerate Jones?

he was just about the most unlikeable person you could listen to and you seemed to love him

I didnt love him at all, and had reservations from day one. Difference was I knew that we needed him to do well. Like JM we need it to work.

BOTH are very uninspiring and the owners are not very good IMOeither

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I see others have already noted this.

There's nothing wrong per se about NJ doing this; I'm sure it was a laugh for all concerned at the match.

Anyone serious about being a Premiership manager would not do this after being sacked. It screams small-time, small-town, local-league-level mentality. 

Do you remember Jeremy Corbyn going to a local constituency garden party fund raiser for learning-disabled homeless single parents, the day after he won the Labour leadership vote? Exact same problem. Nothing wrong with that as far as it goes. But when you've volunteered to go into bat against the big boys, you've got to leave this stuff behind. Corbyn never did, and NJ didn't either. 

Bit of politics there. My name's Ben Elton. ;) 

Anyone wondering if the club did the right thing in jettisoning NJ [after Chelsea I'm sure there's not many], should have their minds put at rest by this.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 14/02/2023 at 20:14, Holmes_and_Watson said:

It's clear from all the other forums and former players that, despite reflection, he couldn't implement any of the hard lessons learnt after his time at Stoke. He talked about being himself in glowing terms. That turned out to be the case with all the traits he would have wanted to move away from too.

 

It makes you wonder what the hell was said in his interview, if he even had one. 

 

Him playing non-league football continues the David Brent analogy for me - in that christmas special when he went on the speed dating show to try and cling to a little bit of fame. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting comments from Jacob Tanswell on the Total Saints Podcast…

”the last week (or post Brentford with NJ) at Staplewood was a disaster. Everyone (staff) sidelined bar NJ, Cohen and Sheehan.

Players took it upon themselves to do their own thing in first half against Wolverhampton.”

Imagine this wouldn’t have gone down well, despite us playing out of our skin, and would explain why we completely fell apart after half time. 

Edited by saintscottofthenortham
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, saintscottofthenortham said:

Interesting comments from Jacob Tanswell on the Total Saints Podcast…

”the last week (or post Brentford with NJ) at Staplewood was a disaster. Everyone (staff) sidelined bar NJ, Cohen and Sheehan.

Players took it upon themselves to do their own thing in first half against Wolverhampton.”

Imagine this wouldn’t have gone down well, despite us playing out of our skin, and would explain why we completely fell apart after half time. 

So Jones saw us playing well in the first half and ensured we played worse in the second rather than admitting he was wrong?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Saint_clark said:

So Jones saw us playing well in the first half and ensured we played worse in the second rather than admitting he was wrong?

God knows. If they've gone against what he'd asked them to do, I'm sure it wouldn't have gone down well, despite playing well. Egotistical maniac, at the end of the day. Something going amiss at HT would explain the complete meltdown, though.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, saintscottofthenortham said:

Interesting comments from Jacob Tanswell on the Total Saints Podcast…

”the last week (or post Brentford with NJ) at Staplewood was a disaster. Everyone (staff) sidelined bar NJ, Cohen and Sheehan.

Players took it upon themselves to do their own thing in first half against Wolverhampton.”

Imagine this wouldn’t have gone down well, despite us playing out of our skin, and would explain why we completely fell apart after half time. 

This seams to back up my theory that the players had agreed to play for themselves in the first half and "work to rule" in the second to show what rubbish NJ was instructing them to do.  This would also explain JWP not taking shots with the late free kicks, it wouldn't surprise me if NJs instruction was to play it short

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, altoniansaints said:

This seams to back up my theory that the players had agreed to play for themselves in the first half and "work to rule" in the second to show what rubbish NJ was instructing them to do.  This would also explain JWP not taking shots with the late free kicks, it wouldn't surprise me if NJs instruction was to play it short

Anyone hear the JWP post match reaction comment on Solent after the Chelsea match?  I'm fairly sure he used the words front footed and aggressive in his opening line.  it was as if he was letting our former manager know that that's how you set up and play to win a football match.  Interested to know if others heard it or whether i was imagining it after 3 tough months.....  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, malcolm waldron said:

Anyone hear the JWP post match reaction comment on Solent after the Chelsea match?  I'm fairly sure he used the words front footed and aggressive in his opening line.  it was as if he was letting our former manager know that that's how you set up and play to win a football match.  Interested to know if others heard it or whether i was imagining it after 3 tough months.....  

JWP managed to give a pretty damning verdict on NJ, without actually saying too much.

”Ruben has come in and really steadied the ship. He has given us calmness, a bit of direction, bit of structure and just… belief.” Then he refers to Ralph’s reign and returning to how they played under him (before it went wrong). Do think his reference to “front-footed and aggressive” may indeed have been intentional.

Suggests things really were as dire, if not worse, than the murmurs coming out from Staplewood. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, saintscottofthenortham said:

Interesting comments from Jacob Tanswell on the Total Saints Podcast…

”the last week (or post Brentford with NJ) at Staplewood was a disaster. Everyone (staff) sidelined bar NJ, Cohen and Sheehan.

Players took it upon themselves to do their own thing in first half against Wolverhampton.”

Imagine this wouldn’t have gone down well, despite us playing out of our skin, and would explain why we completely fell apart after half time. 

Definitely interesting to hear and thanks for sharing for those who haven't listened. I do agree with the decision to sack Jones but it does feel like the easy thing to do, blaming the obvious departing scapegoat in Jones.

The players were still the ones on the pitch, they can't take all the credit when things are going well against Man City or in the first half vs Wolves, and then lay all the blame at NJ for the capitulation. It does sound plausible that Selles got sidelined for Jones' backroom staff, but if this is genuine, then we can expect a massive upturn in form and we should power out of the relegation zone before long. If only life were that simple.

I think the reality is that we don't have a lot of time to make up ground on our rivals, even if it was very encouraging in a number of ways at the weekend. It might be back to earth with a bump if, for example, we only manage a draw against Leeds.

Edited by Ted Bates Statue
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, revolution saint said:

1st game never counts.

It counts if you win it. Apparently he only lasted 10 minutes before he pulled up which means his minutes per assist stats are the best in any league in any European division. Let that sink in.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Ted Bates Statue said:

Definitely interesting to hear and thanks for sharing for those who haven't listened. I do agree with the decision to sack Jones but it does feel like the easy thing to do, blaming the obvious departing scapegoat in Jones.

The players were still the ones on the pitch, they can't take all the credit when things are going well against Man City or in the first half vs Wolves, and then lay all the blame at NJ for the capitulation. It does sound plausible that Selles got sidelined for Jones' backroom staff, but if this is genuine, then we can expect a massive upturn in form and we should power out of the relegation zone before long. If only life were that simple.

I think the reality is that we don't have a lot of time to make up ground on our rivals, even if it was very encouraging in a number of ways at the weekend. It might be back to earth with a bump if, for example, we only manage a draw against Leeds.

What a strange post. 

A point at Leeds would not be a bad result and would be the continuation of the improvement under Selles. It would not be "back to earth with a bump."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, CamberwellSaint said:

 

I see others have already noted this.

There's nothing wrong per se about NJ doing this; I'm sure it was a laugh for all concerned at the match.

Anyone serious about being a Premiership manager would not do this after being sacked. It screams small-time, small-town, local-league-level mentality. 

Do you remember Jeremy Corbyn going to a local constituency garden party fund raiser for learning-disabled homeless single parents, the day after he won the Labour leadership vote? Exact same problem. Nothing wrong with that as far as it goes. But when you've volunteered to go into bat against the big boys, you've got to leave this stuff behind. Corbyn never did, and NJ didn't either. 

Bit of politics there. My name's Ben Elton. ;) 

Anyone wondering if the club did the right thing in jettisoning NJ [after Chelsea I'm sure there's not many], should have their minds put at rest by this.

This. As soon as you get into a leadership role, it's time to abandon those who put you there, the needy, the disabled, the downtrodden, and just focus on more important (and lucrative) areas. Especially in politics, you don't get successful looking after the little guys. Imagine if government leaders focused on helping the bottom 10%, they'd not get elected again for a lifetime.

 

Same with Nathan Jones, he should focus on getting a job at his highest level, which has been made clear is championship max.

 

Edited by ashnats
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with this - the key is to stop Leeds getting 3 points. Yes ideally we win, but I think we are better off drawing this and beating Leicester rather than the other way around. A point at Leeds is a decent result, losing would be very damaging. 
We also have to solve our dreadful home form if we’ll have any chance of staying up. That Leicester match for me is crucial and could be a season maker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Tamesaint said:

What a strange post. 

A point at Leeds would not be a bad result and would be the continuation of the improvement under Selles. It would not be "back to earth with a bump."

 

If we intend to stay up, we need wins and particularly so against our relegation rivals. I don't need to look at the Leeds build-up to tell you that it's not a unique belief among our support. If you think that's strange, you must be surprised by a lot of things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, CamberwellSaint said:

 

I see others have already noted this.

There's nothing wrong per se about NJ doing this; I'm sure it was a laugh for all concerned at the match.

Anyone serious about being a Premiership manager would not do this after being sacked. It screams small-time, small-town, local-league-level mentality. 

Do you remember Jeremy Corbyn going to a local constituency garden party fund raiser for learning-disabled homeless single parents, the day after he won the Labour leadership vote? Exact same problem. Nothing wrong with that as far as it goes. But when you've volunteered to go into bat against the big boys, you've got to leave this stuff behind. Corbyn never did, and NJ didn't either. 

Bit of politics there. My name's Ben Elton. ;) 

Anyone wondering if the club did the right thing in jettisoning NJ [after Chelsea I'm sure there's not many], should have their minds put at rest by this.

He’s gone.

Get over it 🥳

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, saintscottofthenortham said:

JWP managed to give a pretty damning verdict on NJ, without actually saying too much.

”Ruben has come in and really steadied the ship. He has given us calmness, a bit of direction, bit of structure and just… belief.” Then he refers to Ralph’s reign and returning to how they played under him (before it went wrong). Do think his reference to “front-footed and aggressive” may indeed have been intentional.

Suggests things really were as dire, if not worse, than the murmurs coming out from Staplewood. 

That can't be though. When defending his decision making, Rasmus assured us that things were dire under ralph and superb under Jones 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ashnats said:

This. As soon as you get into a leadership role, it's time to abandon those who put you there, the needy, the disabled, the downtrodden, and just focus on more important (and lucrative) areas. Especially in politics, you don't get successful looking after the little guys. Imagine if government leaders focused on helping the bottom 10%, they'd not get elected again for a lifetime.

 

Same with Nathan Jones, he should focus on getting a job at his highest level, which has been made clear is championship max.

 

Utter tosh! The guy obviously loves football and is still fit enough to play so why not? Good on him. We all have hobbies. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ted Bates Statue said:

If we intend to stay up, we need wins and particularly so against our relegation rivals. I don't need to look at the Leeds build-up to tell you that it's not a unique belief among our support. If you think that's strange, you must be surprised by a lot of things.

A defeat against Leeds would definitely be a setback.   We can't afford that. A draw, however would not be a bad result and not "back to earth with a bump".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, coalman said:

It counts if you win it. Apparently he only lasted 10 minutes before he pulled up which means his minutes per assist stats are the best in any league in any European division. Let that sink in.

Christ on a bike!

If that can happen to one of the fittest people on the planet, then what chance do us mere mortals have?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lighthouse changed the title to Nathan Jones

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...