derry Posted 25 January, 2009 Posted 25 January, 2009 He's got to be better than anybody we've got up front at the moment. He looked good for Sheff Utd and Swansea.
Steeleye Saint Posted 25 January, 2009 Posted 25 January, 2009 He's got to be better than anybody we've got up front at the moment. He looked good for Sheff Utd and Swansea. To repeat myself from another thread, he was just beginning to look useful before he was injured - when he's fit again and we're crying out for a decent winger, he's loaned out! Unbelievable! :smt104
Jesus Reigned Posted 25 January, 2009 Posted 25 January, 2009 Loaning Dyer out has to be the least understandable one given that he can't be on that great a wage; I bet he bit our hand off when we offered him a contract straight after his conviction?
CanadaSaint Posted 25 January, 2009 Posted 25 January, 2009 Dave, I agreed with most of what you said on another thread regarding the need for width, but don't look to Dyer for it. He continually cuts inside, often up blind alleys, and doesn't always track back defensively. Unless someone (who?) can get these problems out of his system and get him to skin a full back down the line I fear he wouldn't add much.
ALWAYS_SFC Posted 25 January, 2009 Posted 25 January, 2009 (edited) He was loaned out because Rupert Lowe is an utter dickhead as far as running a football club is concerned and Wilde is just a puppet. Oh!! And Ryan Smith is far better apparently.. Clueless club from boardroom to coaching staff... Edited 25 January, 2009 by ALWAYS_SFC
aintforever Posted 25 January, 2009 Posted 25 January, 2009 It looks like a good manager can get the best out of him, so as we don't have one, in the world of Rupert Lowe the logical thing is to loan him to a club that does.
CanadaSaint Posted 25 January, 2009 Posted 25 January, 2009 It looks like a good manager can get the best out of him, so as we don't have one, in the world of Rupert Lowe the logical thing is to loan him to a club that does. That's probably pretty accurate. It's sad, really, because he could be a heck of a player, given good coaching.
N/West Saint Posted 25 January, 2009 Posted 25 January, 2009 I remember a lot of people on here wanted him out and to never wear a saints shirt again, Oh to be a Saints fan lol
Saintandy666 Posted 25 January, 2009 Posted 25 January, 2009 I always liked dyer and thought he was pretty decent for us when he played well. He came back last season a better player and he had stopped doing his thing when he left the ball behind in runs. To be honest, I think people got carried away with the whole nightclub incident to see this. I would welcome him back. He is exactly the kind of player we need at the moment. The question is, can we afford his wages?
WGC Saint Posted 25 January, 2009 Posted 25 January, 2009 I must say I had to chuckle yesterday when I heard the Talksport commentator at Fratton Pk saying how Dyer had run Pompey and in particular Cranie ragged all afternoon. Why oh why is he not at SMS doing that for us? Utter joke this club is!
Gordon Mockles Posted 25 January, 2009 Posted 25 January, 2009 (edited) He's got to be better than anybody we've got up front at the moment. He looked good for Sheff Utd and Swansea. Agreed. Dyer would add much to our current squad of wasted & pointless loans. It's as though the club is deliberately run into the ground as you couldn't run a club any worse if you tried!! I always liked dyer and thought he was pretty decent for us when he played well. He came back last season a better player and he had stopped doing his thing when he left the ball behind in runs. To be honest, I think people got carried away with the whole nightclub incident to see this. I would welcome him back. He is exactly the kind of player we need at the moment. The question is, can we afford his wages? I'd have thought so as he was given a new contract, then promptly loaned out! Edited 25 January, 2009 by Gordon Mockles
Saintandy666 Posted 25 January, 2009 Posted 25 January, 2009 I'd have thought so as he was given a new contract, then promptly loaned out! Ah yes, but we are not within a normal financial world. We are in the weird and wonderful world of Southampton Football Club! (maybe we just wanted to keep him at saints and get him back for when we can afford him?)
sidthesquid Posted 25 January, 2009 Posted 25 January, 2009 He was loaned out because a) he had a bad attitude and b) every time he played for Saints he was sh1te. One good game against the Sk*tes doesn't make him the answer to all our prayers, enjoyable though it was to see. Let's keep a bit of perspective - he could come back & start to live up to his potential, but just as likely he'll have one good game before reverting to headless chicken mode.
ALWAYS_SFC Posted 25 January, 2009 Posted 25 January, 2009 He was loaned out because a) he had a bad attitude and b) every time he played for Saints he was sh1te. One good game against the Sk*tes doesn't make him the answer to all our prayers, enjoyable though it was to see. Let's keep a bit of perspective - he could come back & start to live up to his potential, but just as likely he'll have one good game before reverting to headless chicken mode. Fit in well with the Portvliet/Wotte/Gorre fiasco then.
70's Mike Posted 25 January, 2009 Posted 25 January, 2009 I remember a lot of people on here wanted him out and to never wear a saints shirt again, Oh to be a Saints fan lol your to rational to be a saints supporter you must have changed since you moved up North
eelpie Posted 25 January, 2009 Posted 25 January, 2009 Why oh why is he not at SMS doing that for us? Because Lowe is a tit.
Torbay Saint Posted 25 January, 2009 Posted 25 January, 2009 I may be proved wrong but as I have been tolod by someone ITK he cannot be recalled this season.
SaintRobbie Posted 25 January, 2009 Posted 25 January, 2009 He's a legend now! Get him back FAST... talk about an apetite to give him a second chance!!! He's also x8 better than Smith.
Bailey Posted 25 January, 2009 Posted 25 January, 2009 I may be proved wrong but as I have been tolod by someone ITK he cannot be recalled this season. Not only that, but Swansea have every intention to sign Dyer on a permanent basis at the end of his loan spell. I think the best we can hope for is that his good performances boost his price up somewhat.
del boy Posted 26 January, 2009 Posted 26 January, 2009 He was loaned out because a) he had a bad attitude and b) every time he played for Saints he was sh1te. One good game against the Sk*tes doesn't make him the answer to all our prayers, enjoyable though it was to see. Let's keep a bit of perspective - he could come back & start to live up to his potential, but just as likely he'll have one good game before reverting to headless chicken mode. The head - hit - nail
Sheff Saint Posted 26 January, 2009 Posted 26 January, 2009 He was loaned out because a) he had a bad attitude and b) every time he played for Saints he was sh1te. One good game against the Sk*tes doesn't make him the answer to all our prayers, enjoyable though it was to see. Let's keep a bit of perspective - he could come back & start to live up to his potential, but just as likely he'll have one good game before reverting to headless chicken mode. Exactly. Dyer might one day be ok (he'll never be better than that) but only if coached very well and if in a team of big stong men. In our current set up he's not got the physical support he needs.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now