Jump to content

Women’s Football

Turkish

By Turkish
in The Saints

 Share

Recommended Posts

John B

John B

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Well it’s true. I see you’ve just picked up on that comment not all the others during and after the game. Typical 

Yes I saw your other comments later but why be crass in the first place

  • Like 1
Turkish

Turkish

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, John B said:

Yes I saw your other comments later but why be crass in the first place

It wasn’t crass and secondly Because after the winning the euros my social media was full of women going on about send a woman to do a man’s job. Sorry you don’t like that 

egg

egg

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Behave Spain were much better. How many chances did England have? The one against the bar, that’s about it, hardly anything in the second half 

Hemp had a couple of half chances first half. Other than that, we created nothing. We were worse 2nd half after the tactical changes. Spain were significantly better. 

John B

John B

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Turkish said:

It wasn’t crass and secondly Because after the winning the euros my social media was full of women going on about send a woman to do a man’s job. Sorry you don’t like that 

So just man up a bit if you want to continue on Social Media I have given up especially twitter where so many people have a completely different outlook on life to me

 

 

  • Like 1
Baird of the land

Baird of the land

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, Saint_clark said:

I felt uncomfortable as well. Was weird.

Infantino looked fucking elated as well.

Don't get the issue. Seemed just completely celebratory to me, not at all weird. Players didn't seem uncomfortable and seemed very happy going in for the hugs. Cheek kissing may not be british but it is a very european thing.

sadoldgit

sadoldgit

Posted
Posted
57 minutes ago, John B said:

Yes I saw your other comments later but why be crass in the first place

To be fair, one of Duckhunter, Batman or Turkish were always going to make that comment.

  • Like 1
Turkish

Turkish

Posted
  • Author
Posted
43 minutes ago, John B said:

So just man up a bit if you want to continue on Social Media I have given up especially twitter where so many people have a completely different outlook on life to me

 

 

Man up? Is it still 1990? You know that term is not politically correct yet you’re jumping all over me for posting a fact a put my social media and getting all angry about it. As for stopping reading things that you don’t like which is more likely, everyone will agree and align 100% with your view on life or most people will sometimes not agree with you but thats fine and it doesn’t matter 

Lord Duckhunter

Lord Duckhunter

Posted
Posted

It was women against girls, perhaps our birds believed the hype. The mangeress was certainly out coached by the Spanish bloke. Some of the English lot looked they were running through treacle and were carrying a bit too much timber. The mangeress is ultimately responsible for fitness levels & if I was in the FA I’d be questioning  that aspect of the preparation. 
 

At the end of the day England we’re lucky it was only 1

  • Like 1
aintforever

aintforever

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Turkish said:

It wasn’t crass and secondly Because after the winning the euros my social media was full of women going on about send a woman to do a man’s job. Sorry you don’t like that 

Awww diddums, did the nasty girlies jokes get Turkish all upset? :lol:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Fan The Flames

Fan The Flames

Posted
Posted
54 minutes ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

It was women against girls, perhaps our birds believed the hype. The mangeress was certainly out coached by the Spanish bloke. Some of the English lot looked they were running through treacle and were carrying a bit too much timber. The mangeress is ultimately responsible for fitness levels & if I was in the FA I’d be questioning  that aspect of the preparation. 
 

At the end of the day England we’re lucky it was only 1

Bloke 1 - 0 Bird, yeahhhh.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Fan The Flames

Fan The Flames

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, Turkish said:

It never ceases to amuse me how one throw away comment on here get so many people so excited 🤣🤣🤣🤣

But you're still excited by throw away comments from over a year ago.

  • Like 2
Barsiem

Barsiem

Posted
Posted

Shame about the performance today, but Spain fully deserved it.  We had a very kind run to the final & Spain were the only team of real note we had to play all tournament.  If we had a fully fit team perhaps it would have been different, but a few teams could say that.

If only the men's team had a defence of the equivalent quality of the women!  We are so solid at the back and again only conceded a few goals all tournament.  You can see why Earp's is considered the best GK in the world

whelk

whelk

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

It was women against girls, perhaps our birds believed the hype. The mangeress was certainly out coached by the Spanish bloke. Some of the English lot looked they were running through treacle and were carrying a bit too much timber. The mangeress is ultimately responsible for fitness levels & if I was in the FA I’d be questioning  that aspect of the preparation. 
 

At the end of the day England we’re lucky it was only 1

Fuck me was your missus out so you were allowed to watch tv? So all your dog and duck comments were bs you chose to watch birds. Phoney 

  • Haha 3
Holmes_and_Watson

Holmes_and_Watson

Posted
Posted

Immensely proud they got to the final. On the day, they were beaten by the better side.

Both teams had their chances. But despite England having more possession in their opponent's penalty area well into the first half, the better of them were from Spain. England, without the creativity of Mead were more direct, looking for the physicality of Russo. When that went, they looked a bit flat, resulting in an England and Bright combo, with James supporting.

Spain Sussex out how to get into the vacant full back position, created by England's 3 at the back. England were always vulnerable to attacks from wide, in a competition with a lot of team who can ping long balls from deep.

Bronze has been caught a few times in this tournament. Usually giving away passes on the flank. But the balance is the work rate, positioning and control she gives at other times.

While England did struggle to chase the game, and Earps (taking Bronze's advice for the pen) kept them in it, they can look back at the moment Hemp's shot hit the bar. Spain's posession after going a goal up, played to their strengths. One of Spain's players could well have been shown a red for being silly and kicking the ball away. Harsh for a world cup final, but the player was key in keeping England at bay. But to grasp at such moments shows how hard England found this one.

But in the end a game too far, with a team that did so well despite missing personnel (as had Spain). Hopefully, we'll continue to see the side refreshed over the next couple of years with up and coming talent, to give the side a few more options. The whole team did everyone proud.

  • Like 1
East Kent Saint

East Kent Saint

Posted
Posted

They looked very Saintsy playing a back 3 , caught on the break with plenty of room on the flanks . Also had plenty of players back at times but no one near the attacker , got plenty of last minute blocks in as a result.

A few players lacked the speed/mobility of Spains players . On another day if they scored ………….

  • Like 1
Jimmy_D

Jimmy_D

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, cloggy saint said:

Just seen some highlights, surely Earps was well off her line when the penalty was hit?

Edit: Maybe not!

https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-14---the-penalty-kick

“When the ball is kicked, the defending goalkeeper must have at least part of one foot touching, in line with, or behind, the goal line.”


I thought it’d have to be retaken initially as I thought the foot had to be on the line, but it doesn’t and she timed it perfectly.

Lord Duckhunter

Lord Duckhunter

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Fan The Flames said:

Bloke 1 - 0 Bird, yeahhhh.

For a bird that supposed to be a coaching genius, and potential to transfer her “skills” to the mens game, she looked out of her depth to me. Awful coaching performance when it mattered, the Spanish bloke schooled her. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Jimmy_D

Jimmy_D

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

For a bird that supposed to be a coaching genius, and potential to transfer her “skills” to the mens game, she looked out of her depth to me. Awful coaching performance when it mattered, the Spanish bloke schooled her. 

It must have been torture waiting two years for her first loss in a competitive game so you could finally criticise her.

  • Like 6
Fan The Flames

Fan The Flames

Posted
Posted
57 minutes ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

For a bird that supposed to be a coaching genius, and potential to transfer her “skills” to the mens game, she looked out of her depth to me. Awful coaching performance when it mattered, the Spanish bloke schooled her. 

Only in this crazy woke world you dream of, did any one say she was a coaching genius and is going to move in to the men's game. People posed the question, it's what us normals do on the internet. 

Anyway I'm happy for you that a man coach won and given you've your pub bore theme for the week.

  • Like 1
hypochondriac

hypochondriac

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Saint_clark said:

Dark blue shorts of the home kit would clash with Spains.

Bit shit though. No one wants to potentially win the World Cup wearing blue. 

Edited by hypochondriac
  • Haha 1
whelk

whelk

Posted
Posted

Fucking BBC still banging on about not being able to buy the keepers shirt. FFS always want to ran some angle on a story. Most are  very supportive but such a need for drama and controversy at every turn. I am sure Nike made no sort of commercial decision whatsoever and was solely based on their loathing of female sport and the need to continue support of the patriarchy 

Jimmy_D

Jimmy_D

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, the colonel said:

Now women's and men's football are expected to be treated equally, should we be saying that we have won 9 FA Cups not just 1? And runners up 5 times not 3?

Separate teams. The Southampton team that won those isn’t affiliated with Saints.

Barsiem

Barsiem

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, whelk said:

Fucking BBC still banging on about not being able to buy the keepers shirt. FFS always want to ran some angle on a story. Most are  very supportive but such a need for drama and controversy at every turn. I am sure Nike made no sort of commercial decision whatsoever and was solely based on their loathing of female sport and the need to continue support of the patriarchy 

They are quite right to keep "banging on" about it.  Having the rights to produce England shirts is a prestigious contract, and no way should Nike be picking and choosing which shirts they reproduce for fans to buy.  We have the no 1 rated keeper in the world and kids who idolise her cannot have a copy of her shirt.

Your post reads more that you hate the BBC tbh.  Nothing wrong with that, but this is an issue that should be highlighted 

whelk

whelk

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Barsiem said:

They are quite right to keep "banging on" about it.  Having the rights to produce England shirts is a prestigious contract, and no way should Nike be picking and choosing which shirts they reproduce for fans to buy.  We have the no 1 rated keeper in the world and kids who idolise her cannot have a copy of her shirt.

Your post reads more that you hate the BBC tbh.  Nothing wrong with that, but this is an issue that should be highlighted 

It has been reported previously and no need to keep bringing it up. The news is to inform not to campaign against Nike. 

Turkish

Turkish

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Barsiem said:

They are quite right to keep "banging on" about it.  Having the rights to produce England shirts is a prestigious contract, and no way should Nike be picking and choosing which shirts they reproduce for fans to buy.  We have the no 1 rated keeper in the world and kids who idolise her cannot have a copy of her shirt.

Your post reads more that you hate the BBC tbh.  Nothing wrong with that, but this is an issue that should be highlighted 

Honestly, how many will want the shirt? To see kids walking round in goalkeepers shirts is extremely rare, it’s also rare to see kids walking round in the women’s England shirt so you don’t have to be a genius to work out they’d be lucky to sell a handful of women’s England keepers shirts. I doubt Nike did it to be dicks they probably did a bit of market research into it, maybe rather than berating Nike, who are renowned for their brilliant marketing campaigns about diversity and being different, for not making a product that won’t sell the question should be asked what can be done to encourage more girls to become goalkeepers

Edited by Turkish
Miltonaggro

Miltonaggro

Posted
Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, whelk said:

Fucking BBC still banging on about not being able to buy the keepers shirt. FFS always want to ran some angle on a story. Most are  very supportive but such a need for drama and controversy at every turn. I am sure Nike made no sort of commercial decision whatsoever and was solely based on their loathing of female sport and the need to continue support of the patriarchy 

I think that the issue is that having done their research most of the prospective purchasers would be 20-30 year old men living with their parents and it doesn’t make economic sense to only manufacture the shirts in xl to xxxxl. 

Edited by Miltonaggro
  • Haha 3
once_bitterne

once_bitterne

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, The Cat said:

Why is a farmer with an MBE presenting Sky News? Don't they have any actual TV presenters?

He seems like a bit of an idiot.

He's not a presenter.  They do a paper review thing where they bring in 2 people to comment on stories, usually former politicians, journos, tv presenters, etc.

The Cat

The Cat

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, once_bitterne said:

He's not a presenter.  They do a paper review thing where they bring in 2 people to comment on stories, usually former politicians, journos, tv presenters, etc.

Oh ok. I never watch Sky News, or any news really for that matter. 

whelk

whelk

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, once_bitterne said:

He's not a presenter.  They do a paper review thing where they bring in 2 people to comment on stories, usually former politicians, journos, tv presenters, etc.

For balance do they always make sure one of them is a farmer?

  • Haha 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...