Jump to content

Elon Musk

whelk

By whelk
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

whelk

whelk

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Probably a little too intellectual a podcast for a bloke who loves to quote Dan Hodges and watches Talk Tv admiring the commentator colossus that is Mike Graham. 

  • Like 1
whelk

whelk

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

What Stewart actually said.....

 

This fool wouldn’t take time to have listened to the podcast. It is quite desperate what Is happening on social media.with misinformation. Guess if your lesbian idol says it you just so want to believe it

Edited by whelk
badgerx16

badgerx16

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, whelk said:

This fool wouldn’t take time to have listened to the podcast. It is quite desperate what Is happening on social media.with misinformation. Guess if your lesbian idol says it you just so want to believe it

Stewart's specific mention of Rochdale and Rotherham is reflective of the Times article, and he goes on to discuss the failures of the Police, the state, and local authorities, and the CPS. Taking a snippet out of context is poor form, especially on such an important issue.

  • Like 4
Gloucester Saint

Gloucester Saint

Posted
Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

The Mail reporting that Musk and Domino Cummings are plotting via WhatsApp on how to bring down the UK Government.

Hmmm, wonder who they got that from? The obese, dishonest, philandering, non-condom wearing, over-annuated ex-PM they pay a fortune to write garbage on a Saturday for them who fell out with Dominic Cummings per chance?

Edited by Gloucester Saint
Gloucester Saint

Gloucester Saint

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, whelk said:

This fool wouldn’t take time to have listened to the podcast. It is quite desperate what Is happening on social media.with misinformation. Guess if your lesbian idol says it you just so want to believe it

How many pints would Martina be for Duck?

badgerx16

badgerx16

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Hmmm, wonder who they got that from? The obese, dishonest, philandering, non-condom wearing, over-annuated ex-PM they pay a fortune to write garbage on a Saturday for them who fell out with Dominic Cummings per chance?

They quote "Government sources".

harvey

harvey

Posted
Posted

The Lefts response whenever they're caught out....

'He/She didn't do it you bigot'

'He/She only did it once!'

'He/She did it but what's the big deal?'

'He/She did it, and this is why it's a good thing'

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
harvey

harvey

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Hmmm, wonder who they got that from? The obese, dishonest, philandering, non-condom wearing, over-annuated ex-PM they pay a fortune to write garbage on a Saturday for them who fell out with Dominic Cummings per chance?

And how would you describe the current PM?

badgerx16

badgerx16

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, harvey said:

And how would you describe the current PM?

My wife says he looks like Harry Potter with an owl stuffed up his arse.

  • Haha 1
harvey

harvey

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, whelk said:

This fool wouldn’t take time to have listened to the podcast. It is quite desperate what Is happening on social media.with misinformation. Guess if your lesbian idol says it you just so want to believe it

Spoken like a true Democrat, misinformation blah blah blah........Liebour will be obliterated at the next election and will never recover.

harvey

harvey

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

My wife says he looks like Harry Potter with an owl stuffed up his arse.

Now that I would agree with! 😁

whelk

whelk

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, harvey said:

Spoken like a true Democrat, misinformation blah blah blah........Liebour will be obliterated at the next election and will never recover.

What are you talking about you daft cunt?

harvey

harvey

Posted
Posted
Just now, whelk said:

What are you talking about you daft cunt?

You know and understand, apologise for not insulting you back....it's rather childish.

whelk

whelk

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, harvey said:

You know and understand, apologise for not insulting you back....it's rather childish.

How about you listen to the podcast and come to same conclusion that Navratilova is peddling? No of course you won’t. You seem a little unhinged about ‘the left’ but really you jsut need an enemy to vent against. So yeah ‘the left all love Paki rapists’ gets you going no doubt.

  • Like 2
Gloucester Saint

Gloucester Saint

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, harvey said:

And how would you describe the current PM?

Not one I voted for but compared to Johnson a fuck sight better. Hell, even Truss was better than Boris, let alone May, Cameron, Brown, Blair, Major and Thatcher.

And most of those could keep it in their underpants or at least use a condom.

None of the above told blatant lies on the side of a large red bus to swing a generational referendum nor have been sacked by the Times for lying.

So yeah, Boris is a shitheap and worse than Truss, she’s a delusional lunatic but not pathologically dishonest per se.

  • Like 1
harvey

harvey

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, whelk said:

How about you listen to the podcast and come to same conclusion that Navratilova is peddling? No of course you won’t. You seem a little unhinged about ‘the left’ but really you jsut need an enemy to vent against. So yeah ‘the left all love Paki rapists’ gets you going no doubt.

Hey if that's what you want to think then you go for it. I'm neither Left nor Right. 

I've tried to keep an open mind about the GG scandal but if there's nothing to hide why did Starmer order Liebour mps to vote against the bill for a public enquiry and then abstain himself?

I'll listen to the podcast before commenting further.

harvey

harvey

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Not one I voted for but compared to Johnson a fuck sight better. Hell, even Truss was better than Boris, let alone May, Cameron, Brown, Blair, Major and Thatcher.

And most of those could keep it in their underpants or at least use a condom.

None of the above told blatant lies on the side of a large red bus to swing a generational referendum nor have been sacked by the Times for lying.

So yeah, Boris is a shitheap and worse than Truss, she’s a delusional lunatic but not pathologically dishonest per se.

I'd say Starmer is far worse than any of them!

hypochondriac

hypochondriac

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, whelk said:

Probably a little too intellectual a podcast for a bloke who loves to quote Dan Hodges and watches Talk Tv admiring the commentator colossus that is Mike Graham. 

TBF I listen to that podcast all the time and rort Stewart has some really odd takes. He totally embarrassed himself over the US election. 

Gloucester Saint

Gloucester Saint

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, harvey said:

I'd say Starmer is far worse than any of them!

Your opinion and clearly that of the social media followers you have. 90% of people wouldn’t agree, even most Conservatives.

harvey

harvey

Posted
Posted
Just now, Gloucester Saint said:

Your opinion and clearly that of the social media followers you have. 90% of people wouldn’t agree, even most Conservatives.

It's 'You're'........and 'you're' talking bollocks.

Gloucester Saint

Gloucester Saint

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, harvey said:

It's 'You're'........and 'you're' talking bollocks.

It is your in this instance, not you’re which would be plural. Do yourself a favour and cut down on the Carling during the match. 

harvey

harvey

Posted
Posted
Just now, Gloucester Saint said:

Your opinion and who is being abusive now?

Go and follow Andrew Tate and Elon Musk, you’ll enjoy the content.

I was just editing my reply. Apologies, you were correct, 'Your not You're'......you're still talking bollocks though.

  • Haha 1
harvey

harvey

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

It is your in this instance, not you’re which would be plural. Do yourself a favour and cut down on the Carling during the match. 

Tbh that's more of an insult than anything I've ever heard on here😐........CARLING! 🤮

  • Haha 2
aintforever

aintforever

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, harvey said:

I've tried to keep an open mind about the GG scandal but if there's nothing to hide why did Starmer order Liebour mps to vote against the bill for a public enquiry and then abstain himself?

Because there has already been one and they think another would be a waste of time and money which would be better off spent implementing the findings of the last one?

  • Like 2
SotonianWill

SotonianWill

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

TBF I listen to that podcast all the time and rort Stewart has some really odd takes. He totally embarrassed himself over the US election. 

On topic - the other day Rory suggested Musk believed in the "Great Replacement Theory." Which would be big news if that were the case, as that would surely mean Musk may be in on it. Musk is a Zionist: he basically begged the AFD leader to support Israel the other night. Elon is supportive of H-1B visas. He actively supports Indian immigration into America. 

 

All this means, if Rory is correct (he's not), Elon not only believes in the Great Replacement, but is also playing his part in it through his support of both immigration and Israel. 

 

Or its a completely baseless claim. Like lots of the Rest is Politics' claims.

  • Like 1
harvey

harvey

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, aintforever said:

Because there has already been one and they think another would be a waste of time and money which would be better off spent implementing the findings of the last one?

How much was 'discluded' from that enquiry that would be relevant now?

Gloucester Saint

Gloucester Saint

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, SotonianWill said:

On topic - the other day Rory suggested Musk believed in the "Great Replacement Theory." Which would be big news if that were the case, as that would surely mean Musk may be in on it. Musk is a Zionist: he basically begged the AFD leader to support Israel the other night. Elon is supportive of H-1B visas. He actively supports Indian immigration into America. 

 

All this means, if Rory is correct (he's not), Elon not only believes in the Great Replacement, but is also playing his part in it through his support of both immigration and Israel. 

 

Or its a completely baseless claim. Like lots of the Rest is Politics' claims.

It could also be indicative of Musk’s poor mental health (self-confessed) and inconsistency created by his own views and the requirements of his businesses. Stewart does flip flop but then David Owen became a Brexiteer and Liz Truss was a Lib Dem. It may be the case that Musk sees some immigration as good and some bad based on his view. 

SotonianWill

SotonianWill

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

It could also be indicative of Musk’s poor mental health (self-confessed) and inconsistency created by his own views and the requirements of his businesses. Stewart does flip flop but then David Owen became a Brexiteer and Liz Truss was a Lib Dem. It may be the case that Musk sees some immigration as good and some bad based on his view. 

I think he is ill, probably on drugs - based on the Wall Street Journals recent article. 

 

But no matter ones bias against him, as is inherent in the Rest is Politics, to accuse him essentially of believing in a fake Jewish conspiracy to replace white people is a tad extreme. Especially with no evidence to back it up. 

Edited by SotonianWill
Gloucester Saint

Gloucester Saint

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, SotonianWill said:

I think he is ill, probably on drugs - based on the Wall Street Journals recent article. 

 

But no matter ones bias against him, as is inherent in the Rest is Politics, to accuse him essentially of believing in a fake Jewish conspiracy to replace white people is a tad extreme. Especially with no evidence to back it up. 

As I say, whilst Stewart’s overall outlook is not dissimilar to mine overall, some of his expressions of it are not consistent and can be incoherent occasionally. FWIW I don’t think Musk does per se. A lot of MAGA folk do though, hence the tensions we have already seen.

Gloucester Saint

Gloucester Saint

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Gloucester Saint said:

As I say, whilst Stewart’s overall outlook is not dissimilar to mine overall, some of his expressions of it are not consistent and can be incoherent occasionally. FWIW I don’t think Musk does per se. A lot of MAGA folk do though, hence the tensions we have already seen.

I didn’t realise when I typed this earlier that Steve Bannon had made these comments declaring war on Musk https://www.vanityfair.com/news/story/steve-bannon-vows-to-oust-elon-musk-from-donald-trump-inner-circle?srsltid=AfmBOoqY4mvzHtRpMEQQmS8gmt858gKNHJkYm8LI31MvXpWWWg52773y

Whilst Trump is the lead singer for MAGA, Bannon is the song writer. The GOP will always back Bannon and Trump needs the GOP to pass his plans - see recent budget saga for how difficult that’s already proved.

At least Musk isn’t a jailbird I suppose.

Edited by Gloucester Saint

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...