ozzmeister Posted 1 March, 2022 Share Posted 1 March, 2022 https://www.football-observatory.com/IMG/sites/b5wp/2021/wp370/en/ My assumption is because we either haven’t had a major academy player sale for a while / we have been making money through buying in raw and selling in as a profit (so players not actually being trained by us). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_clark Posted 1 March, 2022 Share Posted 1 March, 2022 Since July 2015 we only sold Matt Targett from our academy didn't we? No-one else sold, just released. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StDunko Posted 1 March, 2022 Share Posted 1 March, 2022 Obafemi? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_clark Posted 1 March, 2022 Share Posted 1 March, 2022 1 hour ago, StDunko said: Obafemi? Still only bumps us up to what, £21million? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nta786 Posted 1 March, 2022 Share Posted 1 March, 2022 Yep no shock we aren't on here. The likes of City can flog Angus Gunn for £13.5m, or Iheanacho for £25m etc Liverpool can sell Ibe, Sterling, Brewster etc for lots of money too. It is annoying because it's almost self-perpetuating, bigger clubs receive more for their players purely because you assume they're decent players who will rarely ever breakthrough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexLaw76 Posted 1 March, 2022 Share Posted 1 March, 2022 4 minutes ago, nta786 said: Yep no shock we aren't on here. The likes of City can flog Angus Gunn for £13.5m, or Iheanacho for £25m etc Liverpool can sell Ibe, Sterling, Brewster etc for lots of money too. It is annoying because it's almost self-perpetuating, bigger clubs receive more for their players purely because you assume they're decent players who will rarely ever breakthrough Chelsea have players in loan to saints, we have players on loan at Ross County See the difference? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S-Clarke Posted 1 March, 2022 Share Posted 1 March, 2022 (edited) It's since 2015, and that's why we're nowhere near. Our academy fell through the floor after 2011, signs it's on the way back now though. If it was done in say 2010 then we'd be way up on the list having sold Shaw, Lallana, Chambers, Chamberlain in that time frame etc. Edited 1 March, 2022 by S-Clarke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Appy Posted 1 March, 2022 Share Posted 1 March, 2022 3 hours ago, Saint_clark said: Since July 2015 we only sold Matt Targett from our academy didn't we? No-one else sold, just released. Harrison Reed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danbert Posted 1 March, 2022 Share Posted 1 March, 2022 Gallagher? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VectisSaint Posted 1 March, 2022 Share Posted 1 March, 2022 Sam Gallagher (undisc - thought I read 5m), Jankewitz (undisc), Callum Slattery (undisc), Harrison Reed (6m), Matt Targett (15.6m), Jordan Turnbull (undisc), Dom Gape (undisc), Jason McCarthy (undisc), Obafemi (1.5m). Slim pickings since 2015. Don't know whether loan fees would be included for players we loaned during this period. Did we benefit from any sell-on fees (Alex O-C)? Of course at the beginning of 2014/15 season we sold Shaw, Lallana and Chambers (68m for the three). 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TWar Posted 1 March, 2022 Share Posted 1 March, 2022 (edited) Disclosed fees since 2015: Obafemi - £1.8m Reed - £5.85m Targett - £14m Gallagher - £5.85m Total: £27.5m However the summer before this started: Shaw - £33.75m Lallana - £27.9m Chambers - £18.2 Total: £79.85m If those three were sold a year later then we'd have a profit of £107.35m or about 134m euros. This would have us as 23rd on the list, below Dynamo Zagreb and above Villa. Obviously other sides also probably had sales in 2014, just trying to show how the reason we don't appear is the timescale cuts off our three biggest sales by a year. Edited 1 March, 2022 by TWar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winnersaint Posted 1 March, 2022 Share Posted 1 March, 2022 Wondering how this matters? Not being snarky btw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tajjuk Posted 2 March, 2022 Share Posted 2 March, 2022 I also wonder whether this counts actual academy players or poached players that then develop between 16-21, because the big clubs do that a lot, like Sterling is on that list for Liverpool but he didn't come through their academy, he came through QPRs academy and Liverpool bought him for a fee rising up to £2 million. Again for like Man City Iheanacho joined their 'academy' at 18, so hardly like they developed him. That is the issue, plenty of genuine ones there obviously like Athletic Club, Ajax, Anderlecht etc. but many of those big clubs just buy players at 15-18 and then they become homegrown if they stay there for 3 years, so count as the 'academy', which obviously the wealthiest clubs can afford to do more often, when we are only spending £15 million or so on players for the first team, we can't exactly spend £3-5 million for the 'academy' that often. Although this practice should in theory struggle a little more now because Brexit I think has made it so British clubs can't sign players from the EU who are under 18, plus the loan rule changes mean clubs can't 'loan farm' players out which will either clog up their squads or mean they have to stop hoovering up so much talent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now