Jump to content

Most Profitable Youth Academies - how are Saints not on the list!


ozzmeister
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yep no shock we aren't on here.

The likes of City can flog Angus Gunn for £13.5m, or Iheanacho for £25m etc

Liverpool can sell Ibe, Sterling, Brewster etc for lots of money too.

It is annoying because it's almost self-perpetuating, bigger clubs receive more for their players purely because you assume they're decent players who will rarely ever breakthrough

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, nta786 said:

Yep no shock we aren't on here.

The likes of City can flog Angus Gunn for £13.5m, or Iheanacho for £25m etc

Liverpool can sell Ibe, Sterling, Brewster etc for lots of money too.

It is annoying because it's almost self-perpetuating, bigger clubs receive more for their players purely because you assume they're decent players who will rarely ever breakthrough

Chelsea have players in loan to saints, we have players on loan at Ross County 

See the difference?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's since 2015, and that's why we're nowhere near. Our academy fell through the floor after 2011, signs it's on the way back now though.

If it was done in say 2010 then we'd be way up on the list having sold Shaw, Lallana, Chambers, Chamberlain in that time frame etc.

Edited by S-Clarke
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sam Gallagher (undisc - thought I read 5m), Jankewitz (undisc), Callum Slattery (undisc), Harrison Reed (6m), Matt Targett (15.6m), Jordan Turnbull (undisc), Dom Gape (undisc), Jason McCarthy (undisc), Obafemi (1.5m). Slim pickings since 2015. Don't know whether loan fees would be included for players we loaned during this period. Did we benefit from any sell-on fees (Alex O-C)?

Of course at the beginning of 2014/15 season we sold Shaw, Lallana and Chambers (68m for the three).

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disclosed fees since 2015:

  • Obafemi - £1.8m
  • Reed - £5.85m
  • Targett - £14m
  • Gallagher - £5.85m

Total: £27.5m

However the summer before this started:

  • Shaw - £33.75m
  • Lallana - £27.9m
  • Chambers - £18.2

Total: £79.85m

If those three were sold a year later then we'd have a profit of £107.35m or about 134m euros. This would have us as 23rd on the list, below Dynamo Zagreb and above Villa.

Obviously other sides also probably had sales in 2014, just trying to show how the reason we don't appear is the timescale cuts off our three biggest sales by a year. 

Edited by TWar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also wonder whether this counts actual academy players or poached players that then develop between 16-21, because the big clubs do that a lot, like Sterling is on that list for Liverpool but he didn't come through their academy, he came through QPRs academy and Liverpool bought him for a fee rising up to £2 million. 

Again for like Man City Iheanacho joined their 'academy' at 18, so hardly like they developed him. 

That is the issue, plenty of genuine ones there obviously like Athletic Club, Ajax, Anderlecht etc. but many of those big clubs just buy players at 15-18 and then they become homegrown if they stay there for 3 years, so count as the 'academy', which obviously the wealthiest clubs can afford to do more often, when we are only spending £15 million or so on players for the first team, we can't exactly spend £3-5 million for the 'academy' that often.  Although this practice should in theory struggle a little more now because Brexit I think has made it so British clubs can't sign players from the EU who are under 18, plus the loan rule changes mean clubs can't 'loan farm' players out which will either clog up their squads or mean they have to stop hoovering up so much talent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...