Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Chez said:

why are they loaning James out? Seems a strange move. I'm not a big fan, he's super fast, but end product is often limited...but don't they need a squad player like him? 

Wages I expect, he’s their joint highest paid player believe it or not 

Posted

Why would be upset the potential best CB partnership wev'e have in years and who are both young enough to improve even more.

Seems weird and not really the best use of 30mil if that is our budget to spend without sales

  • Like 3
Posted
2 minutes ago, whelk said:

Don’t be so fucking stupid

Solid response. I’m just saying i think he’s got mistakes in him, he rushes too often leaving spaces exposed in behind, and we know he’s got a rash tackle in him for a pen. If he’s unwilling to sign a new contract i think cashing in on him now isnt a bad option, that’s all

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, SonicBoom said:

I've seen that guy on twitter and he never claims to be in the know. He says he's just like everyone else but he collects rumours and shares them. He openly said he has no inside info. Why do you think he's getting a living from his twitter account? 

I was referring to Crook and if this fella was on the radio (I thought that was implied) doing the same thing, then him also.

If he wasn't , then I'm just talking about Crook. 

 

Edited by Chez
Posted
5 minutes ago, warwicksaint said:

Putting it out there, if we could ship of Salisu for 40 mil+ to Newcastle and bring in this Lacroix lad for less I’d say that’s good business. Longer contract, meant to be the dogs bollocks and let’s be honest Salisu hasn’t looked that great for 6 months or so now 

48h ago he was superb against Chelsea. 

  • Like 3
Posted
3 minutes ago, sibster said:

Just googled him and apparently he is a Canadian ice hockey player. Guess it will add a bit of power & strength to the side! 

Referral by Ralph Krueger probably

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Appy said:

Wages I expect, he’s their joint highest paid player believe it or not 

Good point.

I can believe it. Players that sign for Man U for £30m or whatever, don't get paid peanuts. £100k a week no problem. If they move, they tend to still get a fortune. Leeds paid even more for him than  Man U did, so no reason why he'd get a wage reduction. Possibly got a rise.

Posted
3 minutes ago, warwicksaint said:

Solid response. I’m just saying i think he’s got mistakes in him, he rushes too often leaving spaces exposed in behind, and we know he’s got a rash tackle in him for a pen. If he’s unwilling to sign a new contract i think cashing in on him now isnt a bad option, that’s all

Sod playing the money game. CB pairing looks solid for first time in ages and you want rid for some Saudi blood money. Fuck that

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Chez said:

why are they loaning James out? Seems a strange move. I'm not a big fan, he's super fast, but end product is often limited...but don't they need a squad player like him? 

Assume he doesnt see much playing time at leedsnbetween now and the world cup for wales and he wants minutes. 

They did say there would be some stranger moves than normal this window as players look for minutes ahead of the world cup.

Posted
Just now, Saint Fan CaM said:

AMN and CC deals still not done - just ‘close’ according to SSN.

SSN strike me as being slow to the news instead of at the front. Would that be fair?

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Chez said:

SSN strike me as being slow to the news instead of at the front. Would that be fair?

Hardly watch it as unbearable smug twats pretending to be in the know. 

probably just reading Fabriano Romani’s tweets

Edited by whelk
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, whelk said:

Sod playing the money game. CB pairing looks solid for first time in ages and you want rid for some Saudi blood money. Fuck that

Agreed. Only fly in ointment would be if Salisu wanted some of that lucre and wanted out. All entirely conjecture I hope as I agree they are forming something good

Posted

Barclay to Fulham would make sense geographically. He also seems like a player Rangers might go for. No sure he fits any of our criteria, except maybe `quality', which is pretty important. Doesn't feel #Saintsy.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Chez said:

I was referring to Crook and if this fella was on the radio (I thought that was implied) doing the same thing, then him also.

If he wasn't , then I'm just talking about Crook. 

 

Yeah, this Rob fella was on Solent this morning discussing transfers with Blackmore.

Posted
Just now, Convict Colony said:

Just think 24hrs ago we were taking the piss out of everton for buying CBs and midfielders and now we are supposedly doing it 🤣

But have Notts Forest been linked to these potential recruits yet ?

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, whelk said:

Sod playing the money game. CB pairing looks solid for first time in ages and you want rid for some Saudi blood money. Fuck that

Fair enough, but it is a football business not a club, at some point the board may want to some business to prevent them going bust. 

No fan ever wants to sell a player, unless they are shite, which if the case tends to mean you get fuck all for them, so doesn't achieve what you want - bring money in to spend on quality.

  • Like 1
Posted

So are we doing a sweepstake for which transfer the club announces first? Or do we think they'll wait until everyone has signed and do a group photo? 😁

  • Like 1
Posted

So if Dawson goes to Wolves, then Bednarek goes to West Ham. If Bednarek leaves we bring in Caleta-Car or Lacroix. Valery and Stephens both out the door.

Are they all going out on loan? 

Given we weren't really interested in a CB as of the start of the week, I find it strange we are now after 2 very decent CB's.  We don't need 4 good CB's that all expect to play surely ? And then where does it leave Lyanco, apart from emergency striker?

Some of this doesn't really make sense, 

Posted
Just now, Saint Garrett said:

So if Dawson goes to Wolves, then Bednarek goes to West Ham. If Bednarek leaves we bring in Caleta-Car or Lacroix. Valery and Stephens both out the door.

Are they all going out on loan? 

Given we weren't really interested in a CB as of the start of the week, I find it strange we are now after 2 very decent CB's.  We don't need 4 good CB's that all expect to play surely ? And then where does it leave Lyanco, apart from emergency striker?

Some of this doesn't really make sense, 

Yeah we want forwards

Posted
4 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

But have Notts Forest been linked to these potential recruits yet ?

they were liked to Loic Bade who we thought (earlier this morning) we were signing .

Posted
1 minute ago, SNSUN said:

So are we doing a sweepstake for which transfer the club announces first? Or do we think they'll wait until everyone has signed and do a group photo? 😁

Being a Saints fan so long I expect on deadline day just tumbleweed blowing around in the picture

Posted
3 minutes ago, Saint Garrett said:

So if Dawson goes to Wolves, then Bednarek goes to West Ham. If Bednarek leaves we bring in Caleta-Car or Lacroix. Valery and Stephens both out the door.

Are they all going out on loan? 

Given we weren't really interested in a CB as of the start of the week, I find it strange we are now after 2 very decent CB's.  We don't need 4 good CB's that all expect to play surely ? And then where does it leave Lyanco, apart from emergency striker?

Some of this doesn't really make sense, 

Unless there are 'verbal' agreements about selling other players further down the line? Or we're taking a slightly braver approach?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Bad Wolf said:

Isn't that basically what internet forums are?

Not sure many here are claiming to being in the know but just giving their opinions

Posted
2 minutes ago, whelk said:

Not sure many here are claiming to being in the know but just giving their opinions

My comment wasn't meant to be taken seriously. I apologise. No offence meant.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Bad Wolf said:

Is this going to be one of those links that loudly plays porn noises?

Dammit would have been better. Sorry I'm with Cloggy - its gone a bit boring 😅

  • Haha 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Green said:

Links to defenders - does this mean we haven't seen the end of the 3 at the back experiment?

Maybe not but there’d be a great difference between Valery-Bednarek-Salisu that we played against Spurs and ABK-Caleta-Car-Salisu

Posted
1 minute ago, Miltonaggro said:

Result, that was taken on the Red Funnel ferry this morning! 

Robbie Savage's let himself go

Posted
8 minutes ago, Green said:

Links to defenders - does this mean we haven't seen the end of the 3 at the back experiment?

3 at the back is fine as a formation option if you have the right players to play it. We currently don’t have a third CB capable of it, maybe we’re trying to sign one. Albeit I still don’t see it as ever being our best formation, it’s definitely one that could be used when necessary. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, SNSUN said:

Maybe not but there’d be a great difference between Valery-Bednarek-Salisu that we played against Spurs and ABK-Caleta-Car-Salisu

Like what you did there gone from a back three to a four 😀

  • Haha 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...