Jump to content

Tino Anjorin

Saint Garrett

By Saint Garrett
in The Saints

 Share

Recommended Posts

Saint Garrett

Saint Garrett

Posted
Posted

An interesting one....certainly seems that we're keen and doesnt seem to be shy from the video below. Plenty of confidence.

Maybe one for the summer if we can't get it done this month.

 

 

 

Turkish

Turkish

Posted
Posted (edited)
  On 27/01/2022 at 16:23, SuperSAINT said:

Injured, I think. Metatarsal. 

Expand  

You sure? That injury stopped being fashionable about 10 years ago, it was the go to injury just after everyone stopped getting shin splints.

Edited by Turkish
ErwinK1961

ErwinK1961

Posted
Posted

Like the direction we are going with these types of (attempted) transfers. Think this feels a bit more of a summer move to be honest, but you never know.

Watch him tear the championship up on loan then Chelsea keep him 😂

”Hey Armando, we’ve bought another friend in for you.. so about that permanent deal..”

one of us GIF

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Give it to Ron

Give it to Ron

Posted
Posted

Sheriff Anjorin [Tino’s father] on reports of Southampton interest in the Chelsea midfielder: “Talks are ongoing. In a few days, you will know everything. There are no other comments.” #saintsfc [rb sport via sport24]

Dman

Dman

Posted
Posted
  On 27/01/2022 at 17:26, Harry_SFC said:

His agent is Nathan Bertrand, Ryan's brother. He also represents Broja, Simeu and Levi Colwill.

Expand  

Interesting… FWIW Colwill (a Southampton lad, who’s family member's are key heavily involved with sholing), will be a top player.

SuperSAINT

SuperSAINT

Posted
Posted
  On 27/01/2022 at 17:38, Dman said:

Interesting… FWIW Colwill (a Southampton lad, who’s family member's are key heavily involved with sholing), will be a top player.

Expand  

He’s been outstanding in the championship this season 

qwertyell

qwertyell

Posted
Posted

Loftus-Cheek vibes from the way he strides powerfully through the midfield. Whether he can so easily brush aside fully grown men remains to be seen.

An interesting proposition at the right price.

  • Like 1
terraloon

terraloon

Posted
Posted

Make of this what you will

 

I am very not here for several aspects of the idea but the mind does wander towards what the framework of a deal to get Livramento back (before the buyback becomes active in 2023) looks like with Broja involved, from both clubs' perspectives.
  • Confused 3
Dman

Dman

Posted
Posted
  On 27/01/2022 at 18:17, terraloon said:

Make of this what you will

 

I am very not here for several aspects of the idea but the mind does wander towards what the framework of a deal to get Livramento back (before the buyback becomes active in 2023) looks like with Broja involved, from both clubs' perspectives.
Expand  

If Chelsea offered us a deal livramento including Broja, I’d snap their hand off. Broja would be far more important and valuable to us and we have KWP, who’s more than good enough (imo better atm) and I’m sure we could find a back up RB. 

Does make you wonder about the links to that Spence at Forest…. 

  • Like 2
egg

egg

Posted
Posted
  On 27/01/2022 at 18:23, Dman said:

If Chelsea offered us a deal livramento including Broja, I’d snap their hand off. Broja would be far more important and valuable to us and we have KWP, who’s more than good enough (imo better atm) and I’m sure we could find a back up RB. 

Does make you wonder about the links to that Spence at Forest…. 

Expand  

There'll be all sorts of possible permutations to a deal involving us signing Broja, or agreeing to end his loan early. Tino's buy back could come into play, ditto all sorts of other players. They've got Bettinelli as number 3 keeper who's no worse than McCarthy, for example. 

Tino is superb but we've shown we're OK without him. Broja over Tino all day long for me. 

  • Like 2
Master Bates

Master Bates

Posted
Posted
  On 27/01/2022 at 18:17, terraloon said:

Make of this what you will

 

I am very not here for several aspects of the idea but the mind does wander towards what the framework of a deal to get Livramento back (before the buyback becomes active in 2023) looks like with Broja involved, from both clubs' perspectives.
Expand  

Can someone translate this for me please

  • Haha 2
Tamesaint

Tamesaint

Posted
Posted
  On 27/01/2022 at 18:17, terraloon said:

Make of this what you will

 

I am very not here for several aspects of the idea but the mind does wander towards what the framework of a deal to get Livramento back (before the buyback becomes active in 2023) looks like with Broja involved, from both clubs' perspectives.
Expand  

Why would Tini want to break the terms of the loan deal? We only have him after he turned down a 5yr deal from Chelsea preferring us for the first team football that we offered. What would have changed for him to want to return there?

  • Like 1
manji

manji

Posted
Posted (edited)
  On 27/01/2022 at 20:17, Turkish said:

What local reliable press? 
 

 

Expand  

Yeah I was going to mention that. It beggars belief that anyone would rely on The Daily Echo or Hampshire Live.

Edited by manji
SuperSAINT

SuperSAINT

Posted
Posted
  On 28/01/2022 at 12:51, manji said:

Yeah I was going to mention that. It beggars belief that anyone would rely on The Daily Echo or Hampshire Live.

Expand  

I mean the ones that talk to the club. 

Anyone reliable said Anjorin would be summer target.

Chez

Chez

Posted
Posted

Are there any videos showing footage of his 7 games in Moscow? 

He looks powerful and skill full against other nippers, but Chelsea's youth team is so strong that its hard to gauge how good he is when decimating inferior rivals.

Getting in the Chelsea youth side means he's half decent, but £17m decent? That's quite a lot of wedge for us to fork out for a `youth' player with limited games to go on. Obviously Livramento worked out well. But that doesn't mean they all will. £5m for an untried youngster is not to be sniffed at, but £17m? Blimey. He must be amazing. Or its that the price these days? Perhaps that figure was just agent/media talk?

  • Like 3
terraloon

terraloon

Posted
Posted (edited)
  On 27/01/2022 at 19:43, Master Bates said:

Can someone translate this for me please

Expand  

When Livramento was signed from Chelsea it was within a week of Broja eventually signing on loan. You can’t have two players on loan from the same club.

At the time little sense could be made of the fact that the buy back deal doesn’t come into play until  22/23 season nor were Southampton due to pay any of the fee till the end of this season. 

There is a view and I guess it’s what that tweet was referring to that there may well be another clause in terms of what Chelsea’s options are.

https://saintsmarching.com/2021/09/30/crucial-terms-livramento-agreement-chelsea-brilliant-southampton/

Edited by terraloon
revolution saint

revolution saint

Posted
Posted
  On 28/01/2022 at 13:18, Chez said:

Are there any videos showing footage of his 7 games in Moscow? 

He looks powerful and skill full against other nippers, but Chelsea's youth team is so strong that its hard to gauge how good he is when decimating inferior rivals.

Getting in the Chelsea youth side means he's half decent, but £17m decent? That's quite a lot of wedge for us to fork out for a `youth' player with limited games to go on. Obviously Livramento worked out well. But that doesn't mean they all will. £5m for an untried youngster is not to be sniffed at, but £17m? Blimey. He must be amazing. Or its that the price these days? Perhaps that figure was just agent/media talk?

Expand  

Nah, there's not much apart from the goal he scored against Marseille.  To be fair it was a pretty good goal though.  Tend to agree with you - 17M for a player who has barely played first team football is a lot of cash but I expect fees for academy prospects are going to increase a fair bit over the next few years.  I guess you have to take that figure with a pinch of salt - probably loads of add-ons that are included and it would only be exercised if he was a success.  

Saint Garrett

Saint Garrett

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Not sure I've read anything suggesting we're willing to pay £17m.  But thats what was pre-agreed with Moscow, with a buy back, after the loan.  I think possibly Chelsea were protecting themselves there if he want and tore it up in that league.  It was only an option.

Katalinic

Katalinic

Posted
Posted
  On 28/01/2022 at 15:09, Saint Garrett said:

Not sure I've read anything suggesting we're willing to pay £17m.  But thats what was pre-agreed with Moscow, with a buy back, after the loan.  I think possibly Chelsea were protecting themselves there if he want and tore it up in that league.  It was only an option.

Expand  

We have put a bid in but it's been rejected. Not sure as yet if we have gone back in with an improved one.

  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...