Saint Garrett Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 An interesting one....certainly seems that we're keen and doesnt seem to be shy from the video below. Plenty of confidence. Maybe one for the summer if we can't get it done this month.
skintsaint Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 Hasn't played much in Moscow, step up too much?
SuperSAINT Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 6 minutes ago, skintsaint said: Hasn't played much in Moscow, step up too much? Injured, I think. Metatarsal.
Turkish Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 (edited) 2 minutes ago, SuperSAINT said: Injured, I think. Metatarsal. You sure? That injury stopped being fashionable about 10 years ago, it was the go to injury just after everyone stopped getting shin splints. Edited 27 January, 2022 by Turkish
SuperSAINT Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 1 minute ago, Turkish said: You sure? That injury stopped being fashionable about 10 years ago, it was the go to injury just after everyone stopped getting shin splints. Fashion is cyclical, Turks. 1
ErwinK1961 Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 Like the direction we are going with these types of (attempted) transfers. Think this feels a bit more of a summer move to be honest, but you never know. Watch him tear the championship up on loan then Chelsea keep him 😂 ”Hey Armando, we’ve bought another friend in for you.. so about that permanent deal..” 1 1
John Boy Saint Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 Blimey a danger of us becoming Budget Brendon Rodgers, raiding the verdant plains of Cobham. The late Matthew Hardings muse about us being Chelsea on Sea might finally come to fruition 2 1
Saint_clark Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 Who else does his agent represent out of interest?
Give it to Ron Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 Sheriff Anjorin [Tino’s father] on reports of Southampton interest in the Chelsea midfielder: “Talks are ongoing. In a few days, you will know everything. There are no other comments.” #saintsfc [rb sport via sport24]
Harry_SFC Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 34 minutes ago, Saint_clark said: Who else does his agent represent out of interest? His agent is Nathan Bertrand, Ryan's brother. He also represents Broja, Simeu and Levi Colwill.
Dman Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 I wonder if we’ve been told no to Broja (or not yet at least), but Anjorin is available… 1
Dman Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 10 minutes ago, Harry_SFC said: His agent is Nathan Bertrand, Ryan's brother. He also represents Broja, Simeu and Levi Colwill. Interesting… FWIW Colwill (a Southampton lad, who’s family member's are key heavily involved with sholing), will be a top player.
HarvSFC Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 According to this article from September, his father is his agent: https://www.thechelseachronicle.com/loan-watch/chelsea-teenagers-father-hints-at-his-sons-potential-permanent-stay-at-loan-club/
SuperSAINT Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 10 minutes ago, Dman said: Interesting… FWIW Colwill (a Southampton lad, who’s family member's are key heavily involved with sholing), will be a top player. He’s been outstanding in the championship this season
qwertyell Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 Loftus-Cheek vibes from the way he strides powerfully through the midfield. Whether he can so easily brush aside fully grown men remains to be seen. An interesting proposition at the right price. 1
terraloon Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 Make of this what you will Chelsea Youth @chelseayouth · 7h I am very not here for several aspects of the idea but the mind does wander towards what the framework of a deal to get Livramento back (before the buyback becomes active in 2023) looks like with Broja involved, from both clubs' perspectives. 3
Dman Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 3 minutes ago, terraloon said: Make of this what you will Chelsea Youth @chelseayouth · 7h I am very not here for several aspects of the idea but the mind does wander towards what the framework of a deal to get Livramento back (before the buyback becomes active in 2023) looks like with Broja involved, from both clubs' perspectives. If Chelsea offered us a deal livramento including Broja, I’d snap their hand off. Broja would be far more important and valuable to us and we have KWP, who’s more than good enough (imo better atm) and I’m sure we could find a back up RB. Does make you wonder about the links to that Spence at Forest…. 2
egg Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 15 minutes ago, Dman said: If Chelsea offered us a deal livramento including Broja, I’d snap their hand off. Broja would be far more important and valuable to us and we have KWP, who’s more than good enough (imo better atm) and I’m sure we could find a back up RB. Does make you wonder about the links to that Spence at Forest…. There'll be all sorts of possible permutations to a deal involving us signing Broja, or agreeing to end his loan early. Tino's buy back could come into play, ditto all sorts of other players. They've got Bettinelli as number 3 keeper who's no worse than McCarthy, for example. Tino is superb but we've shown we're OK without him. Broja over Tino all day long for me. 2
Master Bates Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 1 hour ago, terraloon said: Make of this what you will Chelsea Youth @chelseayouth · 7h I am very not here for several aspects of the idea but the mind does wander towards what the framework of a deal to get Livramento back (before the buyback becomes active in 2023) looks like with Broja involved, from both clubs' perspectives. Can someone translate this for me please 2
Turkish Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 6 minutes ago, Master Bates said: Can someone translate this for me please I thought exactly the same 🤣 1
Toadhall Saint Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 16 minutes ago, Turkish said: I thought exactly the same 🤣 I’m with the pair of you - fookin drivel at its best. 1
Suhari Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 2 hours ago, Give it to Ron said: Quoting this just to check that @Matthew Le God is okay. I'd expect having a phrase such as "% chances out of a 100...." appear here would normally send him into overdrive. 😃
Tamesaint Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 1 hour ago, terraloon said: Make of this what you will Chelsea Youth @chelseayouth · 7h I am very not here for several aspects of the idea but the mind does wander towards what the framework of a deal to get Livramento back (before the buyback becomes active in 2023) looks like with Broja involved, from both clubs' perspectives. Why would Tini want to break the terms of the loan deal? We only have him after he turned down a 5yr deal from Chelsea preferring us for the first team football that we offered. What would have changed for him to want to return there? 1
SuperSAINT Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 Interesting how none of the reliable local press have said anything… Agent driven? 1
Turkish Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 Just now, SuperSAINT said: Interesting how none of the reliable local press have said anything… Agent driven? What local reliable press? 1 1
S-Clarke Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 13 minutes ago, SuperSAINT said: Interesting how none of the reliable local press have said anything… Agent driven? I'm just waiting for the Alex Crook seal of approval before I get excited. 1
Turkish Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 5 minutes ago, S-Clarke said: I'm just waiting for the Alex Crook seal of approval before I get excited. There is only one seal of approval anything needs 5
SuperSAINT Posted 27 January, 2022 Posted 27 January, 2022 15 minutes ago, S-Clarke said: I'm just waiting for the Alex Crook seal of approval before I get excited. Not him. 😁 1
S-Clarke Posted 28 January, 2022 Posted 28 January, 2022 Be good to see how he does in the Championship, must have been tricky to do in this window for whatever reason. 1
manji Posted 28 January, 2022 Posted 28 January, 2022 (edited) 16 hours ago, Turkish said: What local reliable press? Yeah I was going to mention that. It beggars belief that anyone would rely on The Daily Echo or Hampshire Live. Edited 28 January, 2022 by manji
SuperSAINT Posted 28 January, 2022 Posted 28 January, 2022 22 minutes ago, manji said: Yeah I was going to mention that. It beggars belief that anyone would rely on The Daily Echo or Hampshire Live. I mean the ones that talk to the club. Anyone reliable said Anjorin would be summer target.
Chez Posted 28 January, 2022 Posted 28 January, 2022 Are there any videos showing footage of his 7 games in Moscow? He looks powerful and skill full against other nippers, but Chelsea's youth team is so strong that its hard to gauge how good he is when decimating inferior rivals. Getting in the Chelsea youth side means he's half decent, but £17m decent? That's quite a lot of wedge for us to fork out for a `youth' player with limited games to go on. Obviously Livramento worked out well. But that doesn't mean they all will. £5m for an untried youngster is not to be sniffed at, but £17m? Blimey. He must be amazing. Or its that the price these days? Perhaps that figure was just agent/media talk? 3
terraloon Posted 28 January, 2022 Posted 28 January, 2022 (edited) 18 hours ago, Master Bates said: Can someone translate this for me please When Livramento was signed from Chelsea it was within a week of Broja eventually signing on loan. You can’t have two players on loan from the same club. At the time little sense could be made of the fact that the buy back deal doesn’t come into play until 22/23 season nor were Southampton due to pay any of the fee till the end of this season. There is a view and I guess it’s what that tweet was referring to that there may well be another clause in terms of what Chelsea’s options are. https://saintsmarching.com/2021/09/30/crucial-terms-livramento-agreement-chelsea-brilliant-southampton/ Edited 28 January, 2022 by terraloon
revolution saint Posted 28 January, 2022 Posted 28 January, 2022 35 minutes ago, Chez said: Are there any videos showing footage of his 7 games in Moscow? He looks powerful and skill full against other nippers, but Chelsea's youth team is so strong that its hard to gauge how good he is when decimating inferior rivals. Getting in the Chelsea youth side means he's half decent, but £17m decent? That's quite a lot of wedge for us to fork out for a `youth' player with limited games to go on. Obviously Livramento worked out well. But that doesn't mean they all will. £5m for an untried youngster is not to be sniffed at, but £17m? Blimey. He must be amazing. Or its that the price these days? Perhaps that figure was just agent/media talk? Nah, there's not much apart from the goal he scored against Marseille. To be fair it was a pretty good goal though. Tend to agree with you - 17M for a player who has barely played first team football is a lot of cash but I expect fees for academy prospects are going to increase a fair bit over the next few years. I guess you have to take that figure with a pinch of salt - probably loads of add-ons that are included and it would only be exercised if he was a success.
Saint Garrett Posted 28 January, 2022 Author Posted 28 January, 2022 Not sure I've read anything suggesting we're willing to pay £17m. But thats what was pre-agreed with Moscow, with a buy back, after the loan. I think possibly Chelsea were protecting themselves there if he want and tore it up in that league. It was only an option.
Katalinic Posted 28 January, 2022 Posted 28 January, 2022 1 hour ago, Saint Garrett said: Not sure I've read anything suggesting we're willing to pay £17m. But thats what was pre-agreed with Moscow, with a buy back, after the loan. I think possibly Chelsea were protecting themselves there if he want and tore it up in that league. It was only an option. We have put a bid in but it's been rejected. Not sure as yet if we have gone back in with an improved one. 1
qwertyell Posted 28 January, 2022 Posted 28 January, 2022 Well, that rumour burned brightly for about three hours. Good times.
SuperSAINT Posted 28 January, 2022 Posted 28 January, 2022 40 minutes ago, Katalinic said: Huddersfield on loan apparently. Means we can scout Levi Colwill at the same time.
Toadhall Saint Posted 28 January, 2022 Posted 28 January, 2022 5 hours ago, Katalinic said: We have put a bid in but it's been rejected. Not sure as yet if we have gone back in with an improved one. ITK it would seem?
Katalinic Posted 28 January, 2022 Posted 28 January, 2022 2 minutes ago, Toadhall Saint said: ITK it would seem? Not directly and not usually, but have been told a few things today on this one specifically, the latest being the Huddersfield loan. Assuming it's accurate anyway.
Toadhall Saint Posted 28 January, 2022 Posted 28 January, 2022 42 minutes ago, Katalinic said: Not directly and not usually, but have been told a few things today on this one specifically, the latest being the Huddersfield loan. Assuming it's accurate anyway. Deffo itk
rooney Posted 29 January, 2022 Posted 29 January, 2022 8 hours ago, Toadhall Saint said: Deffo itk I know Katalinic is close to this one. 1
waylander Posted 31 January, 2022 Posted 31 January, 2022 Confirmed as having signed for Huddersfield on loan until end of the season
SuperSAINT Posted 31 January, 2022 Posted 31 January, 2022 On 28/01/2022 at 20:54, Katalinic said: Huddersfield on loan apparently. ITK Champion 🏆 this window goes to @Katalinic 2 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now