Jump to content

Russia


whelk
 Share

Referendum on Moscow to officially become territory of Wales  

36 members have voted

  1. 1. Referendum on Moscow to officially become territory of Wales

    • Da!
      33
    • Net!
      3


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Baird of the land said:

Because i’m capable of having sympathy for 2 things at the same time. Because I dislike the thin edge of the wedge where it’s deemed acceptable to come after someone for dubious reasoning related to their ancestry.

 

Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do have some sympathy for individual players. They aren't on sanctions lists, may have differing levels of connection with Russia and their profile and that of their sport plays a part in number 10 in Comms with the organisers. I had heard yesterday, there were other tennis organisations who felt differently.

However, any sense of normality in their participation will be milked shamelessly in Russia and fed to a populace with restricted access to alternative views. Not to mention those there that support their leadership's actions. Whether they participate under their flag or not.

A policy of restricting their participation completely isolates them from latching onto any success or spin. The more isolated, the more chance of change, in some form, over whatever length of time.

I also wouldn't want players to have to openly declare their views on the invasion. They may have family put at risk as a result, and there could be lasting implications beyond the conflict. Public self flagellation, while talks go on between politicians isn't something I'd be demanding. Again, even if that happened their success/participation would be spun at home.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Baird of the land said:

Don’t see how punishing individuals based on ancestry who may not currently live in Russia at events where they wouldn’t be officially representing Russia is right or puts the slightest pressure on the Russian govt.

Because at the moment the Russian people are being fed a whole load of bullshit propaganda about the war, this is one way of maybe getting the message across that the rest of the world thinks what their government is doing is wrong.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, aintforever said:

Because at the moment the Russian people are being fed a whole load of bullshit propaganda about the war, this is one way of maybe getting the message across that the rest of the world thinks what their government is doing is wrong.

It doesn't get that message across at all. It sends a mccartyite message of coming after people based on ancestry. Russian media won't even have to spin it as punishing someone for sin of being born in russia when not even representing Russia is going to engender outrage. It even bans players who have been anti the war.

Edited by Baird of the land
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Baird of the land said:

It doesn't get that message across at all. It sends a mccartyite message of coming after people based on ancestry. Russian media won't even have to spin it as punishing someone for sin of being born in russia when not even representing Russia is going to engender outrage. It even bans players who have been anti the war.

They are representing Russia. Imagine something like this happening to the UK, if Lewis Hamilton was still out winning F1 races, we wouldn’t all suddenly pretend he was a completely different person, from Turkmenistan.

Everything you’ve said could also apply to Russian soldiers. Should we have a rule not to shoot them, in case we kill a non-rapey, forced conscript who doesn’t support Putin? It’s war, there will be innocent casualties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Lighthouse said:

They are representing Russia. Imagine something like this happening to the UK, if Lewis Hamilton was still out winning F1 races, we wouldn’t all suddenly pretend he was a completely different person, from Turkmenistan.

Everything you’ve said could also apply to Russian soldiers. Should we have a rule not to shoot them, in case we kill a non-rapey, forced conscript who doesn’t support Putin? It’s war, there will be innocent casualties.

They aren't representing Russia or Belarus, they are working for themselves, not even living in Russia. This isn't Davis Cup. Restricting whether someone is allowed to work based on their ethnicity is wrong. If people are stupid enough to want to support Lewis Hamilton because he was once born in the UK but ran off to Monaco at the earliest opportunity that's your idiocy.

Pretty sure UK isn't at war with Russia currently so yeah we shouldn't be shooting any russian soldiers. Ukraine's forces are quite within their rights to be shooting invading soldiers. Soldiers aren't innocent casualties regardless of how they were recruited.

 

 

Edited by Baird of the land
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Baird of the land said:

It doesn't get that message across at all. It sends a mccartyite message of coming after people based on ancestry. Russian media won't even have to spin it as punishing someone for sin of being born in russia when not even representing Russia is going to engender outrage. It even bans players who have been anti the war.

I disagree, Russia will obviously try and spin it however they want but if we just let Russia compete as normal they will just spin that as the whole world being behind them. It’s tough on the competitors effected but the more pressure applied the better, even if it only prompts a few people to try and look beyond the propaganda for the truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, aintforever said:

I disagree, Russia will obviously try and spin it however they want but if we just let Russia compete as normal they will just spin that as the whole world being behind them. It’s tough on the competitors effected but the more pressure applied the better, even if it only prompts a few people to try and look beyond the propaganda for the truth.

I'm coming round to this point of view but still think it's unfair on individual competitors.  I understand Medvedev hasn't even lived in Russia for years, for example.  

So the unfairness on individuals is justifiable because of the greater good that the ban might achieve.  I get it, but still feel sorry for the individuals (providing they are anti the invasion of course). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, aintforever said:

I disagree, Russia will obviously try and spin it however they want but if we just let Russia compete as normal they will just spin that as the whole world being behind them. It’s tough on the competitors effected but the more pressure applied the better, even if it only prompts a few people to try and look beyond the propaganda for the truth.

You say the whole world? 
you mean the western world?

even the western world is dis-unified against Russia.

Edited by AlexLaw76
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

You say the whole world? 
you mean the western world?

even the western world is dis-unified against Russia.

He said that if we don't apply strict sanctions then the Russians would spin it as 'the whole world being behind them', and effectively supporting the SMO.

Try reading and understanding the posts you respond to.

Edited by badgerx16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

He said that if we don't apply strict sanctions then the Russians would spin it as 'the whole world being behind them', and effectively supporting the SMO.

Try reading and understanding the posts you respond to.

Fair point, I did not read it properly 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Manuel said:

I'm coming round to this point of view but still think it's unfair on individual competitors.  I understand Medvedev hasn't even lived in Russia for years, for example.  

So the unfairness on individuals is justifiable because of the greater good that the ban might achieve.  I get it, but still feel sorry for the individuals (providing they are anti the invasion of course). 

There's a Russian cycling team (Russian owned), that has numerous other nationalities riding for them as well as countless staff, coaches etc the majorit of whom are not Russian.  I understand why the 'team' has had its racing licence removed given that it is funded by Russian money, but that leaves ALL of the staff and riders without a job.  Since the racing licence has been rescinded by the UCI, the contracts state that there is no responsibility to pay the staff.

That doesn't seem particularly fair to the people in the team and probably could have been avoided if the UCI had left the licence in place but just banned the team from competing....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kyle04 said:

Seems Russia has whacked 2 olligarchs recently, one in Russia, another living in Spain. Oh, and the wife and daughters of both, just to make it look like murder/suicide.

They killed thousands of Ukrainian civilians and now they’ve started on their own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, kyle04 said:

Seems Russia has whacked 2 olligarchs recently, one in Russia, another living in Spain. Oh, and the wife and daughters of both, just to make it look like murder/suicide.

That's six oligarchs who have died under "suspicious circumstances" since the start of the war.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 22/04/2022 at 19:17, AlexLaw76 said:

You say the whole world? 
you mean the western world?

even the western world is dis-unified against Russia.

There’s very little support for the Russian invasion outside of Russia.

There’s a certain level of tolerance for it from some places, due to either the cost of opposing Russia and existing deals, or opportunism of Russia being being forced to buy and sell in a smaller market, but everywhere is facing uncertainty because of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 18/04/2022 at 21:23, buctootim said:

No. It's true that after the invasion of 2014 there was a big upswing in Ukrainian patriotism and identity and there have been moves to mainstream use of Ukrainian in public life and schools but the languages share maybe 70% of their words and most people still speak Russian in some form. Removal of 'Russian' monuments and statues is actually about Soviet communist monuments.      

The examples I saw were the eternal flame munuments to the millions of Russians who died in WW2 fighting the Nazis. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jonnyboy said:

The examples I saw were the eternal flame munuments to the millions of Russians who died in WW2 fighting the Nazis. 

A war where probably thousands of civilians have been deliberately killed is bound to change opinions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jonnyboy said:

The examples I saw were the eternal flame munuments to the millions of Russians who died in WW2 fighting the Nazis. 

Why would Ukrainians want Soviet / Russian monuments on their territory?  They were invaded and occupied by them. Do you have any idea what Stalin and other Soviets did to them? - worse even than the Nazis. Invasion and destruction of their country in 1917, a deliberate forced famine to subjugate them in the 1930s killing around 4 million. Another 6 million in WW2 - 25% of the population wiped out by purges and brutality with an average life expectancy of 8 years at birth. The NKVD massacring the prison population of Ukraine in 1941.

Why woulds they want any monuments celebrating how wonderful it all was?  These are Ukrainian monuments.    

 

1912-oped-balan-holodomor-banner-978696.jpg

People commemorate victims of the Nazi massacre in Kyiv

 

Edited by buctootim
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently activists in Belarus disrupted the rail network in the early weeks of the invasion and caused severe problems for Russian supply lines. This was made easier because the Belarus rail network management system operates on Windows XP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

Apparently activists in Belarus disrupted the rail network in the early weeks of the invasion and caused severe problems for Russian supply lines. This was made easier because the Belarus rail network management system operates on Windows XP.

Anonymous probably gave it to a junior trainee to cut their teeth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jimmy_D said:

Both Sweden and Finland have agreed to apply to join NATO next month.

Can’t imagine too many barriers will be put in their way.

Norfolk better watch out as that is the needless provocation he needs to shell us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 24/04/2022 at 00:53, Jonnyboy said:

The examples I saw were the eternal flame munuments to the millions of Russians who died in WW2 fighting the Nazis. 

Presumably you have no issue with the statue in Kyiv celebrating 'Friendship' between Ukraine and Russia being dismantled.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 24/04/2022 at 09:24, buctootim said:

Why would Ukrainians want Soviet / Russian monuments on their territory?  They were invaded and occupied by them. Do you have any idea what Stalin and other Soviets did to them? - worse even than the Nazis. Invasion and destruction of their country in 1917, a deliberate forced famine to subjugate them in the 1930s killing around 4 million. Another 6 million in WW2 - 25% of the population wiped out by purges and brutality with an average life expectancy of 8 years at birth. The NKVD massacring the prison population of Ukraine in 1941.

Why woulds they want any monuments celebrating how wonderful it all was?  These are Ukrainian monuments.    

 

1912-oped-balan-holodomor-banner-978696.jpg

People commemorate victims of the Nazi massacre in Kyiv

 

Seems to me that the country is terminally divided between those that want to be Ukranian and those that want to be Russian. Isn't that what Russia has said all along?

Perhaps rather than all this death and destruction some sort of agreement to split the country would've been better? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jonnyboy said:

Seems to me that the country is terminally divided between those that want to be Ukranian and those that want to be Russian. Isn't that what Russia has said all along?

Perhaps rather than all this death and destruction some sort of agreement to split the country would've been better? 

Really? Who wants to be Russian? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, buctootim said:

Really? Who wants to be Russian? 

A referendum would reveal that. 

Zelensky said he sees Ukraine as the new Israel. I guess he sees some people as becoming second class citizens. 

Edited by Jonnyboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jonnyboy said:

Seems to me that the country is terminally divided between those that want to be Ukranian and those that want to be Russian. Isn't that what Russia has said all along?

Perhaps rather than all this death and destruction some sort of agreement to split the country would've been better? 

Or they could f**k off and actually live in Russia, if it's really that important to them. Which it isn't.

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Lighthouse said:

Or they could f**k off and actually live in Russia, if it's really that important to them. Which it isn't.

The Donbass is the most 'pro' Russia area of Ukraine. In 2013 before the Russian invasion the population was around 6.3 million. When Russia invaded (the leaders of the 'militia' were Russian army officers) 3 million refugees were created. 2.5 million relocated within Ukraine and only 500,000 relocated to Russia - despite Russia offering immediate passports, jobs and money and it being a richer country. Thats a pretty clear referendum imo - and that was 8 years ago - before the present day schitt.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Jonnyboy said:

Seems to me that the country is terminally divided between those that want to be Ukranian and those that want to be Russian. Isn't that what Russia has said all along?

Perhaps rather than all this death and destruction some sort of agreement to split the country would've been better? 

All this death and destruction is a result of your psychopathic mate

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Jonnyboy said:

Seems to me that the country is terminally divided between those that want to be Ukranian and those that want to be Russian. Isn't that what Russia has said all along?

Perhaps rather than all this death and destruction some sort of agreement to split the country would've been better? 

That's like saying Ireland should hold a referendum now to avoid the threat of death and destruction due to the threat of British invasion.

There's no excuse or justification for what Russia has done.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jimmy_D said:

That's like saying Ireland should hold a referendum now to avoid the threat of death and destruction due to the threat of British invasion.

There's no excuse or justification for what Russia has done.

Mate it’s the West. Never simple in Jonny’s eyes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Jonnyboy said:

Seems to me that the country is terminally divided between those that want to be Ukranian and those that want to be Russian. Isn't that what Russia has said all along?

Perhaps rather than all this death and destruction some sort of agreement to split the country would've been better? 

Putin doesn't want to 'liberate' the 'Russians' in Donbas, he has openly admitted he wants the whole of Ukraine back as Russian territory, as he does not recognise Ukraine's right to exist independently. His next stop will be Moldova, not just Transnistra, and without NATO he would roll on to the Baltic states. His aim is to reinstate the Russian empire. He is as much an expansionist megalomaniac as Hitler was.

Edited by badgerx16
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

Putin doesn't want to 'liberate' the 'Russians' in Donbas, he has openly admitted he wants the whole of Ukraine back as Russian territory, as he does not recognise Ukraine's right to exist independently. His next stop will be Moldova, not just Transnistra, and without NATO he would roll on to the Baltic states. His aim is to reinstate the Russian empire. He is as much an expansionist megalomaniac as Hitler was.

Source? 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jonnyboy said:

Source? 

Well, there were the photos of Lukashenko standing in front of a large battle map which said, "invasion of Moldova, this way," and explaining it to a room full of high ranking generals. Very subtle but the clues are there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Jonnyboy said:

Source? 

The man himself ;

"“Ukraine is not just a neighboring country for us, It is an inalienable part of our own history, culture, and spiritual space. Ukraine’s borders have no meaning other than to mark a former administrative division of the Soviet Union: “Modern Ukraine was entirely created by Russia.”"

He is currently attempting to create what is known as 'Novorossiya'.

Also, try this.....

http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/66181

Edited by badgerx16
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

“Ukraine is not just a neighboring country for us, It is an inalienable part of our own history, culture, and spiritual space. Ukraine’s borders have no meaning other than to mark a former administrative division of the Soviet Union: “Modern Ukraine was entirely created by Russia.”"

As deluded and inaccurate as the Nazi's Aryan race theory, Ukraine has been subject to unspeakable brutality by Russia/USSR for over a century now, so by some perverse logic it seems the two are intertwined. The Ukrainians seem to have an awful lot of national pride and patriotism for a country that really dosen't exist. As their cities have been pounded, has their army surrendered, mutinied, attempted a coup? A former comedy actor FFS has stared down one of the most ruthless dispassionate figures in world politics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...