Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Mattster said:

This is 100% true and something I am always banging on about to people complaining about having it. I think the stats are something like once every 10 years on average across the population, so it is really not that common, and it is or can be a really nasty disease (no such thing as "just" the flu). There's no question of muddling through at work when you've got the full on flu despite what the Beechams ads might say. I had a colleague who swore he got flu twice a year, every year, and wouldn't budge on it, but colds can be pretty nasty too sometimes.

Yeah but how do you know people don’t have same virus but repel it better so symptoms are minor so fatigue etc is still suffering but not to same degree as others?

Posted
23 minutes ago, whelk said:

Yeah but how do you know people don’t have same virus but repel it better so symptoms are minor so fatigue etc is still suffering but not to same degree as others?

It's always going to be variable depending on the person, exposure and vaccine history etc. But the government do monitor flu cases, and I have no reason not to believe the average of once every 10 years on average per person. Which would make my old friend getting it twice every year so unlikely as to not be believable.

Posted
2 hours ago, waylander said:

If he got it 40 days ago then it was more than likely the Delta variant rather than Omicron which is proving to be much less severe !

I've had it for 3 days now, my sniffle has gone and the cough is becoming less intermittent. I've had much worse colds over the years than this...

Good luck to the fella mind, hope he pulls through without lasting effects !

Posted

Swansea have a “considerable amount”’of COVID cases, according to the club’s website. I doubt they’d also want to play home matches behind closed doors, especially an FA Cup match, given the loss in revenue hitting the Football League already previously. So…

  • Like 1
Posted

Surely the opposition should have a say in games being called off as its going to impact them with a fixture pile up. What's the point in u23's etc. Clubs are happy enough playing kids etc in cup games.

Posted

Wow they must have put a lot of effort into getting more cases. I spent Xmas with my family, elderly and youngsters. Mixing for the first time in ages. No restrictions on licking door handles or sharing snacks. Six days later, everyone departs with no issues. 

Now if they had done a herpies test, I'd have to eat outside, but they skipped that this year, so its all good. 

Covid is Sooooooooooo yester-year. Only fat, smoking fast food twats will say different. And that is a fact check true. 

  • Confused 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Teddeer said:

How very convenient for them. Don't think anyone saw that coming.

With so many cases being reported throughout the country it is hardly surprising that football is being involved

 

Surely it is better to wait and get the games played well everybody is fit and well Adams has Covid it cannot be nice for him to be under pressure to return to the team

Posted (edited)

Can't believe the like$ of trou$ers $uggesting that Newca$tle are trying to get an unfair advantage.

Can $omeone think of the player$ and $taff!

/$

Edited by OttawaSaint
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

I've just sent a Get Well Soon card addressed to St James Park c/o Mr Howe to share with his poorly players, hopefully it will give them the lift they need to get the game on. 

 

Swansea haven't played a game of football since 11th December! Complete farce. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, Pamplemousse said:

Newcastle are still going down, no amount of money will change that.

 

Look at QPR for example...

 

It will all go tits up for them.

Fingers crossed 🤞

Posted

Knowing our luck we will get a covid outbreak at the time of the reschedule and they will not allow it to be postponed again because of fixture congestion and we get tonked or are forced to forfeit.

  • Haha 2
  • Confused 1
Posted

Given how infectious Omicron is and how Newcastle played Manchester United just three days ago, United should also be missing a tonne of players due to positive tests tonight, right?

Posted
42 minutes ago, OttawaSaint said:

Can't believe the like$ of trou$ers $uggesting that Newca$tle are trying to get an unfair advantage.

Can $omeone think of the player$ and $taff!

/$

Why wa$ chel$ea match not po$tponed, when they reque$ted it?

Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

Why wa$ chel$ea match not po$tponed, when they reque$ted it?

So that you could point it out every 5 minutes to show people how darn clever you are?

#legend

Edited by trousers
  • Haha 3
Posted

Swansea have already called off their game scheduled for 3rd January,  not looking good for that one either at this rate. We nearly got a bye v Shrewsbury last season but they managed to get a team together just in time going to be like that again, will be interesting to see what they do with the FA Cup as less scope for rearranging games before the next round. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, JRM said:

Swansea have already called off their game scheduled for 3rd January,  not looking good for that one either at this rate. We nearly got a bye v Shrewsbury last season but they managed to get a team together just in time going to be like that again, will be interesting to see what they do with the FA Cup as less scope for rearranging games before the next round. 

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/swansea-city-v-fulham-postponed-22603562

Posted
1 minute ago, JRM said:

Swansea have already called off their game scheduled for 3rd January,  not looking good for that one either at this rate. We nearly got a bye v Shrewsbury last season but they managed to get a team together just in time going to be like that again, will be interesting to see what they do with the FA Cup as less scope for rearranging games before the next round. 

No replays so there is a bit of flexibility in terms of rearranging the game.

Posted

 

4 hours ago, nta786 said:

In truth I don’t think I can blame Newcastle for trying to get it off. It’s a dog eat dog world out there, can anyone blame Newcastle for wanting to give themselves the best chance of beating us? 

In fact I say good on them because in life if you don’t ask you don’t get- if there is a loophole to be exploited it’s rational for them to try to gain an advantage. When there is livelihoods and millions of pounds at stake, expect all ethics to be thrown out of the window.

I think all anger should be directed to the PL who have not been transparent in the process and have somewhat lost control of the whole situation which has allowed teams to make a mockery of the rules.

Depends. If their list of ineligible includes unvaccinated and suspensions, then I say fuck them.

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Dark Munster said:

 

Depends. If their list of ineligible includes unvaccinated and suspensions, then I say fuck them.

That's a novel punishment for being unvaccinated.

  • Haha 3
Posted
1 minute ago, ecuk268 said:

That's a novel punishment for being unvaccinated.

Required vaccinations is not unreasonable. They're professional athletes, who already have work requirements that the rest of us don't (keeping fit, not eating junk, limited alcohol, no smoking, etc.)

MLT excepted of course.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Dark Munster said:

Required vaccinations is not unreasonable. They're professional athletes, who already have work requirements that the rest of us don't (keeping fit, not eating junk, limited alcohol, no smoking, etc.)

MLT excepted of course.

I think he means the "fuck them" part..

Posted
7 hours ago, Matthew Le God said:

Yup, Hasenhüttl has already suggested the Brentford rearranged game may be midweek after the  Swansea FA Cup match.

Plus they'll all be bleating about the AN cup soon.

 

Posted
33 minutes ago, Toadhall Saint said:

Integrity 

Would they be some keen to play if they had Watford at home as opposed to Utd away. Anyway, I’m sure their supporters will be delighted with their “integrity” seeing as their 3 down after 35 mins.

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

Would they be some keen to play if they had Watford at home as opposed to Utd away. Anyway, I’m sure their supporters will be delighted with their “integrity” seeing as their 3 down after 35 mins.

Not sure what point you are trying to make? My opinion is obvious as that’s how I see it.

  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Toadhall Saint said:

Not sure what point you are trying to make?

Most of his points are intended to show how intelligent he is. My opinion is different to his on this matter too. I'll concede abrasive and opinionated though..

Posted
3 hours ago, Dark Munster said:

 

Depends. If their list of ineligible includes unvaccinated and suspensions, then I say fuck them.

will you say if they are all vaccinated - whats the point of the fucking  vaccination 

  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, richardc said:

will you say if they are all vaccinated - whats the point of the fucking  vaccination 

Fucking hell how many more thick cunts are there on here?

Edited by whelk
  • Like 3
Posted
1 hour ago, whelk said:

Fucking hell how many more thick cunts are there on here?

whats thick about pointing out that vaccination does little to stop the transmission of omincrom and therefore discriminating against those people is unnecessary.

we all know your a facist bootlicker that shouts down anyone you dont agree with - with your hard man language - i wonder if your so hard away from your keyboard

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
34 minutes ago, richardc said:

whats thick about pointing out that vaccination does little to stop the transmission of omincrom and therefore discriminating against those people is unnecessary.

we all know your a facist bootlicker that shouts down anyone you dont agree with - with your hard man language - i wonder if your so hard away from your keyboard

Vaccinated players are less likely to get infected with omicron and delta, and less likely to get sick if they do. There's no excuse for anything less than a 100% vaccination rate among professional footballers.

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Dark Munster said:

Vaccinated players are less likely to get infected with omicron and delta, and less likely to get sick if they do. There's no excuse for anything less than a 100% vaccination rate among professional footballers.

 

 

 

Edited by AlexLaw76
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

How, after all this time, do you still not understand how vaccines work?

You're far less likely to contract the virus if vaccinated. It's hard to pass on a disease that you don't have.

Edited by niceandfriendly
  • Like 4
Posted
49 minutes ago, niceandfriendly said:

How, after all this time, do you still not understand how vaccines work?

You're far less likely to contract the virus if vaccinated. It's hard to pass on a disease that you don't have.

Not according to all in the profession (whilst we sit and get told everyone is getting the virus this winter)

  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, niceandfriendly said:

How, after all this time, do you still not understand how vaccines work?

You're far less likely to contract the virus if vaccinated. It's hard to pass on a disease that you don't have.

The benefits in terms of contracting and transmitting are marginal at best.

In the latest 4 week figures, just as an illustration, among 18-30 YOs, there were 163k cases vaccinated, 52k unvaccinated.
The double jabbed rate in those groups, according to the same report, is approx  60%.

vaccination should be a personal medical choice.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1043608/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_51.pdf

And here is just one .example of a practical  issue.

 

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.23.21268276v1.full

 

 

 

Edited by teamsaint
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Not according to all in the profession (whilst we sit and get told everyone is getting the virus this winter)

Hmmm.

See answers 4 and 5 here:

 

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/health/how-effective-are-covid-19-vaccines-against-omicron
 

Given the enormous lengths footballers are expected to go to in order to maximise their chances of playing at peak performance, it’s beyond absurd that players paid millions a year - often equating to several thousand pounds per minute on the pitch - wouldn’t take 3 jabs.

  • Like 7

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...