Jump to content
2nd January - updates ×

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Manuel said:

Ha, I never knew you couldn't score directly from a throw.  Odd rule to have really.  

Not sure how old you are but there's a classic example in a Birmingham derby when a player threw the ball back to Peter Enckleman in goal, he went to control it, but messed up and it took a slight touch off his foot and went in. If he'd have completely missed it the goal wouldn't have counted.

 

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Chez said:

if a keeper throws it from one end to the other and it goes straight in, does that count? I am guessing not.

No it doesn't count. Not wanting to tempt fate here but a keeper can throw it into his own net.

Seems a strange rule really as there's no chance on earth a keeper would be able to throw one in the opposing goal.

Posted
On 25/11/2021 at 12:08, CAH61 said:

I think that a change of formation might work with 5 at the back and 3 CMs. I think that Tino needs a rest as he appears to have tired in games lately and he is still only 19. If Stuey is fit I would bring him on later or if we are chasing the game, the same with Redders and Broja.

 

team.png.9022875775d39822db57ecf451ed5dc7.png

If we score an early goal it will be 11 at the back with Liverpool peppering the goal.

Posted (edited)

3-0 defeat or less would be a result.

They're absolute monsters at the moment.

We're not getting anything out of this game today.

Not even a whiff of a point.

Edit to say: I doff my cap to anyone who has traveled up there today.

Edited by JustinSFC
Posted
1 hour ago, Manuel said:

Ha, I never knew you couldn't score directly from a throw.  Odd rule to have really.  

You can’t score a goal with your hands. Until 2019 a goalkeeper could throw the ball into the opposition net and score but no longer. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, egg said:

Brave is the kindest word I can think of. If ever there was a game for 3 in the middle it was today. 

Technically, we've got in midfield, but I get what you mean 

Posted

No KWP, but he's a versatile sub to bring on if we are under the cosh. I wonder if Armstrong will play slightly more withdrawn and make those space making runs into space?..

It will be interesting to see how they set up.

Posted

Liking the formation change, 5 at the back defending, 3 in possession. I know it hasn't worked before early on in Ralph's tenure but we have better personnel for it now. 

 

Also dropping our ineffective number 10s gets a tick from me. 3 eager strikers and Adams and Armstrong can play deeper to Broja. Good luck to Lyanco too.

 

Liverpool will still maul us but at least Ralph had tried IMO. 

 

3 nil Dippers.

Posted

While I'm not confident for the game, I do like that team and formation. Let's hope it doesn't backfire and we get humped today because it'll mean the formation won't be used again.

 

Play for the cleansheet and hope Adams can hit another worldly. 

Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, JustinSFC said:

Take out McCarthy and that's the strongest team we've got.

No it's not! No KWP, Redmond or Armstrong for starters.

1-5 today in this weather

Edited by Charlie Wayman
  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, The Cat said:

This has 3-3 written all over it.

Problem is we seem to need about 8 chances per goal so going to need to be a lot sharper in front of goal to get 3. 

I'll go with our usual 1 goal to Liverpools 3. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Saint NL said:

While I'm not confident for the game, I do like that team and formation. Let's hope it doesn't backfire and we get humped today because it'll mean the formation won't be used again.

We've used it already on multiple occasions this season during games.

Posted
Just now, macca155 said:

Good grief it's cold up here. 

Bit of a mental lineup against Liverpool but hey it might work.

We thought about going but now at home hearing about the weather and being nice and warm glad made that decision. It’s an age thing

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Lots of long balls from the back from us I reckon, could be good if we can get in behind them on the counter attack.

Edited by CAH61
Posted
Just now, CAH61 said:

Lots of long balls from the back from us I reckon, should be good if we can get in behind them on the counter attack.

Why do you think that? It isn't how Saints play regardless of formation.

Image

Posted
4 minutes ago, CAH61 said:

Lots of long balls from the back from us I reckon, could be good if we can get in behind them on the counter attack.

Agreed. We'll be more direct I think, balls into the channels for the 3 up top, also expect to see them coming deep to almost play as 10's and play on the turn. Really interesting line up. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Matthew Le God said:

What about it don't you understand?

Give it a fucking rest mate. People don't have to explain every opinion they have. 

  • Like 3
Posted
1 minute ago, Matthew Le God said:

Why are you telling me it is his opinion? What else could it have been? 🤔

You're questioning him as if everything anyone says HAS to have a foundation of solid verifiable fact.
 

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, JustinSFC said:

You're questioning him as if everything anyone says HAS to have a foundation of solid verifiable fact.
 

I was merely asking him why he held that opinion given the evidence to the contrary which shows we aren't remotely a long ball team.

Edited by Matthew Le God
Posted
1 minute ago, JustinSFC said:

I like how mods secretly remove comments so that the thread doesn't make sense.

*puts on MLG hat*

Accccccshhewwwaaalllllaaay. If it was secret, how would you know?

Posted
20 minutes ago, Charlie Wayman said:

No it's not! No KWP, Redmond or Armstrong for starters.

1-5 today in this weather

Lol.

Armstrong is injured.

Redmond is beyond shite.

And a full back isn't the pinnacle of a team.
 

  • Confused 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, whelk said:

We thought about going but now at home hearing about the weather and being nice and warm glad made that decision. It’s an age thing

Hey never too old

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...