Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 27/11/2021 at 12:29, Manuel said:

Ha, I never knew you couldn't score directly from a throw.  Odd rule to have really.  

Expand  

Not sure how old you are but there's a classic example in a Birmingham derby when a player threw the ball back to Peter Enckleman in goal, he went to control it, but messed up and it took a slight touch off his foot and went in. If he'd have completely missed it the goal wouldn't have counted.

 

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
  On 27/11/2021 at 12:33, Chez said:

if a keeper throws it from one end to the other and it goes straight in, does that count? I am guessing not.

Expand  

No it doesn't count. Not wanting to tempt fate here but a keeper can throw it into his own net.

Seems a strange rule really as there's no chance on earth a keeper would be able to throw one in the opposing goal.

Posted
  On 25/11/2021 at 12:08, CAH61 said:

I think that a change of formation might work with 5 at the back and 3 CMs. I think that Tino needs a rest as he appears to have tired in games lately and he is still only 19. If Stuey is fit I would bring him on later or if we are chasing the game, the same with Redders and Broja.

 

team.png.9022875775d39822db57ecf451ed5dc7.png

Expand  

If we score an early goal it will be 11 at the back with Liverpool peppering the goal.

Posted (edited)

3-0 defeat or less would be a result.

They're absolute monsters at the moment.

We're not getting anything out of this game today.

Not even a whiff of a point.

Edit to say: I doff my cap to anyone who has traveled up there today.

Edited by JustinSFC
Posted

No KWP, but he's a versatile sub to bring on if we are under the cosh. I wonder if Armstrong will play slightly more withdrawn and make those space making runs into space?..

It will be interesting to see how they set up.

Posted

Liking the formation change, 5 at the back defending, 3 in possession. I know it hasn't worked before early on in Ralph's tenure but we have better personnel for it now. 

 

Also dropping our ineffective number 10s gets a tick from me. 3 eager strikers and Adams and Armstrong can play deeper to Broja. Good luck to Lyanco too.

 

Liverpool will still maul us but at least Ralph had tried IMO. 

 

3 nil Dippers.

Posted

While I'm not confident for the game, I do like that team and formation. Let's hope it doesn't backfire and we get humped today because it'll mean the formation won't be used again.

 

Play for the cleansheet and hope Adams can hit another worldly. 

Posted
  On 27/11/2021 at 14:12, The Cat said:

This has 3-3 written all over it.

Expand  

Problem is we seem to need about 8 chances per goal so going to need to be a lot sharper in front of goal to get 3. 

I'll go with our usual 1 goal to Liverpools 3. 

Posted
  On 27/11/2021 at 14:17, Saint NL said:

While I'm not confident for the game, I do like that team and formation. Let's hope it doesn't backfire and we get humped today because it'll mean the formation won't be used again.

Expand  

We've used it already on multiple occasions this season during games.

Posted
  On 27/11/2021 at 14:18, macca155 said:

Good grief it's cold up here. 

Bit of a mental lineup against Liverpool but hey it might work.

Expand  

We thought about going but now at home hearing about the weather and being nice and warm glad made that decision. It’s an age thing

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Lots of long balls from the back from us I reckon, could be good if we can get in behind them on the counter attack.

Edited by CAH61
Posted
  On 27/11/2021 at 14:23, CAH61 said:

Lots of long balls from the back from us I reckon, could be good if we can get in behind them on the counter attack.

Expand  

Agreed. We'll be more direct I think, balls into the channels for the 3 up top, also expect to see them coming deep to almost play as 10's and play on the turn. Really interesting line up. 

Posted (edited)
  On 27/11/2021 at 14:31, JustinSFC said:

You're questioning him as if everything anyone says HAS to have a foundation of solid verifiable fact.
 

Expand  

I was merely asking him why he held that opinion given the evidence to the contrary which shows we aren't remotely a long ball team.

Edited by Matthew Le God

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...