Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Lot of huff and puff but shite in the final third. Found ourselves with someone running at the heart of their defence several times but lacked the composure and quality to play the right pass.

Probably shot our bolt now.

Maybe put Djenepo and Walcott on in the second half...

What have we done to deserve another game of Efan Ekoku and his weird grievance against all things Saints related on commentary?

Posted
  On 18/05/2021 at 17:55, qwertyell said:

Lot of huff and puff but shite in the final third. Found ourselves with someone running at the heart of their defence several times but lacked the composure and quality to play the right pass.

Probably shot our bolt now.

Maybe put Djenepo and Walcott on in the second half...

What have we done to deserve another game of Efan Ekoku and his weird grievance against all things Saints related on commentary?

Expand  

Erm, they are both on already. 

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Posted

Played well in that first half. The better side without ever really looking that dangerous. We've been here before several times this season.......................

Posted
  On 18/05/2021 at 17:55, qwertyell said:

Lot of huff and puff but shite in the final third. Found ourselves with someone running at the heart of their defence several times but lacked the composure and quality to play the right pass.

Probably shot our bolt now.

Maybe put Djenepo and Walcott on in the second half...

What have we done to deserve another game of Efan Ekoku and his weird grievance against all things Saints related on commentary?

Expand  

Well, I find him a good commentator, and don't hear any particular bias.

  • Like 5
Posted
  On 18/05/2021 at 18:07, egg said:

Yep, he's decent. 

Expand  

Apart from when he was trying to say JWP deserves a red for absolutely nothing other than getting his arm across the Leeds player. 

Posted
  On 18/05/2021 at 18:16, SKD said:

Shouldn’t need to. Stone wall penalty. Terrible of VAR to ignore it. 

Expand  

Kind of agree but you're into a whole new labyrinth of clear and obvious interpretations if they start giving penalties that could/should have resulted in the attacker going to ground when they didn't. 

Posted
  On 18/05/2021 at 18:17, Saint_clark said:

Why? You can't have the advantage and the chance to score and then still want the penalty when you don't.

Expand  

Hardly an advantage. By the time he got to the ball the defender had recovered and he was practically on the touch line. 
 

Had he gone down, that’s a pen. Why shouldn’t it be when he stays on his feet? 
 

Stonewall. 

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 18/05/2021 at 18:19, SKD said:

Hardly an advantage. By the time he got to the ball the defender had recovered and he was practically on the touch line. 
 

Had he gone down, that’s a pen. Why shouldn’t it be when he stays on his feet? 
 

Stonewall. 

Expand  

If he hasn't got to the ball after the contact then a penalty should be given, but what if he'd blown the whistle for a penalty as bamford slotted it into the net? 

Posted
  On 18/05/2021 at 18:19, stknowle said:

Kind of agree but you're into a whole new labyrinth of clear and obvious interpretations if they start giving penalties that could/should have resulted in the attacker going to ground when they didn't. 

Expand  

But you don’t need to go to ground for it to be a foul by the letter of the law. That’s just the interpretation the incompetent refs have. 

Posted
  On 18/05/2021 at 18:20, Saint_clark said:

If he hasn't got to the ball after the contact then a penalty should be given, but what if he'd blown the whistle for a penalty as bamford slotted it into the net? 

Expand  

But he didn’t and regardless, VAR should have pulled it back as it was an obvious foul. 

Posted
  On 18/05/2021 at 18:16, SKD said:

Shouldn’t need to. Stone wall penalty. Terrible of VAR to ignore it. 

Expand  

Would have been the perfect opportunity to  try and stop players going down easily but instead the refs are effectively encouraging it and making their job harder. 
Said it before but don’t see why the Premier League that wants the best players in the world doesn’t go and get the best refs from other countries as well.

Posted
  On 18/05/2021 at 18:22, ChrisPY said:

Would have been the perfect opportunity to  try and stop players going down easily but instead the refs are effectively encouraging it and making their job harder. 
Said it before but don’t see why the Premier League that wants the best players in the world doesn’t go and get the best refs from other countries as well.

Expand  

Agree. Mike Riley, is absolutely useless as the head of PGMOL. 

Posted

 

  On 18/05/2021 at 18:20, Saint_clark said:

If he hasn't got to the ball after the contact then a penalty should be given, but what if he'd blown the whistle for a penalty as bamford slotted it into the net? 

Expand  

Have you heard of the advantage rule? The referee can wait and pull play back. It happens nearly every week. I’m surprised you didn’t know that. 

Posted
  On 18/05/2021 at 18:21, SKD said:

But he didn’t and regardless, VAR should have pulled it back as it was an obvious foul. 

Expand  

So players should be given the advantage to see if they score and then if they don't still given the penalty anyway? 

Posted
  On 18/05/2021 at 18:17, Saint_clark said:

Why? You can't have the advantage and the chance to score and then still want the penalty when you don't.

Expand  

I've seen refs play advantage before for fouls outside the box and then pull things back for the freekick when the advantage didn't play out. Don't see why that can't also happen for penalties

Posted
  On 18/05/2021 at 18:23, Lord Duckhunter said:

 

Have you heard of the advantage rule? The referee can wait and pull play back. It happens nearly every week. I’m surprised you didn’t know that. 

Expand  

Of course I know about that, and in this situation if he hadn't got to the ball after the contact then it should be pulled back. But he still got the ball after the contact and still did nothing with it.

Posted (edited)
  On 18/05/2021 at 18:23, Saint_clark said:

So players should be given the advantage to see if they score and then if they don't still given the penalty anyway? 

Expand  

But there wasn’t an advantage, was there. By the time he got the ball, the chance to slot it in had gone. 
 

If that had happened the other end, you’d be outraged. 

Edited by SKD
Posted

Fuck me this is playing out like so many games this season. Completely 2nd best in the 2nd half after being the better side in the 1st. Would happily take a point.

Posted
  On 18/05/2021 at 18:26, SKD said:

But there wasn’t an advantage, was there. By the time he got the ball, the chance had gone. 
 

If that had happened the other end, you’d be outraged. 

Expand  

No I wouldn't. But you know what, sure, it should have been a penalty and I'm sure we can all agree that's yet more evidence that Forster should be number 1 instead of this ridiculous rotation policy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...