Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Billy the Kidd said:

Who knows, but your constant fucking bashing literally everything is fucking boring to keep reading.

Losing every week and making the same mistakes every week is also fucking boring to keep watching. 

  • Like 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, Whitey Grandad said:

Presumably it was the referee’s decision and VAR didn’t want to damage the poor little sweetie’s confidence.

The only consolation is that it’s only a one game ban and not three.

Unless I missed it, it’s a straight red and that’s three matches suspension 

Posted
Just now, Toussaint said:

Shut the fuck up about Ramadan you wokie cork sucker

It's so fucking transparent , love a bit of virtue signalling point scoring 

  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, Lord Duckhunter said:

Let’s see if Ralph has learnt anything from the two 9-0’s. Surely we can play 2 banks of 4 and keep the score down this time. 

In fairness, it looks like we have.... credit where it’s due, I guess. 

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, Noodles34 said:

Unless I missed it, it’s a straight red and that’s three matches suspension 

That’s only ever been the case for dangerous or violent conduct.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Saint_clark said:

If you're can't understand the differences between what Jankewitz did and what Vestergaard did I'm not even going to bother explaining it.

No I agree with you was a post said in haste.

I’m still seething but if we can take a point out of this it’ll go some way towards reducing that

Posted
1 minute ago, JRM said:

We don't want to fucking hear about Ramadam 

 

1 minute ago, Toussaint said:

Shut the fuck up about Ramadan you wokie cork sucker

Behave. It's no bad thing that some of you get educated. 

  • Like 6
Posted
3 minutes ago, Billy the Kidd said:

What have I defended? How come you dont read properly, and just make shit up to fit your view. 

I really couldnt give a fuck what you think, best you carry on masturbating.

Think you've had enough internet today. Go cry into your Ralph blanket 

Posted
2 minutes ago, egg said:

 

Behave. It's no bad thing that some of you get educated. 

I am fully conversant with all major religions thank you. No one needs a five minute speech about it in a fucking football match 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Chapel End said:

Why watch then?

Because, for all my sins, I think today may be the day that Ralph tries something different.
 

But anyway, Tella would be a lot more effective on the counter attack than Redmond. 

Posted
Just now, Saint_clark said:

Even Evans and Maddison were shaking their head at the ref when he pulled the red out.

Shows how totally wrong it was if porkchop twat-face Maddison was arguing against it.

Posted
2 minutes ago, davefoggy said:

Never ever a red card. He won the ball!!

They are saying it was for the follow through on vardy's ankle & denying a goal scoring opportunity! 🤦‍♂️

Posted

Can Ralph please come out and say that there is a ‘conspiracy against us’. 😩

I know the haters on here will refer to the WBA goal disallowed recently as well as the challenge on Foden by McCarthy, but both ended up being so inconsequential anyway. 

We’ve definitely had more go against us this season. 

Posted
Just now, Toussaint said:

I am fully conversant with all major religions thank you. No one needs a five minute speech about it in a fucking football match 

Conversant perhaps, but tolerant seemingly not. Not sure why anyone would be bothered about it. 

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 minute ago, SKD said:

Because, for all my sins, I think today may be the day that Ralph tries something different.
 

But anyway, Tella would be a lot more effective on the counter attack than Redmond. 

I think on this situation, experience is needed. Only a slight edge mind.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Mr X said:

They are saying it was for the follow through on vardy's ankle & denying a goal scoring opportunity! 🤦‍♂️

Because Vardy is so quick he'd have been able to sprint after the cleared ball, stop it and chip it over the milky bar kid goalie in the Saints net. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Mr X said:

They are saying it was for the follow through on vardy's ankle & denying a goal scoring opportunity! 🤦‍♂️

How was he supposed to stop moving after contact on the ball

Posted
6 minutes ago, Noodles34 said:

Unless I missed it, it’s a straight red and that’s three matches suspension 

Watch again. He makes a mistake, connects with the ball to make amends and gets enough on it to prevent a goal scoring opportunity. It was at full stretch. VAR should have checked it and it would have been a different decision.Why did VAR not even look at it?

 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Chapel End said:

How was he supposed to stop moving after contact on the ball

Exactly. His leg was there from the good tackle. Absolutely ridiculous. 

Posted
1 minute ago, OttawaSaint said:

Because Vardy is so quick he'd have been able to sprint after the cleared ball, stop it and chip it over the milky bar kid goalie in the Saints net. 

Yes that was a certainly! 🤔😜

Posted
Just now, Sergei Gotsmanov said:

Watch again. He makes a mistake, connects with the ball to make amends and gets enough on it to prevent a goal scoring opportunity. It was at full stretch. VAR should have checked it and it would have been a different decision.Why did VAR not even look at it?

 

Who said they didn’t? 

Posted
1 minute ago, Chapel End said:

How was he supposed to stop moving after contact on the ball

That’s the definition of being out of control and a dangerous challenge.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...