Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Sheaf Saint said:

Of all the dreadful pundits Sky manage to find, I think Kevin Campbell is up there with the very worst of them. Him and Carragher together are pretty much unwatchable. 

Agreed he is poor. Possibly not Efan "2 0 is not a real lead" Ekoko poor. Listening to Carragher is like having some mutant form of tinitus.

  • Lighthouse changed the title to WBA vs Saints - Match Thread
Posted
5 minutes ago, CB Fry said:

So hesgoal.com seems to have moved entirely to Dutch commentaries now. Annoying, as was, up to a couple of weeks ago, the most reliable and faff free streaming service.

is it better and easier to understand than Carragher?

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

West Brom absolutely robbed there. Pathetic defending from us again. 
 

Ottawa will still blame the ref or VAR for  being against us for something though. 

Edited by SKD
Posted

Fraser is a lucky boy. Terrible flap/push up in the air. Deserved to have one VAR offside go for Saints but harsh to rule it out. If they are that marginal they should all stand. VAR meant to be there for the blooper. 

Posted
Just now, Saint_clark said:

How the fuck have they given that as offside???????

VAR is shit. Should've been a goal. We'd be fuming if it'd been at the other end.

Let off for us there.

Posted

Is it just me or are WBA a big side in terms of height. We look like a team of kids versus them with the exception of the two CB. 

Posted
Just now, saint1977 said:

Fraser is a lucky boy. Terrible flap/push up in the air. Deserved to have one VAR offside go for Saints but harsh to rule it out. If they are that marginal they should all stand. VAR meant to be there for the blooper. 

It wasn't even marginal, Diang was clearly onside and Bartley was nowhere near interfering.

Posted (edited)

Can only assume the other attacker was blocking the view so therefore couldn’t determine 100% either way, so went with on field ...

Edited by SKD
Posted
Just now, Saint_clark said:

It wasn't even marginal, Diang was clearly onside and Bartley was nowhere near interfering.

Agreed. They seemed to give up checking it half way through the investigation. Bizarre

Posted
Just now, Saint_clark said:

It wasn't even marginal, Diang was clearly onside and Bartley was nowhere near interfering.

Got to go for us once in a while 

Posted

Have to say we really did get away with WBA goal when they showed it again.

I mean I’m not gonna complain because of the recent calls we have had against us, but I think fans really should be able to hear the VAR refs so we can hear what they are thinking. 

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...