Jump to content

International Saints

TWar

By TWar
in The Saints

 Share

Recommended Posts

cloggy saint

cloggy saint

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, JustinSFC said:

That's a grim result.

Not really, it's 3 points in the bag. The days of established teams putting 6, 7, 8 goals past 'lesser' sides are more or less over (with occasional exceptions) but I suspect you're too young to realise.

Turkish

Turkish

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, cloggy saint said:

Not really, it's 3 points in the bag. The days of established teams putting 6, 7, 8 goals past 'lesser' sides are more or less over (with occasional exceptions) but I suspect you're too young to realise.

Apart from in the premier league it seems....

  • Haha 2
cloggy saint

cloggy saint

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, cloggy saint said:

Not really, it's 3 points in the bag. The days of established teams putting 6, 7, 8 goals past 'lesser' sides are more or less over (with occasional exceptions) but I suspect you're too young to realise.

 

17 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Apart from in the premier league it seems....

As said, with occasional exceptions.

SKD

SKD

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, cloggy saint said:

 

As said, with occasional exceptions.

Yep, just once a season....

 

...when we go down to 10 men 

JustinSFC

JustinSFC

Posted
Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, cloggy saint said:

Not really, it's 3 points in the bag. The days of established teams putting 6, 7, 8 goals past 'lesser' sides are more or less over (with occasional exceptions) but I suspect you're too young to realise.

Well..ahem...
 

Considering that France team featured Martial, Pogba, Mbappe and co, I'd say that's something like Eastleigh FC v Man City at Stoneham...

But I take your point, it is a win.

Edited by JustinSFC
Turkish

Turkish

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, SKD said:

Yep, just once a season....

 

...when we go down to 10 men 

Hmm, got away with keeping the score down to five in two others games this season as well. Could easily have been 6 or 7 at least in those. Good to know it didn’t happen because the days of that happening are gone. 

nta786

nta786

Posted
Posted

Commentator in the Scotland game:

“Che Adams is pressing but he needs some help otherwise he is wasting energy”

From the 10mins I’ve watched his link-up play has been okay but otherwise pretty drab affair

SKD

SKD

Posted
Posted

If you think Southgates England is bleak, the u21’s are appalling. Something like 1 shot on target in 180 minutes. 

Chris cooper

Chris cooper

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, JustinSFC said:

Well..ahem...
 

Considering that France team featured Martial, Pogba, Mbappe and co, I'd say that's something like Eastleigh FC v Man City at Stoneham...

But I take your point, it is a win.

Denmark 8 Moldova 0

Badger

Badger

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, SKD said:

Yes man ✅ Right image ✅ Ability to waste another golden generation ✅ 

Hes the perfect candidate. Expect aidy boothroyd to take charge after the 2022 World Cup to lead us to another 10 years of obscurity. 
 

But in all seriousness, I think he was just the default option of ‘he’s managed the younger lads, we have younger lads coming through, let’s give it a go’. 

Think you're being a bit kind with that description.

SKD

SKD

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, Badger said:

Think you're being a bit kind with that description.

Really..? Kane, Foden, Grealish, Mount, Sterling, Rashford, Sancho are all world class and would walk into nearly every team in the competition. 
 

Our only weakness is at CB and arguably CM. Although I think Rice / Henderson is a very very good CM pairing. 

Saint86

Saint86

Posted
Posted

3-4 members of the Polish squad have tested positive for covid. Including klitch (who is pictured next to and talking to Jan). You know what's going to happen now right? Covid outbreak in the saints team 👍

JRM

JRM

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, TWar said:

Japan are battering Mongolia 7-0. Minimino got the opener, still on the pitch.

Finished Mongolia 0 -14 Japan. Minamino only got the one goal. 

Not a great year to be a Saints and Mongolia fan. 

  • Haha 3
TWar

TWar

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, SuperSAINT said:

Subbed in the 71st min.

Moments after I posted he was still on the pitch. Always the way. Either way atleast it protects him from injury

JRM

JRM

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, TWar said:

Moments after I posted he was still on the pitch. Always the way. Either way atleast it protects him from injury

Yeah we could do with him playing in at least some of the Burnley and WBA games as he's cup tied so need others available for Wembley. 

  • Like 1
SuperSAINT

SuperSAINT

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, TWar said:

Moments after I posted he was still on the pitch. Always the way. Either way atleast it protects him from injury

‘Tis OK.  I wasn’t MLG’ing you.  I just read the match report. 

  • Haha 1
ChrisPY

ChrisPY

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, saintwbu said:

Only ever seems to have any fitness issues when he’s either on duty with England, or been called up to the squad. Good lad. 

Is the modern day ‘precaution’ something that wouldn’t have been questioned 10 years ago and players would have just played on. Feel like Prowsey is quite happy to get on with it where some players are told by the people around them not to risk it unless they are 100%.

Guess he wasn’t in the starting line up tonight so the decision was made for him but fully expect him to start against Burnley.

JustinSFC

JustinSFC

Posted
Posted

If Prowse isn't genuinely fitness impeded and he's returned to us because Ralph has leant on him, then he is a fucking idiot and probably just spaffed his chances of going to the euros.

I know some of you will be saying "but...but.... That means he's nice and fresh for Burnley"...etc

But I genuinely would have liked to have seen him go to the tournament.

simo

simo

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, JustinSFC said:

If Prowse isn't genuinely fitness impeded and he's returned to us because Ralph has leant on him, then he is a fucking idiot and probably just spaffed his chances of going to the euros.

I know some of you will be saying "but...but.... That means he's nice and fresh for Burnley"...etc

But I genuinely would have liked to have seen him go to the tournament.

He's shown what he can do , if he's not 100% and probs wasn't going to start he's best off coming back to saints . Now without him in the squad I'm hoping for a Poland clean sheet! Will probably flick over to the Scotland game more than once too , How Armstrong doesn't start every game for them I'll never know her far better than all of those players starting ahead of him . 

SNSUN

SNSUN

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, JustinSFC said:

If Prowse isn't genuinely fitness impeded and he's returned to us because Ralph has leant on him, then he is a fucking idiot and probably just spaffed his chances of going to the euros.

I know some of you will be saying "but...but.... That means he's nice and fresh for Burnley"...etc

But I genuinely would have liked to have seen him go to the tournament.

He'll be a Liverpool player by the time the Euros comes around anyway then we'd have to hear commentators calling him "Liverpool's Ward-Prowse" 😁😜😈

 

Seriously I'd love a Saint in the England squad but I don't think he'd get much game time. Maybe a late sub to whip balls in or a reliable penalty taker. I like W-P but I don't think he's first XI material.

Streaky

Streaky

Posted
Posted
Just now, SNSUN said:

He'll be a Liverpool player by the time the Euros comes around anyway then we'd have to hear commentators calling him "Liverpool's Ward-Prowse" 😁😜😈

 

Seriously I'd love a Saint in the England squad but I don't think he'd get much game time. Maybe a late sub to whip balls in or a reliable penalty taker. I like W-P but I don't think he's first XI material.

Not sure Kalvin Phillips is  either but he's in the first 11 and will probably go to the euros. Can prowsey displace him, I think so.

JustinSFC

JustinSFC

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Saint_clark said:

Because there's no VAR. 

Really? So they changed that rule purely to accommodate VAR?

I didn't realise that was the basis for it.

It's a ridiculous rule. Just flag when the offence occurs like in this match.

Saint_clark

Saint_clark

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, JustinSFC said:

Really? So they changed that rule purely to accommodate VAR?

I didn't realise that was the basis for it.

It's a ridiculous rule. Just flag when the offence occurs like in this match.

If you flag, and you're wrong, then there's no going back. 

If you don't flag, and VAR shows you were wrong, then it can make the correct decision. 

That's the logic behind it.

Saint_clark

Saint_clark

Posted
Posted

Better play from England tonight and a lot more effort against better opposition, unlike against San Marino when it was clearly abundantly obvious to anyone who knew what they were talking about that they weren't trying their absolute best as they didn't need to. 

JRM

JRM

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, ChrisPY said:

Is the modern day ‘precaution’ something that wouldn’t have been questioned 10 years ago and players would have just played on. Feel like Prowsey is quite happy to get on with it where some players are told by the people around them not to risk it unless they are 100%.

Guess he wasn’t in the starting line up tonight so the decision was made for him but fully expect him to start against Burnley.

No way would he return if he didn't have a minor knock, it would have only been a few more hours and time on the bench for England. 

Hopefully he's fine, good that Armstrong is on the bench for Scotland as he struggles with too many games. Just need Adams and Bednarek to avoid injury. Adams got to be looking for a goal to make his mark against the Faroes. 

JustinSFC

JustinSFC

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Saint_clark said:

Better play from England tonight and a lot more effort against better opposition, unlike against San Marino when it was clearly abundantly obvious to anyone who knew what they were talking about that they weren't trying their absolute best as they didn't need to. 

Playing Phillips & Rice together is overkill, I think you only need one of them.

Plus side is, Poland haven't got anywhere near our box.

Saint Billy

Saint Billy

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, sad saints fan said:

Is it me or is this commentator in love with Foden . As far as I can see he has produced next to nothing in that first half .

Yes, just took a terrible corner and the commentator said it was a shot at goal and very close, which it wasn’t.

egg

egg

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, JustinSFC said:

Playing Phillips & Rice together is overkill, I think you only need one of them.

Plus side is, Poland haven't got anywhere near our box.

The criticism in your first paragraph is the reason for the second paragraph. 

JustinSFC

JustinSFC

Posted
Posted
Just now, egg said:

The criticism in your first paragraph is the reason for the second paragraph. 

Yes, I know that.

That's why I said: 'the plus side is...'

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...