Jump to content

Sheffield Utd 0-2 Saints - Match Thread

Harry_SFC

By Harry_SFC,
in The Saints

 Share

Recommended Posts

VectisSaint

VectisSaint

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Matthew Le God said:

A 'couple of seasons ago' is not 5 years ago!

Do you think you could call this a photo of a man and his couple of wives? 

Man married five women and had 24 kids, allows cameras into his home for a rare inside look

How do you know they are all his wives? A couple of them (2 to be precise) are dressed in yellow, they may not be 'wives' . Since polygamy is illegal in most countries, none of them are likely to be technically his wives. Actually a couple of wives may be a more accurate description than 'five'. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
VectisSaint

VectisSaint

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Matthew Le God said:

A 'couple of seasons ago' is not 5 years ago!

Do you think you could call this a photo of a man and his couple of wives? 

Man married five women and had 24 kids, allows cameras into his home for a rare inside look

How do you know they are all his wives? A couple of them (2 to be precise) are dressed in yellow, they may not be 'wives' . Since polygamy is illegal in most countries, none of them are likely to be technically his wives. Actually a couple of wives may be a more accurate description than 'five'. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
VectisSaint

VectisSaint

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Matthew Le God said:

A 'couple of seasons ago' is not 5 years ago!

Do you think you could call this a photo of a man and his couple of wives? 

Man married five women and had 24 kids, allows cameras into his home for a rare inside look

How do you know they are all his wives? A couple of them (2 to be precise) are dressed in yellow, they may not be 'wives' . Since polygamy is illegal in most countries, none of them are likely to be technically his wives. Actually a couple of wives may be a more accurate description than 'five'. 

Edited by VectisSaint
Not sure how I managed to post this a couple or three times
Link to comment
Share on other sites
davefizzy14

davefizzy14

Posted
Posted (edited)

Great win yesterday - just what we needed to get back on track :)

Armstrong was man of the match for me- what a top player he is, great chest back to Adams for his wonder strike :) on and off the ball Stuart was immense. Tella also was brilliant, great run to win the penalty which was cooly dispatched by Prowsey :) Good performances too from Adams, Minamino, KWP, Forster, Prowsey, Diallo and Bertrand. Both Bednarek and Vestergaard were solid too. Hoping Ingsy's injury isn't too bad.

Ralph will be very pleased with this and we can go into the City game with confidence :)

Edited by davefizzy14
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
david in sweden

david in sweden

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, VectisSaint said:

How do you know they are all his wives? A couple of them (2 to be precise) are dressed in yellow, they may not be 'wives' . Since polygamy is illegal in most countries, none of them are likely to be technically his wives. Actually a couple of wives may be a more accurate description than 'five'. 

I think ...that the Mormons follow the old biblical tradition.  Perhaps it's quite normal in Utah ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GarrettIvo

GarrettIvo

Posted
Posted
On 07/03/2021 at 00:58, Ohio Saint said:

I'm very happy, don't get me wrong. but this result was largely due to the opposition failing to score despite some very good opportunities that they should not have had.

 

But yeah, YAY!!! :D

Are you familiar with how the game works?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DT

DT

Posted
Posted
On 07/03/2021 at 10:43, S-Clarke said:

God forbid anyone says anything publicly about her, you are put into the stocks and vilified.

It's nothing to do with them being a woman or a bloke, she is just inept and over excited. I cannot follow commentary when she's on it. It all feels a bit forced and fake.

For what it's worth, just so the 'sexist' brigade don't jump on this, I like Alex Scott as a pundit and feel she offers a lot more compared to some of the non-entity male pundits around.

If it's the same one I listened to I find the main problem is that it's one of those 'added after the event' commentaries where they try to pretend they did actually have someone there live, but didn't. Hence it sounds very fake. Because it is. She might as well say something like 'I wonder if Tella is about to get a penalty for Southampton by being felled in the box. And there it is!' Ripe for an Alan Partridge piss take

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CB Fry

CB Fry

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, DT said:

If it's the same one I listened to I find the main problem is that it's one of those 'added after the event' commentaries where they try to pretend they did actually have someone there live, but didn't. Hence it sounds very fake. Because it is. She might as well say something like 'I wonder if Tella is about to get a penalty for Southampton by being felled in the box. And there it is!' Ripe for an Alan Partridge piss take

They didn't pretend she was there, she was there. She was stood inside Bramhall Lane doing the pre-match build up on Football Focus at lunchtime and stood in front of Ralph asking him questions post match.

Whether she is any good at commentary or not is another discussion but they didn't "pretend she was there".

What a surprise to see you completely wrong about something yet again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
VectisSaint

VectisSaint

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Sunglasses Ron said:

I see JWP and CA made Garth Crook's team of the week. Makes a nice change, but then he had to spoilt it by saying that JWP needs to move to Liverpool in the summer. I remember him doing the same when Lemina had one good game for us (think it was Arsenal that he was selling him to).

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/56324917

Nearly half of Crooks' team current or ex Saints. Strange really, don'think JWP was that good against Sheff Utd, nor was Che for that matter. I don't believe Crooks actually does much research, just goes for the headline grabbers. Saw Crooks recommendation of JWP for Liverpool quoted today in another newspaper as being reason the Bin Dippers should sign him. Ridiculous that people give him credence, he is a twat who keeps this job for one reason. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Alanh

Alanh

Posted
Posted
On 09/03/2021 at 18:22, VectisSaint said:

Nearly half of Crooks' team current or ex Saints. Strange really, don'think JWP was that good against Sheff Utd, nor was Che for that matter. I don't believe Crooks actually does much research, just goes for the headline grabbers. Saw Crooks recommendation of JWP for Liverpool quoted today in another newspaper as being reason the Bin Dippers should sign him. Ridiculous that people give him credence, he is a twat who keeps this job for one reason. 

Please tell us the reason.  Don't be obtuse, make it very clear why you think he keeps the job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Alanh

Alanh

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, VectisSaint said:

Because he played for Spurs. What else did you think?

I had an open mind on what your reason might be.  I've never been aware of anyone suggesting that he has the job because he played for Spurs though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...