Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Turkish said:

More panic about the Finland variant I see. This has been labeled a super variant despite only one case being found in the world. Jesus wept.

Maybe you shouldn't read the Daily Mail. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Yes Timmy, the only place it was reported was in the Daily Mail :facepalm:

According to Google it literally is my little 'processed food is bad' protein powder taking pal. The fourth entry down the list is simply a quote from the Mail headline. 

 

image.thumb.png.a849530ccb6820e6db328584b9dc9c93.png

 

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, buctootim said:

According to Google it literally is my little 'processed food is bad' protein powder taking pal. The fourth entry down the list is simply a quote from the Mail headline. 

 

image.thumb.png.a849530ccb6820e6db328584b9dc9c93.png

 

It’s a shame your missus dumped you, you’d make a great case study for her about people being obsessed by those they meet on the internet.

Edited by Turkish
Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, Turkish said:

It’s a shame your missus dumped you, you’d make a great case study for her about people being obsessed by those they meet on the internet.

It's not so much an obsession. It's more being equipped with a memory greater than a gnat's. It enables me to repeat the ridiculous shyte you post back to you.  Re the divorce in a marriage of two people its a 50:50 chance of who leaves who. Unsurprisingly, based on your track record, you cant even win a 50:50.     

Edited by buctootim
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said:

good old timmy, always gets it wrong!

Also reported in :

AA.com

Helsinki Times

Daily Sabah

Standard

ExpressYorkshire Evening Post

I could go on, but you get the point (timmy won't).

Piggy!! How are you?? 

Just FYI the issue  wasn't whether the Finnish variant existed,  it was whether it was described as a "super" variant anywhere apart from the Daily Mail. But you tried, and that's important too.    

Edited by buctootim
Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, buctootim said:

It's not so much an obsession. It's more being equipped with a memory greater than a gnat's. It enables me to repeat the ridiculous shyte you post back to you.  Re the divorce in a marriage of two people its a 50:50 chance of who leaves who. Unsurprisingly, based on your track record, you cant even win a 50:50.     

Or maybe it’s just that you care much more. You seem to be able to remember posts I made 10 years ago, I can’t remember and don’t care about stuff you posted yesterday. Let’s not forget who was the one talking At length to their partners about, it wasn’t me. Talking about me at length to your ex, remember my posts from a decade ago, what I do for a job, what I wear, I eat. What my hobbies are. Yeah Timmy, perfectly normal not odd at all.

Edited by Turkish
Posted
19 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said:

That's the spirit, double down!

UNFold times

TW News

Haha you absolute cretin. You never fail to disappoint.  Two points  1. Both of those news scraper sites are directly quoting the Mail. They even tell you that in the story.  2. I do howevefr like your proposition that he was more likely to be reading the story on two hyper obscure and tiny sites ranked below #700,000 in the world (c20,000 visits per month) than reading it on the world's 4th biggest news website with 375 million visits.       

  • Like 2
Posted
25 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Or maybe it’s just that you care much more. You seem to be able to remember posts I made 10 years ago, I can’t remember and don’t care about stuff you posted yesterday. Let’s not forget who was the one talking At length to their partners about, it wasn’t me. Talking about me, remember my posts from a decade ago, some might call that obsessed and weird.

Actually, as I told you last time you made this desperate ploy up, she asked what I was laughing at so I showed her your post attempting to persuade everybody a £1,000 nylon puffa jacket was cool. So you're right to that extent - you do come up with some memorable shite.  

Posted
1 minute ago, buctootim said:

Haha you absolute cretin. You never fail to disappoint.  Two points  1. Both of those news scraper sites are directly quoting the Mail. They even tell you that in the story.  2. I do howevefr like your proposition that he was more likely to be reading the story on two hyper obscure and tiny sites ranked below #700,000 in the world (c20,000 visits per month) than reading it on the world's 4th biggest news website with 375 million visits.       

haha, you absolute cretin.  You never fail to disappoint.

First you claim that it was only reported as a 'super' variant in the Mail.  Now your claiming he couldn't possibly have read it in either of the papers I linked to - there are more, I just couldn't be arsed to copy and paste!

This seems to be very much like your 'principles', ever changing to suit your current whim!

You're all over the place, can you make your mind up, which argument you're going with?

Posted
Just now, buctootim said:

Actually, as I told you last time you made this desperate ploy up, she asked what I was laughing at so I showed her your post attempting to persuade everybody a £1,000 nylon puffa jacket was cool. So you're right to that extent - you do come up with some memorable shite.  

You were talking to your missus about what someone you’ve never met was posting about on an Internet forum. Nothing made up about that, it happened. No “made this desperate ploy up” It’s what you did. I guess even you know it’s a bit weird if you’re honest with yourself.

But okay Timmy, it’s perfectly normal to still be talking about things someone you don’t know said on the Internet a decade ago, as well as their hobbies, job etc, perfectly normal, nothing slightly stalkerish and freaky about it at, nothing at all. 😳

Posted

Discussions on here only go to show what a shitstorm social media is. Sometimes I truly despair of what is put up, so much utter bollocks. Make me question who's the fucking loon on here though and keeps me moderately amused and entertained!

Posted
42 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said:

haha, you absolute cretin.  You never fail to disappoint.

First you claim that it was only reported as a 'super' variant in the Mail.  Now your claiming he couldn't possibly have read it in either of the papers I linked to - there are more, I just couldn't be arsed to copy and paste!

This seems to be very much like your 'principles', ever changing to suit your current whim!

You're all over the place, can you make your mind up, which argument you're going with?

To be fair, it is hardly being reported on most news sites I’ve been to, and the reputable news sites I’ve seen it on just report it as a variant that may go undetected by a certain test so it’s bollocks to say there is some sort of panic over it as dipshit suggested.

Posted
9 minutes ago, aintforever said:

To be fair, it is hardly being reported on most news sites I’ve been to, and the reputable news sites I’ve seen it on just report it as a variant that may go undetected by a certain test so it’s bollocks to say there is some sort of panic over it as dipshit suggested.

Most news sites you’ve been too should hardly be the benchmark of accurate reporting given how incredibly stupid you repeatedly make yourself look

Posted
18 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Most news sites you’ve been too should hardly be the benchmark of accurate reporting given how incredibly stupid you repeatedly make yourself look

Why don’t you just admit it, you read it on the Daily Mail and actually believed it. That explains why you constantly piss your pants over players taking the knee, you’re a Mail-Reading fucktard. 

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, aintforever said:

Why don’t you just admit it, you read it on the Daily Mail and actually believed it. That explains why you constantly piss your pants over players taking the knee, you’re a Mail-Reading fucktard. 

My point was, mr aintclever, that it wasn’t only reported in the mail. Which is true. As usual you failed to understand the subject in hand. As usual you jump in and end up looking a silly billy. 

Posted
30 minutes ago, Turkish said:

My point was, mr aintclever, that it wasn’t only reported in the mail. Which is true. As usual you failed to understand the subject in hand. As usual you jump in and end up looking a silly billy. 

It was reported elsewhere but you got it in your little head that there was some sort of mass panic going on, and that’s classic Daily Mail.

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, aintforever said:

It was reported elsewhere but you got it in your little head that there was some sort of mass panic going on, and that’s classic Daily Mail.

So I was right then, the Daily mail wasn’t the only place reporting it. Glad we agree. I’ll ignore the rest of your post as it’s stuff you’ve made up. Once again you try and argue and once again you make yourself look extremely stupid.

Edited by Turkish
  • Lighthouse changed the title to The Pig Sty
Posted (edited)

The posts on here are hilariously ridiculous. From me criticizing the media for labeling it a super strain a few of our more special and obsessed posters desperately trying to prove I was reading the daily mail. Shows how thick, obsessed and desperate some of you are. Still it worked a treat. :lol: 

Edited by Turkish

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...