Jump to content

Saints 1-2 Wolves - Match Thread

Harry_SFC

By Harry_SFC
in The Saints

 Share

Recommended Posts

DT

DT

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Whitey Grandad said:

McCarty finds touch and Ralph shakes his head.

So why does he keep picking him?

Mr X

Mr X

Posted
Posted

I think as a fanbase we have been patient, two nine Nils, six losses in a row, leads thrown away repeatedly, nearly always poor the second half of games, where does the goodwill end? 

  • Like 7
Whitey Grandad

Whitey Grandad

Posted
Posted
Just now, Barry the Badger said:

Gotta love saintsweb, thanks for cheering me up by making up your own definition of a near post goal that’s the and then swearing that everybody else is wrong 

You have a very narrow understanding about ‘letting a goal in at his near post’.

  • Confused 1
northam soul

northam soul

Posted
Posted
Just now, S-Clarke said:

You could argue that this team is the worst team in our history. Might sound quite a brash statement to make, but this lot have lost 9-0 twice and have just lost 6 games in a row - the most this club has ever lost in a row in any league.

We are mentally weak, fragile and lack any sort of leadership. When the chips are down we wilt, every single team. That won't change without significant changes in the playing squad, which is something we can't do as we have an owner who doesn't support us.

Long and short of it, we are fucked. No idea where we are heading.

Careful Trousers will tell you it’s the refs fault 

S-Clarke

S-Clarke

Posted
Posted

You don't lose 6 games on the bounce and have two 9-0's over two seasons because of bad luck. You do that because you have a bad team. Let's not focus on the 'decisions'. It's gone beyond that.

  • Like 3
Pamplemousse

Pamplemousse

Posted
Posted

Abysmal second half. Blame the officials, I don't, I blame our players. Sloppy in midfield, terrible defensively, and those final five minutes were a disgrace, every other team puts pressure on, we faff about with it.

 

Not good enough, as good as we were for some parts, there are still major issues with our game and Ralph needs to fix them, quickly.

  • Like 2
Saint_clark

Saint_clark

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Mr X said:

I think as a fanbase we have been patient, two nine Nils, six losses in a row, leads thrown away repeatedly, nearly always poor the second half of games, where does the goodwill end? 

If fans were in the grounds it wouldn't seem like we'd been patient. There would be horrendous boos after this game and others.

Saint Scott

Saint Scott

Posted
Posted

Ralph is at fault for decisions in this game. McCarthy shouldn't be near the team and at fault yet again for a goal. Should never be beaten by Neto from there. The substitutions are bewildering. Armstrong ran the first half, what is his fascination with Redmond. Sick of capitualing as soon as something goes against us.

  • Like 4
  • Confused 1
S-Clarke

S-Clarke

Posted
Posted
Just now, Saint_Jonny said:

Are we allowed to start talking about making a managerial change yet or are going to keep our collective heads in the sand?

I think we need to start talking about a big change up in the squad and afford Ralph some flexibility in the market. I don't think he's the issue to be honest, sure he has flaws and we are very 'Plan A' - but the makeup of the players he he's having to make do with is all wrong IMO.

  • Like 2
Jeremy Corbyn

Jeremy Corbyn

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Pamplemousse said:

Abysmal second half. Blame the officials, I don't, I blame our players. Sloppy in midfield, terrible defensively, and those final five minutes were a disgrace, every other team puts pressure on, we faff about with it.

 

Not good enough, as good as we were for some parts, there are still major issues with our game and Ralph needs to fix them, quickly.

We are very one paced.  That "one pace" is quite good but if the opposition react or are better than us we have no way of adjusting.  

BotleySaint

BotleySaint

Posted
Posted
Just now, Saint_Jonny said:

Are we allowed to start talking about making a managerial change yet or are going to keep our collective heads in the sand?

Now would be the best time to do it. We are basically safe and any new man would have time to work on the team.

However I can't think of anyone who could come in instead. Or whom we could afford. So we're stuck with Ralph.

LGTL

LGTL

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Jonnyboy said:

That's not the way 99% of people use the phrase. 

More like not the way anyone uses it, except Whitey Grandad it appears. Still, it’s cheered me up slightly. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
gammon cheeks

gammon cheeks

Posted
Posted

There is a frailty in this team that is very alarming !   Did Moussa actually do anything ?   Romeu never gave up though .......Wolves upped their game 2nd half a few dodgey decisions but really we can have no complaints about the result

  • Like 1
Wade Garrett

Wade Garrett

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Saint_Jonny said:

Are we allowed to start talking about making a managerial change yet or are going to keep our collective heads in the sand?

Not many who would get 29 points out of that side.

Don’t be ridiculous.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Pamplemousse

Pamplemousse

Posted
Posted
Just now, trousers said:

So, you rule out a different result if the Wolves penalty isn't given? #mysticmeg

Even so, it's 1-1, there's plenty of time for us to get back into it. But they put pressure on us at the start of the second half (and we should have expected it) and we crumbled. Can't blame the officials for not being able to pass.

  • Like 1
Saint_Jonny

Saint_Jonny

Posted
Posted
Just now, Wade Garrett said:

Not many who would get 29 points out of that side.

Don’t be ridiculous.

What's ridiculous? We've never lost 6 games in a row in our history, he's overseen two record defeats and clearly has no plan at all for when the game doesn't go for us. It's absolutely awful to watch and we're in free fall. 

  • Like 2
Lord Duckhunter

Lord Duckhunter

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Whitey Grandad said:

Yes but that’s not the point. He wasn’t beaten inside his near post and I don’t think anybody said he was. He was beaten at his near post.

You’re so obsessed with digging out McCarthy you’re trying to rewrite football jargon. He wasn’t beaten at his near post. 
 

The goal was a combination of 2 mistakes from Bednarek & 1 from Vesty. I guess because Stephens isn’t playing McCarthy gets blamed for goals. It’s pathetic. 

  • Like 4
nta786

nta786

Posted
Posted
Just now, Wade Garrett said:

Not many who would get 29 points out of that side.

Don’t be ridiculous.

The way I see it too- unless we had a Pep or a Klopp.

Ralph has earned the chance to get us out of this rut. 
 

  • Like 1
Whitey Grandad

Whitey Grandad

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, LGTL said:

More like not the way anyone uses it, except Whitey Grandad it appears. Still, it’s cheered me up slightly. 

You’re all too young. You’ve been watching too much soccerball.

obelisk

obelisk

Posted
Posted

I've given up counting the number of points dropped from winning positions. Is there something wrong in the players' heads?

 

And yet again I have to say Saints failed to apply any sort of pressure after going behind. Wolves finished that game very comfortably. I think it's safe to say that opposing teams know exactly how to handle Ralph's tactics now.

  • Like 1
Bewildered

Bewildered

Posted
Posted

Players are so weak mentally and have been for a long time and unfortunately it is down to the manager and coaching staff to instill a strong mentality in the squad which they have failed to do.

  • Like 1
Jimmy_D

Jimmy_D

Posted
Posted
Just now, Saint_Jonny said:

Are we allowed to start talking about making a managerial change yet or are going to keep our collective heads in the sand?

What do you think a different manager would have done differently?

We’re on a run of relatively poor results, but I don’t put that down to our tactics particularly. We’re obviously low on confidence, and the officiating has been among the worst I can remember watching, but I’m still enjoying the way we play.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Whitey Grandad

Whitey Grandad

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

You’re so obsessed with digging out McCarthy you’re trying to rewrite football jargon. He wasn’t beaten at his near post. 
 

The goal was a combination of 2 mistakes from Bednarek & 1 from Vesty. I guess because Stephens isn’t playing McCarthy gets blamed for goals. It’s pathetic. 

For Gawd’s sake. He was at his near post for a shot close to his near post. 
 

That was a near post goal. Always has been and always will be.

Edited by Whitey Grandad
  • Like 1
  • Haha 6
SaintJackoInHurworth

SaintJackoInHurworth

Posted
Posted

Some of you wrist slitters should just give up supporting Saints and go and support P*mpey. All it takes is one Skate in our midst to criticise Hassenhuttl and you are jumping in bed with them and joining in.

LET'S BE ABSOLUTELY CLEAR: at a time of poor investment in the club, following on from a period of bad investment and mismanagement of transfer policy, Ralph Hassenhuttl has steadied the ship and got us playing decent football. If he leaves, we are stuffed!

I would far rather the wrist slitters take their fishiness down the road and let real Saints supporters get behind the club. To put it simply: if you don't like it, get lost!

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1
SaintZamboni

SaintZamboni

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, BotleySaint said:

Now would be the best time to do it. We are basically safe and any new man would have time to work on the team.

However I can't think of anyone who could come in instead. Or whom we could afford. So we're stuck with Ralph.

I think saying ‘stuck with Ralph’ is incredibly harsh. 
He is clearly a quality manager who is hamstrung by a squad that needs refreshing. 
Who on earth would come in, do a better job or get us playing anywhere near as well? I have no interest in Saints going down the replace for safety route again.

That said, we cannot keep bemoaning VAR decisions when we haven’t been good enough to win.

Disco Stu

Disco Stu

Posted
Posted

This losing leads every week thing is so deflating. The inconsistent officiating that seems to always go in the oppositions favour. The 9-0 defeats that we'll now be reminded of for the rest of time. The record for most league losses in a row. Our favourite players always leaving. It's enough to make you start to question whether its really worth it.

  • Like 2
trousers

trousers

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Pamplemousse said:

Even so, it's 1-1, there's plenty of time for us to get back into it. But they put pressure on us at the start of the second half (and we should have expected it) and we crumbled. Can't blame the officials for not being able to pass.

Sounds like we'll have to agree to disagree. Just different opinions. No worries.

  • Like 1
tajjuk

tajjuk

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, S-Clarke said:

You don't lose 6 games on the bounce and have two 9-0's over two seasons because of bad luck. You do that because you have a bad team. Let's not focus on the 'decisions'. It's gone beyond that.

We are 1-0 up against a team who has barely done much all game after what 60 mins? And then they get a pen for the ball hitting our defender from like 2-3 yards away with his arm tucked against his body and they get a goal back giving them renewed confidence, meanwhile their defender sticks out a blatant arm in the box and we get nothing. 

We are vastly the better team against Villa, more chances, more shots, more possession, we have a stonewall pen where the defender saves the ball like he is a gk and we get no pen, they score from basically the only thing they did all game, and then an equalising goal is ruled off side because of cms after they take the frame AFTER the ball is played, robbing the team again. 

The 9-0, an injury ravaged team with teenagers playing, that then loses a player after 2 minutes, gets battered with bad decision after bad decision, resulting in another record loss.

The team is in not great form and confidence, but a large part of that reason is we have consistently over those games been screwed over by referees, destroying the players confidence further. 

These decisions are so terrible that they cannot be ignored imo.  

  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
Whitey Grandad

Whitey Grandad

Posted
Posted
Just now, SaintZamboni said:

I think saying ‘stuck with Ralph’ is incredibly harsh. 
He is clearly a quality manager who is hamstrung by a squad that needs refreshing. 
Who on earth would come in, do a better job or get us playing anywhere near as well? I have no interest in Saints going down the replace for safety route again.

That said, we cannot keep bemoaning VAR decisions when we haven’t been good enough to win.

To be fair, this wasn’t a case of VAR going against us. It was a referee making two inconsistent decisions.

  • Like 3
beatlesaint

beatlesaint

Posted
Posted

First half good

Second half fkin abysmal

Strange subs.....how the fuck Redmond stays on, he was ok ish first half, second half I forgot he was playing.

Forster back in goal please and I never thought I would say that.

Subs totally ineffective 

Another record, 6 straight defeats, will be 7 next weekend....

Not good.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...