Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

We haven't laid a glove on West Ham this half. Not too sure if its fatigue but the passing is so slow and predictable atm. 

However, we always knew our form would dip at some point. Great thing is it can return ad quickly as it has left us. 

Posted
Just now, East Kent Saint said:

Looking at the bench , how do you make a change for the better ? 

Even if you put on Forster instead of Long it would be an improvement. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, Plastic said:

Difficult game. WHAM have been pretty good. 

They have defended resolutely. Dawson marshalled them superbly at the back. You have to factor the opposition, it's not just Saints being poor. 

Posted

The less said about that the better.

That was absolutely diabolical. We are certainly in a slump, be interesting to see where we are at the end of Jan. I doubt it will be anywhere near the top 6.

Posted

Ings attitude has been atrocious since he came back from injury. Sick of seeing him stand there demanding the ball, throwing a hissy fit when he doesn't get it, then cheaply giving it away with an over ambitious pass or run. 

  • Confused 2
Posted
Just now, obelisk said:

Well, in the past we'd have lost that. Take the positives.

We were lucky West Ham were equally as dreadful. They seemed more bothered about stopping attacks than attacking themselves.

Posted

Terrible...we seem more concerned with not losing than winning. Bertrand I wouldn't bother with a new contract, too slow and too many backward passes lately.

Posted
Just now, obelisk said:

Well, in the past we'd have lost that. Take the positives.

Fully agree, a point against a decent team that we dislike playing against and our manager not on the sidelines.

If we were West Brom fans we’d have plenty to moan about.

Posted

The positive is that we took a point. Good to see Ings back, lovely movement for the disallowed goal but not sure why he played the full 90 as he didn't look 100%.

We were pretty terrible going forward. I know that we like to recycle the ball back but today it just seemed excessive and slow. We are missing vestergaard's set piece danger too.

Can't understand why we still persist with long rather than giving a youngster that 30 minutes to have an impact. Long's major achievement today seemed to be tackling djenepo.

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Saint_clark said:

Ings attitude has been atrocious since he came back from injury

Which just happened to coincide with Ralph going public on Ings contract situation... Something defo not right with Ings (mentally as well as physically) IMO

Posted

Armstrong should have been on at half time and when you need a goal you throw on the prolific Shane long. West Hams bench looked so much better than ours. Great start to the season but we look fooked now..

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...