Jump to content

Sport Republic


Dusic
 Share

Recommended Posts

When you have owners that have no previous connection to the club you are always going to have a gap between the priorities of the average supporter and the owners. Saints Fans want to see stylish, exciting football alongside accumulating enough points to either get promotion or qualify for Europe. Owners meanwhile buy football clubs for one major reason. To make money. Sometimes how they do that ties in with the fan’s priorities but sometimes it doesn’t. SR are in this for themselves ultimately and while failure on the pitch hurts their pockets it’s a business first and foremost. Unless you are lucky and do a Brighton ie the owner is a fan you will always get an element of discord. Either that your owner is so rich they they just throw money at the problem a la City. 
Unfortunately our owners are neither super rich or fans and at the moment don’t even seem very intelligent going by their last three managerial appointments. Wilcox was hailed as the new Mesiah but selecting a manager that seems so inflexible and tactically inept doesn’t give me confidence in his abilities or the people who put him there. 

  • Like 4
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of the decision making is baffling. All that talent sold and we bring in a couple of loans and a sprinkling of youth..... 

We get rid of Perraud, I'm sorry but he is a way better player than Manning.. 

We are relying on the likes of Smallbone and even offered him a 3 year deal.... Watch how many times he is bypassed in a game it's ridiculous.

For a laugh before games I try and select a team and I'm like well where is the height? Where is the tough tackling midfielders?  This has been the same story for a couple of seasons now... 

All we have is a team of lightweight midgets.... 

The over reliance on youth is killing us it's insanity. 

Get the chequeook out ASAP and bring in two experienced destroy / leader type players 

You know sort old skool no messing about straight in and whack! 

A couple of Romeus is what we need desperately... 

Edited by ally_uk
Spell
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Long Shot said:

When you have owners that have no previous connection to the club you are always going to have a gap between the priorities of the average supporter and the owners. Saints Fans want to see stylish, exciting football alongside accumulating enough points to either get promotion or qualify for Europe. Owners meanwhile buy football clubs for one major reason. To make money. Sometimes how they do that ties in with the fan’s priorities but sometimes it doesn’t. SR are in this for themselves ultimately and while failure on the pitch hurts their pockets it’s a business first and foremost. Unless you are lucky and do a Brighton ie the owner is a fan you will always get an element of discord. Either that your owner is so rich they they just throw money at the problem a la City. 
Unfortunately our owners are neither super rich or fans and at the moment don’t even seem very intelligent going by their last three managerial appointments. Wilcox was hailed as the new Mesiah but selecting a manager that seems so inflexible and tactically inept doesn’t give me confidence in his abilities or the people who put him there. 

Acquisitions of football clubs can also be motivated by ego, and I think that is true in the case of SR, evidenced by the multi club model and the blind insistence on pressing ahead with “radical”footballing strategies which are unlikely to succeed.

Edited by Toussaint
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, FarehamSaintJames said:

Equally if we’d won 1-0 tonight no one would be complaining and the appointment of RM would be seen as a stroke of genius. 😂

If things aren’t improved I reckon he’ll be gone come January.

SR will wait until February so the departing manager will get the chance to waste more money on dross in the January transfer window. It's what they like to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ally_uk said:

Some of the decision making is baffling. All that talent sold and we bring in a couple of loans and a sprinkling of youth..... 

We get rid of Perraud, I'm sorry but he is a way better player than Manning.. 

We are relying on the likes of Smallbone and even offered him a 3 year deal.... Watch how many times he is bypassed in a game it's ridiculous.

For a laugh before games I try and select a team and I'm like well where is the height? Where is the tough tackling midfielders?  This has been the same story for a couple of seasons now... 

All we have is a team of lightweight midgets.... 

The over reliance on youth is killing us it's insanity. 

Get the chequeook out ASAP and bring in two experienced destroy / leader type players 

You know sort old skool no messing about straight in and whack! 

A couple of Romeus is what we need desperately... 

Lots to agree with here. Perraud is a much better fullback than Manning who has been awful in every game so far. I'd give Bree a go on the right and play KWP left back with none of this inverted nonsense. If one gets forward down one wing then the other stays back and both concentrate more on defensive duties than attacking.

We never address the lack of height and power in the side. Its an essential part of the make-up of any team yet we continue to field too many weaklings who are not up to the physicality of professional football.

Cut out the tip-tap walking football from the back, beef up the midfiled (though we probably don't have the players for this), get two wide players hugging the touchlines and Stewart, when fit, through the middle. Ping balls down the flanks or channels with midfielders bursting forward in support. Much more movement off the ball and getting between the lines. We'll create more chances, score more goals and be much more solid at the back. Carry on the RM way and the only direction for us is down because we'll leak goals by the bucket load.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, saintant said:

Lots to agree with here. Perraud is a much better fullback than Manning who has been awful in every game so far. I'd give Bree a go on the right and play KWP left back with none of this inverted nonsense. If one gets forward down one wing then the other stays back and both concentrate more on defensive duties than attacking.

We never address the lack of height and power in the side. Its an essential part of the make-up of any team yet we continue to field too many weaklings who are not up to the physicality of professional football.

Cut out the tip-tap walking football from the back, beef up the midfiled (though we probably don't have the players for this), get two wide players hugging the touchlines and Stewart, when fit, through the middle. Ping balls down the flanks or channels with midfielders bursting forward in support. Much more movement off the ball and getting between the lines. We'll create more chances, score more goals and be much more solid at the back. Carry on the RM way and the only direction for us is down because we'll leak goals by the bucket load.

Lots to agree with there. The inverted full back concept just isn't working. The logical thing, as you say, is surely to have one full going while the other one sits. If we play that way I can see a role for Bree, and if happily see KWP shift to the other side. I wouldn't ditch Manning though - I think he'd add something in the midfield where he's played most of his pro games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, egg said:

Lots to agree with there. The inverted full back concept just isn't working. The logical thing, as you say, is surely to have one full going while the other one sits. If we play that way I can see a role for Bree, and if happily see KWP shift to the other side. I wouldn't ditch Manning though - I think he'd add something in the midfield where he's played most of his pro games. 

Wouldn't be against trying Manning in midfield - my only reservation being that he's another short arse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Toussaint said:

Acquisitions of football clubs can also be motivated by ego, and I think that is true in the case of SR, evidenced by the multi club model and the blind insistence on pressing ahead with radical footballing strategies which are unlikely to succeed.

100%. Valenciennes in the summer was another ego move when they haven’t got their houses in order here, or at Goztepe. Not that I care about what happens in Turkey.

The £20m+ used to purchase Valenciennes would have been better served going towards our summer transfer budget and giving us a better chance of getting promotion at the first attempt. What’s going to bring in more money in the long run, the Premier League, or French football? But, it was purely an ego move, as you say, to add another club to the portfolio.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, HarvSFC said:

100%. Valenciennes in the summer was another ego move when they haven’t got their houses in order here, or at Goztepe. Not that I care about what happens in Turkey.

The £20m+ used to purchase Valenciennes would have been better served going towards our summer transfer budget and giving us a better chance of getting promotion at the first attempt. What’s going to bring in more money in the long run, the Premier League, or French football? But, it was purely an ego move, as you say, to add another club to the portfolio.

Excuse Me What GIF by Bounce

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Toussaint said:

Acquisitions of football clubs can also be motivated by ego, and I think that is true in the case of SR, evidenced by the multi club model and the blind insistence on pressing ahead with radical footballing strategies which are unlikely to succeed.

I must have missed our "radical footballing strategies" - unless you include playing like 7 year olds 🤷

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said:

I must have missed our "radical footballing strategies" - unless you include playing like 7 year olds 🤷

It was meant to be ironic, I’ll add the inverted “full back” commas for the avoidance of doubt. 
 

Funny you mention 7 year olds, I watched my grandson play this morning (under 12s) and even they left two defenders back for corners!

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't help but think that Martin is a SR (Rassmus) masterclass, rather than Wilcox. 

I suspect SR want to replicate City and as part of that want to replicate their style and I have no doubt Wilcox would have had an input into defining that style but I've absolutely no doubt that we've looked at a spreadsheet and have seen his (Martin's) stats for possession are the highest... completely ignoring that he's achieved the square root of fuck all with it. 

If that is the case, I have to wonder if Wilcox will be as supportive..

On a side note, how many games did Jones last? Martin must be closing towards it..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Dman said:

I can't help but think that Martin is a SR (Rassmus) masterclass, rather than Wilcox. 

I suspect SR want to replicate City and as part of that want to replicate their style and I have no doubt Wilcox would have had an input into defining that style but I've absolutely no doubt that we've looked at a spreadsheet and have seen his (Martin's) stats for possession are the highest... completely ignoring that he's achieved the square root of fuck all with it. 

If that is the case, I have to wonder if Wilcox will be as supportive..

On a side note, how many games did Jones last? Martin must be closing towards it..

All roads lead to Rasmus in our catastrophic decline over last season and where we find ourselves now.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Dman said:

I can't help but think that Martin is a SR (Rassmus) masterclass, rather than Wilcox. 

I suspect SR want to replicate City and as part of that want to replicate their style and I have no doubt Wilcox would have had an input into defining that style but I've absolutely no doubt that we've looked at a spreadsheet and have seen his (Martin's) stats for possession are the highest... completely ignoring that he's achieved the square root of fuck all with it. 

If that is the case, I have to wonder if Wilcox will be as supportive..

On a side note, how many games did Jones last? Martin must be closing towards it..

If they truly want us to be Man City-lite, then they've also got that all wrong and we don't have the players for that.

Strong midfielder in the middle, top centre forward up front, flexible 10's in a 3 behind the forward.

We had Joe Aribo and Will Smallbone anchoring our midfield last night, with Adam Armstrong as our flexible 10. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not as though Man City have stayed the same though. Guardiola has changed things during his time there. The idea that we need to copy some sort of blueprint in the Championship is silly.

Most Champ teams would love to have Adams, Stewart, Armstrong, Fraser, Alcaraz, Sulemana and Edozie. 

Most Champ teams would probably like to have Bednarek, Stephens, HTB and KWP. 

Apparently Manning and Bree are good full backs at this level.

I expect most teams would like to have Charles too.

We don't need to be clever. Just get a decent structure in defence and get the attacking players in a positive mindset. Job done.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Dman said:

I can't help but think that Martin is a SR (Rassmus) masterclass, rather than Wilcox. 

I suspect SR want to replicate City and as part of that want to replicate their style and I have no doubt Wilcox would have had an input into defining that style but I've absolutely no doubt that we've looked at a spreadsheet and have seen his (Martin's) stats for possession are the highest... completely ignoring that he's achieved the square root of fuck all with it. 

If that is the case, I have to wonder if Wilcox will be as supportive..

On a side note, how many games did Jones last? Martin must be closing towards it..

Jones 14, Selles 17. They’ll give RM a good few more than that I reckon as they’ve invested more in this one. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SaintTex said:

since SR purchased the club in Jan 2022, Saints have mustered 14 league wins out of 62 matches.

2022 : 5 wins | 22-23 : 6 wins | 23-present : 3 wins

 

it's been an unmitigated disaster.

 

Shocking. So the question is, how long is Dragan going to put up with this? It's his money they are pissing down the drain for unmitigated disastrous results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 17/09/2023 at 19:18, Weston Super Saint said:

I must have missed our "radical footballing strategies" - unless you include playing like 7 year olds 🤷

The radicalism with 66.66% of SR is thinking that they'll get away with it.  They won't but it's going to be a painful watch! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They had the choice to stick or twist with Ralph and changing the coaching team.
They screwed that up.

They had to get his replacement right. They hired Nathan Jones.
They screwed that up.

They had to pay out and get an experienced manager in to have any hope of keeping us up (when it was well within our reach); I’m sure relation wasn’t part of the SR plan?
They hired Ruben Selles on the back of an attack v defence win at Chelsea, at a period where everyone was beating Chelsea.
They screwed that up monumentally.

As for this latest hire, thoughts? 😢

 

Sport Republic masterclass.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, FarehamSaintJames said:

They had the choice to stick or twist with Ralph and changing the coaching team.
They screwed that up.

They had to get his replacement right. They hired Nathan Jones.
They screwed that up.

They had to pay out and get an experienced manager in to have any hope of keeping us up (when it was well within our reach); I’m sure relation wasn’t part of the SR plan?
They hired Ruben Selles on the back of an attack v defence win at Chelsea, at a period where everyone was beating Chelsea.
They screwed that up monumentally.

As for this latest hire, thoughts? 😢

 

Sport Republic masterclass.

And the common denominator. Wish they had never set foot in our club. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People give Semmens a hard time and he did relatively little wrong, he ran it as a business and we didn’t spend above our means.
Gao wasn’t a bad owner. The Chinese government instructed all overseas investment in business be withdrawn. He didn’t take any money out the club.

Sport Republic are just the child equivalent of Todd Boehly. Spend a shit load of money on untried and inexperienced players and hope it sticks, and if it goes wrong, throw more money at it.

Only difference is Chelsea we’re too high up the table after their start to last season to get relegated.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m sorry but I don’t trust whatever they have planned next.

Martin is not going to get better as we are getting worse.

Leeds next week and Piroe will score an hat-rick and finally put his ex manager out of his misery.

Time to get these cunts out of the club as they have no idea how to run this football club. Honestly fucking Boro dicked us this afternoon and Russell’s is going to waffle some shit in the press conference.

 

Ha ha ha 4 games lost in a row.

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...