Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hammers are going to sneak this aren’t they, just to piss off every non Hammers fan around the world. Come on Chelsea!

Posted

West Ham are gaining on us, they're gaining on us, they're gaining on us we're going down we're going down we're going down oh god oh god oh god.

Posted (edited)

As usual Gary Neville thinks every goal from a free kick or long range shot is the keepers fault. Good free kick.

Edited by shurlock
Posted
3 minutes ago, shurlock said:

As usual Gary Neville thinks every goal from a free kick or long range shot is the keepers fault. Good free kick.

I did wonder why anyone would blame the keeper for that one. It was perfectly placed. 

Posted
2 hours ago, S-Clarke said:

I reckon we could have fun against them at their place.

Our game will probably be the one that confirms it too. Maybe.

That would be brilliant.

Posted

Chelsea have been awful at the back on the left hand side all game.  Strange performance from them given the Leicester result. 

Posted

As funny as it would have been, West Ham were never likely to go down. They have the best squad, easiest run in and the three teams below them are. Just... F**king... Awful.

Posted

Look on the bright side - with the dildo brothers in charge and Moyes at the helm perhaps they’ll go down next year instead.

Posted
42 minutes ago, bpsaint said:

Look on the bright side - with the dildo brothers in charge and Moyes at the helm perhaps they’ll go down next year instead.

More likely that in the transfer window they will sign some Carlos Kickaball for £45m again and this forum will go into meltdown again about how we are being left behind. Again.

Posted
9 hours ago, CB Fry said:

More likely that in the transfer window they will sign some Carlos Kickaball for £45m again and this forum will go into meltdown again about how we are being left behind. Again.

Amen.

I wonder which promoted team it will be this year that spends £100m that everyone gets in a flap about. Two years ago it was Fulham, it was Villa this season, Leeds maybe?

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, ErwinK1961 said:

Amen.

I wonder which promoted team it will be this year that spends £100m that everyone gets in a flap about. Two years ago it was Fulham, it was Villa this season, Leeds maybe?

Don’t forget a certain individual getting all hot and bothered about Norwich and Van Wolfswinkle. Castigating Saints at every opportunity for missing out on him.

Posted

phil foden starting to look like the player the hype was about.

if he can get a fair few games (including big games) next season, he could develop into a hell of a player

Posted
48 minutes ago, trousers said:

Not sure why that was a penalty... Looks like he got the ball to me...

 

 

FB_IMG_1593719812155.jpg

Who cares, it was given against Liverpool.

Posted

What _is_ the penalty for sexual assault?

I'm only following the game on a MBM, but what is the prognosis for Citeh's performance against us on Sunday? On a short high, on the beach?

 

Posted (edited)

Just watched City demolish Liverpool. Everytime I see Foden he's getting better. Hopefully they'll rest him on Sunday and bring in.......Oh.....David Silva.

Anyway, apparently "Wickh thwack kackth chack wickth Liverpooooool thwick chwackh kickth wickth thwack kwackth thwick ackthually" ............according to Jamie Carragher

Edited by Saint Keef
Posted
2 hours ago, trousers said:

Not sure why that was a penalty... Looks like he got the ball to me...

 

 

FB_IMG_1593719812155.jpg

Persistent holding. Look at his right arm and not his leg. 
 

mind you, Sterling had a hold of Gomez’s shirt at one stage.

Posted
17 minutes ago, Whitey Grandad said:

Persistent holding. Look at his right arm and not his leg. 
 

mind you, Sterling had a hold of Gomez’s shirt at one stage.

 

2 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

Who cares, it was given against Liverpool.

I’m disappointed in the pair of you.

  • Haha 1
Posted

Nice to be able to sit back and watch other results today with no real concern.

But I'd still ideally like to see wins for Norwich, Man U. 😳, Leicester, Wolves and Chelsea.

Posted

Brighton winning @ Norwich.

Pretty much secures Brighton if they see it out, and it removes any faint hope Norwich may have had.

Shit result for those below West Ham really, looking quite bleak for Bournemouth particularly.

Posted

Buendia is the only one on the Norwich side who looks like he may interest other Prem teams when they go down. Apparently he is 5th in the league for chances created.

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, Saint Pete said:

Buendia is the only one on the Norwich side who looks like he may interest other Prem teams when they go down. Apparently he is 5th in the league for chances created.

Cantwell too - too much of a luxury outside of the top six but coveted by those clubs. Godfrey and Aarons as well, both would be ideal in Ralph’s system but Godfrey wanted by Man U/Chelsea and others. Spurs love him but can’t even afford PEH with only a year left on his contract. Would prefer Buendia but he’s heading for bigger things. Bournemouth’s trio are Ake, Brooks and Wilson that clubs will target, would like Brooks but not sure we will buy in that position. Villa literally have Grealish and their reliance on him and according lack of goals will see them join Norwich and Bournemouth. 

Edited by saint1977
Posted
1 minute ago, saint1977 said:

Cantrell too - too much of a luxury outside of the top six but coveted by those clubs. Godfrey and Aarons as well, both would be ideal in Ralph’s system but Godfrey wanted by Man U/Chelsea and others. Spurs love him but can’t even afford PEH with only a year left on his contract. Would prefer Buendia but he’s heading for bigger things. Bournemouth’s trio are Ake, Brooks and Wilson that clubs will target, would like Brooks but not sure we will buy in that position. Villa literally have Grealish and their reliance on him and according lack of goals will see them join Norwich and Bournemouth. 

It's crazy isn't it - when you look at Villa and you can only really pin point Grealish that may attract real interest, yet Villa are the team who spent £160m on new talent in the summer!

#fail.

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, S-Clarke said:

It's crazy isn't it - when you look at Villa and you can only really pin point Grealish that may attract real interest, yet Villa are the team who spent £160m on new talent in the summer!

#fail.

It’s like Reed and Wilson went there for a summer. Bournemouth have got some garbage on comparatively big wages to their future income - Cook, Solanke, Lerma - we wanted Mepham but don’t know what happened to him. Ibe must have been a big waste too. 

Edited by saint1977

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...