The BBC Thread

[badgerx16]

59 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said:

Got to be underage to be a nonce, surely? 

Changes to the Law mean that 'inciting' a 17 year old is now illegal.

[whelk]

 

[aintforever]

22 minutes ago, whelk said:

 

Good on them. Would be nice if they raise a decent amount.

[Wade Garrett]

3 hours ago, Farmer Saint said:

Got to be underage to be a nonce, surely? 

Legally, it’s noncery.

[Weston Super Saint]

1 hour ago, aintforever said:

Good on them. Would be nice if they raise a decent amount.

Normally I would assume that this was a sarcastic response.  Given that it's you, I suspect you genuinely believe that Gary and Rylan will be getting together to sue thousands of right wing twitter users.  I don't have a twitter account but do they have some kind of flag on them on something to identify which ones are the 'right wing' ones, just to make sure they don't accidently include a 'left wing' one in their sue-ing frenzy 🤣🤣🤣

[AlexLaw76]

2 hours ago, aintforever said:

Good on them. Would be nice if they raise a decent amount.

I suspect neither make a penny from taking legal action against users on Twitter

[Farmer Saint]

1 hour ago, Wade Garrett said:

Legally, it’s noncery.

I'll bow to your greater knowledge on noncery. 

[AlexLaw76]

I have been trying to work out the BBC personality, now that Gary Linekar and Rylan Clarke have ruled themselves out.

I have a picture, can anyone help?

[egg]

47 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

I have been trying to work out the BBC personality, now that Gary Linekar and Rylan Clarke have ruled themselves out.

I have a picture, can anyone help?

That doesn't look too different to the person who I think it is. 

[Wade Garrett]

55 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said:

I'll bow to your greater knowledge on noncery. 

As a child of the 70s entertained by the likes of Saville, Harris, King ang Glitter I have huge knowledge of noncery.

[whelk]

44 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

As a child of the 70s entertained by the likes of Saville, Harris, King ang Glitter I have huge knowledge of noncery.

Mate that is incredible bad luck to have been interfered with by all 4. Hope the therapy is working out

 

[sadoldgit]

Given that one main name is all over social media I am surprised that our resident Twitter surfer and Nonce Finder General has not outed him yet.

[Wade Garrett]

44 minutes ago, whelk said:

Mate that is incredible bad luck to have been interfered with by all 4. Hope the therapy is working out

 

But without Glitter and Saville I would never have learned to milk a cow blindfolded.

[CB Fry]

21 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

Given that one main name is all over social media I am surprised that our resident Twitter surfer and Nonce Finder General has not outed him yet.

There's nothing on Twitter except idle speculation.

Yesterday morning Twitter divs had all decided it was Jeremy Vine.

[hypochondriac]

A well known male presenter on six figures that the mum immediately recognised and really enjoyed watching (so likely entertainment.) If you go down the list there's only a handful that would really apply to and some of them have already ruled themselves out. 

[badgerx16]

7 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

A well known male presenter on six figures that the mum immediately recognised and really enjoyed watching (so likely entertainment.) If you go down the list there's only a handful that would really apply to and some of them have already ruled themselves out. 

Well, they would say that, wouldn't they. 😉

 

 

[Ribtickler]

35 grand for playing with your purple headed warrior or/and wizards sleeve.  Whoever it is needs to have their head wobbled.

Think of all the grot you can get on Only Fans for that, Anne Widdacombes thong is 10k.

That's all i will say on the matter

[hypochondriac]

14 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

Well, they would say that, wouldn't they. 😉

 

 

Well yes but when it inevitably comes out they will look a bit foolish and will get more stick so I'm inclined to believe them. There's a couple that are notable because they haven't made any denials as yet. One is more obvious than the others in my opinion. 

Edited 9 July, 2023 by hypochondriac

[badgerx16]

Just now, hypochondriac said:

Well yes but when it inevitably comes out they will look a bit foolish and will get more stick so I'm inclined to believe them. 

Given the number of people within the Beeb who must know who it is, plus presumably the Sun, I am surprised it hasn't leaked out. It won't take long for it to be noticed if it is a 'well known presenter' when he fails to appear on telly.

[hypochondriac]

Just now, badgerx16 said:

Given the number of people within the Beeb who must know who it is, plus presumably the Sun, I am surprised it hasn't leaked out. It won't take long for it to be noticed if it is a 'well known presenter' when he fails to appear on telly.

There's been one name mentioned more than others. I asked my mate who's a bbc producer and he hasn't been told so I don't think it's everywhere. Should know this week for sure. 

[Farmer Saint]

Can anyone guess Huw it is yet? 

[whelk]

Norton?

[whelk]

Fiona Bruce?

[whelk]

John Craven?

[aintforever]

4 hours ago, Weston Super Saint said:

Normally I would assume that this was a sarcastic response.  Given that it's you, I suspect you genuinely believe that Gary and Rylan will be getting together to sue thousands of right wing twitter users.  I don't have a twitter account but do they have some kind of flag on them on something to identify which ones are the 'right wing' ones, just to make sure they don't accidently include a 'left wing' one in their sue-ing frenzy 🤣🤣🤣

Who gives a shit how they vote, if it raises money for good causes it doesn’t matter where the money comes from. If someone is accusing you of something you didn’t do you would want to sue them regardless of their politics.

[Weston Super Saint]

6 minutes ago, aintforever said:

Who gives a shit how they vote, if it raises money for good causes it doesn’t matter where the money comes from. If someone is accusing you of something you didn’t do you would want to sue them regardless of their politics.

And who are "they" exactly?

Do you have to prove your name and address when you create a twitter account? If not, how do they sue them?

Unless you can take @purpleheadedstrangler69 and similar weird accounts to court?

[aintforever]

6 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said:

And who are "they" exactly?

Do you have to prove your name and address when you create a twitter account? If not, how do they sue them?

Unless you can take @purpleheadedstrangler69 and similar weird accounts to court?

God knows, I never said they would be successful, just that it would be nice if they were.

You should try reading, porky.

Edited 9 July, 2023 by aintforever

[Weston Super Saint]

19 minutes ago, aintforever said:

God knows, I never said they would be successful, just that it would be nice if they were.

You should try reading, porky.

Wow, that's a fast volte face even for you.

Your statement "would be nice if they raised a decent amount" suggested you believed without doubt they would be successful, it's just the award amount that needed to be determined.

[aintforever]

1 hour ago, Weston Super Saint said:

Wow, that's a fast volte face even for you.

Your statement "would be nice if they raised a decent amount" suggested you believed without doubt they would be successful, it's just the award amount that needed to be determined.

No it suggested I wanted them to be successful, nothing else. It’s obviously going to be hard to sue Twitter users.

[Turkish]

aintclever on pretty much every thread 

 

[Weston Super Saint]

 

8 hours ago, aintforever said:

No it suggested I wanted them to be successful, nothing else. It’s obviously going to be hard to sue Twitter users.

No, you stated that you wanted them to 'raise a decent amount' - suggesting that victory was already in the bag.

At no point have you mentioned the impossibility of sueing twitter users - until I pointed it out to you....

16 hours ago, aintforever said:

Good on them. Would be nice if they raise a decent amount.

[aintforever]

2 hours ago, Weston Super Saint said:

 

No, you stated that you wanted them to 'raise a decent amount' - suggesting that victory was already in the bag.

At no point have you mentioned the impossibility of sueing twitter users - until I pointed it out to you....

 If you say so Porky.

It would be nice if they raised a decent amount of cash for charity.

It would be nice if Saints won the league next year.

It would be nice if I got a tug-job off Anna Kendrick.

It would be nice if you could understand English.

Not sure any of those will happen though.

Edited 10 July, 2023 by aintforever

[Weston Super Saint]

41 minutes ago, aintforever said:

 If you say so Porky.

It would be nice if they raised a decent amount of cash for charity.

It would be nice if Saints won the league next year.

It would be nice if I got a tug-job off Anna Kendrick.

It would be nice if you could understand English.

Not sure any of those will happen though.

Bless.

[Saint86]

13 hours ago, Farmer Saint said:

Can anyone guess Huw it is yet? 

There are certainly some incriminating images doing the rounds on this front.

[Turkish]

2 hours ago, Weston Super Saint said:

Bless.

what's all this porky/piggy stuff about by the way?

[Guided Missile]

8 minutes ago, Turkish said:

what's all this porky/piggy stuff about by the way?

A "Deliverance" reference.

[Lord Duckhunter]

1 hour ago, Saint86 said:

There are certainly some incriminating images doing the rounds on this front.

There’s one of him and a huge arse. 
 

#sickening 

 

 

[cloggy saint]

2 hours ago, Saint86 said:

There are certainly some incriminating images doing the rounds on this front.

Incriminating how? The suspect is accused of receiving photos, not sending them.

[Saint86]

1 minute ago, cloggy saint said:

Incriminating how? The suspect is accused of receiving photos, not sending them.

No, the unknown presenter is accused of paying a 17-20 year old to send photos? Nothing has been said about them sending them? 

 

[cloggy saint]

2 minutes ago, Saint86 said:

No, the unknown presenter is accused of paying a 17-20 year old to send photos? Nothing has been said about them sending them? 

 

Isn't that what I just said? 

[Farmer Saint]

14 minutes ago, cloggy saint said:

Incriminating how? The suspect is accused of receiving photos, not sending them.

I would be very surprised if it weren't though, wouldn't you be? News presenters with pictures of themselves with their pants around their ankle's.

[Saint86]

15 minutes ago, cloggy saint said:

Isn't that what I just said? 

Ah yes, basically 😅. 

I just mean that accusations currently relate to payments to receive stuff / keep quiet. But i wouldn't be surprised if it ends up being more than that once it all comes out 🤷‍♂️... And similairy ruling it out seems premature. Especially as there is certainly an incriminating photo doing the rounds - although whether genuine or not who knows. 

Edited 10 July, 2023 by Saint86

[Weston Super Saint]

4 hours ago, Turkish said:

what's all this porky/piggy stuff about by the way?

No idea. Something Lamesaint has invented whilst claiming he's definitely not obsessed with me.

[Turkish]

24 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said:

No idea. Something Lamesaint has invented whilst claiming he's definitely not obsessed with me.

It’s hilarious. Especially the way aintclever has latched onto it 

[CB Fry]

Only a matter of time before GB News go for broke and just name him.

As long as all they say is "xxxx is under investigation by the BBC" I can't really see how they can be sued or stopped.

By the time there is an Ofcom investigation or whatever, it will be known that what they said was true.

Every single person reading the news knows who it is. The dam will break very quickly.

 

[whelk]

Revelation that fuck all in it. #freeHuw

[CB Fry]

6 minutes ago, CB Fry said:

Only a matter of time before GB News go for broke and just name him.

As long as all they say is "xxxx is under investigation by the BBC" I can't really see how they can be sued or stopped.

By the time there is an Ofcom investigation or whatever, it will be known that what they said was true.

Every single person reading the news knows who it is. The dam will break very quickly.

 

Or maybe not.....plot twist

[whelk]

Case study for what a sad nation we have become

[cloggy saint]

This could disappoint a lot of people here  https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-66159357

[egg]

Interesting development, and a crap statement from the sun. I hadn't appreciated that this was all based on a 3rd party complaint.