Jump to content

The BBC Thread

Guided Missile

By Guided Missile
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Plastic

Plastic

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

I’d agree with that. The other thing they do is ruin the end by gerrymandering the story line for another series. Why can’t they just leave it at a natural end. 
 

I’ve just got Disney to watch the Peter Jackson Beatles thing and there’s some half decent adult stuff on there, but I’m sure it’s the just the novelty and once I’ve watched the best stuff it’ll be the same shite. 

Disney’s the best of the lot tbh. 

Back on the BBC - credit where it’s due - Green Planet was superb. 

  • Like 1
  • 6 months later...
  • 5 months later...
Lord Duckhunter

Lord Duckhunter

Posted
Posted
On 17/09/2020 at 11:49, Lord Duckhunter said:


 

Sums Radio 2 up, it’s going right down the pan. Apart from Ken Bruce, it’s lost it.  

They’ve now lost Ken. 
 

Watch the new chump lose as many listeners as Ball has. The bloke on in the afternoon is even worse than Steve Wright, which I thought was pretty much impossible.
 

How to fuck up a decent radio station. 

  • Like 3
  • 1 month later...
whelk

whelk

Posted
Posted (edited)

Few devotees of The Apprentice must be worried given the absolute bollocks Sugar Tweets

Edited by whelk
AlexLaw76

AlexLaw76

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

Would GL have been sidelined if he had tweeted that the Government's plans were a "bloody good idea" ?

He would have been hounded out of his street by the great and good by the end of the day

whelk

whelk

Posted
Posted
Just now, AlexLaw76 said:

To be fair with MOTD, a house brick could be the main presenter and the same number of people would probably watch it

Funny you posted about watching it last week eh

whelk

whelk

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, whelk said:

Few devotees of The Apprentice must be worried given the absolute bollocks Sugar Tweets

 

  • Like 2
SotonianWill

SotonianWill

Posted
Posted

blessing in disguise this MOTD stuff, can they finally just show us the highlights with a few comments after instead of the useless, boring analysis they normally do. Big Match format so much better, if adapted with all games you could show long highlights of high scoring games, then shorter for boring ones. 

  • Like 1
saint1977

saint1977

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, whelk said:

Too much to hope for but would be hilarious if everyone followed Ian Wright. 

Alan Shearer just has. So many problems that the ENP (English Nationalist Party) has inflicted on this country and we’re having this waste of a debate about boats which represent less than 5% of the immigration figures. With associated stupidity and vile language from Leaky Sue the hypocrite. Sunak is fucking stupid for getting behind this and the legislation will crumble at the first challenge.

Yet again economic migration and asylum are getting conflated when they are totally separate. That’s Braverman’s influence, trying to be Nigel Farage, Enoch Powell or Nick Griffin.

Look at the ITV News article on the Ambulance service pressures - this is what’s important.

It’s not wrong to discuss immigration sensibly but the Conservatives and particularly Braverman aren’t capable - it’s all arbitrary targets irrespective of the economy/NHS. 

Le Tissier will end up presenting it tomorrow night - his far right, vile conspiracy theory views will fit right in with the current BBC CEO and Sunak/Braverman.

Edited by saint1977
  • Like 2
aintforever

aintforever

Posted
Posted

Love the way the right-wing press bang on about how bad cancel culture is then as soon as someone says something they don’t like they cry like a bunch of babies and get them cancelled. :lol: 

  • Like 5
SotonianWill

SotonianWill

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, aintforever said:

Love the way the right-wing press bang on about how bad cancel culture is then as soon as someone says something they don’t like they cry like a bunch of babies and get them cancelled. :lol: 

I agree on the most part but it was a stupid comment

whelk

whelk

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, SotonianWill said:

blessing in disguise this MOTD stuff, can they finally just show us the highlights with a few comments after instead of the useless, boring analysis they normally do. Big Match format so much better, if adapted with all games you could show long highlights of high scoring games, then shorter for boring ones. 

You don’t have to watch it pal

  • Like 1
SotonianWill

SotonianWill

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, whelk said:

You don’t have to watch it pal

I don’t watch it anymore, i’m just saying it would be more interesting with a new format. Sky put the highlights on YT 5 mins after full time.

Lord Duckhunter

Lord Duckhunter

Posted
Posted
Just now, SotonianWill said:

I agree on the most part but it was a stupid comment

If people can’t see why BBC presenters shouldn’t make these sort of comments then perhaps they’re not as intelligent as they think they are. Personally, I’d rather the wokie twats were encouraged to make more political observations, as it’ll hasten the demise of the TV poll tax… 

revolution saint

revolution saint

Posted
Posted

I thought the 30's Germany comparison was a bit OTT and unhelpful but don't have any problem with Lineker saying it.  As far as I'm concerned he can say whatever he likes outside of the BBC.

Surprised about Shearer - always thought he'd be a bit of a Tory.  I reckon they'll get Danny Mills in - he looks like he would drink the blood of migrants.

  • Like 1
AlexLaw76

AlexLaw76

Posted
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, revolution saint said:

I thought the 30's Germany comparison was a bit OTT and unhelpful but don't have any problem with Lineker saying it.  As far as I'm concerned he can say whatever he likes outside of the BBC.

Surprised about Shearer - always thought he'd be a bit of a Tory.  I reckon they'll get Danny Mills in - he looks like he would drink the blood of migrants.

But does his contract - which he gladly signed - allow him?

I am guessing not, and he probably has received many warnings over recent time...

As for Ian Wright, no solidarity with his peers here - https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news/ian-wright-matt-le-tissier-sky-sports-sacked-soccer-saturday-phil-thompson-charlie-nicholas-a9690971.html

Edited by AlexLaw76
whelk

whelk

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

But does his contract - which he gladly signed - allow him?

I am guessing not, and he probably has received many warnings over recent time...

As for Ian Wright, no solidarity with his peers here - https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news/ian-wright-matt-le-tissier-sky-sports-sacked-soccer-saturday-phil-thompson-charlie-nicholas-a9690971.html

What? You say Batman is too fucking thick to understand something?

ecuk268

ecuk268

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

LOL 

you stupid cunt

That's a very erudite and well-constructed riposte.

You have hidden talents.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
AlexLaw76

AlexLaw76

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, ecuk268 said:

Your childish reply tends to answer his question.

A childish question is ok then?

Just a yes or no will do, when you are ready

Edited by AlexLaw76
ecuk268

ecuk268

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

A childish question is ok then?

Just a yes or no will do, when you are ready

If the question was so childish you should have had no problem in forming a suitably critical reply.

Dumb insults show that he got to you.

Sheaf Saint

Sheaf Saint

Posted
Posted (edited)
53 minutes ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

If people can’t see why BBC presenters shouldn’t make these sort of comments then perhaps they’re not as intelligent as they think they are. 

Don't seem to remember you ever complaining about Andrew Neil posting some horrendously biased right wing bollocks on Twitter while also being a senior political presenter on the BBC.

Edited by Sheaf Saint
  • Like 2
AlexLaw76

AlexLaw76

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, ecuk268 said:

If the question was so childish you should have had no problem in forming a suitably critical reply.

Dumb insults show that he got to you.

The dumb question showed something in the first instance, no?

ecuk268

ecuk268

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

The dumb question showed something in the first instance, no?

Quite possibly.

By refusing to rise to the bait you could have negated his argument.

Sheaf Saint

Sheaf Saint

Posted
Posted (edited)
49 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

But does his contract - which he gladly signed - allow him?

Obviously not, because GL has been tweeting politically charged, anti-government content for many years. So if that was against the terns of his contract then he would have been sacked long before now.

I seriously doubt there would be any legal basis to include a clause in his contract forbidding him to have his own opinion on social media where he is posting as an individual and not representing his employer. Given his propensity to such postings, I very much doubt he would sign such a contract even if there was.

Edited by Sheaf Saint
  • Like 2
Lord Duckhunter

Lord Duckhunter

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Sheaf Saint said:

Don't seem to remember you ever complaining about Andrew Neil posting some horrendously biased right wing bollocks on Twitter while also being a senior political presenter on the BBC.

I must have missed these, perhaps you could post them and I’ll then  comment. Every time I’ve seen Neil on the BBC he comes across as incredibly impartial, so would be interested in this “horrendously biased right wing bollocks”. 

whelk

whelk

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, ecuk268 said:

Quite possibly.

By refusing to rise to the bait you could have negated his argument.

Hey I love Batman. Just Saintweb banter

AlexLaw76

AlexLaw76

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, ecuk268 said:

Quite possibly.

By refusing to rise to the bait you could have negated his argument.

Look forward to your intervention the next time someone throws around language like I did - Whelk is a good'un for it, but you probably agree with what he posts on here, so that one may be a lost cause.

 

whelk

whelk

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

Agreed, he’s got principles.
 

 He’d never let money compromise them. 
 

 

 

 

3B3FCCB7-9CFF-48A2-B0A1-881EB1A84335.jpeg

AFE4F9FE-E4B5-4DF0-B64B-B724442766B0.jpeg

The old bigot just gets more stupid by the day. Baaaaaaa

Tamesaint

Tamesaint

Posted
Posted

What a shocking day for the BBC. It bows to the Daily Mail and government ministers re Gary Lineker and it admits to not challenging Nadine Dorries when she made up smears about Sue Grey. I suppose that is what you get when the chairman of the BBC is a Johnson crony and the director of communications used to work for Theresa May.

It's hilarious to think that the likes of Batman are so gaslit that they think the BBC is a left wing organisation!!

  • Like 1
whelk

whelk

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Tamesaint said:

What a shocking day for the BBC. It bows to the Daily Mail and government ministers re Gary Lineker and it admits to not challenging Nadine Dorries when she made up smears about Sue Grey. I suppose that is what you get when the chairman of the BBC is a Johnson crony and the director of communications used to work for Theresa May.

It's hilarious to think that the likes of Batman are so gaslit that they think the BBC is a left wing organisation!!

Don’t forget the Director General

 

  • Like 2
badgerx16

badgerx16

Posted
Posted

If GL had said what he said whilst in the pub, rather than putting it on Twatter, would the reaction have been the same ? Or are all BBC empoyees not allowed to ever hold or reveal their personal opinions ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...