Jump to content

Matt Crocker Returns Thread


SuperSAINT

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, hypochondriac said:

Wow. Crocker is certainly an impressive person. To think that some people thought that Krueger was actually worth listening to and not full of absolute shit. 

Kruger was more interested in telling us how proud we should be to see our former players doing so well at Liverpool. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

Yes I am entirely aware of that thanks for pointing out the obvious. The point is that whilst both had different roles, both of them have spoken about the club whilst beong employees. If you read what krueger used to say and then what an actual football person says like Matt then the difference is night and day. We are very lucky to have someone who very clearly knows exactly what they are talking about. 

Crocker's article is a fairly damning indictment of how the club was run after Poch (and by implication Cortese). The idea of the academy teams playing the same style as the first team to hep progression was put in place by Poch, but it seems the bullshit of Krueger and the machinations of Les Reed undid all of the good intentions and work. For all of Ronald Koeman's good managerial skilss once he broke free of the Reed shackles, he never had the long term future of Saints in mind and didn't have much faith in the Academy. Mind you, the same could happen again if/when Ralph leaves, unless strategic plans are put in place to replace him, its all very well getting the young players to play in the style of the first team and to be able to fit in, but if the first team philosophy changes, as one day it will then they are stuck again.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, VectisSaint said:

Crocker's article is a fairly damning indictment of how the club was run after Poch (and by implication Cortese). The idea of the academy teams playing the same style as the first team to hep progression was put in place by Poch, but it seems the bullshit of Krueger and the machinations of Les Reed undid all of the good intentions and work. For all of Ronald Koeman's good managerial skilss once he broke free of the Reed shackles, he never had the long term future of Saints in mind and didn't have much faith in the Academy. Mind you, the same could happen again if/when Ralph leaves, unless strategic plans are put in place to replace him, its all very well getting the young players to play in the style of the first team and to be able to fit in, but if the first team philosophy changes, as one day it will then they are stuck again.

I would have thought that the only change would be the playbook. The rest of the strategy would remain in place, we would work with the new manager and hopefully only tweak the playbook to their requirements. This would then be implemented across the Academy, B-Team and 1st Team.

The players would have to learn some different tactics/positions - but as pro's you'd expect them to adapt to that. They would have played numerous roles and systems already and would expect to throughout their career.

The key would the appointment of another progressive manager who has a philosophy that the whole club believes in and players thrive in. Appreciate that it's easy to say and not so easy to put in practice. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

My point was and still is that Chairmen and CEO’s speak very differently to DofF who are more hands on to the technical side of things so it is pointless comparing the two. If you want to compare Krueger compare him to Semmens. 

Something isn't pointless just because you claim it to be. Krueger's interviews were of interest because they signalled a larger problem that the club had at the time- namely "style" and flowery words signifying nothing over actual substance and acumen with a clear footballing philosophy where everyone sang from the same hymn sheet. It is clear that whilst Semmens has brought this himself, Crocker is an absolutely amazing person to continue this change for a club of our size. As he rightly says we cannot compete financially with other clubs so we have to be different in other ways. The stark difference in language between Krueger and Crocker is the interesting bit despite their differing job roles. We are in safe hands. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, VectisSaint said:

Crocker's article is a fairly damning indictment of how the club was run after Poch (and by implication Cortese). The idea of the academy teams playing the same style as the first team to hep progression was put in place by Poch, but it seems the bullshit of Krueger and the machinations of Les Reed undid all of the good intentions and work. For all of Ronald Koeman's good managerial skilss once he broke free of the Reed shackles, he never had the long term future of Saints in mind and didn't have much faith in the Academy. Mind you, the same could happen again if/when Ralph leaves, unless strategic plans are put in place to replace him, its all very well getting the young players to play in the style of the first team and to be able to fit in, but if the first team philosophy changes, as one day it will then they are stuck again.

True. I think however this was exacerbated when we panicked and appointed Mark Hughes to save us from relegation. All vestige of long term planning was thrown out the window to make sure we had short term survival. It is only now that we are building back better again. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Saint Mikey said:

I would have thought that the only change would be the playbook. The rest of the strategy would remain in place, we would work with the new manager and hopefully only tweak the playbook to their requirements. This would then be implemented across the Academy, B-Team and 1st Team.

The players would have to learn some different tactics/positions - but as pro's you'd expect them to adapt to that. They would have played numerous roles and systems already and would expect to throughout their career.

The key would the appointment of another progressive manager who has a philosophy that the whole club believes in and players thrive in. Appreciate that it's easy to say and not so easy to put in practice. 

The timing is key. Hopefully we can agree a departure with Ralph and have a smooth transition with plenty of time. Quite often managerial changes are foisted upon a club with a downturn in form or a sudden poaching. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Matthew Le God said:

How does he prevent him going if an elite European club comes in for him?

I think it's been quoted elsewhere that to implement a new style successfully it takes a team 2 seasons before they are experts in its application.

There is no existing big team in the world that would wait longer than 6months in my view.

Ralph is a world class manager at a club that has world class patience and belief.

If anything I could see him going back to Red Bull now Ralph Ragwick is gone but think it would be unlikely, I think next season will be our big season if we get our recruitment right 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Athletic is such good value. I know many of us expect everything on internet to be free but now I no longer read anything else.

Just read great article on Patrick Bamford. They just don’t churn out the usual shot in the papers. I’m on £1 a month deal such value. Feel like I actually want to support them as refreshingly depth journalism.

Loved the Crocker article too. We are going to win the league

Edited by whelk
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, whelk said:

The Athletic is such good value. I know many of us expect everything on internet to be free but now I no longer read anything else.

Just read great article on Patrick Bamford. They just don’t churn out the usual shot in the papers. I’m on £1 a month deal such value. Feel like I actually want to support them as refreshingly depth journalism.

Loved the Crocker article too. We are going to win the league

What's so good about it? Genuine question. im not really interested in reading nonsense about geeks doing tactical analysis or transfer gossip about WHO SHOULD LIVERPOOL SIGN? or opinions by crap journalists or journeyman players. The saints guy used to work for the echo didn't he? I dont remember him being anything special there.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Turkish said:

What's so good about it? Genuine question. im not really interested in reading nonsense about geeks doing tactical analysis or transfer gossip about WHO SHOULD LIVERPOOL SIGN? or opinions by crap journalists or journeyman players. The saints guy used to work for the echo didn't he? I dont remember him being anything special there.  

Nor am I and I hate tactic bores although Michael Cox and Jonathan Wilson are ok in small doses. I mean there are limits on how much you can do about football and sometimes feels like the pressure to turn articles regularly but they try and come up with different angles and seems like they do get decent interviews. And they don’t do the bs click bait. 
 

Screenshots show some of recent Saints articles41F9F0D6-67CD-46B9-9F64-EEC71EC7F676.thumb.png.d6098e8c6cea53d69d2202797e0e0d15.png5FDDDF8A-4DFB-4081-9205-0F0E546158E5.thumb.jpeg.6d87ad1f34ae4849b74f56375d2c430f.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally getting to read this. Crocker comes across as very impressive and it is refreshing to see him using his previous experience here to try and return the club to its core values. He places so much emphasis on the new B team and how important it is to the progression of the club. Begs the question though why somebody like Dave Horseman is in charge of the team. Willing to give him the benefit of the doubt that the team are still adapting to new style of play, but the results this season havent been great so far

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, woodsaint1 said:

Begs the question though why somebody like Dave Horseman is in charge of the team. Willing to give him the benefit of the doubt that the team are still adapting to new style of play, but the results this season havent been great so far

Match results aren't what Horseman should be judged on. It should be how well he develops players to be ready to move into the first team.

They could lose every game 3-0, but if he is improving some of the players so Hasenhuttl can use them then he is doing his job well.

Edited by Matthew Le God
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said:

Match results aren't what Horseman should be judged on. It should be how well he develops players to be ready to move into the first team.

They could lose every game 3-0, but if he is improving some of the players so Hasenhuttl can use them then he is doing his job well.

I partly agree, but players need confidence to perform and develop. Getting beaten 3 nil each week won't help with that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
  • 1 month later...
52 minutes ago, SuperSAINT said:

 

Doesn't say if Cambridge United or Cambridge University, not sure which is the better grounding. 

Anyway, googled him and it is Cambridge Utd. wonder what the stand out credentials are to recruit from a L2 side albeit one just promoted. That said, he was previously at MK Dons which wasn't a bad starting point for Mitchell. (One of Reed's better appointments). Hope it's an inspired choice

Edited by Badger
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...