Jump to content

General Election 2019 - Post Match Reaction


SWF Exit Poll  

40 members have voted

  1. 1. SWF Exit Poll

    • Conservatives
      21
    • Labour
      12
    • Liberals
      6
    • Brexit
      1
    • SNP/Plaid
      0
    • Green
      0
    • Independant
      0


Recommended Posts

Posted
I'm not embarrassed at all at your pathetic dissembling, Gavin, or the attempts of your cohort remoaners to try and put words into my mouth. I find it all very amusing sometimes and boring on other occasions. This is one of those boring occasions.

 

You really do need to raise your game, Gavin. I'm quite happy to count down the days until the 12th December. Where Musk builds his factory isn't going to influence the vote on the day, so stop p*ssing in the wind.

 

You’re well out of your depth up against him, and everyone can see it regardless of their opinion on Brexit.

 

Best to leave it.

Posted
High profile casualties from this election?

 

Swinson could be one.

 

So could Boris wasn't his majority in Uxbridge slashed in half at the 2017 election? It would be kind of funny if the Tories won the election and Boris lost his seat.

Posted
So could Boris wasn't his majority in Uxbridge slashed in half at the 2017 election? It would be kind of funny if the Tories won the election and Boris lost his seat.

 

There is a big student community in that area. Fingers crossed!

Posted

Party leaders tend to get a bit of a boost in their own constituencies during election campaign, lots of publicity & limelight. I’d be amazed if either lost their seats.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted
Party leaders tend to get a bit of a boost in their own constituencies during election campaign, lots of publicity & limelight. I’d be amazed if either lost their seats.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

I think Swinson will be a casualty after the election.

She had made huge statements about lots of things, and given the state of labour, she should be swiping seats from them all over the place.

 

I don’t think her message is good outside of those who would vote for her traditionally anyway (which is not a lot)

Posted
It’s a nonsense that the Speaker gets a free ride. They should chose a Speaker from those who are elected after the GE.

 

And reduce a vote from one party?

Posted
It’s a nonsense that the Speaker gets a free ride.

Why ? He / she can't vote in conventional Commons divisions, so theoretically the party they previously supported loses an MP.

Posted

It made complete sense for the previous HOC to elect the speaker. Apart from one or two exceptions they had all served with the candidates for the length of the parliament. They’d all seen their strengths, characteristics and behaviour. The new parliament could contain 150 newbies who wouldn’t have a clue whether or not Lynsey Hoyle or one of the others would make a good speaker.

They would also be under pressure on their first day, without having to pick a speaker.

 

 

Yet again Soggy fails to see common sense.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted
Why ? He / she can't vote in conventional Commons divisions, so theoretically the party they previously supported loses an MP.

 

Because their constituency don’t get a meaningful vote.

Posted
They still get to vote for a candidate of their choice.

 

And what of the electorate in the constituencies held by the 3 deputy speakers, none of whom will vote in Parliamentary divisions. Are they being denied proper representation in the HoC ?

Posted
And what of the electorate in the constituencies held by the 3 deputy speakers, none of whom will vote in Parliamentary divisions. Are they being denied proper representation in the HoC ?

 

Clearly they are.

Posted
And what of the electorate in the constituencies held by the 3 deputy speakers, none of whom will vote in Parliamentary divisions. Are they being denied proper representation in the HoC ?

 

Yes of course

Posted
It made complete sense for the previous HOC to elect the speaker. Apart from one or two exceptions they had all served with the candidates for the length of the parliament. They’d all seen their strengths, characteristics and behaviour. The new parliament could contain 150 newbies who wouldn’t have a clue whether or not Lynsey Hoyle or one of the others would make a good speaker.

They would also be under pressure on their first day, without having to pick a speaker.

 

 

Yet again Soggy fails to see common sense.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

Given that 650 MPs are returned there will always be plenty of experienced people to choose from. Also why do the Speakers have to be MPs? Why not have experienced civil servants doing the job? That way every MP is properly elected and every MP gets to vote on issues in the House. Given the way you carry on about “democracy” I would have thought you would be in total agreement.

Posted
That way every MP is properly elected and every MP gets to vote on issues in the House.

Even allowing for Sinn Fein, there are many divisions in the HoC where not every MP votes.

Posted

I'm very disappointed about the exclusion from tonight's ITV election debate of the Liberal Democrats and Jo Swinson.

 

They deserve to be seen on prime time national television.

Posted
Even allowing for Sinn Fein, there are many divisions in the HoC where not every MP votes.

 

That would usually be by choice would it not? The Speaker doesn’t have a choice.

Posted
That would usually be by choice would it not? The Speaker doesn’t have a choice.

There are many things wrong with our electoral / democratic / Parliamentary system, most of which are more critical than whether the Speaker's constituents are being short changed.

Posted
There are many things wrong with our electoral / democratic / Parliamentary system, most of which are more critical than whether the Speaker's constituents are being short changed.

 

I don’t disagree but thought it worth a mention.

Posted
I have been a political reporter for almost three decades and have never encountered a senior British politician who lies and fabricates so regularly, so shamelessly and so systematically as Boris Johnson.

 

Per Peter Oborne who wrote the book on political lying. Calling Brett from Camden aka Batman to serve up his daily dish of whataboutery.

Posted

Just read that Johnson has called the plan to give everyone free broadband a Communist plot.

 

I am sure that he is aware that the only way you can claim Universal Credit is online.

 

 

Hmmmm :rolleyes:

Posted

What an absolute farce this has been. Pathetic moderator has no control at all, Johnson is just blustering his way through difficult questions with sound bites, Corbyn follows suit and refuses to answer direct questions.

Posted
What an absolute farce this has been. Pathetic moderator has no control at all, Johnson is just blustering his way through difficult questions with sound bites, Corbyn follows suit and refuses to answer direct questions.

 

Johnson always gets off lightly from interviewers.

Posted
Members of the audience jeering when Corbyn mentions the poor. WTF?

 

Strangest part of the whole debate that. Booing people for having the audacity to be poor.

Posted
Strangest part of the whole debate that. Booing people for having the audacity to be poor.

 

Especially as it was mentioned in the context of climate change, and Corbyn is right, poorer countries are going to suffer much more.

Posted

Awful format. What is the obsession with audience participation and the host butting in every few minutes , it’s made QT unwatchable and these debates are a joke. The stupid Xmas question just about summed it up.

 

Suspect this won’t change the polls, which is ultimately good news for the Tories. But the sooner these debates are binned the better all round.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted
Especially as it was mentioned in the context of climate change, and Corbyn is right, poorer countries are going to suffer much more.

 

Why would anyone who has seen the interviews of people flooded out of their homes think it appropriate to boo at that point?

Posted

Agreed, the audience should be banned.

 

As for performance I can’t imagine anyone will be changing their vote from one to the other after that. Two very weak attempts at canvassing. At best just entrenching views. Overall Corbyn was slightly better but massively let down by his refusal to answer the Brexit polling question.

 

very weak format and the moderator was truly terrible.

Posted
Awful format. What is the obsession with audience participation and the host butting in every few minutes , it’s made QT unwatchable and these debates are a joke. The stupid Xmas question just about summed it up.

 

Suspect this won’t change the polls, which is ultimately good news for the Tories. But the sooner these debates are binned the better all round.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

The host wasn’t great but then if they don’t answer the question or talk too long she had to do something. Agree about the audience. It adds atmosphere to the proceedings but they do distract from the responses.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...