Jump to content

Ralph Hasenhuttl

Edmonton Saint

By Edmonton Saint
in The Saints

 Share

Recommended Posts

MarkSFC

MarkSFC

Posted
Posted

Why the fuck is he still here. Ridiculous. Lose to Bournemouth and that must surely be it. Win versus Bournemouth and it should still be it. Its Bournemouth ffs. 

  • Like 2
saintant

saintant

Posted
Posted
Just now, MarkSFC said:

Why the fuck is he still here. Ridiculous. Lose to Bournemouth and that must surely be it. Win versus Bournemouth and it should still be it. Its Bournemouth ffs. 

Because, as Semmens said at the pre-season fan's forum, where we finish is not important. I think there was more to that statement than most of us appreciated at the time. People saw it as a throw-away remark but maybe it was a warning to the supporters. SR may have no desire or intention to get rid of Ralph whatever the results and our league position. 

  • Confused 1
MarkSFC

MarkSFC

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, saintant said:

Because, as Semmens said at the pre-season fan's forum, where we finish is not important. I think there was more to that statement than most of us appreciated at the time. People saw it as a throw-away remark but maybe it was a warning to the supporters. SR may have no desire or intention to get rid of Ralph whatever the results and our league position. 

Why bother going then. Why bother "supporting" people who have no interest in creating sporting success. Cvnts the lot of them. This is almost as bad as Branfoot time. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
verlaine1979

verlaine1979

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, saintant said:

Because, as Semmens said at the pre-season fan's forum, where we finish is not important. I think there was more to that statement than most of us appreciated at the time. People saw it as a throw-away remark but maybe it was a warning to the supporters. SR may have no desire or intention to get rid of Ralph whatever the results and our league position. 

I think you can take it for granted that he wasn't including getting relegated in that analysis. SR didn't spend nearly 200m on the club and invest another 70m on players for us to get relegated, lose most of our income, most of our equity as a PL club and have our best players cherry picked for less than they're worth because they refuse to play in the Championship.

They want the club to be a showcase to power a business model based on player sales. That means staying up and playing football that allows our young players to show their ability reasonably frequently, even if the exact league position isn't as important to them.

  • Like 3
Wade Garrett

Wade Garrett

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, verlaine1979 said:

I think you can take it for granted that he wasn't including getting relegated in that analysis. SR didn't spend nearly 200m on the club and invest another 70m on players for us to get relegated, lose most of our income, most of our equity as a PL club and have our best players cherry picked for less than they're worth because they refuse to play in the Championship.

They want the club to be a showcase to power a business model based on player sales. That means staying up and playing football that allows our young players to show their ability reasonably frequently, even if the exact league position isn't as important to them.

They need to fucking grow a pair quickly if they don’t want to go down.

  • Like 3
saint1977

saint1977

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, verlaine1979 said:

I think you can take it for granted that he wasn't including getting relegated in that analysis. SR didn't spend nearly 200m on the club and invest another 70m on players for us to get relegated, lose most of our income, most of our equity as a PL club and have our best players cherry picked for less than they're worth because they refuse to play in the Championship.

They want the club to be a showcase to power a business model based on player sales. That means staying up and playing football that allows our young players to show their ability reasonably frequently, even if the exact league position isn't as important to them.

Which I would think is true, but SR has not accounted for the impact of Semmens and Ralph’s negativity and lack of drive through the club and onto the first team culture. If you start saying league position and results aren’t important, that’s a very, very dangerous game to play. Only way for SR to recover this is either a big name who shakes the place up and lifts standards like Hoddle or WGS did, or a lesser name who is hyper driven and can find some tactical points of difference. I’m struggling to see sufficient goal threat for anything other than relegation this season even so.

  • Like 3
Fitzhugh Fella

Fitzhugh Fella

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, stevy777_x said:

Yes

How can anyone think that after 13/66 home points? Or just 3 wins from 22 home games? It’s utterly indefensible and worse than anything Hughes and Pellegrino produced. People who want him to stay must be utterly delusional or dangerous cultists. 

  • Like 5
Roboze

Roboze

Posted
Posted

I like Ralph, but i'm thinking now its time to change, i wonder if (as he has stated) plans to retire and the end of his contract means the desire and ambition are no longer there?

 

Dman

Dman

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Fitzhugh Fella said:

How can anyone think that after 13/66 home points? Or just 3 wins from 22 home games? It’s utterly indefensible and worse than anything Hughes and Pellegrino produced. People who want him to stay must be utterly delusional or dangerous cultists. 

There is a select few who will not blame Ralph regardless of what happens. They could find Ralph in bed with their wife and they’d tuck him in. 
 

He’s had every excuse under the sun given to him. Not his squad, injuries, bad eggs in the camp and now ‘but we didn’t sign a striker’. Some of them justified (injuries), others just absolute cop outs to void Ralph of any responsibility. 

Yes we didn’t sign a striker this season, but we’re not even playing well, we could stick Haaland up there and our pedestrian build up would just isolate him. 

In fact, over the past 4 years, brilliance in the form of 2 exceptional runs of from 2 strikers (ings then Broja) and JWP turning Free kicks into penalties, papered over a lot of cracks. 
 

If Ralph hadn’t managed RB, was English, looked like Steve cooper and spoke like Puel, he’d have been out the door a long, long time ago.

  • Like 5
  • Haha 3
The Cat

The Cat

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Dman said:

If Ralph hadn’t managed RB, was English, looked like Steve cooper and spoke like Puel, he’d have been out the door a long, long time ago.

It would be very confusing if he was English but spoke with a French accent.

I'd be very surprised if he was still here if we lose to Bournemouth. Let's face it, we'll lose to Arsenal anyway so it wouldn't matter who is in charge for that game.

  • Like 1
Bad Wolf

Bad Wolf

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, Sarisbury Saint said:

Think you must have a fantastic memory to be that precise and remember something so far back, OR your making it up.

 I certainly don’t remember that.

I do. I'm autistic and so I remember everything about everything. It happened, I was in Ibiza listening on the website and heard the boo's.

  • Haha 4
sfc4prem

sfc4prem

Posted
Posted

Decisive action needs taking, soon. Picking up points at the moment is down to luck and chance, rather than any managerial intervention, tactics or inspiration.

If we somehow fluke points against Bournemouth, it doesn't justify Ralph staying at the helm.

He's already left us rudderless and without any sense of direction or purpose. There's just no sense of belief at the club anymore.

  • Like 1
SotonianWill

SotonianWill

Posted
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, Appy said:

Is there actually anyone who thinks he should still be in a job now?

Me, but only really because I like the idea of having the same manager for a long time. We are s**t right now though. 

Edited by SotonianWill
Turkish

Turkish

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Dman said:

There is a select few who will not blame Ralph regardless of what happens. They could find Ralph in bed with their wife and they’d tuck him in. 
 

He’s had every excuse under the sun given to him. Not his squad, injuries, bad eggs in the camp and now ‘but we didn’t sign a striker’. Some of them justified (injuries), others just absolute cop outs to void Ralph of any responsibility. 

Yes we didn’t sign a striker this season, but we’re not even playing well, we could stick Haaland up there and our pedestrian build up would just isolate him. 

In fact, over the past 4 years, brilliance in the form of 2 exceptional runs of from 2 strikers (ings then Broja) and JWP turning Free kicks into penalties, papered over a lot of cracks. 
 

If Ralph hadn’t managed RB, was English, looked like Steve cooper and spoke like Puel, he’d have been out the door a long, long time ago.

This is very true. People talk about the finance problems he's had, having to sell to buy, but it's been that was since 2014, Koeman and Puel both got far, far better results with the same constraints. Our form now over an extended period is worse than anything under Pellegrino and Hughes too.

Wurzel

Wurzel

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, Appy said:

Is there actually anyone who thinks he should still be in a job now?

Presumably Ralph himself does, otherwise he'd have done the decent thing and walked by now.

  • Haha 2
saintant

saintant

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, verlaine1979 said:

I think you can take it for granted that he wasn't including getting relegated in that analysis. SR didn't spend nearly 200m on the club and invest another 70m on players for us to get relegated, lose most of our income, most of our equity as a PL club and have our best players cherry picked for less than they're worth because they refuse to play in the Championship.

They want the club to be a showcase to power a business model based on player sales. That means staying up and playing football that allows our young players to show their ability reasonably frequently, even if the exact league position isn't as important to them.

I don't doubt that but so far they've shown a strange way of going about it. Since they took over we have possibly regressed as a football club.

Bad Wolf

Bad Wolf

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, Wurzel said:

Presumably Ralph himself does, otherwise he'd have done the decent thing and walked by now.

Yes, he should do the honourable thing and dishonour the contract we gave him. I agree that it's time for him to go but can we stop this "do the decent thing" please? We whinge about players and managers not honouring contracts and then we demand they scrap their contracts to suit our own agenda. SR are clearly prepared to spend money so that's not an issue so I can only imagine they genuinely do back him.

100%Red&White

100%Red&White

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Bad Wolf said:

I do. I'm autistic and so I remember everything about everything. It happened, I was in Ibiza listening on the website and heard the boo's.

Although, tbf, you didn't remember how to type boos

Charlie Wayman

Charlie Wayman

Posted
Posted

Could it be that Hasenhuttl was being 'carried' by Watson, Fleming & Davis and the club have sacked the wrong people. You can never be sure that our down turn has coincided with their departure. I know we dissed those blokes as being useless but..............

Bad Wolf

Bad Wolf

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, 100%Red&White said:

Although, tbf, you didn't remember how to type boos

Pointing out spelling or grammar errors is right up there with "that was Hitler's logic" as a cop out.

  • Like 1
Bad Wolf

Bad Wolf

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Charlie Wayman said:

Could it be that Hasenhuttl was being 'carried' by Watson, Fleming & Davis and the club have sacked the wrong people. You can never be sure that our down turn has coincided with their departure. I know we dissed those blokes as being useless but..............

Seems unlikely but I have no actual evidence to refute it.

Christophenburg

Christophenburg

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Charlie Wayman said:

Could it be that Hasenhuttl was being 'carried' by Watson, Fleming & Davis and the club have sacked the wrong people. You can never be sure that our down turn has coincided with their departure. I know we dissed those blokes as being useless but..............

I think that's very, very unlikely, not least because we were terrible in the last half of last season and slightly better initially this season

Saint NL

Saint NL

Posted
Posted

They need to fire Ralph before we hit one of those 6-8 game runs where we look invincible.

If he's still here when that happens, then he buys himself another year and we're in this situation again in a few weeks.

Dman

Dman

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, Bad Wolf said:

Pointing out spelling or grammar errors is right up there with "that was Hitler's logic" as a cop out.

A bit like saying, “I’m autistic, I remember everything, it happened” as evidence of your claim. 

If there were boos at the end of the Huddersfield game, it could have been aimed at anything, the ref, the players, sammy the saint. 
 

“I heard boos on the radio, therefore fans wanted him out after 10 games” is a ridiculously weak argument. 

Turkish

Turkish

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Dman said:

A bit like saying, “I’m autistic, I remember everything, it happened” as evidence of your claim. 

If there were boos at the end of the Huddersfield game, it could have been aimed at anything, the ref, the players, sammy the saint. 
 

“I heard boos on the radio, therefore fans wanted him out after 10 games” is a ridiculously weak argument. 

Hes talking bollocks. Ralph has had backing like no other manager. Even Koeman had fans questioning him during our second season when we went out of Europe with the awful performance in Denmark then went on a bad run around Christmas time. Ralph has been cut slack for 3 years, its only really been towards the end of last season onwards fans have started to turn and it really isn't surprising. We are shite.

  • Like 5
Bad Wolf

Bad Wolf

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Dman said:

A bit like saying, “I’m autistic, I remember everything, it happened” as evidence of your claim. 

If there were boos at the end of the Huddersfield game, it could have been aimed at anything, the ref, the players, sammy the saint. 
 

“I heard boos on the radio, therefore fans wanted him out after 10 games” is a ridiculously weak argument. 

Fair point, well made. Though anyone who boos Sammy the Saint can do one.

Toussaint

Toussaint

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Bad Wolf said:

Am too!

Or, it confirms you are TWAR? You also got a frowny face from "the king if frowny faces", AKA MLG, or was that subterfuge?   

Toussaint

Toussaint

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Bad Wolf said:

Yes, he should do the honourable thing and dishonour the contract we gave him. I agree that it's time for him to go but can we stop this "do the decent thing" please? We whinge about players and managers not honouring contracts and then we demand they scrap their contracts to suit our own agenda. SR are clearly prepared to spend money so that's not an issue so I can only imagine they genuinely do back him.

He sort of has dishonoured it as he falls way short  of the standard he is being paid handsomely for.

  • Like 1
Bad Wolf

Bad Wolf

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Toussaint said:

He sort of has dishonoured it as he falls way short  of the standard he is being paid handsomely for.

But I can't imagine that's a clause in his contract. Sorry but no football manager regardless of how bad they are should resign unless they want to.

  • Haha 1
Toussaint

Toussaint

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Bad Wolf said:

But I can't imagine that's a clause in his contract. Sorry but no football manager regardless of how bad they are should resign unless they want to.

No there won't be a clause, but there would be an implied term that you can actually carry the duties for which you are employed, to the required level. He is clearly too proud to resign and probably thinks he can turn it around still, so yes, in that sense the decision should be made for him.

Bad Wolf

Bad Wolf

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, Toussaint said:

No there won't be a clause, but there would be an implied term that you can actually carry the duties for which you are employed, to the required level. He is clearly too proud to resign and probably thinks he can turn it around still, so yes, in that sense the decision should be made for him.

Yes, it should be made for him.

Don't forget he offered to resign after the first 9-0 so he's clearly not averse to the idea however the resignation was rejected. But he's had a new contract since then presumably with a bigger pay out.

Dman

Dman

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, BARCELONASAINT said:

pretty sure Ralph will retire after this job comes to an end. No way he quits, he will wait to be sacked and walk away with his millions and i don't blame him.

I think he’ll take another job in the future, but I think he’d be foolish to rush into another job, especially in the PL. 

He needs some time away to find himself and his style again. His intense nature must take it out of him. He certainly looks broken. 

  • Like 1
Lord Duckhunter

Lord Duckhunter

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Bad Wolf said:

Fair point, well made. Though anyone who boos Sammy the Saint can do one.

He was in nets at half time & he was shite, made Forster look light footed. Deserved to be booed & my mate heard the boos from Gran Caneria 

Lord Duckhunter

Lord Duckhunter

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Bad Wolf said:

but no football manager regardless of how bad they are should resign unless they want to.

If they didn’t want to, it wouldn’t be a resignation 🤡. 
How can you resign without wanting to, by accident? 

Edited by Lord Duckhunter

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...