bigdavewatson Posted 20 January, 2009 Posted 20 January, 2009 What is the highest number of users on this forum at any one time? What is the total number of registered users? How many different users have posted in the last 12 months or so? Interested in terms of this site being a vehicle for potential protests as well as generally interested. Thanks in advance.
Master Bates Posted 20 January, 2009 Posted 20 January, 2009 Most users ever online was 649, 10-01-2009 at 05:09 PM Members: 8,094, Active Members: 1,851
trousers Posted 20 January, 2009 Posted 20 January, 2009 Does anyone know the number of posters who have been registered since November 2006 with conspiracy inducingly low post counts?
Mr X Posted 20 January, 2009 Posted 20 January, 2009 Most users ever online was 649, 10-01-2009 at 05:09 PM Members: 8,094, Active Members: 1,851 The figure was a lot higher than this I can remember when it was 980 something when it was called the saints forum
hugh Posted 20 January, 2009 Posted 20 January, 2009 Does anyone know the number of posters who have been registered since November 2006 with conspiracy inducingly low post counts? How low is low? Does this count?
trousers Posted 20 January, 2009 Posted 20 January, 2009 How low is low? Does this count? 300? Nah....way too high. Anything in the sub 100s tickles my stick Below 50 and I struggle to contain myself.
Ponty Posted 20 January, 2009 Posted 20 January, 2009 The figure was a lot higher than this I can remember when it was 980 something when it was called the saints forum It was, on the day Lowe resigned. We could get another biggie soon.
stevegrant Posted 20 January, 2009 Posted 20 January, 2009 The figure was a lot higher than this I can remember when it was 980 something when it was called the saints forum The only data we still have is what Master Bates has copied from the front page of the forum, which is as from 3rd August 2008, the date Saints Web was launched after the TSF server died a horribly painful death. I think you are right, though, the "most online at once" figure was a bit higher on the previous incarnation. The levels of total traffic are pretty similar, though. In fact, since the New Year, they've actually been higher than the old forum.
Mr X Posted 20 January, 2009 Posted 20 January, 2009 It was, on the day Lowe resigned. We could get another biggie soon. The only way were get a new online record is if Lowe resigns and there is about as much chance of that as I have of being appointed the next manager
trousers Posted 20 January, 2009 Posted 20 January, 2009 The levels of total traffic are pretty similar, though. In fact, since the New Year, they've actually been higher than the old forum. Alan Titchmarsh did say on the radio this morning that plants were coming out earlier this year
Master Bates Posted 20 January, 2009 Posted 20 January, 2009 If Lowe goes, won't the server crash again?
Mr X Posted 20 January, 2009 Posted 20 January, 2009 If Lowe goes, won't the server crash again? for sure
bridge too far Posted 20 January, 2009 Posted 20 January, 2009 If Lowe goes, won't the server crash again? Duh - why do you think we had an upgrade? They knew something we didn't
trousers Posted 20 January, 2009 Posted 20 January, 2009 I'm still trying to work out how a server crash can lose all the old TSF posts given data is usually recoverable in such circumstances. Not that I wish to drag up that old conspiracy theory again.... Edit: sorry, forgot this...
Snowballs2 Posted 20 January, 2009 Posted 20 January, 2009 The only way were get a new online record is if Lowe resigns and there is about as much chance of that as I have of being appointed the next manager Will you play 4-4-2 or 3-5-1
stevegrant Posted 20 January, 2009 Posted 20 January, 2009 I'm still trying to work out how a server crash can lose all the old TSF posts given data is usually recoverable in such circumstances. Not that I wish to drag up that old conspiracy theory again.... Edit: sorry, forgot this... Long story short: data files got corrupted, would have taken longer to fix and restore them than to set up the new server, and a move to a new server had always been the plan at some point anyway, so it merely gave us the impetus to do so there and then. If you really want to trawl the old archives, you might find some stuff on the Google cache of the forum (if it's still there) or on archive.org
Mr X Posted 20 January, 2009 Posted 20 January, 2009 Will you play 4-4-2 or 3-5-1 4-4-2 and I will work out what my best team is in the first month in charge
trousers Posted 20 January, 2009 Posted 20 January, 2009 Long story short: data files got corrupted, would have taken longer to fix and restore them than to set up the new server, and a move to a new server had always been the plan at some point anyway, so it merely gave us the impetus to do so there and then. If you really want to trawl the old archives, you might find some stuff on the Google cache of the forum (if it's still there) or on archive.org Cheers. You think I'm sad enough to be trawling through Google for stuff like that....?
stevegrant Posted 20 January, 2009 Posted 20 January, 2009 Cheers. You think I'm sad enough to be trawling through Google for stuff like that....? Probably best I don't answer that :smt044
Master Bates Posted 20 January, 2009 Posted 20 January, 2009 I tried that archive.org thing, I gave up.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now