Jump to content

The United Kingdom and the Death of Boris Johnson as we know it.


CB Fry

SWF (Non Legally Binding) General Election  

193 members have voted

  1. 1. SWF (Non Legally Binding) General Election

    • Conservatives
      42
    • Labour
      65
    • Liberals
      54
    • UKIP
      1
    • Green
      18
    • Brexit
      8
    • Change UK
      0
    • Other
      5


Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

It was, but also read somewhere that their boundary was the north and south circular... No idea if the latest scheme is within those...

Still, you can kill as many people as you like with your 4x4 emission, just got to pay £15 for the thrill of it.

Possibly the N&S circular roads were the extent of Shapps demand, who knows. Now the tories see opposing it as beneficial, we will never know the truth.

As it's part of the bail out settlement Shapps has made it as much about revenue raising as it is about pollution reduction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fan The Flames said:

Possibly the N&S circular roads were the extent of Shapps demand, who knows. Now the tories see opposing it as beneficial, we will never know the truth.

As it's part of the bail out settlement Shapps has made it as much about revenue raising as it is about pollution reduction.

Bless that you think it is anything other than a revenue raising mechanism 

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sadoldgit said:

He clearly didn’t bother to to read the article properly, or if he did then perhaps he had the same mindset as Braverman. As stated, this man is not a threat to society and his one misdemeanour concerns a drug a lot milder and more widespread than that used by a number of MPs (Michael Gove being one). It is also below the threshold of non readmittance. Braverman (and Turkish it would appear) are trying to tell us that this man is akin to Pablo Escobar 🙄. Nasty, nasty people with a deeply unpleasant agenda. Who separates a parent from their child under such flimsy circumstances?

someone that wants to keep a lot of other people safe from convicted drug dealers perhaps?

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sadoldgit said:

He clearly didn’t bother to to read the article properly, or if he did then perhaps he had the same mindset as Braverman. As stated, this man is not a threat to society and his one misdemeanour concerns a drug a lot milder and more widespread than that used by a number of MPs (Michael Gove being one). It is also below the threshold of non readmittance. Braverman (and Turkish it would appear) are trying to tell us that this man is akin to Pablo Escobar 🙄. Nasty, nasty people with a deeply unpleasant agenda. Who separates a parent from their child under such flimsy circumstances?

There’s a big difference in the law between taking and supplying drugs. Just because a case is less serious than another dosent mean he shouldn’t be treated as a criminal, which he was. 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, SotonianWill said:

There’s a big difference in the law between taking and supplying drugs. Just because a case is less serious than another dosent mean he shouldn’t be treated as a criminal, which he was. 

The Law says that the threshold for automatic refusal of entry is to have received a 12 months sentence, which he did not get, so this was an extraordinary personal intervention by the Home Secretary, who has failed to give any justification for her decision.

But it does help her image in certain parts of the media.

Edited by badgerx16
rogue apostrophe
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Bless that you think it is anything other than a revenue raising mechanism 

Bless that you are pretending not to understand that London, London’s traffic and London’s air pollution don’t just begin and end at the North & South Circular roads - unless I have missed the building of a giant dome a la Springfield over the inner London boroughs?

47 minutes ago, SotonianWill said:

There’s a big difference in the law between taking and supplying drugs. Just because a case is less serious than another dosent mean he shouldn’t be treated as a criminal, which he was. 

Like the previous poster, you need to reread the full article from The Guardian. You have completely missed the point.

Edited by sadoldgit
Add text
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's a criminal - he was wearing a loud shirt in a built up area after dark, and in possession of an offensive wife.

A neutral might suggest that Suella's unusual intervention in this minor case is purely to arouse the right, not to make the UK safer.

If so, it's worked.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

The Law says that the threshold for automatic refusal of entry is to have received a 12 months sentence, which he did not get, so this was an extraordinary personal intervention by the Home Secretary, who has failed to give any justification for her decision.

But it does help her image in certain parts of the media.

And be the darling of the Saintsweb gammon. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You would think that the Home Secretary would have more important things to worry about given the rise in knife crime, the state of the Met and the lack of progress in stopping the small boats. 
What’s the betting though that she keeps her job in Sunak’s next reshuffle.

Edited by sadoldgit
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, The Kraken said:

This is something that has actually been designed and tested by Border Force and the RN.

Correct, however the purpose was to stop high speed suicide / autonomous boats and nothing to do with refugees and asylum seekers boats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, moonraker said:

Correct, however the purpose was to stop high speed suicide / autonomous boats and nothing to do with refugees and asylum seekers boats.

Simply re-inventing/re-purposing anti torpedo nets, which navies around the World started using before WW1, whether strung on outriggers from the side of warships or floating from bouys and booms across harbour entrances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

The Law says that the threshold for automatic refusal of entry is to have received a 12 months sentence, which he did not get, so this was an extraordinary personal intervention by the Home Secretary, who has failed to give any justification for her decision.

But it does help her image in certain parts of the media.

I suspect this man has been given the justification. I'm not sure that it's necessary that it's explained publicly. If he doesn't like her decision and/or reasoning, he can judicially review it. Personally, it feels an odd decision though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not a condemnation of any political party but of the "system" as a whole.

As with the case of the man who spent 17 years in prison for a rape he did not commit; if you are wrongly imprisoned but eventually get your conviction quashed, you can apply, quite rightly, for compensation. However, the Prison Service will petition for that money to be reduced as they will claim a share for 'board and lodgings'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

Simply re-inventing/re-purposing anti torpedo nets, which navies around the World started using before WW1, whether strung on outriggers from the side of warships or floating from bouys and booms across harbour entrances.

Bit more high tech, especially the deployment system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 26/07/2023 at 17:46, sadoldgit said:

You would think that the Home Secretary would have more important things to worry about given the rise in knife crime, the state of the Met and the lack of progress in stopping the small boats. 
What’s the betting though that she keeps her job in Sunak’s next reshuffle.

 

5B595ED8-EA97-443E-9DD0-2E205926EB64.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suella Braverman is now trying to drag Starmer into the blame game over demonstration at one of the Prime Minister’s homes because Labour have taken money from Just Stop Oil. Seriously Suella? More pathetic attempts at deflection. As Home Secretary perhaps you need to take some responsibility for the appalling lapse in security there?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-66440335

Quote

Italy has passed a one-off 40% tax on the profits banks earn from higher interest rates, in a shock move that has seen shares plummet.

Seems like a cracking move and not sure why we aren't doing it.  The message is clear, pass the interest rises on to savers or get taxed to fuck on the profiteering.

Should do similar with the energy suppliers as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Finally, Mad Nad has found the exit;

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-66630308

 

"Nadine Dorries has resigned from the Commons, more than two months after pledging to go "with immediate effect".

She launched a blistering attack on Rishi Sunak in her resignation statement, telling the prime minister "history will not judge you kindly"."

Edited by badgerx16
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Braverman is absolutely fucking bonkers.

She's denying basic maths by persistently claiming 20,000 extra police officers when the real figure is 3,000, she's obsessed with pleasing thick racists by using mad soundbite phrases like lefty lawyers and woke as she tries to conjure up some imaginary enemy we can all blame, she has stated that opposition political parties support criminal gangs and now she seems to think that all firefighters are hardcore political activists acting against her.

She's wrong on most things, she's grossly incompetent, she's wasted hundreds of millions of pounds on madcap stunts, she couldn't run a bath, she's dangerous and she's a fucking lunatic.

It's not a good mix and it's an appalling public image for the UK.

Fareham, sort it out.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, rallyboy said:

Braverman is absolutely fucking bonkers.

She's denying basic maths by persistently claiming 20,000 extra police officers when the real figure is 3,000, she's obsessed with pleasing thick racists by using mad soundbite phrases like lefty lawyers and woke as she tries to conjure up some imaginary enemy we can all blame, she has stated that opposition political parties support criminal gangs and now she seems to think that all firefighters are hardcore political activists acting against her.

She's wrong on most things, she's grossly incompetent, she's wasted hundreds of millions of pounds on madcap stunts, she couldn't run a bath, she's dangerous and she's a fucking lunatic.

It's not a good mix and it's an appalling public image for the UK.

Fareham, sort it out.

Suella outclassed, outwitted and humiliated on Sky News this morning https://www.independent.co.uk/tv/editors-picks and then taken apart by Richard Madeley after that https://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1806675/Richard-Madeley-Suella-Braverman-clash

A lot of rumours she is being sacked next week and too much smoke for her not to be fired  - although some reservations about how much shit she’ll fling from her backbench cage egged on by the loony ERG and swivel-eyed shire membership. Good - every soundbite from her is worth 10 extra seats to Labour or the Lib Dem’s at the next GE. She’s actually surpassed Boris, Liam Fox and Grayling as the worst ever cabinet minster. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 08/08/2023 at 15:53, Weston Super Saint said:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-66440335

Seems like a cracking move and not sure why we aren't doing it.  The message is clear, pass the interest rises on to savers or get taxed to fuck on the profiteering.

Should do similar with the energy suppliers as well.

I dont like the banks especially the way the top brass take big bonusses but the man in the street does get some of the profit as our pension companies invest in them that in turn help towards our pensions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Wikipedia's page on the new Defence Secretary;

"In September 2012, Google blacklisted 19 of the Shapps' business websites for violating rules on copyright infringement related to the web scraping-based TrafficPayMaster software sold by them.Shapps's web marketing business's 20/20 Challenge publication also drew criticism. It cost $497 and promised customers earnings of $20,000 in 20 days. Upon purchase, the "toolkit" was revealed to be an ebook, advising the user to create their own toolkit and recruit 100 "Joint Venture Partners" to resell it for a share of the profits.

Shapps's use of the names Michael Green, Corinne Stockheath and Sebastian Fox attracted controversy in 2012. He denied having used a pseudonym after entering parliament and, in 2014, threatened legal action against a constituent who had stated on Facebook that he had. In February 2015, he publicly said: "I don't have a second job and have never had a second job while being an MP. End of story."

However, in March 2015, Shapps admitted to having had a second job while being an MP, and practising business under a pseudonym."

 

So he is a lying, schyster, pyramid selling, intellectual property theif.

No wonder he's a Tory MP.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems Rishi was shown evidence of a critical risk to life from the crumbling concrete in schools two years ago when he was chancellor, so instead of addressing that he decided to halve the budget for school repairs. Amazing.

Sunak refused to fully fund repairs of England’s crumbling schools, says ex-official | Schools | The Guardian

  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Sheaf Saint said:

It seems Rishi was shown evidence of a critical risk to life from the crumbling concrete in schools two years ago when he was chancellor, so instead of addressing that he decided to halve the budget for school repairs. Amazing.

Sunak refused to fully fund repairs of England’s crumbling schools, says ex-official | Schools | The Guardian

There are no votes in crumbling concrete. Seems to be all about popularity rather than governing seriously and having any sort of strategy about anything. Not all their fault though as forced this way by the ever more low attention span of the electorate.

Edited by whelk
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sheaf Saint said:

It seems Rishi was shown evidence of a critical risk to life from the crumbling concrete in schools two years ago when he was chancellor, so instead of addressing that he decided to halve the budget for school repairs. Amazing.

Sunak refused to fully fund repairs of England’s crumbling schools, says ex-official | Schools | The Guardian

Gillian Keegan, Education Secretary, on the radio this morning came out with a couple of brilliant sond bites: firstly she said that where they have been notified of a problem they have acted immediately - to put in props and supports. ( It was the failure last week of a ceiling that had been so assessed and propped up that precipitated the current panic ). She also said that there was less money to addres the problem because of the teachers' pay rise.

  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

Gillian Keegan, Education Secretary, on the radio this morning came out with a couple of brilliant sond bites: firstly she said that where they have been notified of a problem they have acted immediately - to put in props and supports. ( It was the failure last week of a ceiling that had been so assessed and propped up that precipitated the current panic ). She also said that there was less money to addres the problem because of the teachers' pay rise.

She's done a fucking good job though, isn't that the real story here? What a fucking good job she has done? Not sure why people are giving her a hard time and going on about concrete, she's done a fucking good job. Well done her.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-66709282

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ashnats said:

She's done a fucking good job though, isn't that the real story here? What a fucking good job she has done? Not sure why people are giving her a hard time and going on about concrete, she's done a fucking good job. Well done her.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-66709282

 

I stopped when she mentioned front fucking footedness!

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rishi claims it was nothing to do with him when he was Chancellor as he expanded the capital program in his first statement to the Commons............

It is a semantic point, as what he actually said was he would raise spending such that per pupil it would get back to pre-2010, ( pre Tory ), levels in real terms.

Edited by badgerx16
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ashnats said:

She's done a fucking good job though, isn't that the real story here? What a fucking good job she has done? Not sure why people are giving her a hard time and going on about concrete, she's done a fucking good job. Well done her.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-66709282

 

I think Duckie with his recent swearing outbursts has become her scriptwriter.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have just played this back to confirm what I thought I heard;

On R4 the Science Minister was on to talk about the UK rejoining the Horizon program, ( yay, we are now associate members of something we used to be full members of ). However, before getting on to this subject she was asked about the escape from Wandsworth prison and part of her answer was....

"In terms of the number of escapees it is not incomparable to the number we had under the Labour Government, it is about 4 or 5 times the amount under their tenure".

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

I have just played this back to confirm what I thought I heard;

On R4 the Science Minister was on to talk about the UK rejoining the Horizon program, ( yay, we are now associate members of something we used to be full members of ). However, before getting on to this subject she was asked about the escape from Wandsworth prison and part of her answer was....

"In terms of the number of escapees it is not incomparable to the number we had under the Labour Government, it is about 4 or 5 times the amount under their tenure".

 

 

 

Assuming that you've typed that correctly, it doesn't make sense.

The double negative "not incomparable" implies that it is comparable and then saying that the number of escapes is 4 or 5 times what it was under Labour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ecuk268 said:

Assuming that you've typed that correctly, it doesn't make sense.

The double negative "not incomparable" implies that it is comparable and then saying that the number of escapes is 4 or 5 times what it was under Labour.

Find this morning's Today program on BBC Sounds and listen to it. This is what I did as I could not believe what I heard, and as I type this reply I am listening to it again, and that is almost verbatim what she said - other than I have typed "than we saw..." and she actually said "than we had...", and I also transliterated "something like..." to "it is about...", ( 2 hours, 17 minutes, and 15 seconds into the 3 hour program ).

Edited by badgerx16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

I have just played this back to confirm what I thought I heard;

On R4 the Science Minister was on to talk about the UK rejoining the Horizon program, ( yay, we are now associate members of something we used to be full members of ). However, before getting on to this subject she was asked about the escape from Wandsworth prison and part of her answer was....

"In terms of the number of escapees it is not incomparable to the number we had under the Labour Government, it is about 4 or 5 times the amount under their tenure".

 

 

 

https://data.justice.gov.uk/prisons/public-protection/escapes

She misspoke, it was 4 or 5 times more under labour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Picard said:

https://data.justice.gov.uk/prisons/public-protection/escapes

She misspoke, it was 4 or 5 times more under labour.

I had no doubt that she did, but it shows the problem with asking questions of unbreifed interviewees with no direct connection to an issue. One misplaced "was" completely reverses the point being made. As has been said many times, The Thick Of It was more documentary than comedy.

Edited by badgerx16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Picard said:

https://data.justice.gov.uk/prisons/public-protection/escapes

She misspoke, it was 4 or 5 times more under labour.

Erm no . It’s was around 20 times higher under the Major Tory government with 88 escapes in 1996. Blair / Brown successively reduced that to 5 per year in 2009/10. The Tories have maintained it at about the same level since 2010

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
12 minutes ago, rallyboy said:

Laura Trott is a pointless excuse of an MP.

She must now regret giving up her fantastic career as an Olympic cyclist to chase the dream of being a pensions minister.

It's sad to see what she's become. 😕

 

 

 

Tory MP trying to curry public favour by stealing the identity of a national sports heroine.

Just because Laura, ( the cyclist ), changed her surname to Kenny when she got married, didn't leave the 'Trott' part free for somebody else to pick up and exploit.

Edited by badgerx16
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Mad Lizzie has spoken. She wants to increase the retirement age even further, cut taxes (presumably because public services are all awash with too much cash) and reduce benefits. She did nothing wrong in office apart from slaughtering pigs too early . (presumably because of her obsession with pork markets).

How this woman still has the nerve to speak in public amazes me. Why the BBC choose to start their radio news bulletins with her thoughts is staggering.

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tamesaint said:

So Mad Lizzie has spoken. She wants to increase the retirement age even further, cut taxes (presumably because public services are all awash with too much cash) and reduce benefits. She did nothing wrong in office apart from slaughtering pigs too early . (presumably because of her obsession with pork markets).

How this woman still has the nerve to speak in public amazes me. Why the BBC choose to start their radio news bulletins with her thoughts is staggering.

 

Forgot to add that she also wants to scrap the windfall taxes on energy companies. The Conservative party members really lumbered the country with a nutcase when they chose her.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...