Jump to content

The United Kingdom and the Death of Boris Johnson as we know it.


SWF (Non Legally Binding) General Election  

193 members have voted

  1. 1. SWF (Non Legally Binding) General Election

    • Conservatives
      42
    • Labour
      65
    • Liberals
      54
    • UKIP
      1
    • Green
      18
    • Brexit
      8
    • Change UK
      0
    • Other
      5


Recommended Posts

Posted

Boris' former boss, Max Hastings.....

"The only people who think Boris is a nice guy are those who do not know him".

 

Alistair Campbell........

"When you become the story, it is time to go."

  • Like 3
Posted

Annoyingly it is almost guaranteed Boris will win the no confidence vote.

He will be untouchable for a year and the unbearable drivel about how we can now all move on and his mandate will make me want to top myself.

Posted

Malcolm Tucker needs to get hold of Dorries. Getting angry with Hunt and in doing so claiming we were hopelessly under prepared for Covid. That ain’t the line

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 06/06/2022 at 11:05, farawaysaint said:

Annoyingly it is almost guaranteed Boris will win the no confidence vote.

He will be untouchable for a year and the unbearable drivel about how we can now all move on and his mandate will make me want to top myself.

Expand  

He is toast mate. Doesn’t matter what happens tonight

  • Like 2
Posted

Mad Nad nailing her colours to the mast already. She only supports Johnson because she knows full well there isn't another candidate quite stupid or desperate enough to have her in their cabinet. Likewise Liz Truss.

She thinks she's being clever but all she is doing is admitting that her party were woefully unprepared for a pandemic, which she has strenuously denied previously. She couldn't outwit a blancmange.

  • Like 3
Posted
  On 06/06/2022 at 11:57, Sheaf Saint said:

Mad Nad nailing her colours to the mast already. She only supports Johnson because she knows full well there isn't another candidate quite stupid or desperate enough to have her in their cabinet. Likewise Liz Truss.

She thinks she's being clever but all she is doing is admitting that her party were woefully unprepared for a pandemic, which she has strenuously denied previously. She couldn't outwit a blancmange.

Expand  

This is important and I hope people take note, because if Johnson goes there will be an effort to rebrand the successor as the "new" Tory party, like Johnson himself successfully did after ousting May.

Posted (edited)
  On 06/06/2022 at 11:05, farawaysaint said:

Annoyingly it is almost guaranteed Boris will win the no confidence vote.

He will be untouchable for a year and the unbearable drivel about how we can now all move on and his mandate will make me want to top myself.

Expand  

Graham Bradley has strongly hinted that the rule about no further challenge for a year might be removed.

Edited by badgerx16
Posted
  On 06/06/2022 at 12:35, badgerx16 said:

Graham Bradley has strongly hinted that the rule about no further challenge for a year might be removed.

Expand  

Don't know if that suggests overwhelming desire to get him out but some want to identify a succrssor first, or an evenly split party.  

Posted

When Dido Harding's husband decides even they can no longer take money from this government and he jacks in his role because he thinks the PM should resign, that's like Gary Glitter saying you're too noncey for his liking.

The game is up - HMS Boris is fucked, it's just a matter of how long before it sinks, and how many fuckwits are still on the decks parroting excuses as they all slip beneath the waves.

Big decisions right, glug, glug, leading the world, glug, glug, vaccine rollout, glug, glug....glug....

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)
  On 06/06/2022 at 16:09, Sheaf Saint said:

 

Utterly shameless cunt. 

Expand  

he'd do it again as he (nor anyone else in No.10) were scared of Covid.  They probably realise the rules were ridiculous and no doubt will never be seen again!

Anyway, here is what he actually said (apparently)

  Quote

The PM was very clear he would thank departing staff again.

Expand  

 

Edited by AlexLaw76
Posted
  On 06/06/2022 at 16:18, AlexLaw76 said:

he'd do it again as he (nor anyone else in No.10) were scared of Covid.  They probably realise the rules were ridiculous and no doubt will never be seen again!

Anyway, here is what he actually said (apparently)

 

Expand  

It is possible to thank departing staff and still adhere to socially distancing rules. Unless we have all missed something and the small print said that the PM is exempt and all staff leaving his service need a party and plenty to drink?

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 06/06/2022 at 16:29, sadoldgit said:

It is possible to thank departing staff and still adhere to socially distancing rules. Unless we have all missed something and the small print said that the PM is exempt and all staff leaving his service need a party and plenty to drink?

Expand  

I agree, the rules were ridiculous and will never be seen again! 

Posted
  On 06/06/2022 at 16:35, revolution saint said:

Presumably you'd be in favour of him going because he created rules that were ridiculous and should never have been implemented then?

Expand  

To get rid of a Prime Minister (or the Leader and Deputy Leader of the opposition) for Cake and Curry is barking mad.

 

  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)

I think the reasoning is more the lying to Parliament bit rather than the cake bit. The fact that he is the only sitting PM to ever have been confirmed to have broken the law is also pretty damning.

Edited by farawaysaint
  • Like 1
Posted
  On 06/06/2022 at 16:37, AlexLaw76 said:

To get rid of a Prime Minister (or the Leader and Deputy Leader of the opposition) for Cake and Curry is barking mad.

 

Expand  

So you keep telling us, while utterly failing to grasp that it's not the cake or the curry that is the real issue; it's the principle.

In other news, Mad Nad said in a live interview "the donors have spoken", thus admitting that the Tory party prioritises serving the interests of its corporate sponsors ahead of the interests of the nation.

She's the gift that keeps on giving.

  • Like 3
Posted
  On 06/06/2022 at 16:46, Sheaf Saint said:

So you keep telling us, while utterly failing to grasp that it's not the cake or the curry that is the real issue; it's the principle.

In other news, Mad Nad said in a live interview "the donors have spoken", thus admitting that the Tory party prioritises serving the interests of its corporate sponsors ahead of the interests of the nation.

She's the gift that keeps on giving.

Expand  

No real difference to Labour bending the knee to their donors.

 

I agree, the principle was ridiculous and could cost the leader of the opposition (and his no.2) their jobs.  

Posted

Tory MP Natalie Elphicke said that the Vote of Confidence "is not due to a lack of confidence in the Prime Minister".

What is it about then ?

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
  On 06/06/2022 at 17:27, badgerx16 said:

Tory MP Natalie Elphicke said that the Vote of Confidence "is not due to a lack of confidence in the Prime Minister".

What is it about then ?

Expand  

Most worrying is that the blatant gaslighting lying sems to have to spread out from Johnson like a cancer. Its almosty Putinesque. He has to go for that reason alone. 

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 06/06/2022 at 17:02, Weston Super Saint said:

You seem to be under the impression that BoJo gives a shiny shit about morals and ethics.

If / when he wins the vote, he'll become more of a cock than he is now.

Expand  

No one wins and recovers. Enough Tories know he has lost the confidence of the voters and cannot recover. Not policies but trust and cannot be won back. Been exposed.

Hope he does go on to next election as they will all be toast. 

Posted

What do we reckon in terms of tonight? He’ll get the 180 in favour, would be very surprised if he didn’t. Under 75 against would be a big result, 90-100 medium damaging but could carry on. Over 100 worse damage, limping on and over 125 would be very challenging for any longer than 12 months. JRM said earlier that a victory by 1 was sufficient and was reminded of his quote from the ERG having launched the challenge v May. He had to apologise to her in effect on R5L. As for Dorries, saw the barrage v Hunt, haven’t seen the donors quote yet but let’s face it anyone with a brain knows they exist for their paymasters anyway. The paymasters have changed to some extent with Brexit eg Odey, JCB, Vote Leave and hangers on. Why I vote Lib Dem. 

Posted
  On 06/06/2022 at 19:23, saint1977 said:

What do we reckon in terms of tonight? He’ll get the 180 in favour, would be very surprised if he didn’t. Under 75 against would be a big result, 90-100 medium damaging but could carry on. Over 100 worse damage, limping on and over 125 would be very challenging for any longer than 12 months. JRM said earlier that a victory by 1 was sufficient and was reminded of his quote from the ERG having launched the challenge v May. He had to apologise to her in effect on R5L. As for Dorries, saw the barrage v Hunt, haven’t seen the donors quote yet but let’s face it anyone with a brain knows they exist for their paymasters anyway. The paymasters have changed to some extent with Brexit eg Odey, JCB, Vote Leave and hangers on. Why I vote Lib Dem. 

Expand  

Apparently he would have done worse than Theresa May did in her no confidence vote if there are more than 133 votes against him. She only lasted s few months after that. If there are more than 133 votes against him, he really is a dead man walking.

Not quite sure how abstentions fit into that scenario. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
  On 06/06/2022 at 19:46, Tamesaint said:

Apparently he would have done worse than Theresa May did in her no confidence vote if there are more than 133 votes against him. She only lasted s few months after that. If there are more than 133 votes against him, he really is a dead man walking.

Not quite sure how abstentions fit into that scenario. 

Expand  

211 for, 148 against. Wow, only 63 clear. Tories are as cohesive and broken as Saints playing a high line in the 4222 formation against a front two of Son and Mbappe.

Edited by saint1977
Posted
  On 06/06/2022 at 20:04, saint1977 said:

211 for, 148 against. Wow, only 63 clear. Tories are as cohesive as Saints playing a high line in the 4222 formation against a front two of Son and Mbappe.

Expand  

63 clear, but only 32 away from losing the vote.

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 06/06/2022 at 20:05, The Kraken said:

He won’t though. He won’t go until he is forced.

Expand  

He won’t have a prayer. His stooges calling it a handsome victory. They embarass themselves daily. Zero credibility as know exactly what they say regardless of the facts.

Posted
  On 06/06/2022 at 20:15, Weston Super Saint said:

Lol.

He's not going anywhere. His puppet masters need him to carry on playing the fool for another year before they replace him.

Expand  

His masters fear for a Labour Govt. Upcoming By Elections will give a stark message that this is a realistic possibility. He’s gone

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...