Patrick Bateman Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 On 11/09/2024 at 08:31, Patrick Bateman said: This is not fkn news: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c89w4110n89o 😡 Also, not fkn news: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn5r5nk4ry6o ... FFS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Super Saint Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 4 hours ago, trousers said: The twats I'm talking about are the ones that go to one Tesco store at a time... Are they not going to Tesco's - I.e. the store that belongs to Tesco? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgerx16 Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 (edited) The BBC putting images like this on articles; Commercial aircraft do not cruise at an altitude of 14 miles. That is about 6 miles higher than such planes manage, although Concord flew at around 11 miles up when supersonic. Edited September 15 by badgerx16 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Behind Enemy Lines Posted September 16 Share Posted September 16 18 hours ago, badgerx16 said: The BBC putting images like this on articles; Commercial aircraft do not cruise at an altitude of 14 miles. That is about 6 miles higher than such planes manage, although Concord flew at around 11 miles up when supersonic. It’s the note at the bottom that annoys me more! As if it needs to be said the objects aren’t to scale! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revolution saint Posted September 16 Share Posted September 16 2 hours ago, Behind Enemy Lines said: It’s the note at the bottom that annoys me more! As if it needs to be said the objects aren’t to scale! Apparently Yuri Gagarin was quite a big fella. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgerx16 Posted September 16 Share Posted September 16 A replacement motor for my electric sander is 50% dearer than a replacement sander. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamilton Saint Posted September 16 Share Posted September 16 Using a country's name as an adjective: "France goalkeeper saves penalty". Correct form should be 'French goalkeeper saves penalty', or 'France's goalkeeper saves penalty'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Super Saint Posted September 16 Share Posted September 16 20 minutes ago, Hamilton Saint said: Using a country's name as an adjective: "France goalkeeper saves penalty". Correct form should be 'French goalkeeper saves penalty', or 'France's goalkeeper saves penalty'. You need to have a word with someone about going to Tesco's 😉 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Kraken Posted September 16 Share Posted September 16 20 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said: You need to have a word with someone about going to Tesco's 😉 I only shop in Sainsbo’s and Waitro’s. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted September 18 Share Posted September 18 People (mainly politicians) that call it "our" NHS rather than "the" NHS. Cretins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint francis Posted September 18 Share Posted September 18 Clothes and shoe sizes. A medium t'shirt might fit, be too big or too small. A size 8 shoe might be too big or too small. I have a closet where I have shoe sizes that fit from sizes 7 to 10. If manufacturers are incapable of accurately standardising clothes and shoe sizes, which they are, then your clothes and shoe shops should size items by centimetre. This way you wouldn't have to bother trying it on, know it would fit and would be more confident buying off the internet. And no, I'm not putting on weight. Well I am actually but that's not the point. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkish Posted September 18 Share Posted September 18 On 16/09/2024 at 19:22, The Kraken said: I only shop in Sainsbo’s and Waitro’s. Sains - bros and Wait- Bros in the kids language, no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamilton Saint Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 On 16/09/2024 at 13:40, Hamilton Saint said: Using a country's name as an adjective: "France goalkeeper saves penalty". Correct form should be 'French goalkeeper saves penalty', or 'France's goalkeeper saves penalty'. On today's BBC News website: "Four members of one family killed in Italy house collapse". Correct form would be 'four members of one family killed in collapse of Italian home'. Another one: "At least 51 dead in Iran coal mine explosion". Correct form would be 'at least 51 dead in explosion at Iranian coal mine'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 7 hours ago, Hamilton Saint said: On today's BBC News website: "Four members of one family killed in Italy house collapse". Correct form would be 'four members of one family killed in collapse of Italian home'. Another one: "At least 51 dead in Iran coal mine explosion". Correct form would be 'at least 51 dead in explosion at Iranian coal mine'. Even more annoying that many youngsters won’t see these examples as wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revolution saint Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 I'm sure this has been mentioned many, many times but people dawdling and shuffling along whilst looking at their phones. Put your phone away, get your head up and look where you're going! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheaf Saint Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 3 hours ago, Whitey Grandad said: Even more annoying that many youngsters won’t see these examples as wrong. Yeah but news headlines need to be concise and, as such, they have always had their own grammatical rules that you don't find anywhere else. It's not a new thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB Fry Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 12 hours ago, Hamilton Saint said: On today's BBC News website: "Four members of one family killed in Italy house collapse". Correct form would be 'four members of one family killed in collapse of Italian home'. Another one: "At least 51 dead in Iran coal mine explosion". Correct form would be 'at least 51 dead in explosion at Iranian coal mine'. 4 hours ago, Whitey Grandad said: Even more annoying that many youngsters won’t see these examples as wrong. Because they aren’t wrong. That’s a writing style perfectly appropriate for news reporting. This is moaning and pointless nitpicking on a par with idiots that say “it’s only the Union Jack when it’s on a boat”. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 Checking, and re-checking, that you're putting a t-shirt on the right way, only to then put it on back-to-front anyway.... What kind of voodoo sh*t is that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 Avocados Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamilton Saint Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 (edited) And then there is the appalling and incorrect practice of turning a noun into a verb: for example, to medal at the Olympic Games (to win a medal at); to weaponise the Justice Department (to turn the Justice Department into a weapon); to summit Mt. Everest (to reach the summit of Mt. Everest), she friended me (she became my friend), to impact the process (to have an impact on the process), etc. etc. Edited September 23 by Hamilton Saint adding another good example! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whelk Posted September 23 Author Share Posted September 23 16 minutes ago, Hamilton Saint said: And then there is the appalling and incorrect practice of turning a noun into a verb: for example, to medal at the Olympic Games (to win a medal at); to weaponise the Justice Department (to turn the Justice Department into a weapon); to summit Mt. Everest (to reach the summit of Mt. Everest), she friended me (she became my friend), to impact the process (to have an impact on the process), etc. etc. A true friend of the ad men desperate for new strap lines. Have you laptoped? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgerx16 Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 30 minutes ago, Hamilton Saint said: And then there is the appalling and incorrect practice of turning a noun into a verb: for example, to medal at the Olympic Games (to win a medal at); to weaponise the Justice Department (to turn the Justice Department into a weapon); to summit Mt. Everest (to reach the summit of Mt. Everest), she friended me (she became my friend), to impact the process (to have an impact on the process), etc. etc. As well as 'to medal' there is also 'to podium'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgerx16 Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 Another one from ''Auntie''.......…. The BBC have a report on an 'ancient' shipwreck in Orkney - the ship is thought to be from the 17th century. That is NOT ancient - the Romans were ancient, the period of the English Civil War is not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 1 hour ago, badgerx16 said: Another one from ''Auntie''.......…. The BBC have a report on an 'ancient' shipwreck in Orkney - the ship is thought to be from the 17th century. That is NOT ancient - the Romans were ancient, the period of the English Civil War is not. Out of idle curiosity, on what date in history does "ancient" cease to be applicable...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgerx16 Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 27 minutes ago, trousers said: Out of idle curiosity, on what date in history does "ancient" cease to be applicable...? Ancient is at least pre-medieval, and 'early medieval' is around the time of the earliest Anglo-Saxon settlement in Britain. However you frame it, King Charles and Oliver Cromwell are not characters from ancient history. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Picard Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 31 minutes ago, trousers said: Out of idle curiosity, on what date in history does "ancient" cease to be applicable...? AD 500 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgerx16 Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 (edited) 3 minutes ago, badgerx16 said: Ancient is at least pre-medieval, and 'early medieval' is around the time of the earliest Anglo-Saxon settlement in Britain. 2 minutes ago, Picard said: AD 500 There you go 🙂 Edited September 26 by badgerx16 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 4 minutes ago, Picard said: AD 500 Bugger... I've got a coin dated AD 501 and have been incorrectly describing it as "ancient" for years! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Super Saint Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 29 minutes ago, trousers said: Bugger... I've got a coin dated AD 501 and have been incorrectly describing it as "ancient" for years! Next year Rodders, next year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 54 minutes ago, trousers said: Bugger... I've got a coin dated AD 501 and have been incorrectly describing it as "ancient" for years! Is it described as ‘pre-used’ ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whelk Posted September 26 Author Share Posted September 26 1 hour ago, badgerx16 said: There you go 🙂 So not Iggy Pop then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamilton Saint Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 4 hours ago, trousers said: Out of idle curiosity, on what date in history does "ancient" cease to be applicable...? According to my Oxford Dictionary, ancient means "of or pertaining to the world prior to the fall of Rome in 476". And "the ancients" are the people of ancient times "especially the Greeks, Romans, Hebrews, and Egyptians". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lighthouse Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 But are any of these ancients justified? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgerx16 Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 13 minutes ago, Lighthouse said: But are any of these ancients justified? Only if they drive an ice cream van. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted October 4 Share Posted October 4 The proliferation of bands/artists releasing "special" 20th/30th/40th/50th anniversary versions of old albums. Stop milking your gullible fans to boost your pension pots and start making some new music you lazy ****ing twats. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rallyboy Posted October 4 Share Posted October 4 Mu Mu. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgerx16 Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 Those TV ads with a talking head speaking into the camera with a moving fuzzy background as the person in view rocks slightly side to side as they pretend to walk along. Yes SelectSpecs, I mean you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whelk Posted October 7 Author Share Posted October 7 Slow speaking football pundits. Fucking get on with it. And while I’m at it you don’t need to say ‘football club’ after team name Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gloucester Saint Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 On 04/10/2024 at 08:25, trousers said: The proliferation of bands/artists releasing "special" 20th/30th/40th/50th anniversary versions of old albums. Stop milking your gullible fans to boost your pension pots and start making some new music you lazy ****ing twats. I love the music of Pink Floyd but the Endless River had about two new tracks on it, the rest was off-cuts from the 1994 Division Bell album. Which was decent but 30 years old itself. At least there was some AI-related innovation in the Beatles single last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted October 11 Share Posted October 11 (edited) The usual idiots on Facebook responding to a "beware, there are kids knocking on people's doors" post with "yeah, but we all did it as kids..." No. No we didn't. Yes, the thick kids did. Us more intelligent children were clever enough to find stuff to do that didn't involve distressing or inconveniencing the local neighbourhood. Thick twats. Edited October 11 by trousers 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gloucester Saint Posted October 11 Share Posted October 11 Receiving an online parcel with incorrect items. Although have never had to contend with an ‘extra’ like this https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c39l3ex0mpgo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted October 11 Share Posted October 11 2 hours ago, Gloucester Saint said: Receiving an online parcel with incorrect items. Although have never had to contend with an ‘extra’ like this https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c39l3ex0mpgo You say that, but someone sent Rudolf Schenker through the post once upon a time... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gloucester Saint Posted October 11 Share Posted October 11 4 hours ago, trousers said: You say that, but someone sent Rudolf Schenker through the post once upon a time... Probably by his brother https://metalwani.com/2021/01/michael-schenker-on-his-brother-rudolf-he-is-a-bully-and-i-dont-connect-with-bullies.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgerx16 Posted October 12 Share Posted October 12 I don't mind people taking stupid risks on bikes if they are only likely to harm themselves, sometimes you can laugh at their plight when it all goes wrong. However, sometimes they take it too far; observed whilst driving to the shops - a man riding a bike on the pavement, no helmet, a shopping bag swinging from the right end of his handlebsrs whilst he uses his phone in his right hand..............and his small daughter sat on his shoulders ! ( Also no helmet ). 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skintsaint Posted October 12 Share Posted October 12 Woman reading the news on the BBC at lunch kept saying Harry Kane Milton. Even rewound it to make sure I wasn't hearing things... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gloucester Saint Posted October 12 Share Posted October 12 5 hours ago, badgerx16 said: I don't mind people taking stupid risks on bikes if they are only likely to harm themselves, sometimes you can laugh at their plight when it all goes wrong. However, sometimes they take it too far; observed whilst driving to the shops - a man riding a bike on the pavement, no helmet, a shopping bag swinging from the right end of his handlebsrs whilst he uses his phone in his right hand..............and his small daughter sat on his shoulders ! ( Also no helmet ). What an absolute pillock (the cyclist/biker). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted October 12 Share Posted October 12 20 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: What an absolute pillock (the cyclist/biker). A right helmet. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lighthouse Posted October 13 Share Posted October 13 P f**king R f**king I f**king N f**king T f**king E f**king R f**king S Remember back in the glorious nineties when you could just plug a printer into your computer and click print and it would print something. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rallyboy Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 The media spoonfeeding trivia to simple folk. There's kids being burned in tents, but half of the UK is being distracted by a pointless debate on whether some fat fuck from an advert is a pervert or not. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winnersaint Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 People with their own YouTube Channels claiming to have heard (Band X) the first time and reacting to it on said channels. Live versions of Sultans of Swing in particular seem to be commonly used in this way. It usually starts with, "Hi I'm a guitarist and I came across this track for the first time." Yeah right, a guitarist who's never heard of Mark Knopfler kind of stretches the boundaries a bit. Also Americans putting stuff up about how different things are in the UK compared to America when they travel to or live in this country. No shit Sherlock! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now