Jump to content

The small things in life that annoy you


whelk

Recommended Posts

The BBC putting images like this on articles;

6192b880-726a-11ef-b02d-c5f3b724a1ea.png

Commercial aircraft do not cruise at an altitude of 14 miles. That is about 6 miles higher than such planes manage, although Concord flew at around 11 miles up when supersonic.

Edited by badgerx16
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

The BBC putting images like this on articles;

6192b880-726a-11ef-b02d-c5f3b724a1ea.png

Commercial aircraft do not cruise at an altitude of 14 miles. That is about 6 miles higher than such planes manage, although Concord flew at around 11 miles up when supersonic.

It’s the note at the bottom that annoys me more! As if it needs to be said the objects aren’t to scale! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clothes and shoe sizes. 

A medium t'shirt might fit, be too big or too small. 

A size 8 shoe might be too big or too small.  I have a closet where I have shoe sizes that fit from sizes 7 to 10.  

If manufacturers are incapable of accurately standardising clothes and shoe sizes, which they are, then your clothes and shoe shops should size items by centimetre. This way you wouldn't have to bother trying it on, know it would fit and would be more confident buying off the internet.  

And no, I'm not putting on weight.  Well I am actually but that's not the point. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 16/09/2024 at 13:40, Hamilton Saint said:

Using a country's name as an adjective: "France goalkeeper saves penalty". Correct form should be 'French goalkeeper saves penalty', or 'France's goalkeeper saves penalty'.

On today's BBC News website: "Four members of one family killed in Italy house collapse". Correct form would be 'four members of one family killed in collapse of Italian home'. Another one: "At least 51 dead in Iran coal mine explosion". Correct form would be 'at least 51 dead in explosion at Iranian coal mine'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Hamilton Saint said:

On today's BBC News website: "Four members of one family killed in Italy house collapse". Correct form would be 'four members of one family killed in collapse of Italian home'. Another one: "At least 51 dead in Iran coal mine explosion". Correct form would be 'at least 51 dead in explosion at Iranian coal mine'.

Even more annoying that many youngsters won’t see these examples as wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Whitey Grandad said:

Even more annoying that many youngsters won’t see these examples as wrong.

Yeah but news headlines need to be concise and, as such, they have always had their own grammatical rules that you don't find anywhere else. It's not a new thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Hamilton Saint said:

On today's BBC News website: "Four members of one family killed in Italy house collapse". Correct form would be 'four members of one family killed in collapse of Italian home'. Another one: "At least 51 dead in Iran coal mine explosion". Correct form would be 'at least 51 dead in explosion at Iranian coal mine'.

 

4 hours ago, Whitey Grandad said:

Even more annoying that many youngsters won’t see these examples as wrong.

Because they aren’t wrong.

That’s a writing style perfectly appropriate for news reporting.

This is moaning and pointless nitpicking on a par with idiots that say “it’s only the Union Jack when it’s on a boat”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And then there is the appalling and incorrect practice of turning a noun into a verb: for example, to medal at the Olympic Games (to win a medal at); to weaponise the Justice Department (to turn the Justice Department into a weapon); to summit Mt. Everest (to reach the summit of Mt. Everest), she friended me (she became my friend), to impact the process (to have an impact on the process), etc. etc.

Edited by Hamilton Saint
adding another good example!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Hamilton Saint said:

And then there is the appalling and incorrect practice of turning a noun into a verb: for example, to medal at the Olympic Games (to win a medal at); to weaponise the Justice Department (to turn the Justice Department into a weapon); to summit Mt. Everest (to reach the summit of Mt. Everest), she friended me (she became my friend), to impact the process (to have an impact on the process), etc. etc.

A true friend of the ad men desperate for new strap lines. Have you laptoped?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Hamilton Saint said:

And then there is the appalling and incorrect practice of turning a noun into a verb: for example, to medal at the Olympic Games (to win a medal at); to weaponise the Justice Department (to turn the Justice Department into a weapon); to summit Mt. Everest (to reach the summit of Mt. Everest), she friended me (she became my friend), to impact the process (to have an impact on the process), etc. etc.

As well as 'to medal' there is also 'to podium'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another one from ''Auntie''.......….

 

The BBC have a report on an 'ancient' shipwreck in Orkney - the ship is thought to be from the 17th century. That is NOT ancient - the Romans were ancient, the period of the English Civil War is not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, badgerx16 said:

Another one from ''Auntie''.......….

 

The BBC have a report on an 'ancient' shipwreck in Orkney - the ship is thought to be from the 17th century. That is NOT ancient - the Romans were ancient, the period of the English Civil War is not.

Out of idle curiosity, on what date in history does "ancient" cease to be applicable...? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, trousers said:

Out of idle curiosity, on what date in history does "ancient" cease to be applicable...? :)

Ancient is at least pre-medieval, and 'early medieval' is around the time of the earliest Anglo-Saxon settlement in Britain.

However you frame it, King Charles and Oliver Cromwell are not characters from ancient history.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

Ancient is at least pre-medieval, and 'early medieval' is around the time of the earliest Anglo-Saxon settlement in Britain.

 

2 minutes ago, Picard said:

AD 500

There you go 🙂

Edited by badgerx16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, trousers said:

Out of idle curiosity, on what date in history does "ancient" cease to be applicable...? :)

According to my Oxford Dictionary, ancient means "of or pertaining to the world prior to the fall of Rome in 476". And "the ancients" are the people of ancient times "especially the Greeks, Romans, Hebrews, and Egyptians".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The proliferation of bands/artists releasing "special" 20th/30th/40th/50th anniversary versions of old albums.

Stop milking your gullible fans to boost your pension pots and start making some new music you lazy ****ing twats.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those TV ads with a talking head speaking into the camera with a moving fuzzy background as the person in view rocks slightly side to side as they pretend to walk along.

 

Yes SelectSpecs, I mean you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 04/10/2024 at 08:25, trousers said:

The proliferation of bands/artists releasing "special" 20th/30th/40th/50th anniversary versions of old albums.

Stop milking your gullible fans to boost your pension pots and start making some new music you lazy ****ing twats.

I love the music of Pink Floyd but the Endless River had about two new tracks on it, the rest was off-cuts from the 1994 Division Bell album. Which was decent but 30 years old itself. At least there was some AI-related innovation in the Beatles single last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The usual idiots on Facebook responding to a "beware, there are kids knocking on people's doors" post with "yeah, but we all did it as kids..."

No. No we didn't. Yes, the thick kids did. Us more intelligent children were clever enough to find stuff to do that didn't involve distressing or inconveniencing the local neighbourhood.

Thick twats.

Edited by trousers
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't mind people taking stupid risks on bikes if they are only likely to harm themselves, sometimes you can laugh at their plight when it all goes wrong. However, sometimes they take it too far; observed whilst driving to the shops - a man riding a bike on the pavement, no helmet, a shopping bag swinging from the right end of his handlebsrs whilst he uses his phone in his right hand..............and his small daughter sat on his shoulders ! ( Also no helmet ).

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

I don't mind people taking stupid risks on bikes if they are only likely to harm themselves, sometimes you can laugh at their plight when it all goes wrong. However, sometimes they take it too far; observed whilst driving to the shops - a man riding a bike on the pavement, no helmet, a shopping bag swinging from the right end of his handlebsrs whilst he uses his phone in his right hand..............and his small daughter sat on his shoulders ! ( Also no helmet ).

What an absolute pillock (the cyclist/biker).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

P f**king R f**king I f**king N f**king T f**king E f**king R f**king S

Remember back in the glorious nineties when you could just plug a printer into your computer and click print and it would print something.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The media spoonfeeding trivia to simple folk. 

There's kids being burned in tents, but half of the UK is being distracted by a pointless debate on whether some fat fuck from an advert is a pervert or not. 

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People with their own YouTube Channels claiming to have heard (Band X) the first time and reacting to it on said channels. Live versions of Sultans of Swing in particular seem to be commonly used in this way. It usually starts with, "Hi I'm a guitarist and I came across this track for the first time." Yeah right, a guitarist who's never heard of Mark Knopfler kind of stretches the boundaries a bit. Also Americans putting stuff up about how different things are in the UK compared to America when they travel to or live in this country. No shit Sherlock!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...