Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thought the point was fairly on the money, it is after all an opinion piece rather than a news item.

 

The only bit that I'd have thought anyone could object to was the idea that all the top players we've had in the past 5 years could have all been in the same team when really many of them were brought in to replace those sold, and thus would probably have never joined without us first selling their predecessor (i.e. if we hadn't had lost Lovren we wouldn't have got Alderweireld, if we'd not lost him we'd never had got Van Dijk). The same for Lambert and Pelle, or J Rod and Mane.

 

They certainly wouldn't have all played in the same team, but many of them did - Lallana, Lovren, Clyne, etc. Although it's used to make a point and certainly we have had a very decent team and a very good manager that if we had been able to add one or two of those new signings (i.e. Mane, Van Dijk) without selling nearly as many players then we may well have theoretically been in a similar position to Spurs.

Posted
if we hadn't had lost Lovren we wouldn't have got Alderweireld, if we'd not lost him we'd never had got Van Dijk

 

The intent was to sign both. Can you imagine us having a centre back pairing of Van Dijk and Alderweireld?

Posted
chelsea sniffing around Callum Wilson

That has to be him gone surely. That is how it works right?

 

Difference is they're just sniffing. If they want him, they'll get him. Sad truth for clubs like us and Bournemouth.

Posted
The intent was to sign both. Can you imagine us having a centre back pairing of Van Dijk and Alderweireld?
Was just about to make this same point, we fully intended to sign Aldeweireld permanently as well as Van Dijk but Atletico stitched us up.

 

Sent from my SM-J600FN using Tapatalk

Posted
Difference is they're just sniffing. If they want him, they'll get him. Sad truth for clubs like us and Bournemouth.

 

It's the same for anyone bar Barca, Real and MAYBE PSG.

 

Chelsea have their place in the pecking order too.

Posted
It's the same for anyone bar Barca, Real and MAYBE PSG.

 

Chelsea have their place in the pecking order too.

 

Why would he go (career-wise I mean, not money-wise) ? Chelsea loan out most of their youngsters, what will they do with him...…..

Posted
Why would he go (career-wise I mean, not money-wise) ? Chelsea loan out most of their youngsters, what will they do with him...…..

 

European games, he'd probably have a few medals too if he stayed there for 2-3 years.

 

If nothing else, money is a better reason than most.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...