Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
15 minutes ago, ChrisR said:

So I take a look at this thread to see if there are any rumours about whom could replace Ralph to read endless drivel about MLG - sums up this place really, my 1st post in years and now my last sad situation this is supposed to be a forum to talk about Saints not other posters

Good example... ;)

  • Haha 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, ChrisR said:

So I take a look at this thread to see if there are any rumours about whom could replace Ralph to read endless drivel about MLG - sums up this place really, my 1st post in years and now my last sad situation this is supposed to be a forum to talk about Saints not other posters

How about this: there aren't any rumours about who is going to replace Ralph Hasenhuttl.

I'm worried you have an unreasonable expectation of what a football forum is able to do.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
35 minutes ago, ChrisR said:

So I take a look at this thread to see if there are any rumours about whom could replace Ralph to read endless drivel about MLG - sums up this place really, my 1st post in years and now my last sad situation this is supposed to be a forum to talk about Saints not other posters

Your first post in years is to talk about another poster. If there were any rumours, rest assured we wouldn't be talking about MLG. Or perhaps you are another of his logins. Can you confirm the amount of confused emojis you have used in the last 6 months please.

  • Haha 2
  • Confused 3
Posted
47 minutes ago, ChrisR said:

So I take a look at this thread to see if there are any rumours about whom could replace Ralph to read endless drivel about MLG - sums up this place really, my 1st post in years and now my last sad situation this is supposed to be a forum to talk about Saints not other posters

 

9 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Your first post in years is to talk about another poster. If there were any rumours, rest assured we wouldn't be talking about MLG. Or perhaps you are another of his logins. Can you confirm the amount of confused emojis you have used in the last 6 months please.

No chance. Even in an attempt to disguise himself there is no way MLG could bring himself to post using such poor punctuation.

Posted
1 hour ago, ChrisR said:

So I take a look at this thread to see if there are any rumours about whom could replace Ralph to read endless drivel about MLG - sums up this place really, my 1st post in years and now my last sad situation this is supposed to be a forum to talk about Saints not other posters

This forum consists of endless drivel coupled with the "clever" mob who wait for certain posters to post and jump in to belittle and bully them to try to get them to leave, when they succeed, I guess they fell a sense of power  👏

  • Like 6
Posted
11 hours ago, tdmickey3 said:

This forum consists of endless drivel coupled with the "clever" mob who wait for certain posters to post and jump in to belittle and bully them to try to get them to leave, when they succeed, I guess they fell a sense of power  👏

Get Out Leave GIF

  • Like 1
Posted
20 hours ago, tdmickey3 said:

This forum consists of endless drivel coupled with the "clever" mob who wait for certain posters to post and jump in to belittle and bully them to try to get them to leave, when they succeed, I guess they fell a sense of power  👏

At least try to not make it obvious you’re a returning poster, MLG/TWar 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
21 hours ago, tdmickey3 said:

This forum consists of endless drivel coupled with the "clever" mob who wait for certain posters to post and jump in to belittle and bully them to try to get them to leave, when they succeed, I guess they fell a sense of power  👏

Behave. MLG, and his various alt logins, are loving the attention. The reactions as MLG but posts from another are plain weird though. One person, one login. You have gotta be a bit special to have more than that, and can't complain when alt logins get pointed it. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
23 hours ago, tdmickey3 said:

This forum consists of endless drivel coupled with the "clever" mob who wait for certain posters to post and jump in to belittle and bully them to try to get them to leave, when they succeed, I guess they fell a sense of power  👏

An account set up on the 14th August, two days before MLG stopped posting and has been posting furiously slagging off other posters recently. I'm sure it's just yet another coincidence and this login is nothing to do with MLG  :lol:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, Turkish said:

An account set up on the 14th August, two days before MLG stopped posting and has been posting furiously slagging off other posters recently. I'm sure it's just yet another coincidence and this login is nothing to do with MLG  :lol:

Only 50 posts since then ?

He does that many in a day 😁

Posted

So this is a still no new manager thread just drivel about who the poster might be or not, and shit................worth popping on for yet again i see kids☺️.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, whelk said:

Surely a religious/God based topic will flush him out?

Or post one statistically inaccurate 'fact' about Saints..

Edited by badgerx16
Posted
2 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

Or post one statistically inaccurate 'fact' about Saints..

He posted an inaccurate fact himself using Bad Wolf when he claimed we have never played Newcastle on a saturday at 3pm, luckily i was able to correct him so he didn't have to correct himself 😎

Posted
44 minutes ago, Raging Bull said:

Tried that with a God bless @Matthew Le God but alas, no joy. 

I’ll keep praying for him 

As the good all inclusive Lord said in Deuteronomy it is what he would want.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
6 hours ago, aintforever said:

Would be nice if Equador stuffed these cunts.

Another magnificent contribution. What would this place be without you

Posted
6 hours ago, Turkish said:

Can people just STFU now about armbands and rainbow hats FFS. Some random Scottish football going on now on GMB. “It’s unbelievable” etc etc, no it isn’t it’s the laws of the country. 

And yet you are the one who continues to post constantly about it? 🤷‍♂️

  • Like 3
Posted
1 hour ago, sydney_saint said:

Probably cos no one can be bothered anymore going through the tedious and futile exercise of engaging with you. 

Apart from you it seems…

Posted
6 minutes ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

Fucking hell, more woke pony at HT. 

I know I shouldn’t but for some reason I’m getting an inordinate amount of pleasure on the impact this is all having on you, Turkish and Alex. Apologies for the schadenfreude. 

  • Like 4
Posted
45 minutes ago, The Left Back said:

I know I shouldn’t but for some reason I’m getting an inordinate amount of pleasure on the impact this is all having on you, Turkish and Alex. Apologies for the schadenfreude. 

No need to apologise. Unlike some people on here the three of us find meaningless token gestures rather pointless, especially when they are withdrawn at the first sign of opposition. Too bad the more gullible amongst us suck it and believe it’s some sort of amazing stand to educate the world with our superior way of life

Posted
1 hour ago, The Left Back said:

I know I shouldn’t but for some reason I’m getting an inordinate amount of pleasure on the impact this is all having on you, Turkish and Alex. Apologies for the schadenfreude. 

Given what a racist Tory hell hole the UK is, with its imperial past, that currently locks up migrants in their own filth, and has a very recent history in destroying Middle Eastern countries.  I am amazed we have the nerve to expect other nations to adopt more of our way of life.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Given what a racist Tory hell hole the UK is, with its imperial past, that currently locks up migrants in their own filth, and has a very recent history in destroying Middle Eastern countries.  I am amazed we have the nerve to expect other nations to adopt more of our way of life.

Indeed we’ve had numerous new threads reminding us what a terrible country this is, yet we have the nerve to call residents of other counties savages and believe that it’s our job to educate them. 

Posted
27 minutes ago, Turkish said:

No need to apologise. Unlike some people on here the three of us find meaningless token gestures rather pointless, especially when they are withdrawn at the first sign of opposition. Too bad the more gullible amongst us suck it and believe it’s some sort of amazing stand to educate the world with our superior way of life

I just don't know who you think you are arguing with? If you look at most people who are pro the queer community and/or on the left. We never thought that wearing an armband or a logo on a shirt was enough. In fact it was incredibly disappointing that no player, team or even sponsor made any real or meaningful stand. That's without taking in the corruption, bribery and wage theft and working conditions for migrant workers. It would have only taken a one or two team big names/teams to make a stand to set the dominoes rolling I reckon. This is not a country where LGBT is just frowned upon, in which case it would be so hypocritical for the west to come in pontificating. But a country where you are literally physically beaten which is against fundamental human rights. 

Even though we thought that that an armband was pathetic, we can still be disappointed that the feeble attempt was abandoned at the first sign of repercussions. I would rather them have done absolutely nothing than to make such a weak attempt at it. Instead all it did was expose the self interest of those involved and if anything, works against LGBT inclusivity which is why I would prefer nothing. 

But you will also find that the person you seem to be arguing is only a tiny slither of people. The amount of people that thought wearing an armband was great and sufficient will pretty much mostly belong to corporate suits, like the sponsors and some media outlets. You are more likely to be arguing against an accountant who lives in Twickenham who votes Lib Dems than you are anyone else. 

So again who do you think you are arguing against or proving a point? 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, sydney_saint said:

I just don't know who you think you are arguing with? If you look at most people who are pro the queer community and/or on the left. We never thought that wearing an armband or a logo on a shirt was enough. In fact it was incredibly disappointing that no player, team or even sponsor made any real or meaningful stand. That's without taking in the corruption, bribery and wage theft and working conditions for migrant workers. It would have only taken a one or two team big names/teams to make a stand to set the dominoes rolling I reckon. This is not a country where LGBT is just frowned upon, in which case it would be so hypocritical for the west to come in pontificating. But a country where you are literally physically beaten which is against fundamental human rights. 

Even though we thought that that an armband was pathetic, we can still be disappointed that the feeble attempt was abandoned at the first sign of repercussions. I would rather them have done absolutely nothing than to make such a weak attempt at it. Instead all it did was expose the self interest of those involved and if anything, works against LGBT inclusivity which is why I would prefer nothing. 

But you will also find that the person you seem to be arguing is only a tiny slither of people. The amount of people that thought wearing an armband was great and sufficient will pretty much mostly belong to corporate suits, like the sponsors and some media outlets. You are more likely to be arguing against an accountant who lives in Twickenham who votes Lib Dems than you are anyone else. 

So again who do you think you are arguing against or proving a point? 

 

 

It’s you who seems to be arguing with me pal. I completely agree with much of what you said. Perhaps I should ask you what exactly you are arguing with me about?

Posted
1 minute ago, Turkish said:

It’s you who seems to be arguing with me pal. I completely agree with much of what you said. Perhaps I should ask you what exactly you are arguing with me about?

Then why do you keep bringing it up?

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, sydney_saint said:

Then why do you keep bringing it up?

Because as I said in my post this morning it’s never ending, will they wear an arm band, will they take the knee, will they wear a shirt with love in it, they’ve all bailed out, except for Denmark I believe, once they knew it was going to have a negative impact on the team so it’s all a pointless exercise in virtual signalling. They’re not standing up for or against anything. And we seem to be left with the cop out “well at least we’re having conversions” brilliant! Discussing it on BBC to the UK audience by people in Qatar being paid to be there. It’s ridiculous. 

Edited by Turkish
Posted

Isn't there a yellow card amnesty after the quarters? So anyone who hasn't picked up a booking can wear a rainbow t-shirt after the match, and it should be wiped. 🙂

I did read that England were threatened with a number of sanctions if they didn't comply. But can't imagine how they'd impact games.

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, Turkish said:

Indeed we’ve had numerous new threads reminding us what a terrible country this is, yet we have the nerve to call residents of other counties savages and believe that it’s our job to educate them. 

Iranian sports reporter to Gareth Southgate:

“We also could’ve asked, just as English reporters did to Queiroz, why are you the head coach of a country that killed many thousands of innocent people in Afghanistan and Iraq?"

Edited by AlexLaw76
Posted
16 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Iranian sports reporter to Gareth Southgate:

“We also could’ve asked, just as English reporters did to Queiroz, why are you the head coach of a country that killed many thousands of innocent people in Afghanistan and Iraq?"

Did he reply "its our responsbility to educate the savages"?

Posted

I've not been following closel, but has the strongest human rights message turned out to be from the Iranian players not singing their anthem?

I saw that England's knee taking looked to be rushed, as the ref was going ahead with the match whether they were on their knees or not.

Posted
2 hours ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Iranian sports reporter to Gareth Southgate:

“We also could’ve asked, just as English reporters did to Queiroz, why are you the head coach of a country that killed many thousands of innocent people in Afghanistan and Iraq?"

He might find that an easier question to answer than if it had been posed to someone who made a living from manning a nuclear submarine.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Holmes_and_Watson said:

I've not been following closel, but has the strongest human rights message turned out to be from the Iranian players not singing their anthem?

I saw that England's knee taking looked to be rushed, as the ref was going ahead with the match whether they were on their knees or not.

For me the fact that there have been conversations happening between the pundits on BBC have sent some incredibly strong messages to the viewing audience here.

Posted
1 hour ago, Turkish said:

For me the fact that there have been conversations happening between the pundits on BBC have sent some incredibly strong messages to the viewing audience here.

Good point. I did notice Alex Scott be more prepared than her colleagues to face these issues. So points for that. Some might be disappointed that she said not going would have been the easy option, then deflecting the point without giving any reasons why that might be the case. But these are some of the pitfalls facing our brave broadcasters as they face down infringements on human rights.

Posted
19 hours ago, aintforever said:

They are highlighting the issues in Qatar because the World Cup is in Qatar you bell-end.

Carry on pissing you pants over a bit of virtual signalling if you want but most sensible people understand the situation they are in.

Why is it that anyone who makes you look silly you call a bellend who pisses in their pants?

Posted

He may look silly but you look obsessed. I came to the lounge for a leisurely browse of the wit and wisdom of our forum’s finest and what do I find? Surprise surprise it’s you on your own. Surprise surprise it’s the LGBT thread. Surprise surprise you’re trying to pick a fight with a post that’s 19 hours old.

  • Like 3
Posted
1 hour ago, Turkish said:

That’s hilarious coming from someone who posts about me an awful lot 

That's a very Trumpian response.  Guess I need to add paranoid to obsessed.

Define 'an awful lot'.  I've posted 370 times in 15 months, so about 25 per month.  I got into one spat with you about a year ago on racism, which took up a few posts.  And I've pointed out your trolling, hypocrisy and obsession about half a dozen times.  Does that constitute an 'awful lot' in your book?  In which case some thickening of the skin might be in order.

PS.  While you are in definition mode, define 'hilarious'.  

  • Like 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, The Left Back said:

That's a very Trumpian response.  Guess I need to add paranoid to obsessed.

Define 'an awful lot'.  I've posted 370 times in 15 months, so about 25 per month.  I got into one spat with you about a year ago on racism, which took up a few posts.  And I've pointed out your trolling, hypocrisy and obsession about half a dozen times.  Does that constitute an 'awful lot' in your book?  In which case some thickening of the skin might be in order.

PS.  While you are in definition mode, define 'hilarious'.  

5 of your last 24 posts have been about me of in response to me. That’s almost 21%. That’s certainly a high figure.

Posted (edited)
57 minutes ago, Turkish said:

5 of your last 24 posts have been about me of in response to me. That’s almost 21%. That’s certainly a high figure.

4 out of 5 posts by you on this page have been sniping at a poster rather than adding to the discussion.

Edited by badgerx16
  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, The Left Back said:

That's a very Trumpian response.  Guess I need to add paranoid to obsessed.

Define 'an awful lot'.  I've posted 370 times in 15 months, so about 25 per month.  I got into one spat with you about a year ago on racism, which took up a few posts.  And I've pointed out your trolling, hypocrisy and obsession about half a dozen times.  Does that constitute an 'awful lot' in your book?  In which case some thickening of the skin might be in order.

PS.  While you are in definition mode, define 'hilarious'.  

The thing with narcissists is that all attention is good attention and he laps up both the good and the bad. He is loving this because, as usual, it is all about him. You will never win no matter what you post as every response feeds his need for attention. It doesn’t matter what the subject of the thread is, eventually it will become about him. For your own peace of mind you should let him find another target. Once you get him as a stalker he is like herpes, impossible to get rid of 😏

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...