Jump to content

The Kindergarten Thread


Batman

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Clearly a bit slow if you copy and paste something word for word and expect no one to notice 🤣🤣

I expected everyone to notice, I find it piss funny that you googled it and thought you were being clever in finding out it was copied when anyone with half a brain would know it was. :lol:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, aintforever said:

I expected everyone to notice, I find it piss funny that you googled it and thought you were being clever in finding out it was copied when anyone with half a brain would know it was. :lol:

 

Youre spending an awful lot of time defending yourself pal. Bothers you doesn’t it 🤣🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
On 21/07/2021 at 08:57, TWar said:

To be clear this is definitely not true.

Getting the vaccine lowers your chances of catching COVID by approximately 91%. It also lessens symptoms considerably, but that isn't the reason for why the club insist on being vaccinated. It is definitely false to say it doesn't lower chances of getting it.

Sources:

https://www.healthline.com/health-news/getting-a-pfizer-or-moderna-covid-19-vaccine-can-drop-your-risk-for-infection-by-91
https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/226413/almost-double-vaccinated-people-england-have/

The reason for insisting on vaccines can be seen through simple decision mathematics:

- Imagine a vaccine source S and two people labelled X and Y wherein X is the "passer" and Y is the receiver.
- Imagine the vaccine is 90% effective.
Consider three cases
- First, if neither X or Y is vaccinated then there is a 100% of the virus being passed from S to X to Y.
- Second, if Y is and X isn't there is a 10% chance of the virus going from S to X to Y.
- Third, If both X and Y are vaccinated then there is a 1% chance of S to X to Y (10% of 10%).

Therefore X not being vaccinated directly effects the health of Y even if Y is vaccinated, any more risk they take on is compounded to everyone else in the network.

In actuality it is a big web of passers and receivers and compound probability is what keeps us safe. This is why, mathematically, insisting on vaccination before gathering is essential, because the vaccine massively reduces risk but it isn't perfect so you need to reduce the transmissibility between nodes. Apologies for nerding out on this one a bit, it's a bit closer to what I do for a living.

Once again you have to teach the ignorant, if they cannot understand the pros vs the cons of being vaccinated there is no hope, they will not spend time looking into the good it does, just regurgitate the false narrative that they want to believe.  Kind of like their football opinions or race.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BERMUDASAINT said:

Once again you have to teach the ignorant, if they cannot understand the pros vs the cons of being vaccinated there is no hope, they will not spend time looking into the good it does, just regurgitate the false narrative that they want to believe.  Kind of like their football opinions or race.

You’re the most patronising and ignorant poster on here. Unwilling to listen or try and understand others point of view. 

It’s your way or the ‘incorrect’ way. 
 

At least TWar has a degree of intelligence about him, all I see if you calling people petty names. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SKD said:

You’re the most patronising and ignorant poster on here. Unwilling to listen or try and understand others point of view. 

It’s your way or the ‘incorrect’ way. 
 

At least TWar has a degree of intelligence about him, all I see if you calling people petty names. 

I was hoping two wrongs make a right, my ignorance :)

I see your concerned enough to respond to our ignorance, perhaps you are ignorant too.

Hiel SKD, we will never forget....

Get vaccinated! 

Be positive!

Go Saints, COYS

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
10 minutes ago, Warriorsaint said:

I wonder if the Heil Mail and the right wing racists will champion this immigrant. Born in Canada to a Chinese mother and Romanian father moved to London aged 2.

.... and she wears the colours of the Romanian flag when she plays in New York. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Warriorsaint said:

I wonder if the Heil Mail and the right wing racists will champion this immigrant. Born in Canada to a Chinese mother and Romanian father moved to London aged 2.

Well they champion the New York born Boris Johnson, and the half Czech Dominic Raab.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Warriorsaint said:

I wonder if the Heil Mail and the right wing racists will champion this immigrant. Born in Canada to a Chinese mother and Romanian father moved to London aged 2.

Damn... I had 15 hours 47 minutes on the 'First person to mention her heritage' sweepstake. So close but, alas, no cigar 

Baby Reaction GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
1 minute ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

It’s not bizarre, it’s perfectly understandable if you’ve an agenda. These loons really do believe it’s the lack of exposure that’s holding the chick game back, whereas the reality is it’s the appalling standard that does that. 

Agree with this. But we have moved on a bit LD. We call em birds these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, suewhistle said:

"chick game"? I always thought this was a parody account and now I know. If anyone has an "agenda" it's the 19th century 

I had to Google parody. Just to make sure. It's just throw away words. His main point still stands. The quality is shocking. Below the MLS (which sky were also trying to flog). Nonsense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, suewhistle said:

"chick game"? I always thought this was a parody account and now I know. If anyone has an "agenda" it's the 19th century throwback Lord Duckhunter.

There’s only one thing that’s a throw back, and that’s the way birds football is piggy backed onto the blokes game. Being a feminist I’d rather the game stood on its own two feet. But if you’re happy to be patted on the head and “looked after “ by the men, knock yourself out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

There’s only one thing that’s a throw back, and that’s the way birds football is piggy backed onto the blokes game. Being a feminist I’d rather the game stood on its own two feet. But if you’re happy to be patted on the head and “looked after “ by the men, knock yourself out. 

Pony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
11 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said:

Why does one silly but ultimately harmless social media video from 2 years ago make him a bellend?

I agree. 
i mean,you nailed it to ‘bellend’ status after hard graft, over a much longer period of time. 

well done you. 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • Like 3
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Chapel End said:

But a painful truth for you though.

Yea it’s painful to know that some weirdo with 100s of different logins to a football forum, that stalked saintsweb on Twitter to demand an explanation as to why one login was banned thinks im a bellend, I don’t know how I’ll ever recover from this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Turkish said:

Yea it’s painful to know that some weirdo with 100s of different logins to a football forum, that stalked saintsweb on Twitter to demand an explanation as to why one login was banned thinks im a bellend, I don’t know how I’ll ever recover from this.

100's of log ins🤣 

Recovery will only be possible if you accept what you are pal, a self important forum bully.

I bet you were the loud mouth in the school playground, desperate to be the centre of attention. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
35 minutes ago, Billy the Kidd said:

And ‘the bloke’s’ also changed lots this season, compared to last season. 

  1. Tactics
  2. Formations
  3. Players as subs
  4. Timings of subs
  5. Harder to score against

I’m sure others can state more (calling @TWar), but one thing I cant really agree with is that Ralph hasn’t learned.

Still, perhaps we should be lucky you didnt post in deiner gewohnt aggressiven Weise.

Good for you.

 

You and Twar should go and sit in a tree together.

You're both made for eachother.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Very arrogant. He’s been very arrogant for a while and I’ve been pointing it out as have others. Good people are realising “People like me” = people who know best, better than you lot. 

Oh Jesus Christ, you have been very patient waiting for TWar to say something like this for you to pick up on 🤣

I dont agree with him over this issue of Ralph’s tactics, but I find his posts pretty useful to listen to, and am pleased he is a member of the forum.

On this occasion I think you and others are slightly talking this out of context, but that suits your agenda, doesn’t it…

Have a good Sunday, Turkish 👍🏾 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Billy the Kidd said:

Oh Jesus Christ, you have been very patient waiting for TWar to say something like this for you to pick up on 🤣

I dont agree with him over this issue of Ralph’s tactics, but I find his posts pretty useful to listen to, and am pleased he is a member of the forum.

On this occasion I think you and others are slightly talking this out of context, but that suits your agenda, doesn’t it…

Have a good Sunday, Turkish 👍🏾 

Get your tongue out of his arsehole billy, only dogs do that, you’re not a dog are you Billy?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
2 hours ago, aintforever said:

I was obviously talking about covid vaccines you dumb cunt. It’s a thread about Covid, why would I be talking about Polio?

Aintclever starts name calling and abusing. Calling people thick, won’t be long before the :lol: comes out and a “it’s not rocket science” for an aintclever house. One of the dimmest people on here ironically telling others “it’s not hard to understand” 🤣🤣🤣

Edited by Turkish
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Aintclever starts name calling and abusing. Calling people thick, won’t be long before the :lol: comes out and a “it’s not rocket science” for an aintclever house. One of the dimmest people on here ironically telling others “it’s not hard to understand” 🤣🤣🤣

Brilliant!  Except Weston started off with the name calling and he’s the one dribbling on about Polio which is completely irrelevant. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, aintforever said:

He says, using six emojis in two posts coming on to help out his fellow Gammon fuck-wit.

You two are like the dumb and dumber of SWF.

Gammon, another aintcleverism when struggling

You’re like a cross between Baldrick and Neil from the young ones. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

we should be at around 1m cases per day.  We were told on Mon gone that it will double every day/other day.

Yet, all Peston and co can do is ask why we are not being locked in our houses.

3,000 fewer infections today than yesterday. Shouldn’t we be at 200k today?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...