Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 21/05/2021 at 19:31, Turkish said:

Clearly a bit slow if you copy and paste something word for word and expect no one to notice 🤣🤣

Expand  

I expected everyone to notice, I find it piss funny that you googled it and thought you were being clever in finding out it was copied when anyone with half a brain would know it was. :lol:

 

Posted
  On 21/05/2021 at 19:37, aintforever said:

I expected everyone to notice, I find it piss funny that you googled it and thought you were being clever in finding out it was copied when anyone with half a brain would know it was. :lol:

 

Expand  

Youre spending an awful lot of time defending yourself pal. Bothers you doesn’t it 🤣🤣

Posted (edited)
  On 21/05/2021 at 19:43, Turkish said:

Youre spending an awful lot of time defending yourself pal. Bothers you doesn’t it 🤣🤣

Expand  

He doth protest too much, methinks. 
 

That’s Shakespeare’s  by the way, not mine. 

Edited by Lord Duckhunter
  • Haha 1
  • 2 months later...
Posted
  On 21/07/2021 at 11:57, TWar said:

To be clear this is definitely not true.

Getting the vaccine lowers your chances of catching COVID by approximately 91%. It also lessens symptoms considerably, but that isn't the reason for why the club insist on being vaccinated. It is definitely false to say it doesn't lower chances of getting it.

Sources:

https://www.healthline.com/health-news/getting-a-pfizer-or-moderna-covid-19-vaccine-can-drop-your-risk-for-infection-by-91
https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/226413/almost-double-vaccinated-people-england-have/

The reason for insisting on vaccines can be seen through simple decision mathematics:

- Imagine a vaccine source S and two people labelled X and Y wherein X is the "passer" and Y is the receiver.
- Imagine the vaccine is 90% effective.
Consider three cases
- First, if neither X or Y is vaccinated then there is a 100% of the virus being passed from S to X to Y.
- Second, if Y is and X isn't there is a 10% chance of the virus going from S to X to Y.
- Third, If both X and Y are vaccinated then there is a 1% chance of S to X to Y (10% of 10%).

Therefore X not being vaccinated directly effects the health of Y even if Y is vaccinated, any more risk they take on is compounded to everyone else in the network.

In actuality it is a big web of passers and receivers and compound probability is what keeps us safe. This is why, mathematically, insisting on vaccination before gathering is essential, because the vaccine massively reduces risk but it isn't perfect so you need to reduce the transmissibility between nodes. Apologies for nerding out on this one a bit, it's a bit closer to what I do for a living.

Expand  

Once again you have to teach the ignorant, if they cannot understand the pros vs the cons of being vaccinated there is no hope, they will not spend time looking into the good it does, just regurgitate the false narrative that they want to believe.  Kind of like their football opinions or race.

Posted
  On 23/07/2021 at 14:18, BERMUDASAINT said:

Once again you have to teach the ignorant, if they cannot understand the pros vs the cons of being vaccinated there is no hope, they will not spend time looking into the good it does, just regurgitate the false narrative that they want to believe.  Kind of like their football opinions or race.

Expand  

You’re the most patronising and ignorant poster on here. Unwilling to listen or try and understand others point of view. 

It’s your way or the ‘incorrect’ way. 
 

At least TWar has a degree of intelligence about him, all I see if you calling people petty names. 

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 23/07/2021 at 14:31, SKD said:

You’re the most patronising and ignorant poster on here. Unwilling to listen or try and understand others point of view. 

It’s your way or the ‘incorrect’ way. 
 

At least TWar has a degree of intelligence about him, all I see if you calling people petty names. 

Expand  

I was hoping two wrongs make a right, my ignorance :)

I see your concerned enough to respond to our ignorance, perhaps you are ignorant too.

Hiel SKD, we will never forget....

Get vaccinated! 

Be positive!

Go Saints, COYS

  • Confused 1
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
  On 09/09/2021 at 08:04, Warriorsaint said:

I wonder if the Heil Mail and the right wing racists will champion this immigrant. Born in Canada to a Chinese mother and Romanian father moved to London aged 2.

Expand  

.... and she wears the colours of the Romanian flag when she plays in New York. 

Posted
  On 09/09/2021 at 08:04, Warriorsaint said:

I wonder if the Heil Mail and the right wing racists will champion this immigrant. Born in Canada to a Chinese mother and Romanian father moved to London aged 2.

Expand  

Well they champion the New York born Boris Johnson, and the half Czech Dominic Raab.

Posted
  On 09/09/2021 at 08:04, Warriorsaint said:

I wonder if the Heil Mail and the right wing racists will champion this immigrant. Born in Canada to a Chinese mother and Romanian father moved to London aged 2.

Expand  

Damn... I had 15 hours 47 minutes on the 'First person to mention her heritage' sweepstake. So close but, alas, no cigar 

Baby Reaction GIF

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
  On 17/09/2021 at 20:11, Lord Duckhunter said:

It’s not bizarre, it’s perfectly understandable if you’ve an agenda. These loons really do believe it’s the lack of exposure that’s holding the chick game back, whereas the reality is it’s the appalling standard that does that. 

Expand  

Agree with this. But we have moved on a bit LD. We call em birds these days.

Posted
  On 17/09/2021 at 20:18, suewhistle said:

"chick game"? I always thought this was a parody account and now I know. If anyone has an "agenda" it's the 19th century 

Expand  

I had to Google parody. Just to make sure. It's just throw away words. His main point still stands. The quality is shocking. Below the MLS (which sky were also trying to flog). Nonsense. 

Posted
  On 17/09/2021 at 20:18, suewhistle said:

"chick game"? I always thought this was a parody account and now I know. If anyone has an "agenda" it's the 19th century throwback Lord Duckhunter.

Expand  

There’s only one thing that’s a throw back, and that’s the way birds football is piggy backed onto the blokes game. Being a feminist I’d rather the game stood on its own two feet. But if you’re happy to be patted on the head and “looked after “ by the men, knock yourself out. 

Posted
  On 17/09/2021 at 20:31, Lord Duckhunter said:

There’s only one thing that’s a throw back, and that’s the way birds football is piggy backed onto the blokes game. Being a feminist I’d rather the game stood on its own two feet. But if you’re happy to be patted on the head and “looked after “ by the men, knock yourself out. 

Expand  

Pony

  • 1 month later...
Posted
  On 14/11/2021 at 21:47, Matthew Le God said:

Why does one silly but ultimately harmless social media video from 2 years ago make him a bellend?

Expand  

I agree. 
i mean,you nailed it to ‘bellend’ status after hard graft, over a much longer period of time. 

well done you. 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • Like 3
  • Haha 2
Posted
  On 15/11/2021 at 20:37, Chapel End said:

But a painful truth for you though.

Expand  

Yea it’s painful to know that some weirdo with 100s of different logins to a football forum, that stalked saintsweb on Twitter to demand an explanation as to why one login was banned thinks im a bellend, I don’t know how I’ll ever recover from this.

Posted
  On 15/11/2021 at 20:47, Turkish said:

Yea it’s painful to know that some weirdo with 100s of different logins to a football forum, that stalked saintsweb on Twitter to demand an explanation as to why one login was banned thinks im a bellend, I don’t know how I’ll ever recover from this.

Expand  

100's of log ins🤣 

Recovery will only be possible if you accept what you are pal, a self important forum bully.

I bet you were the loud mouth in the school playground, desperate to be the centre of attention. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
  On 28/11/2021 at 13:30, Billy the Kidd said:

And ‘the bloke’s’ also changed lots this season, compared to last season. 

  1. Tactics
  2. Formations
  3. Players as subs
  4. Timings of subs
  5. Harder to score against

I’m sure others can state more (calling @TWar), but one thing I cant really agree with is that Ralph hasn’t learned.

Still, perhaps we should be lucky you didnt post in deiner gewohnt aggressiven Weise.

Good for you.

 

Expand  

You and Twar should go and sit in a tree together.

You're both made for eachother.

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 28/11/2021 at 14:43, Turkish said:

Very arrogant. He’s been very arrogant for a while and I’ve been pointing it out as have others. Good people are realising “People like me” = people who know best, better than you lot. 

Expand  

Oh Jesus Christ, you have been very patient waiting for TWar to say something like this for you to pick up on 🤣

I dont agree with him over this issue of Ralph’s tactics, but I find his posts pretty useful to listen to, and am pleased he is a member of the forum.

On this occasion I think you and others are slightly talking this out of context, but that suits your agenda, doesn’t it…

Have a good Sunday, Turkish 👍🏾 

Posted
  On 28/11/2021 at 15:27, Billy the Kidd said:

Oh Jesus Christ, you have been very patient waiting for TWar to say something like this for you to pick up on 🤣

I dont agree with him over this issue of Ralph’s tactics, but I find his posts pretty useful to listen to, and am pleased he is a member of the forum.

On this occasion I think you and others are slightly talking this out of context, but that suits your agenda, doesn’t it…

Have a good Sunday, Turkish 👍🏾 

Expand  

Get your tongue out of his arsehole billy, only dogs do that, you’re not a dog are you Billy?

  • Haha 1
Posted
  On 28/11/2021 at 15:30, Turkish said:

Get your tongue out of his arsehole billy, only dogs do that, you’re not a dog are you Billy?

Expand  

A bit crass, wouldn’t you say, particularly in light of you ‘homophobic’ comment above.

Then again, you wouldn’t say that, as you can be a bit fik.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
  On 18/12/2021 at 16:26, aintforever said:

I was obviously talking about covid vaccines you dumb cunt. It’s a thread about Covid, why would I be talking about Polio?

Expand  

Aintclever starts name calling and abusing. Calling people thick, won’t be long before the :lol: comes out and a “it’s not rocket science” for an aintclever house. One of the dimmest people on here ironically telling others “it’s not hard to understand” 🤣🤣🤣

Edited by Turkish
  • Haha 1
Posted
  On 18/12/2021 at 18:39, Turkish said:

Aintclever starts name calling and abusing. Calling people thick, won’t be long before the :lol: comes out and a “it’s not rocket science” for an aintclever house. One of the dimmest people on here ironically telling others “it’s not hard to understand” 🤣🤣🤣

Expand  

Brilliant!  Except Weston started off with the name calling and he’s the one dribbling on about Polio which is completely irrelevant. :lol:

Posted
  On 18/12/2021 at 18:46, aintforever said:

Brilliant!  Except Weston started off with the name calling and he’s the one dribbling on about Polio which is completely irrelevant. :lol:

Expand  

There’s the laughing face, told you it wouldn’t be long 🤣🤣

Posted
  On 18/12/2021 at 19:02, aintforever said:

He says, using six emojis in two posts coming on to help out his fellow Gammon fuck-wit.

You two are like the dumb and dumber of SWF.

Expand  

Gammon, another aintcleverism when struggling

You’re like a cross between Baldrick and Neil from the young ones. 

Posted
  On 18/12/2021 at 18:59, AlexLaw76 said:

we should be at around 1m cases per day.  We were told on Mon gone that it will double every day/other day.

Yet, all Peston and co can do is ask why we are not being locked in our houses.

Expand  

3,000 fewer infections today than yesterday. Shouldn’t we be at 200k today?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...