Donald Trump Appreciation Thread

[whelk]

Question for SOG. Hopkins, Tate and Robinson in same room. You have a gun with only two bullets in the chamber, who lives?

actually same question for Trump, Putin and Musk?

 

[sadoldgit]

8 minutes ago, Turkish said:

We know all about Tate thank you. he’s a fucking prick, but so are you and saying things like Trump has a soft spot for sex offenders based on a speculative article about Tate flying to the US is weird obsessive behaviour. You really don’t get it do you you think the voice of reason enlightening us all but you come across as weird, bitter, obsessed old man with a chip on your shoulder the size of Romney Marsh

Amusing to see your trying to pass off yet another Guardian opinion piece as fact though 😂

If you are choosing someone to tell you what to think maybe James O’Brien is a better choice than Andrew Tate 😉. Interesting that you get so worked up and feel the need to go into bat for a “fucking prick”. There were two other pieces referenced in my post, not just The Guardian

You give yourself away so often it is embarrassing.

[egg]

1 minute ago, whelk said:

Question for SOG. Hopkins, Tate and Robinson in same room. You have a gun with only two bullets in the chamber, who lives?

actually same question for Trump, Putin and Musk?

 

Can one stand behind the other and catch the bullet on the way through? 

[sadoldgit]

15 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

Who is this Andrew Tate fella? You seem to be a bit of an authority on the subject. I'll add him to the list alongside Hopkins and Robinson. 

He appeals to incels and misogynists. Given your previous support for Hopkins and Robinson on here I would say he is right up your street.

[sadoldgit]

14 minutes ago, Turkish said:

He certainly seems obsessed with him, like a lot of people he claims to be against 

Yet you are the person who started a thread about him. 😂

Given yourself away again. I feel embarrassed for you.

[Turkish]

13 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

Who is this Andrew Tate fella? You seem to be a bit of an authority on the subject. I'll add him to the list alongside Hopkins and Robinson. 

He’s a former MMA fighter I believe how has become a bit of an online celebrity by making some controversial statements on social media and has been accused of sex offences and money laundering. He’s not really on anyone’s radar apart from SOGs it seems with most normal people thinking he’s a complete knob head. However SOGs seems to think him flying to the US where he holds dual nationality is some sort of evidence of Trump supporting sex offenders and anyone who questions him is an Andrew Tate supporter. Meanwhile he seems to have forgets that when someone was actually convicted of having child pornography he described it as “hardly the crime for the century” ignoring his own track record of supporting sex offenders himself. As the saying goes when you point the finger 3 point back at yourself

[Turkish]

4 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

Yet you are the person who started a thread about him. 😂

Given yourself away again. I feel embarrassed for you.

Jesus christ. You really are incredibly thick. Please don’t tell me you thought my thread about him was anything other than a piss take? 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

he

Here I am leading the campaign for the bruv party

 

you really are so fucking thick it’s beyond belief 

Edited Thursday at 10:59 by Turkish

[Turkish]

9 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

If you are choosing someone to tell you what to think maybe James O’Brien is a better choice than Andrew Tate 😉. Interesting that you get so worked up and feel the need to go into bat for a “fucking prick”. There were two other pieces referenced in my post, not just The Guardian

You give yourself away so often it is embarrassing.

The guy who defends a sex offender as having not committed “the crime of century” accuses others of having a soft spot for sex offenders. You can’t make this up fucking hilarious 😂😂😂😂😂

[Turkish]

16 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

If you are choosing someone to tell you what to think maybe James O’Brien is a better choice than Andrew Tate 😉. Interesting that you get so worked up and feel the need to go into bat for a “fucking prick”. There were two other pieces referenced in my post, not just The Guardian

You give yourself away so often it is embarrassing.

I’ve not gone into bat for anyone I don’t defend sex offenders and domestic abusers unlike some on here

[hypochondriac]

11 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

He appeals to incels and misogynists. Given your previous support for Hopkins and Robinson on here I would say he is right up your street.

Yet you seem to be the one who knows all about him and what he's about. Curious. 

[hypochondriac]

10 minutes ago, Turkish said:

He’s a former MMA fighter I believe how has become a bit of an online celebrity by making some controversial statements on social media and has been accused of sex offences and money laundering. He’s not really on anyone’s radar apart from SOGs it seems with most normal people thinking he’s a complete knob head. However SOGs seems to think him flying to the US where he holds dual nationality is some sort of evidence of Trump supporting sex offenders and anyone who questions him is an Andrew Tate supporter. Meanwhile he seems to have forgets that when someone was actually convicted of having child pornography he described it as “hardly the crime for the century” ignoring his own track record of supporting sex offenders himself. As the saying goes when you point the finger 3 point back at yourself

Sounds like a terrible person but hardly the worst crimes in the world. 

[sadoldgit]

Talking of Tate, here’s another person who thinks he has something to say. Coincidently he is also another Trump brown noser.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/jun/20/nigel-farage-andrew-tate-important-voice-men-podcast-interview

Edited Thursday at 11:52 by sadoldgit

[Turkish]

Reform leader Farage says Tate has “gone too far” in his fight for masculinity 

 

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/nigel-farage-calls-misogynist-andrew-tate-an-important-voice-for-men/ar-BB1oDBBC

the other way to spin the comments which again SOG ignores 

[LuckyNumber7]

2 hours ago, sadoldgit said:

No surprise to see who supports Andrew Tate.

For those who don’t know what Tate is all about.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/nov/03/when-andrew-tate-and-the-online-manboys-obsess-over-a-bodycount-girls-you-know-what-to-do

 

Lol at the angry bitter feminist, trying to take the moral high ground by encouraging women to sleep around. 🤣

[whelk]

Sorry state of saturation news coverage that someone like Tate is even a discussion point. Polarise and report views on him as news is depressing. Although to be clear he is a colossal cunt, and weird looking bald cunt at that. 

Edited Thursday at 12:26 by whelk

[Weston Super Saint]

4 hours ago, whelk said:

Question for SOG. Hopkins, Tate and Robinson in same room. You have a gun with only two bullets in the chamber, who lives?

actually same question for Trump, Putin and Musk?

 

Can I just use one and end it all - then I don't have to talk to any of them...

[Farmer Saint]

4 hours ago, whelk said:

Question for SOG. Hopkins, Tate and Robinson in same room. You have a gun with only two bullets in the chamber, who lives?

actually same question for Trump, Putin and Musk?

 

If I'm in a room with that lot I'm probably shooting myself twice.

[Farmer Saint]

4 hours ago, hypochondriac said:

Sounds like a terrible person but hardly the worst crimes in the world. 

He is an utter embarrassment to the human race tbh. I'm not sticking up for SOG here but he is incredibly dangerous insomuch that a lot of young, impressionable males are inspired by his offences and misogyny.

[badgerx16]

4 hours ago, whelk said:

Question for SOG. Hopkins, Tate and Robinson in same room. You have a gun with only two bullets in the chamber, who lives?

 

Shoot Tate and Yaxley-Lennon, then follow Tate's advice with Hopkins and slap the bitch down.

Edited Thursday at 15:27 by badgerx16

[hypochondriac]

32 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said:

He is an utter embarrassment to the human race tbh. I'm not sticking up for SOG here but he is incredibly dangerous insomuch that a lot of young, impressionable males are inspired by his offences and misogyny.

I think you missed the sarcasm... 

[Farmer Saint]

14 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

I think you missed the sarcasm... 

True, I did.

[Holmes_and_Watson]

7 hours ago, whelk said:

Question for SOG. Hopkins, Tate and Robinson in same room. You have a gun with only two bullets in the chamber, who lives?

actually same question for Trump, Putin and Musk?

 

I read that as Question: SOG. Hopkins, Tate and Robinson in same room. You have a gun with only two bullets in the chamber, who lives?

I thought that the mods wouldn't look too kindly on some of the responses. 🙂

[Gloucester Saint]

6 hours ago, whelk said:

Sorry state of saturation news coverage that someone like Tate is even a discussion point. Polarise and report views on him as news is depressing. Although to be clear he is a colossal cunt, and weird looking bald cunt at that. 

Quite, and now they are America’s problem. Their cost and headache, let them stay there. All of the women that voted for Trump, you won’t be gaining any of the extra dollars in the household budget that you thought you were getting but you’ve gained a couple of violent ex-British sex offenders instead. Tough luck. 

Edited Thursday at 19:06 by Gloucester Saint

[badgerx16]

Asked by the BBC's Chris Mason about his calling Volodymyr Zelensky a "dictator", Trump replied: "Did I say that? I can't believe I would say that"

 

And people claimed Biden was 'forgetful';

Edited Thursday at 19:06 by badgerx16

[badgerx16]

Former Defence Secretary Ben Wallace, talking on CNN, has said that Trump's proposed minerals deal with Ukraine is 'pure extortion'.

Edited Thursday at 19:26 by badgerx16

[egg]

11 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

Dormer Defence Secretary Ben Wallace, talking on CNN, has said that Trump's proposed minerals deal with Ukraine is 'pure extortion'.

He's not wrong. Ukraine repaying aid monies following Russia's invasion is simply wrong. To be paying significantly more than that, and ongoing in perpetuity, is beyond scandalous. I'm not even sure what they're buying if the US aren't giving them security guarantees. It ts a shameful carry on. 

[hypochondriac]

2 hours ago, egg said:

He's not wrong. Ukraine repaying aid monies following Russia's invasion is simply wrong. To be paying significantly more than that, and ongoing in perpetuity, is beyond scandalous. I'm not even sure what they're buying if the US aren't giving them security guarantees. It ts a shameful carry on. 

If it goes some way to stopping the war on reasonable terms and doesn't mean Ukraine have to capitulate entirely the whilst it's unedifying to treat your supposed friends like that, I'd probably take it over the war continuing. Lots of unknowns though and it depends what Russia would agree to. 

[east-stand-nic]

20 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

Prat

Awww, cute. Caught out again and you just cant deal with it can ya.

[badgerx16]

1 hour ago, east-stand-nic said:

Awww, cute. Caught out again and you just cant deal with it can ya.

In what way was I "caught out" ? I listed some connections between Tate and Trump that might explain why Donnie would put pressure on Romania to release the Tates from house arrest and you bring up some random bullshit false equivalence whereby Tony Blair is a sex offender because he knew Jimmy Saville. What colour is the sky in your fantasy world ?

 

I repeat my assertion, you are a prat.

 

 

[sadoldgit]

It looks like the European leaders have all been working together to find a way to deal with Trump. Treat him as the petulant child he is. Offer him treats. Flatter him. Gently correct his misspeaks (lies). It would be quite funny if it weren’t so serious and there wasn’t so much at stake. 
I don’t often feel sorry for the Monarchy but I do feel for Charles in having to deal with another visit from Trump. The things one has to do for one’s country!

[badgerx16]

11 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

I don’t often feel sorry for the Monarchy but I do feel for Charles in having to deal with another visit from Trump. The things one has to do for one’s country!

An opportunity for Chuck to earn his corn. He has such a hard life, what with having to decide which castle to live in, and all those State banquets to have to sit through.

Maybe he will give Donnie, the self-styled "King", a few pointers, and when Trump goes back across the pond with his inflated ego there can be another revolution.

Edited Friday at 09:04 by badgerx16

[sadoldgit]

22 hours ago, whelk said:

Question for SOG. Hopkins, Tate and Robinson in same room. You have a gun with only two bullets in the chamber, who lives?

actually same question for Trump, Putin and Musk?

 

An interesting question Whelk and while they are all scumbags and the world would be a better place without them, I would have to decline your offer of the gun. If they didn’t exist there would be others like them to take their places. The problem we have is not these individuals, it is the people who support, enable them and give them the platform. As long as people vote for them in great numbers or give them any kind of credence we are stuffed. There would be no need for bullets if these people were treated as they should be and completely ignored. Sadly they manage to appeal to enough people to find themselves in a position of power and influence. Until we develop societies where these people’s actions and views are not acceptable to the vast majority we will continue to have to contend with the likes of Trump, Putin, Musk and the underlings like Tate, Robinson and Hopkins who do the groundwork for them.
 

[sadoldgit]

The Woke King greets the Anti Woke King. Poor old Charlie will have to practice gritting the royal gnashers. Still, a small price to pay to inflate Trump’s ego enough to keep him onside for a few years more.

[AlexLaw76]

10 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

The Woke King greets the Anti Woke King. Poor old Charlie will have to practice gritting the royal gnashers. Still, a small price to pay to inflate Trump’s ego enough to keep him onside for a few years more.

You are funny

[east-stand-nic]

1 hour ago, badgerx16 said:

In what way was I "caught out" ? I listed some connections between Tate and Trump that might explain why Donnie would put pressure on Romania to release the Tates from house arrest and you bring up some random bullshit false equivalence whereby Tony Blair is a sex offender because he knew Jimmy Saville. What colour is the sky in your fantasy world ?

 

I repeat my assertion, you are a prat.

 

 

So, Blair did not know Savil? Ah I see.

You are the prat and you hate being shown as one.

[sadoldgit]

21 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

You are funny

I know, look how many laughing emojis I get.

[badgerx16]

3 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said:

So, Blair did not know Savil? Ah I see.

You are the prat and you hate being shown as one.

Whether Blair knew Saville or not is completely irrelevant to my making connections between Trump and Tate. I have no idea as to the point you think you are making. Was Margaret Thatcher a sex offender ? She certainly knew Saville.

That tin foil hat has fried what little sense you may once have possessed.

Edited Friday at 10:04 by badgerx16

[sadoldgit]

I know nutty Nic doesn’t deal in fact, but he ought to take a look at this.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-23355531.amp

Typically for a conspiracy theorist, he takes something, makes it in to something it isn’t and ignores something else that blows his original theory out of the water.

Edited Friday at 11:38 by sadoldgit

[benjii]

On 27/02/2025 at 14:54, Turkish said:

He’s a former MMA fighter I believe how has become a bit of an online celebrity by making some controversial statements on social media and has been accused of sex offences and money laundering. He’s not really on anyone’s radar apart from SOGs it seems with most normal people thinking he’s a complete knob head. However SOGs seems to think him flying to the US where he holds dual nationality is some sort of evidence of Trump supporting sex offenders and anyone who questions him is an Andrew Tate supporter. Meanwhile he seems to have forgets that when someone was actually convicted of having child pornography he described it as “hardly the crime for the century” ignoring his own track record of supporting sex offenders himself. As the saying goes when you point the finger 3 point back at yourself

Trump lobbied to get him out of prison in Romania. Don't you think that's a bit weird? 

[sadoldgit]

5 minutes ago, benjii said:

Trump lobbied to get him out of prison in Romania. Don't you think that's a bit weird? 

He is on an awful lot of radars, you only have to google his name to see how much media attention he has had. He appeals to a lot of people whose support Trump wants.

He was the third most googled person in 2023 according to Wiki and has 10 million followers on Twitter. Hardly not on anyone’s radars.

Edited Friday at 11:35 by sadoldgit

[benjii]

18 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

He is on an awful lot of radars, you only have to google his name to see how much media attention he has had. He appeals to a lot of people whose support Trump wants.

He was the third most googled person in 2023 according to Wiki and has 10 million followers on Twitter. Hardly not on anyone’s radars.

Indeed. But Turkish has a tedious personal vendetta to maintain.

[sadoldgit]

14 minutes ago, benjii said:

Indeed. But Turkish has a tedious personal vendetta to maintain.

Very true.

Trump won’t want to give up power in 4 years time and is clearly putting things in place for an attempt to overturn the constitution and get a third term in office. The Tate bros are just more people he will use in his cunning plan and it is reasonable to assume that Trump will make sure that they never see the inside of a court room.

[hypochondriac]

3 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

An opportunity for Chuck to earn his corn. He has such a hard life, what with having to decide which castle to live in, and all those State banquets to have to sit through.

Maybe he will give Donnie, the self-styled "King", a few pointers, and when Trump goes back across the pond with his inflated ego there can be another revolution.

His life is fucking awful. Can never retire, in a fishbowl and no anonymity or ability to make choices for himself for the most part. 

[badgerx16]

5 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

His life is fucking awful. Can never retire, in a fishbowl and no anonymity or ability to make choices for himself for the most part. 

He can retire, by abdicating in favour of William. He isn't "in a fishbowl", 90% of his life is private, and as for making choices - he chose to shag Camilla whilst married to Diana.

[hypochondriac]

1 minute ago, badgerx16 said:

He can retire, by abdicating in favour of William. He isn't "in a fishbowl", 90% of his life is private, and as for making choices - he chose to shag Camilla whilst married to Diana.

Would you want to swap lives? Because I certainly wouldn't.

[badgerx16]

19 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

Would you want to swap lives? Because I certainly wouldn't.

No, but I don't believe in an hereditary monarchy.

[hypochondriac]

Just now, badgerx16 said:

No, but I don't believe in an hereditary monarchy.

Why wouldn't you want to swap lives with him?

[rallyboy]

3 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

Why wouldn't you want to swap lives with him?

The ears - and the sleeping arrangements.

[sadoldgit]

20 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

He can retire, by abdicating in favour of William. He isn't "in a fishbowl", 90% of his life is private, and as for making choices - he chose to shag Camilla whilst married to Diana.

That last choice was a bit strange! Still, each to their own. The thing is the Roayals don’t know any different. Charles doesn’t know anything else. He has been groomed for this role all of his life. Put him in a council house (if you could find one), tell him to get a job and fend for himself and he wouldn’t have a clue what to do. He probably looks at us and thinks that we have “fucking awful lives”.

[sadoldgit]

2 minutes ago, rallyboy said:

The ears - and the sleeping arrangements.

I would quite like to own Cornwall, but that would be a hard trade.