Jump to content

Summer 2018 Transfer/HCDAJFU Thread

SuperSAINT

By SuperSAINT
in The Saints

 Share

Recommended Posts

Matthew Le God

Matthew Le God

Posted
Posted (edited)
Hmmmm..we won't pay Maddison more than Leicester will, yet we are going to pay Wiltshire the 130k a week Arsenal won't pay him and that others will? Not a hope in hell... (Even If we were going to spend that sort of money on wages I can think of 100 players who would be better value than Wiltshire!)

 

Wilshere on £130k a week and no transfer fee works (due to end of contract) works out to be significantly cheaper than Maddison on £70k per week and a £25m transfer fee.

 

 

wiltshire-overview-300.pngskysports-jack-wilshere-exclusive-interview_4203053.jpg?20180111123940

 

But this would probably happen a lot...

 

article-2488130-19541E21000005DC-144_634x388.jpg

Edited by Matthew Le God
Avenue_Saint

Avenue_Saint

Posted
Posted
I'd take Wilshere. Gamble, but not a bad one.

 

Would take Wilshere on a free. No questioning his quality. Injury record suspect, but they say he got 38 games out last season.

 

Better than 10 Ward Prowses

angelman

angelman

Posted
Posted
Go for Bobby Reid - cheaper than Maddison and quality player

 

Possibly. I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest if he was playing PL next season. Contract expires 30/6/18.

Charlie Wayman

Charlie Wayman

Posted
Posted

I think our medical team are rooting for all these sick-note players to come in so that their jobs will be safe.

 

Sad that we are only ever linked to has been journeymen especially as we have a shed load of those on the books already.

Pilchards

Pilchards

Posted
Posted

We want Austin to stay but not Wilshere to sign who probably played 3 times more than our Charlie.

If he makes our team click going forward then bring him in I say.

doddisalegend

doddisalegend

Posted
Posted (edited)

To be honest I'd get rid of Austin to. I like Austin bit of a lad can't argue with his goals to game ratio but good players who don't play enough through Injury are no good to a club our size. That's why the likes of Wilshere, talented though he might be, is a no for me constantly injured talent isn't going to help us.

Edited by doddisalegend
SuperSAINT

SuperSAINT

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I'd take Wilshere on a free, quality player, England were crying out for a Wilshere type player in the second half last night.

 

I'd rather we sign Loftus-Cheek.

Dusic

Dusic

Posted
Posted
I'd rather we sign Loftus-Cheek.
I would love that but think after this WC he wille be in the £35m+ bracket which rules us out. We need to get these sorts of players before their breakout moments.

 

Re Wilshere: are we are good enough team to miss the chance of signing Jack Wilshere on a free transfer if he was interested?

 

Ideal Steven Davis replacement in many ways.

SuperSAINT

SuperSAINT

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I would love that but think after this WC he wille be in the £35m+ bracket which rules us out. We need to get these sorts of players before their breakout moments.

 

Re Wilshere: are we are good enough team to miss the chance of signing Jack Wilshere on a free transfer if he was interested?

 

Ideal Steven Davis replacement in many ways.

 

Agreed. I kept banging on about Loftus-Cheek & Chalobah last summer.

 

Chelsea are always a good club to look at for signings as they have so much talent stock-piled.

the saint in winchester

the saint in winchester

Posted
Posted (edited)
Agreed. I kept banging on about Loftus-Cheek & Chalobah last summer.

 

Chelsea are always a good club to look at for signings as they have so much talent stock-piled.

 

Agree, and not sure Wilshere is a good option for us/anyone. High wages which have to be paid all the time for someone only available half the time. He didn't impress at Bournemouth really. Anyway, he will have suitors of higher rank than us.

Edited by the saint in winchester
Micky

Micky

Posted
Posted
Agree, and not sure Wilshere is a good option for us/anyone. High wages which have to be paid for someone only available half the time. He didn't impress at Bournemouth really. Anyway, he will have suitors of higher rank than us.

 

Agree he may well do, but will he actually play. Does he want to play or does he just want the pay. If he does manage to get to one of the bigger teams could well end up like Ross Barkley, up and coming England midfielder who errrr doesn't actually play football anymore. At the wages that people have mentioned on here (if true) I wouldn't want him, the knock on effect could have a major detrimental effect on a club like ours.

S-Clarke

S-Clarke

Posted
Posted

 

If it's the same player I've read about, isn't he the next big hope in Belgium football? Could be good from what I've read.

 

Also, didn't we setup some sort of relationship with Club Bruuge when Jordy went there on loan? hence why this deal could be a real possibility for us??

shurlock

shurlock

Posted
Posted
If it's the same player I've read about, isn't he the next big hope in Belgium football? Could be good from what I've read.

 

Also, didn't we setup some sort of relationship with Club Bruuge when Jordy went there on loan? hence why this deal could be a real possibility for us??

 

Arent Newcastle interested? I doubt we'd beat them in any competition for his signature.

Matthew Le God

Matthew Le God

Posted
Posted (edited)
Arent Newcastle interested? I doubt we'd beat them in any competition for his signature.

 

Why? Under Mike Ashley they are hardly big spenders. Their record transfer is still below ours and their wage budget is likely to be as well.

Edited by Matthew Le God
Batman

Batman

Posted
Posted
Arent Newcastle interested? I doubt we'd beat them in any competition for his signature.

 

its bournemouth, brighton and huddersfield we need to be wary of these days

Batman

Batman

Posted
Posted
Heady company. I guess Wolves have easily leapfrogged us.

 

seems that way. Ralph made a point in reminding us of the small club we are.

ALWAYS_SFC

ALWAYS_SFC

Posted
Posted
Why? I don't see what they have which we don't.

 

Just think if exactly the same money is on the table, they are seen as a bigger draw.

 

They run a better B & B than we do obviously

Lighthouse

Lighthouse

Posted
Posted
Just think if exactly the same money is on the table, they are seen as a bigger draw.

 

The only thing they've got which trumps us is larger crowds, which players rarely seem to care about. On the flip side we're much closer to London, which has much better flight connections to Belgium and seems to be a factor in a few transfers.

SuperSAINT

SuperSAINT

Posted
  • Author
Posted

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-transfer-news/transfer-news-live-rangers-celtic-12740277

 

Southampton are reportedly ready to firm up their interest in Stuart Armstrong.

 

Record Sport revealed last week Celtic won’t stand in the midfielder’s way with just a year left on his current deal.

 

Player and club were locked in a six-month stand-off last summer before Armstrong eventually penned a two-year deal.

 

But 12 months later Celtic once again face losing the 26-year-old for free next summer and the Daily Star report Saints are set to swoop in with a bid.

 

The south coast club missed out on former Aberdeen loan star James Maddison as he prepares to join Leicester and boss Mark Hughes could now turn his attention to the Scotland star.

 

He could cost the Premier League side around £6million.

benjii

benjii

Posted
Posted
According to this Fulham are in the hunt for a new left back as we want to keep Targett...

 

http://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2018/06/19/do-report-fulham-target-ludwig-augustinsson-as-southampton-make/

 

I was wondering the other day, if Hughes wants to stick with three at the back, whether we will treat Bertrand as a CB and allow Targett and McQueen to compete for LWB. Also allows us to save money on a CB.

 

Although I think we are trying to sign a CB, so probably not.

SuperSAINT

SuperSAINT

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Actually, I've heard from two unconnected places, one agents and one broadcasting, that it's done regarding Gibson.

 

Hope so, sort of signing we really need.

 

Yeah. Hasn't been much news about anyone else being in for him. I think we'll be due a Telegraph update article once Maddison is confirmed at Leicester.

 

(Hopefully a realistic article).

Batman

Batman

Posted
Posted
Actually, I've heard from two unconnected places, one agents and one broadcasting, that it's done regarding Gibson.

 

Hope so, sort of signing we really need.

 

Good news.

Roo1976

Roo1976

Posted
Posted
If it's the same player I've read about, isn't he the next big hope in Belgium football? Could be good from what I've read.

 

Also, didn't we setup some sort of relationship with Club Bruuge when Jordy went there on loan? hence why this deal could be a real possibility for us??

 

The problem with the next big signing is obvious........2 seasons ond off find another,right? its about time to make contracts bind and penalise for early release.

View From The Top

View From The Top

Posted
Posted
Good sources?

 

One is where I get most of my stuff from. The 2nd is from a Saints fan who is in broadcasting who confirmed it.

 

We all know though, nothing is done until it's announced but I've no reason to doubt what they've passed on is in good faith.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...