Jump to content

Arturo Lupoli

Master Bates

By Master Bates
in The Saints

 Share

Recommended Posts

hypochondriac

hypochondriac

Posted
Posted
IMHO this is clearly wrong, or premature at best. If he had signed at the time of this post it would have been announced by both, or at least one of the clubs by now.

 

He may have been approached, or in talks but can't see how he could have been signed but everyone is keeping it a secret!

 

Players have signed before and there has been a delay in announcing it. All I'm saying is I for one believe that MB posted this info in good faith. It may well be that there has been a complication, who knows.

Master Bates

Master Bates

Posted
  • Author
Posted

There was meant to be a press conference today that is now not taking place so I thought it would have been today, i'm hoping they will do the ''RUDI SKACEL-ism'' And announce it before kick off.

 

Todays Echo in the column "Soccer News" has Saints denying it, although no quotes from anyone.

Ivan Katalinic's 'tache

Ivan Katalinic's 'tache

Posted
Posted

Thinking logically, if there's no news today, I guess we'll have to wait and see whether he's part of the Norwich squad for their game against Barnsley. If there is something in the offing, then I'm sure neither us nor Fiorentina will want him to play for them and risk the chance of an injury, which could scupper the deal.

Chez

Chez

Posted
Posted
Poortaloo wont play him v Donny anyway, he'll stick with Saga and McGoaldrought.:smt078

 

don't you mean Saganothingonthescoresheetyet and David 2 in 3 McGoldrick?

Master Bates

Master Bates

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Thinking logically' date=' if there's no news today, I guess we'll have to wait and see whether he's part of the Norwich squad for their game against Barnsley. If there is something in the offing, then I'm sure neither us nor Fiorentina will want him to play for them and risk the chance of an injury, which could scupper the deal.[/quote']

 

Look at the "One to watch"

 

http://www.rivals.net/news/pgarticle.aspx?artid=13526_4801991&id=5

 

I think that (Saga and Seijs) are exactly who he is talking about, as apposed to new people training with us before we decide to sign them. I might be wrong though.

 

Don't think you're wrong.

Master Bates

Master Bates

Posted
  • Author
Posted
so are you saying it won't happen then/ becaus that ivals article seems to suggest that he will be playing.

 

Nah, I was just pointing out who they were looking out for.

 

I have been trying to find out team line ups for the game but the new caretaker manager is keeping his cards close to his chest.

Windmill Arm 2

Windmill Arm 2

Posted
Posted
Mcgoaldrik two in two games, Saga back in the fold, you haven't a fvcking clue, as always windbag totally clueless.

 

And as if by magic a baiter appeared. You cant wait to jump up and scoff at my posts can you warwick. You are a sad individual. So David McGoaldrought is suddenly a prolific goalscorer is he? will it be his goals that keep us up? I rather doubt he is starting a rich vein of form. So he's scored two in two games, WHOOPEE its fukking January and we are in the bottom 3, his sharpness in front of goal has been mesmerising hasnt it :rolleyes::rolleyes:, but lowe luvvies like yourself continue the mindless delusion.

I have no problem with Saga, he will boost us but McGoaldrought is NOT the answer, and this is plain to see. Warwick quit the baiting and find a hobby, or show the wife and kids a little more of your time, there is more to life than Saintsweb, you sad sad loser.

JohnnyFartPants

JohnnyFartPants

Posted
Posted
Saga has played one game you fukkin spaz. Mcgoaldrought has been everpresent, and isn't he sharp...................:rolleyes:

 

A game he was also subbed in because we were winning and needed to defend, so he hasn't even had a full game yet. I echo your thoughts that he may be a spaz.

stevegrant

stevegrant

Posted
Posted
I have no problem with Saga, he will boost us but McGoaldrought is NOT the answer, and this is plain to see.

On what basis? While he's clearly not the best striker in the Championship, he's still our top scorer by some distance, which isn't a complete disgrace given that he's either been playing as a lone frontman with bugger all support or as a wide midfielder giving no support to a different lone frontman for the vast majority of the season. 9 goals in 30 starts isn't a hideous record by any stretch of the imagination in a team that's only scored 29 goals in all competitions this season.

 

Warwick quit the baiting and find a hobby, or show the wife and kids a little more of your time, there is more to life than Saintsweb, you sad sad loser.

He says with his 4021st post on Saintsweb without a hint of irony...

ART

ART

Posted
Posted
There was meant to be a press conference today that is now not taking place so I thought it would have been today, i'm hoping they will do the ''RUDI SKACEL-ism'' And announce it before kick off.

 

Todays Echo in the column "Soccer News" has Saints denying it, although no quotes from anyone.

 

I so wish you'd give up bumping guys during your lunchtime break. I've not forgotten previous encounters and the lack of end product.

Pancake

Pancake

Posted
Posted
And as if by magic a baiter appeared. You cant wait to jump up and scoff at my posts can you warwick. You are a sad individual. So David McGoaldrought is suddenly a prolific goalscorer is he? will it be his goals that keep us up? I rather doubt he is starting a rich vein of form. So he's scored two in two games, WHOOPEE its fukking January and we are in the bottom 3, his sharpness in front of goal has been mesmerising hasnt it :rolleyes::rolleyes:, but lowe luvvies like yourself continue the mindless delusion.

I have no problem with Saga, he will boost us but McGoaldrought is NOT the answer, and this is plain to see. Warwick quit the baiting and find a hobby, or show the wife and kids a little more of your time, there is more to life than Saintsweb, you sad sad loser.

 

TBF Windmill, it does look like you are the one "baiting" here. Many other posters have pointed out the same as Warwick, the with 2 in 2 McG is our "in form" striker and it would be odd at least to drop him.

 

Anyway, whatever your views, lets try and leave out the personal insults please, yeah?

saintjay77

saintjay77

Posted
Posted
And as if by magic a baiter appeared. You cant wait to jump up and scoff at my posts can you warwick. You are a sad individual. So David McGoaldrought is suddenly a prolific goalscorer is he? will it be his goals that keep us up? I rather doubt he is starting a rich vein of form. So he's scored two in two games, WHOOPEE its fukking January and we are in the bottom 3, his sharpness in front of goal has been mesmerising hasnt it :rolleyes::rolleyes:, but lowe luvvies like yourself continue the mindless delusion.

I have no problem with Saga, he will boost us but McGoaldrought is NOT the answer, and this is plain to see. Warwick quit the baiting and find a hobby, or show the wife and kids a little more of your time, there is more to life than Saintsweb, you sad sad loser.

 

TBF as much as McGoldrick has been usless with the amount of chances that have been presented to him he is also our top scorer. Saga hasnt been prolific in front of goal since we signed him on a perminent contract but many believe he is our answer????

 

So out of all our strikers it seems reasonable to play the only one that has actually been scoring ahead of the ones that havent.

 

Personally due to his attitude in many games he would have watched many more games from the stands had I been in charge while Euell would have had a chance up front but im not in charge and we will continue to struggle until a better alternative comes along.

 

Dont see the point in waricks rant though when a simple opinion would have done the trick.

Toomer

Toomer

Posted
Posted

Give DM a couple more years and he might just become the goal every other game striker we need, but not his fault though, he is way out of his depth a the moment.

Master Bates

Master Bates

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I so wish you'd give up bumping guys during your lunchtime break. I've not forgotten previous encounters and the lack of end product.

 

It's ok, I was at work ALLLLLLLLLLLL day yesterday, up until 5:30pm.

 

And as ever, if nothing materialises I will happily take the flak :)

JohnnyFartPants

JohnnyFartPants

Posted
Posted
And as if by magic a baiter appeared. You cant wait to jump up and scoff at my posts can you warwick. You are a sad individual. So David McGoaldrought is suddenly a prolific goalscorer is he? will it be his goals that keep us up? I rather doubt he is starting a rich vein of form. So he's scored two in two games, WHOOPEE its fukking January and we are in the bottom 3, his sharpness in front of goal has been mesmerising hasnt it :rolleyes::rolleyes:, but lowe luvvies like yourself continue the mindless delusion.

I have no problem with Saga, he will boost us but McGoaldrought is NOT the answer, and this is plain to see. Warwick quit the baiting and find a hobby, or show the wife and kids a little more of your time, there is more to life than Saintsweb, you sad sad loser.

 

Just so I can make sense of this, if you think a striker that appears to be coming in to form and is scoring goals should be given a continued opportunity to carry on scoring, then you are a "Lowe Luvvie"? Brilliant!! You have no problem with Saga, eh? So what! Since when has the world stopped turning to consider your opinion you jumped up self appointed font of knowledge. Go and bang your sister you bellend.

DT

DT

Posted
Posted
Would Norwich want it going through in time to face them? Doubt it.

They could always simply include a clause in the deal preventing him from facing his previous employers. Or 'claws' if you got my previous analogy.

NickG

NickG

Posted
Posted
Has signed for Saints, announcement to follow at some point.

 

There was meant to be a press conference today that is now not taking place so I thought it would have been today, i'm hoping they will do the ''RUDI SKACEL-ism'' And announce it before kick off.

 

Todays Echo in the column "Soccer News" has Saints denying it, although no quotes from anyone.

 

Players have signed before and there has been a delay in announcing it. All I'm saying is I for one believe that MB posted this info in good faith. It may well be that there has been a complication, who knows.

 

if, as masterbates said, he was signed yesterday, why would it not have been announced by now -if true? Sure there is something in it but doesn't look like first post was right

krissyboy31

krissyboy31

Posted
Posted
if, as masterbates said, he was signed yesterday, why would it not have been announced by now -if true? Sure there is something in it but doesn't look like first post was right

 

International clearance! ;)

stevegrant

stevegrant

Posted
Posted
They could always simply include a clause in the deal preventing him from facing his previous employers. Or 'claws' if you got my previous analogy.

That would be against FA/Football League rules, as you would effectively be allowing third-party control over the player's appearances. It's a bit different when the player is on loan and therefore cannot play against their parent club, because by him playing in that game, there's a clear conflict of interests. On this occasion, there would be no such conflict as he's owned by Fiorentina, not Norwich.

Big Bad Bob

Big Bad Bob

Posted
Posted
:lol:

 

tbf, I thought this was gonna be him

 

http://saintsfc.co.uk/team/?page_id=6587&player_id=195

 

So who is that then?

 

Dunno, but if Saejis was player ID 194 then I'm guessing MB thought he was clever incrementing it by 1 to see what would happen.

 

However the site developers seems to have coded for this eventuality and return a default profile.

 

So by MB reckoning http://saintsfc.co.uk/team/?page_id=6587&player_id=99999999 means we are going to sign another 99,999,804 players :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

 

Does Barclay's know??

Master Bates

Master Bates

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Dunno, but if Saejis was player ID 194 then I'm guessing MB thought he was clever incrementing it by 1 to see what would happen.

 

However the site developers seems to have coded for this eventuality and return a default profile.

 

So by MB reckoning http://saintsfc.co.uk/team/?page_id=6587&player_id=99999999 means we are going to sign another 99,999,804 players :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

 

Does Barclay's know??

 

Not what I done but very clever.

DT

DT

Posted
Posted
That would be against FA/Football League rules, as you would effectively be allowing third-party control over the player's appearances. It's a bit different when the player is on loan and therefore cannot play against their parent club, because by him playing in that game, there's a clear conflict of interests. On this occasion, there would be no such conflict as he's owned by Fiorentina, not Norwich.

Good point well made. Cheers!

Master Bates

Master Bates

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
Lupoli deal will not be finalised until any players are sold.

newsdesk was speaking with the club and the idea is that players that are gaining interest from us will only be bought in if bids are made for our lads.

 

Dos Santos and Lupoli are on that list, it was confirmed, but there are 4 others on that list who may or may not be signed.

 

Ok so we (me & that source) were early, my bad.

 

At least i'm passing on what's being told. I await the flak, just don't be too harsh :)

Edited by Master Bates

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...