Jump to content

Saints v Chelsea Thread

Koolman

By Koolman
in The Saints

 Share

Recommended Posts

Saint_clark

Saint_clark

Posted
Posted
Nothing to do with giving away a cheap free kick on the edge of the box in the first place

 

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

 

Seeing as they refused to show a replay from the other angle I can't be sure but it looked a very soft freekick anyway. It's irrelevant - it was either a freekick or Hazard having a free shot from the edge of the box unmarked. Point is, Forster still took 4 or 5 clumsy steps to get from the centre of the goal to the right hand side, stumbling all the way, and unsurprisingly didn't get there in time.

OttawaSaint

OttawaSaint

Posted
Posted
We started well and then they upped the tempo and couldn't cope.

 

On the plus side, we do have history of coming back from losing positions at Stamford Bridge so all is not lost.

 

Being able to string a few passes together may help though...

 

We could do with Niemi, Killer, Marsden and Beattie right about now!

James

James

Posted
Posted
Nothing to do with giving away a cheap free kick on the edge of the box in the first place

 

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

 

Doesn’t excuse our incompetent lurch of a keeper. Cost us so many points over the last two seasons.

 

Going down this year, really does look it.

Dazza82

Dazza82

Posted
Posted

Gabbiadini turning in the wall not FF fault but let's blame the keeper cos it's easy too! Yoshida giving away stupid free kick aswell, suppose that was Forster fault aswell[emoji848]

 

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Manuel

Manuel

Posted
Posted
Sorry but i just dont see why Lemina is hailed as some sort of footballing god by some on here. Chelsea only team in it, we are lucky they don't have a striker on the pitch.

He has been very average today.

tobes8

tobes8

Posted
Posted

We are so not in this game.... we have absolutely nothing to offer offensively. Confidence looks shot. Stay with pellegrino we will go down, change we may still go down. Just a shambles all over.

NewYorkSaint

NewYorkSaint

Posted
Posted

Really too bad about the late goal. Was an impressive performance until then. Context. Their team cost 3x as much as ours, and pays 2x the wages. To see us holding our own for 46 mins was pretty satisfying.

 

We had a bad night mid-week, but I still think we have enough quality to be upper half of table by season's end. the confident one-touch football out of defense is beautiful to watch. We just need more creativity, ruthlessness final third.

saintsmike25

saintsmike25

Posted
Posted

Fans being annoyed because we're losing against a team we should lose against...

We could still get an equaliser, Chelsea have looked poor and we've lacked ambition. At least it is better than the turd served up on Wednesday. Redmond so frustrating, looks like one day he may resemble a decent player but so many decisions let him down.

 

I think we're far too scared against teams like this who don't have the same pace as Leicester, the key is always closing down Hazard/Willian and then Chelsea struggle. They're a much poorer side than in previous seasons and are shaky at the back.

stknowle

stknowle

Posted
Posted
Seeing as they refused to show a replay from the other angle I can't be sure but it looked a very soft freekick anyway. It's irrelevant - it was either a freekick or Hazard having a free shot from the edge of the box unmarked. Point is, Forster still took 4 or 5 clumsy steps to get from the centre of the goal to the right hand side, stumbling all the way, and unsurprisingly didn't get there in time.

 

It was definitely a free kick. Forster is definitely a ****ing liability.

5string

5string

Posted
Posted
Chelsea deserved to be in the lead don't they as they are the better team

 

Whats wrong with that

 

Quite a lot wrong with that. We're Saints fans and our team is losing 0-1.

 

We've been the 'better team' against several other teams this season (eg. Burnley, Huddersfield, Brighton) but failed to win.

 

Nothing to do with 'deserved'. We are playing badly, however, so it's not surprising.

Pamplemousse

Pamplemousse

Posted
Posted
Really too bad about the late goal. Was an impressive performance until then. Context. Their team cost 3x as much as ours, and pays 2x the wages. To see us holding our own for 46 mins was pretty satisfying.

 

We had a bad night mid-week, but I still think we have enough quality to be upper half of table by season's end. the confident one-touch football out of defense is beautiful to watch. We just need more creativity, ruthlessness final third.

 

Watching Redmond give it away three times on the edge of his own penalty is not beautiful at all.

trousers

trousers

Posted
Posted
Sorry but i just dont see why Lemina is hailed as some sort of footballing god by some on here.

 

Maybe something to do with him playing a bit like a "footballing god" in his first few games per chance?

stknowle

stknowle

Posted
Posted
Sorry but i just dont see why Lemina is hailed as some sort of footballing god by some on here. Chelsea only team in it, we are lucky they don't have a striker on the pitch.

 

Looked good at first, regressed recently. Gabbiadini syndrome.

Convict Colony

Convict Colony

Posted
Posted
Fans being annoyed because we're losing against a team we should lose against...

We could still get an equaliser, Chelsea have looked poor and we've lacked ambition. At least it is better than the turd served up on Wednesday. Redmond so frustrating, looks like one day he may resemble a decent player but so many decisions let him down.

 

I think we're far too scared against teams like this who don't have the same pace as Leicester, the key is always closing down Hazard/Willian and then Chelsea struggle. They're a much poorer side than in previous seasons and are shaky at the back.

 

No one should expect to lose to certain teams.

doddisalegend

doddisalegend

Posted
Posted
Chelsea deserved to be in the lead don't they as they are the better team

 

Whats wrong with that

 

 

You do understand how this football supporter thing works don't you?

 

There is always something wrong with your team losing....

John B

John B

Posted
Posted
This smells like relegation, it really does.

 

In my lifetime of 72 years we have been relegated four times and promoted five times that's football some team has to relegated but losing to Chelsea hardly means it is going to happen every December it is always the same we play pladly

obelisk

obelisk

Posted
Posted

Don't we have to question the wall there? Incorrectly positioned or man at the end not doing his job perhaps. Once again conceding on or around 45 minutes of a half is also something to be addressed.

OttawaSaint

OttawaSaint

Posted
Posted
No one should expect to lose to certain teams.

 

Yep. WHU and a Palace beat them.

 

We are sick and tired of the excuses. We blew it against Man C and Arsenal, didn’t show up against Leicester and now concede a last kick free kick to a struggling Chelsea.

 

You can bet your arse I’m annoyed.

SaintAndy14

SaintAndy14

Posted
Posted

On the positive side(!), at least that goal on HT might mean we actually try to attack a little in the 2nd half. Watching another half of 11 behind the ball is not an inspiring thought.

OttawaSaint

OttawaSaint

Posted
Posted
In my lifetime of 72 years we have been relegated four times and promoted five times that's football some team has to relegated but losing to Chelsea hardly means it is going to happen every December it is always the same we play pladly

 

Yeah but we’ve played badly in Nov, Oct, Sept, oh and August too.

Lighthouse

Lighthouse

Posted
Posted
In my lifetime of 72 years we have been relegated four times and promoted five times that's football some team has to relegated but losing to Chelsea hardly means it is going to happen every December it is always the same we play pladly

 

I'm assuming this is your first interaction with Dalek.

Dark Munster

Dark Munster

Posted
Posted
Nothing to do with giving away a cheap free kick on the edge of the box in the first place

Hazard was bearing in at goal at full flow, not a cheap free kick. Maya got booked for it, not because it was nasty (it was soft), but because it was done to stop a goal-scoring opportunity.

 

A cheap free kick was the one that led to the first Man City goal against us.

patred44

patred44

Posted
Posted
True but he should saving those all day long! it was straight at him

 

Straight at him ??????? not on my screen, it was just inside the box and FF WAS AT FULL STRETCH.

Plumstead_Saint

Plumstead_Saint

Posted
Posted
In my lifetime of 72 years we have been relegated four times and promoted five times that's football some team has to relegated but losing to Chelsea hardly means it is going to happen every December it is always the same we play pladly

Well said.

Dalek isn't the only bedwetter on here screaming "relegation" today!

Call me old fashioned but I'll start worrying about that if we find ourselves in the bottom 3.

In the meantime I'll pray for the win and keep believing we can do it.

DT

DT

Posted
Posted

My Chelsea supporting mate at the game just texted me to say: 'See what you mean about the keeper'

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

St Chalet

St Chalet

Posted
Posted
We have become the new Sunderland of this league,with ultimately the same outcome.

 

Very different. And it is very different to the season we were relegated.

 

Us in 2004/5 bumped along in the bottom 3 all season and looked shot from the very beginning. Some shocking signings to boot.

 

Not saying we won’t get dragged in, I think we might. But it’s not Sunderland Houdini act.

5string

5string

Posted
Posted

It's almost like we don't want the ball.

 

When we get it, we look backwards and give it away within 3 passes.

 

When we haven't got it, we back off and wait for Chelsea to make a mistake.

DT

DT

Posted
Posted
Hopefully the players show a bit of character in the second, and claw their way back into the game.

 

After their rousing team talk by that master of guts and raw emotion, Mauricio

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

qwertyell

qwertyell

Posted
Posted

I make it 8 goals conceded by Forster already this season from outside the area.

 

Wonder what the record is.

 

What's the point in packing the defence if the opposition can continually score against us without having to bother to break it down?

 

For comparison, we've scored 1 goal from outside the area. And only 4 in the entirety of last season.

 

Sent from my F3311 using Tapatalk

DT

DT

Posted
Posted
I make it 8 goals conceded by Forster already this season from outside the area.

 

Wonder what the record is.

 

What's the point in packing the defence if the opposition can continually score against us without having to bother to break it down?

 

For comparison, we've scored 1 goal from outside the area. And only 4 in the entirety of last season.

 

Sent from my F3311 using Tapatalk

 

It's be because he's cack. I do keep saying

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...