Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Complete non-performance from us. Pelleclown will probably claim we deserved a point or give some other alternate reality assessment of the humping we’ve received.

Posted

JWP on for Boufal, yet Redmond stays on the pitch :lol::lol::lol::lol:

 

**** off now Pellegrino, you ****ing clueless ****. Take Black, Watson, Reed and Kat with you.

Posted

All the goons calling for Puel to be gone are looking stupid now.

 

As many people warned with the fixture list we had to start well or in January we would be struggling. Sadly that is now the case

Posted
All the goons calling for Puel to be gone are looking stupid now.

 

As many people warned with the fixture list we had to start well or in January we would be struggling. Sadly that is now the case

 

No they aren’t - Puel wasn’t the right man for us just because we’ve managed to appoint a significantly inferior manager doesn’t make wanting a poor manager sacked look “silly”.

Posted
All the goons calling for Puel to be gone are looking stupid now.

 

As many people warned with the fixture list we had to start well or in January we would be struggling. Sadly that is now the case

 

Why? Just because Pellegrino is worse than Puel, it doesn’t mean Puel was right for us.

Posted

"Set piece specialist Ward-Prowse"-watch: 71st minute.

 

Men against boys here. Prime steak verses something that probably isn't even food.

 

Sent from my F3311 using Tapatalk

Posted
Hard to blame Forster for that. Firminho’s shot was at point blank.

 

Maybe not, but it once again fits the description of Forster not doing as well as he might have done. He always seems to find that spot of not being to blame but also not doing anything good.

Posted
All the goons calling for Puel to be gone are looking stupid now.

 

As many people warned with the fixture list we had to start well or in January we would be struggling. Sadly that is now the case

 

Puel was hsit.

 

 

This guy is worse.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
No they aren’t - Puel wasn’t the right man for us just because we’ve managed to appoint a significantly inferior manager doesn’t make wanting a poor manager sacked look “silly”.

 

Well said James.

Posted

I just hope we score to show everyone that we have character, and hopefully play well for a 5 minute spell so Pellegrino can say how happy he was with that 5 minutes and how we are therefore the unluckiest team in the league.

Posted
Boufal off....hahahahhahahahaha. How is this p****k in a job? Hopefully tomorrow he won't be
I'd be very surprised if he is sacked this side of January. No signs of discontent among the leadership. If they were going to get rid they'd have done it by now.
Posted
Pellegrino will probably say in his post-match comments that the scoreline was not a fair reflection of how well we played.

 

He would be right.... Should be far heavier against us. Depends how you take 'well' to mean, mind.

Posted
He should’ve been sacked 2 weeks ago.

 

Les Reed won’t do it, he hasn’t got the bottle.

 

We’d better hope you’re wrong as we will be down if he doesn’t sack him. Won’t help that Pulis will be gone next week which will undoubtedly improve WBA. Fat Les will probably wait until we are bottom to sack our clown.

Posted
Sod this, I'm off. I might come back later to join the depression on the post-match thread.

 

The rugby is decent , I'm just going to keep checking to see how many more we have conceded every now and then !

Posted
Why Boufal, who has shown a bit, rather than Redmond, who has been totally anonymous.

 

JWP on for Boufal, yet Redmond stays on the pitch :lol::lol::lol::lol:

 

**** off now Pellegrino, you ****ing clueless ****. Take Black, Watson, Reed and Kat with you.

 

Clueless sub

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

He took Boufal off. OK.

 

I called it. He’s taken off our most threatening player Boufal.

 

Redmond and Long still on.

 

CLUELESS PELLEGRINO

 

Boufal off. lol

 

Fairly obviously a 'lets try and keep the score down' sub.

 

We aren't going to score, Boufal or not, let alone get 3 goals without reply.

Posted
Why? Just because Pellegrino is worse than Puel, it doesn’t mean Puel was right for us.

 

Exactly. The fact that it is so easy to use Puel's tenure as positive comparisons demonstrates how dreadful we are now.

Posted
No they aren’t - Puel wasn’t the right man for us just because we’ve managed to appoint a significantly inferior manager doesn’t make wanting a poor manager sacked look “silly”.

 

Exactly. We were playing awful football under Puel and that was why he was sacked. The problem is if we intended to play the exact same way with someone else why was he sacked? That imo is why Reed is the guy at fault for all this.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...