Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
He's very comfortable on the ball, reads the game quite well, and if he can improve in the air and in one one one situations, he could turn out to be very good.

 

I don't really have a horse in this race, but it's funny to think that the only thing holding Stephens back from being good is actually being good at the two most fundamental aspects of his position...

Posted
I don't really have a horse in this race, but it's funny to think that the only thing holding Stephens back from being good is actually being good at the two most fundamental aspects of his position...

 

Quite! Although actually I think he's quite strong in one-on-one situations... To be honest, although it appears from my comments that I'm backing the Yoshida "horse", I can see the argument for Stephens too. I just don't think the logic of his argument against Yoshida stood up.

 

It may also depend on the defensive partner. I'd be happier putting Stephens alongside van Dijk than Hoedt, because apparently (obv we will see) Hoedt isn't the quickest across the ground, in which case we probably need Yoshida alongside him, as he is quicker than Stephens.

Posted
We will clearly need a big tall CB who can head the ball against Watford for sure. I honestly don't know what our best 11 is and I don't think MoPo does yet or Clueless ever did. That is our fundamental underlying issue, in the team situation we are still forming, not even norming or performing, let alone storming!

 

Hmmmm not sure about that. Pellegrino has stuck with the same team every game, except replacing JWP with Lemina when he joined. That strikes me as someone who at least thinks they know their best team. That may change in due course, given recent performances and new players joining, but up to now it certainly does look like Pellegrino knows his best team - even if the rest of us don't agree with it!

 

And Puel did know his strongest side, he just rotated a lot. The only time there was a noticeable change in our strongest line up was when JWP went to the right and swapped with Tadic, and that worked well for a while.

Posted
Tadic absolutely has to be benched for either Ward-Prowse or Boufal.

 

I think we've all been shown the club's ambitions over the summer by hanging onto our best talent and bringing in some quality. And whilst it's admirable for football clubs to give starting opportunities to local(ish) lads, it's unlikely the club will allow JWP to start in our first team as that's clearly not a strategy which is going to result in winning games of football.

Posted

If Tadic isn't playing well it's because the opposition have identified that he is our most creative player. They will go all out to deny him space and to stop him getting his passes away. Don't drop him, that's exactly what the opposition want us to do. It is up to the manager to devise tactics to help Tadic and get him in to space and it is up to the other players to take advantage of the room created by him being tightly marked.

Posted
If Tadic isn't playing well it's because the opposition have identified that he is our most creative player. They will go all out to deny him space and to stop him getting his passes away. Don't drop him, that's exactly what the opposition want us to do. It is up to the manager to devise tactics to help Tadic and get him in to space and it is up to the other players to take advantage of the room created by him being tightly marked.

 

Rubbish. I bet opposition players try and mark Messi out of the game, it doesn't work. It is up to Tadic to improve himself, he's been consistently poor for a while.

Posted

I really hope Redmond doesn't play tomorrow, getting fed up of seeing that useless pile of t.urd being played every game and bringing nothing except losing the ball continuously.

Posted
I really hope Redmond doesn't play tomorrow, getting fed up of seeing that useless pile of t.urd being played every game and bringing nothing except losing the ball continuously.

 

If he does i hope you watch more closely this time as that is nonsense, he loses the ball no more than anyone else..

Posted
If he does i hope you watch more closely this time as that is nonsense, he loses the ball no more than anyone else..

 

Well either way sorry but I think he is rubbish and brings little, headless chicken sprigs to mind

Posted
I really hope Redmond doesn't play tomorrow, getting fed up of seeing that useless pile of t.urd being played every game and bringing nothing except losing the ball continuously.

 

He usually gives someone else an earful when he loses it as well.

Posted
I really hope Redmond doesn't play tomorrow, getting fed up of seeing that useless pile of t.urd being played every game and bringing nothing except losing the ball continuously.

 

Which sideways passer do you want to bring in instead, then?

Posted
Trouble is, Boufal isn't much of any kind of passer.

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

 

No, but beavis17 was implying that DJ Toast wanted to replace Redmond with someone "sideways" thinking. Boufal wouldn't be classed as that.

Posted
No, but beavis17 was implying that DJ Toast wanted to replace Redmond with someone "sideways" thinking. Boufal wouldn't be classed as that.
No. He just runs until he loses the ball.

 

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

Posted
This forum constantly moans about the lack of creativity and flair in our team and as soon as we have a player capable of that we moan about him losing the ball.
Fair enough. I was being a tad cynical. But we do need a balance: holding the ball and seeing a pass, even if it is sideways is necessary as well as having that bit of flair to beat a player or play the killer ball.

 

My comment about Boufal, and it also applies to Redmond to a lesser extent, is that for me, all too often when he's done something really good he spoils it either by trying to do it again and failing, or by not using the advantage gained to play a telling pass.

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)
Fair enough. I was being a tad cynical. But we do need a balance: holding the ball and seeing a pass, even if it is sideways is necessary as well as having that bit of flair to beat a player or play the killer ball.

 

My comment about Boufal, and it also applies to Redmond to a lesser extent, is that for me, all too often when he's done something really good he spoils it either by trying to do it again and failing, or by not using the advantage gained to play a telling pass.

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

 

That's a fair criticism, but given that Redmond also does that and has recently been poor, I'm not sure Boufal could be do any worse.

 

It's also entirely possible Redmond will play well tomorrow, because he has done on occasion, mainly Jan-Mar last season. But on current form, I'm willing to see what Boufal can do with a run of games.

Edited by mrfahaji
Posted
I don't really have a horse in this race, but it's funny to think that the only thing holding Stephens back from being good is actually being good at the two most fundamental aspects of his position...

 

What's that then?

Posted
But it's a team game and it's not just a question of putting in the theoretically best player in each position.

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

 

I agree with that logic however I don't believe anyone else in our sqaud can do any better. We could have done with someone fresh to compete with those three but as it is, there's nothing else. Putting players such as Davis, Ward-Prowse or Long there is putting players out of position.

Posted
This forum constantly moans about the lack of creativity and flair in our team and as soon as we have a player capable of that we moan about him losing the ball.

 

Is this about Tadic, Boufal or Redmond? :lol:

 

But in all seriousness, Tadic has been poor for quite a while. He also hasn't helped himself by kicking off last season ("i'm the main man, stop subbing me"), despite being regularly knackered after 60min (doing what I don't know). He also has a terrible habit of waving his arms around like someone has shot a small child every time the ball to him isn't perfect... much like Pelle.

 

All of this would be acceptable if his end product was good, but sadly it isn't at the moment and hasn't been for a while. He barely manages to score when he is given a gift from 12yards, he slows play down, he doesn't press, and he constantly wastes possession.

 

I don't want to slate the guy, and will be even handed to him in praise and criticism when in the stands... but lately he has been on the poorer side of average. It would be fair to drop him for a few games and try something new (say Boufal, Davis/JWP/Redmond).

 

Whatever we do, Boufal clearly has some talent and should be given a run of games given our current attacking line ups are misfiring.

 

Like I said, I don't want to be harsh to Tadic, but he hasn't been great lately. Time to give others a chance unless he improves. Maybe a spell out of the team may give him a chance to refocus, and give the team a chance to find a more effective style?

Posted
I agree with that logic however I don't believe anyone else in our sqaud can do any better. We could have done with someone fresh to compete with those three but as it is, there's nothing else. Putting players such as Davis, Ward-Prowse or Long there is putting players out of position.
Davis is our best #10 option.

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

Posted
...1f99f68bb3d3031a547478126391ec05.jpg

 

I really dislike these and they're getting more and more prevalent during games. Clearly somebody dying at such a young age is tragic and heartbreaking, but I think these things should be separate from the actual game.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
I really dislike these and they're getting more and more prevalent during games. Clearly somebody dying at such a young age is tragic and heartbreaking, but I think these things should be separate from the actual game.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

 

I guess it is too much to ask that for 1 minute out of the 90 to allow people to clap to pay their respects to a fellow Saints fan. Don't understand why anyone would 'dislike' this idea.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
I really dislike these and they're getting more and more prevalent during games. Clearly somebody dying at such a young age is tragic and heartbreaking, but I think these things should be separate from the actual game.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

You do come across like a right arse, I have to say.

Posted
I really dislike these and they're getting more and more prevalent during games. Clearly somebody dying at such a young age is tragic and heartbreaking, but I think these things should be separate from the actual game.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Oh do stfu.

Posted
Rubbish. I bet opposition players try and mark Messi out of the game, it doesn't work. It is up to Tadic to improve himself, he's been consistently poor for a while.

 

He's not as good as Messi I agree. Mere mortals can be marked out of games though. Perhaps we have someone as good as Messi that I don't know about to replace him.

Posted
I really dislike these and they're getting more and more prevalent during games. Clearly somebody dying at such a young age is tragic and heartbreaking, but I think these things should be separate from the actual game.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

what a shock...

Posted
I really dislike these and they're getting more and more prevalent during games. Clearly somebody dying at such a young age is tragic and heartbreaking, but I think these things should be separate from the actual game.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

You have no soul. You are no saint. You disgust me.

Please ignore this troll.

RIP.

Posted
I really dislike these and they're getting more and more prevalent during games. Clearly somebody dying at such a young age is tragic and heartbreaking, but I think these things should be separate from the actual game.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Yep, couldn't agree more.

Posted
You have no soul. You are no saint. You disgust me.

Please ignore this troll.

RIP.

 

Why?

 

Because I don't like tributes during the match? I'm all for minutes silence or applause before the game or at half time, I'm all for some sort of memory wall or memorial for supporters. Where does it end, if 3 Saints fans/staff/ex players unfortunately pass away in the same week, do we clap on 24th, 62nd & 71st minute, where does it end. I believe a staff member passed away prior to the West Ham or Swansea game, why was there no tribute. Did that disgust you?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

There's a broader issue about empty sentimentality in football - did the whole Premier League need a minute's silence the week after the Manchester bombing because there there were no fixtures at the time? - but local people, local fans are different. If bereaved friends and family see fit to arrange a tribute then we do it for them. And if we don't take part, we at least keep our thoughts to ourselves when people are reading what we say.

Posted
Why?

 

Because I don't like tributes during the match? I'm all for minutes silence or applause before the game or at half time, I'm all for some sort of memory wall or memorial for supporters. Where does it end, if 3 Saints fans/staff/ex players unfortunately pass away in the same week, do we clap on 24th, 62nd & 71st minute, where does it end. I believe a staff member passed away prior to the West Ham or Swansea game, why was there no tribute. Did that disgust you?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Just imagine you are clapping to commemorate Claude Puel..that will get you through it.

Posted
we at least keep our thoughts to ourselves when people are reading what we say.

 

Fair point. It was inappropriate for me to offer an opinion & apologise to anyone offended. It was thoughtless.

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
I really dislike these and they're getting more and more prevalent during games. Clearly somebody dying at such a young age is tragic and heartbreaking, but I think these things should be separate from the actual game.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I'm glad someone said this. It's just all a bit over the top for my liking. Of course it's sad for the family and friends, but I don't understand why people have to make these things so public.

Posted
Fair point. It was inappropriate for me to offer an opinion & apologise to anyone offended. It was thoughtless.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I'm glad you posted that. It's a perfectly reasonable view but not the time or place to express it.

Posted

I have to agree that it's not really my cup of tea either when I have no idea who this person was but if some fans want to offer their own tribute to a young fan who from the sounds of it died tragically then I have no problem with them doing it.

Posted

Stephens should partner Hoedt.

 

1. Because Yoshi is left footed, as is Hoedt, so I don't think they'd work together.

 

2. Stephens is better than Yoshida.

Posted

Got a bad feeling about this one. In seasons gone by this would be a home win, but we are at the same level as Watford now. Can see them nicking this one nil

 

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

Posted

I'm expecting to see the three behind Gabbiadini made up from Davis/JWP plus two from Boufal, Redmond and Tadic. For me, it's a problem that those three are too similar, and at the moment are failing to deliver.

 

I'd be interested to see Long started instead to add pace.

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

Posted
Got a bad feeling about this one. In seasons gone by this would be a home win, but we are at the same level as Watford now. Can see them nicking this one nil

 

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

 

 

We drew with them at home last season..

Posted
Stephens should partner Hoedt.

 

1. Because Yoshi is left footed, as is Hoedt, so I don't think they'd work together.

 

2. Stephens is better than Yoshida.

 

1. No he's not. He's right footed so will work fine.

 

2. No he's not. Yoshida is a considerably defender than Stephens.

Posted
1. No he's not. He's right footed so will work fine.

 

2. No he's not. Yoshida is a considerably defender than Stephens.

 

My bad. thought for some reason he was left footed. haha

 

I think there's little between them but Stephens is better on the ball whilst being a comparable CB imo.

Posted
My bad. thought for some reason he was left footed. haha

 

I think there's little between them but Stephens is better on the ball whilst being a comparable CB imo.

 

If Stephens could find himself anywhere close to the man he's supposed to be marking in the box he'd be a reasonable defender.

But he can't, so he's not.

Posted
If Stephens could find himself anywhere close to the man he's supposed to be marking in the box he'd be a reasonable defender.

But he can't, so he's not.

 

Yoshida suffers from similar problems tbh.

Posted
Yoshida suffers from similar problems tbh.

 

Not to the same degree I reckon, and I haven't forgotten some of his past howlers.

 

But I do think Yoshida is by far the more switched on of the two.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...